Inc. magazine on Newton Running
July 30, 2008
In the business magazine Inc. this week writer Robert Andrew Powell profiles the Boulder, Colo., company Newton Running, a Gear Junkie Top 10 pick in 2007. It’s a nice article (click here: “Keep Running”) with some background on the innovative business and its unlikely trajectory to success. But then I got to page No. 4 where the writer sideswipes the ol’ Gear Junkie here.
The questionable journalism starts in a section of the story where Powell is looking to play the negative angle on Newton. He glorifies the innovators for a few hundred words then segues into his own hesitant experience with the shoes, writing in an ad hoc review that “The Newtons did not make running any easier, as far as I could tell, but they didn’t seem to cause damage, either.”
A couple sentences later he continues: “I noticed that the Gear Junkie columnist who ranked the Newtons No. 1 in his gear-of-the-year column said the shoes kept him ‘feeling faster’ in the Twin Cities Marathon. And then I saw that his finishing time of four hours and 36 minutes was 46 minutes slower than his time in the same race two years earlier.”
Powell is right that I ran a slow marathon in the Newtons last fall. But he did not phone to ask why. Indeed, the weekend of the marathon I was attempting an endurance feat of sorts, as I raced in (and won) a 12-hour adventure race on Saturday, got a couple hours of sleep, then arose early to run the marathon on Sunday. Blogged on the epic here: http://thegearjunkie.com/12-hour-ar-262-miles
In addition to that oversight, it’s strange logic for Powell to assume or suggest that the shoes I wore for a particular event would affect my time so dramatically. A 46-minute difference should have been a red flag to Powell. Any number of factors might slow you down on a marathon — an injury, the heat or weather one year versus another, your health at the time. But your shoe type causing a 46-minute gap? That’s a stretch.
Anyway, my message to Powell is: Next time call and get the full story straight. Readers, thanks for listening to my rant. Signing off now to go take a training run. . . in my Newtons.
I would agree with Db. Stephen gives his honest thoughts. I think it more interesting that Powell mention information with out talking to the sources. It would seem good journalism to talk to some one else about what the think about the gear. I know I do this when I am looking at new gear. Also remember what might be good for one person might not work for another.
Stephen how many running shoes do you go through in a year?
Roger, come on, man. Glorified press releases? That stings.
Anyway, to Kelsey: I go through maybe three pair a year of my primary running shoes. But I am testing new footwear all the time, so many miles are put on shoes I wear only for a week or two.
I’m training now for a 6-hour footrace in mid-Aug. and then Twin Cities Marathon again in October. Promise to do better this year, as I do not have a 12-hour adventure race scheduled for the day prior like last time around.
Everyone knows those guys over at Inc. are total self-absorbed dicks! Powell is just pissed because you beat his time! It probably took him four hours to find a McDonalds in Manhatten so he could stuff a $.99 McFishwich into his gluttonous oriface.
Rock on with the reviews.
Robert is right. Although I am not training for my first Marathon, like Powel, I am training for my first 15K trail run and then longer distances. I personally can’t make claims about gear such as Stephen. I have read a lot about different shoes, talked to sales personal, and asked lots of questions to make me knowledgeable about my choices. Stephen gives his honest opinion in his review that is why I read Gear Junkie and not Inc.com.
- Follow Gear Junkie on Twitter
- Gear Junkie on Facebook
- Daily Dose RSS Feed
Latest Tweet: Feb 7, 2012 @ 09:20 PM
@A_New_Bike Fast, and a bit chilly.Knicker shorts still for me in Feb. in MN.
- Weekly E-Newsletter
Sign up for our e-news for a weekly update on new gear, adventure travel, and prize giveaways.
- Latest Articles
- GearJunkie Buffs Are Here. (And you can win one!)
- Video: 'Stupor Bowl' Bike Race
- Gear Test with Dog: 'Omnijore' Harness System
- Recap: 'Stupor Bowl' Alleycat Bike Race
- Photo Contest Winners: 'Weekday Warrior' Channel
- Performance Art: Handmade Abstract Wooden Snowboards
- Bike, Run, Hike: New Do-All Shoe
- Stove Burns Wood, Charges USB-Powered Gadgets on Side
- Primo Bike Tool has Lock-in-Place Components
- SIA Trade Show: 'Snow Gear' for 2012/13
- Popular Articles
- gear junkie custom buff headwear
- 'Best in Show' Awards: Part II of Greatest Gear in 2012
- Video: 'Stupor Bowl' Bike Race
- Stove Burns Wood, Charges USB-Powered Gadgets on Side
- Gear Test with Dog: 'Omnijore' Harness System
- Survival Gear: 10 Items To Survive
- Lange Girls 2010
- World's 10 Most Dangerous Mountains
- Technology | Gear Reviews
- Hiking | Gear Reviews
- Biking | Gear Reviews
- Recap: 'Stupor Bowl' Alleycat Bike Race
- 'Best in Show' Awards: Latest, Greatest Gear for 2012!
- Photo Contest Winners: 'Weekday Warrior' Channel
- Winter | Gear Reviews
- Bike, Run, Hike: New Do-All Shoe
- North America's Toughest Ski Runs
- Extreme! 4-Wheel Pedal Bike
- Gear for 2012: Outdoor Retailer Trade Show
- SIA Trade Show: 'Snow Gear' for 2012/13
- GearJunkie Buffs Are Here. (And you can win one!)
- Canada Goose Snow Mantra Parka
- Running | Gear Reviews
- Vibram gets 'Naked'
- Footwear | Gear Reviews
- Bear Grylls Knife
- Interview with a Bear: Grylls on Survivalism, Knives, and Rabbit Snares















Well your “reviews” are generally known as little more than glorified press releases. But it was a over-stepping on Powell’s part to attribute the time diff to the shoes.