Newton Running Shoe Review - Newton Gravity
September 21, 2007
Innovation in the realm of running shoes often comes in the form of new colors, added padding, or subtle — sometimes gimmicky — design tweaks that do little to increase performance on the run.
That’s according to shoe expert Dr. Paul Langer, a podiatrist with Minnesota Orthopaedic Specialists in Minneapolis, and a veteran runner with two-dozen marathons, several triathlons and an Ironman under his belt.
“Running shoe design hasn’t radically changed in 20 years,” he said.
But Newton Running, a new company from Boulder, Colo., that recently shipped its debut line of high-end shoes (read: $175 a pair), has Langer singing a slightly new tune.
Indeed, Langer, who is not alone in his assessment, goes as far as saying that what Newton has done is among the biggest running shoe innovations in recent memory. “The jury is still out on performance, but there’s no doubt the company is trying something new and intriguing,” Langer said.
So what has Newton (www.newtonrunning.com) done? The shoes feature rubber lugs — called “actuators” — that extend a quarter inch or so from the base of the forefoot region on the sole to mimic a barefoot running style, attempting to promote a more efficient and natural running technique. According to the company, the design minimizes detrimental heel-striking, promotes forefoot striking, increases speed, and prevents injury with some runners.
There’s also a claim that the actuators rebound you into each new stride — contracting on impact, absorbing energy, then springing you forward in a fit of, well, Newtonian physics.
In addition, the shoes are fairly lightweight — the Gravity model I tested are about 11 ounces per foot — and they have a mushy, dead-feeling heel, further egging you to strike on your forefoot.
Did I mention they cost $175 a pair?
Langer has two pair of Newtons, but when I ran with him in late August he’d not yet put enough miles on the shoes to make any conclusions.
In my testing, which has included about 200 miles over two months on the Gravity model, I’ve come to love the shoes. They keep me upright, forward and feeling fast. They are well designed, good looking and comfortable. (They’d better be all that for $175.)
Are they miracle shoes? For some runners, maybe. I am a perfect candidate for Newtons, as I land on my heel when I get lazy but am a natural forefoot striker. These shoes reinforce that forefoot stride, keeping me running fast and efficient by encouraging me to land on the actuators, which are right under my forefoot region.
The Gravity shoes have worn well, too. The actuators show signs of use, with the front tip of the lugs now rubbed off and angling down from repeated pavement pounding. But it’s been 200 hard miles, and I’ll likely get another 200 miles out of the shoes before they’re dead. That’s a normal lifespan, according to Dr. Langer.
Newton makes some big claims with its fancy new footwear. You pay a pretty price for a tryout and, depending on your running style, there may be few gains.
As for the company’s claim of rebounding actuators that spring you into each stride, I’m not sold that this is noticeable. For me the advantages have been the shoes’ great fit, the subtle stride-enhancing details, and the position they put my foot in to better run the race.
(Stephen Regenold writes The Gear Junkie column for eight U.S. newspapers; see www.THEGEARJUNKIE.com for video gear reviews, a daily blog, and an archive of Regenold’s work.)
i’ve been keeping an eye on these for a few months now, but i haven’t gotten up the courage to plop down for them. i’m a big fan of forefoot, good posture running, so i like the idea, but my new balance mr 790s were $100 cheaper and do a pretty good job on the road and the trail …. i with they’d come down in price a little, i’d probably go for it.
they are ok… but not worth the price. if fore front striking is what your after there are better and cheaper models on the market. personally, i was more impressed with velocy.
They are great!Being a heavier disatnce runner i was concerned but i am now into my 5th pair and couldnt be happier.In my first run in them i was leaning so far forward i nearly fell over never mind tripping over twice due to those “lugs”.I would suggest that their claims {for me anyway}have been very accurate…but they are expensive!
Tony Kofkin-Australia
- Search
- Social Media
- Follow Gear Junkie on Twitter
- Gear Junkie on Facebook
- Daily Dose RSS Feed
Latest Tweet: Jul 3, 2009 @ 09:41 AM
Top 10 Bike Posts on GearJunkie.com (No. 10 of 10): SURLY PUGSLEY http://bit.ly/15gFCg
- Weekly E-Newsletter
Sign up for our e-news for a weekly update on new gear, adventure travel, and prize giveaways. Visit our E-Newsletter Archive to read past issues.
- Latest Articles
- Best Biking Cities
- Ribz Frontpack
- Running Gait Analysis
- UK Gear PT-03 Desert Shoe
- Team Garmin-Slipstream Race Food
- Single-Speed Bike: Raleigh Rush Hour
- "Run for Life" Book
- YogaSlackers Y.E.S. Tour of Colorado
- Whitewater Creek Boating
- Garmin 405 Review
- Popular Articles
- Best Biking Cities | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- Running Gait Analysis | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- Outdoor Gear Reviews Archive | Gear Junkie
- Ribz Frontpack | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- UK Gear PT-03 Desert Shoe | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- Therm-a-Rest NeoAir | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- Single-Speed Bike Trend - Kona Paddy Wagon Column | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- Single-Speed Bike: Raleigh Rush Hour | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- Men Who Shave Their Legs | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
- Vibram FiveFingers Running Shoes | Gear Review | Gear Junkie
