23

Vibram FiveFingers Running Shoes

By STEPHEN REGENOLD

OK, clear your throat. Now let out a hearty laugh. Yes, these are gloves for your feet, and they look silly. Now listen: Vibram USA is onto something here. I have run close to 100 miles in a pair of FiveFingers, and darn if I’m not becoming a convert.

Marketed as the first footwear to offer “the sensation of going barefoot with the protection and security of a sole,” Vibram’s FiveFingers (www.vibramfivefingers.com) shoe-gloves have stretchy synthetic uppers and thin rubber soles.

Vibram touts its three FiveFingers models as promoting better foot health and stimulating the muscles in the feet and lower legs for greater balance, agility and strength. Other potential benefits the company cites include better posture and reduced back pain.


I’ve been testing the Sprint model, which costs $80 and is made for hiking, yoga, sailing, surfing, canoeing, and “barefoot” running.

Naturally, these shoes fit tight, wrapping each toe and following the lines of your foot back to a defined heel cup. The Sprint model has a Velcro strap that cinches over the top of the foot for extra security.

Despite the purported health advantages, first-time FiveFingers wearers have to be careful, especially for running. I am a regular runner, and I prefer shoes that promote minimal support in favor of bolstering foot and leg strength. But the FiveFingers philosophy is the epitome of this minimalism, as there’s zero cushioning underfoot.

You feel sticks, stones and cracks in the sidewalk through the shoes. The sole serves only to protect your skin, not your joints.

Anyone with bad knees or other health problems might think twice before trying the Vibram experience.

But in the right physical condition — and with the right technique — running in a pair of FiveFingers is a cool feeling. You can almost sense yourself getting stronger.

For other terrestrial activities, I was less sold. Hiking or walking in the Sprints seemed silly. The company touts FiveFingers for bouldering, but most serious rock climbers would not consider the shoes appropriate for the activity. For casual use, I was too embarrassed to wear FiveFingers indoors anywhere.

In the water, FiveFingers shoes are nice. But for waves or rivers you might look at the $100 boot-like Surge, which comes up over the ankle and has a 2mm neoprene lining.

As for fit, I’d recommend trying a pair or two on at a store. My foot size is 12.5, but for the Sprint model I ended up going with a size 11.5 shoe for its secure fit in the heel area.

Getting any of the FiveFingers models on is a chore, as the toe slots are small and tight. But be patient. Once on and secured a FiveFingers shoe should fit, well, like a glove.

(Stephen Regenold writes The Gear Junkie column for eight U.S. newspapers; see www.THEGEARJUNKIE.com for video gear reviews, a daily blog, and an archive of Regenold’s work.)

23 comments - Add Comment Permalink Discuss Article Bookmark and Share
Commenting on post : Vibram FiveFingers Running Shoes
Posted by Toby - 01/08/2008 12:27 PM

How does the material inside feel against bare skin? Do you think Injinji toe socks would work with these?

Posted by Stephen Regenold - 01/08/2008 09:46 PM

No, go barefoot. The material inside the shoe is soft, made to wear w/o socks.

Posted by Ice - 01/10/2008 03:16 PM

wow. I can’t imagine trailrunning in those! It’s bad enough walking over rocks with wetsuit boots on, and they have a rubber sole, seems like actually running would be quite painful. Or maybe I’m just a wuss. ;-)

Are the tops of them pretty thin too? I’m wondering if they’d work better with fins than bulkier wetsuit boots…

Posted by dean shaw - 01/10/2008 03:33 PM

Ill bet they would be good for archery when doing a sneak on animals?

Posted by Stephen Regenold - 01/11/2008 09:22 AM

Re Ice’s question, the top fabric is thin and breathable.

As my story says, you should be a strong and experienced runner before putting these on for a jog. You have to run with a forefoot strike, not a heel-to-toe “roll.” They allow you to mimic a barefoot running style, though with some protection underfoot.

Posted by Claire Walter - 01/11/2008 10:40 AM

Weird indeed—even weirder than using poles for fitness walking still is and snowshoeing used to be. Snowshoeing finally caught on big-time. Hopefully, Nordic Walking will too. Maybe these “foot gloves” will hit big too. But then again, probably not. Tevas and other river sandals and then Crocs and clones became popular footwear styles, but they both are easy to put on and take off.
Claire @ http://nordic-walking-usa.blogspot.com

Posted by Scott - 01/11/2008 10:32 PM

I purchased a pair and I think they would make good aqua socks for kayaking, but not for running. Good fit, but as in the review I do have some discomfort on the heals.

Posted by Rod Johnson - 01/12/2008 12:57 PM

Hi Stephen,
I tried out a pair of Five Fingers on a Via Ferrata climb in the Dolomites last September. They were fun to climb in, but did poorly on the icy sections. I have a great photo of them in use, if you would like, I can e-mail it to you.
I have had good comments from people while I have been walking around in them.

Posted by Austin - 01/14/2008 11:00 AM

How tough are they? I could see myself using these on many occasions, either doing calisthenics or for around camp (apres backpacking). Does the rubber show any separation from the material?

Posted by Stephen Regenold - 01/15/2008 03:17 PM

Austin—Very little wear on mine, though I run pretty light on my feet in them and stay on grass trails, smooth dirt and asphalt. They don’t get much use here in MN in the winter, though.

Posted by Stephen Regenold - 01/15/2008 03:18 PM

Rod—Please do send me those images!

stephen@thegearjunkie.com

Posted by Dwayne - 01/17/2008 11:41 AM

Hey Stephen,
I have been contemplating getting me a pair of VFF. However I live outside the US, UK, and Canada, so a try out is not possible. I have used the Nike Air rifts on trails before and the feel was great but lacked the traction, so I got the Puma Complete Trail Fox, awesome shoe. As you can tell I prefer minimalist shoes, especially as I am a sprinter, but I am concerned of the complete lack of cushioning. I intend to use the VFF for speed work and short runs. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Posted by Stephen Regenold - 01/18/2008 11:54 AM

Dwayne,
They are minimal. Nothing really there underfoot. It’s like a second skin for barefoot runners. Would you speed train barefoot? If so, these might be the “shoes” for you. Make sure there’s a return policy if you buy online to make sure you get the right fit. As my column said, I took a whole size smaller in these than what I wear for street shoes.

Posted by Rachel H - 01/31/2008 12:49 AM

I hadn’t heard of these until I saw them on JuliB.com, where Lisa Hoffman recommends them for tide pools… sounds like about the right speed, considering the look of them.

Posted by AJ D. - 02/19/2008 02:19 PM

I’ve been an advocat of barefoot running for some time now and I absolutely love these things. I have the ones with the strap over the top. I don’t know if it’s the hippie in me or something else but i hate shoes and these are the perfect option for me. Like Stephen says, there is no support, only the thin sole. I use mine for hiking, running, water sports, and just wearing around town. It took some getting used to but now I can’t see myself ever running in shoes again.

Posted by David - 03/21/2008 12:35 PM

Stephen, I found your site a few days ago and I’ve barely started exploring it but I really enjoy it. I hope you don’t mind a clarification? The model you’ve pictured is the KSO (“Keep Stuff Out”). The Sprint lacks the mesh in front of the strap, and has two short Velcro straps around the heel plus the instep strap.

The KSO and the Flow (same coverage as the KSO but with a 2mm Neoprene lining) aren’t going to appear on the VFF website until April 1, according to email from a VFF customer service person. (Though a few sites already advertise the KSO as being in stock and ready for delivery.) Google found me a brochure showing both new models: http://www.head2foot.se/fivefingers/pdf/fivefingers_workbook.pdf. The CS rep also told me that the Surge model (the boots) is being discontinued so if you like them, get them while you can.

I got a pair of the Sprint about ten days ago but I’m in Pittsburgh so I haven’t worn them outside, just on the treacherous terrain of carpet and hardwood floors. Toby, for me they’re fine over Injinji’s Outdoor and Performance socks as well as over bare feet. I won’t be using for real, I returned them as soon as I learned of the KSO (I hate stuff getting inside my Keens). My primary use for them will be running, I’m trying out Nicholas Romanov’s “Pose Method.”

D.

Posted by Harvey S. Cohen - 06/27/2008 10:08 AM

I wear my Sprints both with and without Injinji socks.
I wear either Sprint or KSO on the golf course. Sprint tends to collect sand from traps, but it’s easy to empty them out. I can put on my Sprints easily by leaving them flat on the ground and sliding my feet in; holding them in the hands and sliding them on (like socks) does not work so well. The KSO are harder to put on (or perhaps I have yet to find the right technique).
Walking the golf course in VFFs feels delicious. Traction for swinging is excellent on dry grass; marginal on really wet grass.
Fit for VFFs is based strictly on foot length (back of heel to tip of longest toe). The VFF web site translates this measurement into a size. The translation is different for different models. (I have 11-inch feet and wear a size 44 Sprint and size 43 KSO).

Posted by peter - 08/22/2008 02:29 AM

I just purchased a pair of Vibram KSO’s and I have mixed feelings.

During my initial run with them, I stepped on a twig (not a branch, merely a twig) which rolled over and ripped a hole in the upper of the Vibrams, over the big toe. I am fully onboard with mimicking the barefoot running technique, but I seriously question the durability of these shoes.

I purchased the Vibrams from Rock Creek Outfitters online. I immediately emailed my concerns that the shoes didn’t make it through my first run and their response was that they were unwilling to take them as a return or exchange. Essentially, I had wasted $80. If you want to purchase these shoes, DO NOT BUY THEM FROM ROCK CREEK OUTFITTERS. They will not offer any sort of customer service when necessary.

Posted by Stephen Regenold - 08/22/2008 09:10 AM

Hmm, too bad. Must have been a sharp twig! I have run many miles in mine and the uppers are fine.

I’d contact Vibram direct to see about warranty.

Posted by mc - 11/11/2008 09:09 AM

For folks wondering about how to fit any and all of the 4 current (winter 08) models of VFF’s, here’s an overview of how to fit each one, and how they fit – especially if you have an “odd” foot shape. also covered: how to size and fit with sox.

Posted by David - 12/01/2008 09:41 AM

As a barefoot runner for nearly 7 years, the most important thing is to properly ‘transition’ to barefoot running. VFFs are a decent alternative when barefooting isn’t possible, but they do not substitute the slower training needed before you can use them. Regardingheel-striking, this is caused ONLY when wearing traditional running shoes die to their positive heel design. This along with over-cushioned design element cause the feet to become lazy and causer a medley of injuries. Check out www.BarefootRunner.com to learn more as well as keep an eye on Skora footwear, which I’m trying to launch for late ’09 / early ’10. www.skorashop.com Happy trails! David.

Posted by Zsofi - 03/17/2009 08:38 AM

I have a pair of classic and i really love it!I wear it indoor, and i always notice people saying omg:)Its very comfortable!When its really hot , the sidewalks are hot tooo and i have to hurry:)So i recommend it it to everybody!

Posted by RunColo - 06/25/2009 10:59 AM

http://www.runcolo.com/Product-Reviews/Vibram-Five-Fingers.html

I have the Classics, love ‘em!

Add Comment or Discuss This Article

  1. Add link by using "LinkText":http://google.com