'Fat Bike' Trend: Overrated or For Real?
March 7, 2012, 9:35 am / Categories: Biking, Winter Gear
It was a frozen day in 2006 when I first swung a leg over the frame of a fat bike. The venue was the debut edition of the Arrowhead 135 Ultra, a race that traveled its namesake 135 miles through the snow in northern Minnesota. Back then, the large-tire bikes were freaks, and they were made only by custom frame-builders who liked to pedal in snow and a single Minnesota brand, Surly Bikes, which mass-produced the first notable bike in the “fat” genre with its Pugsley frame.
Wide rims, extra-large tires, and weirdly-dimensioned frames to make it all fit together define a fat bike, a cycling subcategory that’s garnered a serious following now in 2012. Bike shops report selling out of fat-bike stock. Brand managers at Surly and Salsa Cycles, another fat-bike maker owned by Minnesota’s QBP, have told me demand this year has overwhelmed supply.
What is the appeal? From improved traction on dirt to flotation when riding through snow, the obese tires let a bike roll where it has not rolled before. The wide rubber — some fatty tires are 4+ inches across, or twice as wide as most mountain-bike tire tread — adds notable grip on the ground, and the extra surface area does not allow the wheel to sink as much into soft surfaces like snow or sand.
Another distinction: You can ride with significantly lower tire pressure. Think 15 or 10 psi, or even lower still. This gives the tire some significant squish, and that play translates to more rubber conforming onto the trail for serious grip.
On snow, the wide tires have more surface area touching down and simply “float” a bit more rather than digging in like skinnier tires can. Finally, with all that squishy rubber under you, suspension is not necessary for most fat bikes. (Though Salsa recently revealed a not-for-sale dual-suspension fatty it is contemplating bringing to market soon.)
continued on next page. . .
Shop the GearJunkie Store
If you need a good custom builder for a fatbike, try talking to Alex at A-train Cycles — I’ve worked with him in his workshop (I am a framebuilder, but I don’t do fatbikes yet). He’s produced bikes that have been ridden in the Arrowhead and elsewhere, and are absolutely gorgeous, as well as durable enough to be raced in the worst conditions.
these bikes are an excuse to get out and ride in the winter. it is a significantly more fun way to ride single track in the snow and also to ride on local gravel or crushed gravel commuter trails. For those that race or those that want to build significant base mileage/time in the winter these bikes are a relatively fun/inexpensive way to do it. I have the cheapest Mukluk you can buy and I bought it new this winter as I could not find a reasonably priced used one. I am guessing that they will begin to be available in future seasons used for less $$$. My LBS here in MN has all in stock fat bikes at 20% off now and most likely they could be had for less than that. i have had ZERO desire to ride my studded tire MTB this winter and with its more expensive components I am not interested in trashing any of them with salt or crashing on it and having a repair that is expensive. My base model fat bike is perfect with inexpensive parts and is crazy fun to ride in the snow.
For REAL!!!
I don’t know where this fat bike craze will go but I certainly don’t think that a $1,500+ bike is “inexpensive” Most of the people I know are riding regular MTB’s as all year round bikes that cost less than that. You also don’t NEED one to ride in the winter or keep mileage up. One look at the increase of riders in MPLS, MN should tell us about that. When I ride on the trial, road… in the snow and ice I don’t see many fat bikes. Most people are on commuters or cyclocross bikes and running 32 – 35c tires with knobbies or MTB tires…maybe they studded tires but most don’t. Some people are even riding fixies with skinnies. It’s ok to be a cheerleader in the comment sections for review articles but lets be honest.
They’ll stay because it isn’t just for snow. They are a gas to ride no matter the terrain. Pavement, gravel, grass or rock gardens and logs – whatever you ride it is FUN! People are riding places bikes could not go before. That is why the whole genre is “Fatbike” now instead of “snowbike”. Cost-wise it is much more affordable than a specialized bike could be. I don’t have $1600 lying around either – but I wish I did, because I’d likely have to have a fatbike. If you haven’t ridden one on your local trail, you aren’t really giving them their just dues.
A couple of comments – first, the debut edition of Arrowhead was 2005, when the winner was on a fat bike, and those with regular mountain bikes struggled in loose snow. Any subsequent edition of Arrowhead that has had new snow would be tough on a mountain bike. Same with Tuscobia or any of the Alaskan winter races. Fat bikes are here to stay because they are a gas to ride, they offer an option for winter riding. Yeah, they are slower and heavier but they’re not build for speed and anyone who is looking for a stealth bike should stay away from them. Its all a matter of what you want to ride and where you want to ride it. No different than kayaking or flying – you use the equipment that works on the terrain. Have fun fat biking!!
I dabble in snow biking and Alaska endurance racing. I rode a full-suspension 26” Gary Fisher Sugar in the 2006 Susitna 100, an old Raleigh rigid mountain bike with 40mm Snowcat rims in the 2007 Susitna 100, and finally plunked down for a Pugsley in late 2007. It’s true what they say — Once you go fat, you’ll never go back. I sorta pity those who don’t know.
I’m on my 2nd fatbike in a year. Started with a Pugsley and upgraded to a Ti Twenty2. NOT slow! I got mine under 30lbs, and it’s only slightly slower on the uphills than my regular (26 lb)mountain bike. It makes up for it everywhere else, and the fun factor is immeasurable. And i’ve only ridden in the snow once. Oh, and Stephen’s way off on the tire pressure. 6-7 psi is the sweet spot. Try one. If you don’t like it, I’ll sell you one of my dust-collecting “skinny” tire MTB’s.
Maybe over-rated, but perhaps they can help create new bike-games and if it’s fun, people will bike more and couch less. I think it may have some appeal to trials riders also.
I don’t see why someone can’t offer a steel frame “fat bike” with industrial components (3 speed SA coaster brake and cable disc or spoon brake front), entry level tires, and mass produced wheels, for $500-600.
In Northern Nevada, we have a good bit of singletrack, and we have 1000s of miles of less desirable dirt roads going in every direction. Until we got fat bikes. Now we ride loose roads with no regard to conditions. This article makes it sound like these bikes are intended for racing in the snow, but I feel these bikes are about fun and freedom. It may not work for everyone, but we’ve had an absolute blast not being constrained. Also, I have friends that are very picky and snobbish about the trails they ride. “All-terrain bikes” are not for trail snobs. They are for adventurers!
Just got my Moonlander about a month ago and it joins my Rocky Mountain cyclocross, Kona full-sus MTB, and Catrike recumbent. Each bike has its merits and each excels at what it’s meant to do. In general, the Moony is not as smooth, or as fast, or at times as comfortable, but it is seriously fun! When you ride one for a bit, you’ll know. It’s like riding a bouncy armored tank and it takes you places that you never thought you could go. You smile way more too :)
I live in Alaska where when the snow falls it doesn’t seem to stop. I have been riding year round for the last 9 years. 1st i discovered studs 2nd I had the widest rims and tires possible put on my MTB and now I have a Fat bike. If you live in the snow for the majority of the year a fat bike is a good choice. If your just some yuppy who wants one and rides it on the pavement then your an idiot. The only reason to own one would be for specifically mass amount of sand or snow. Its just about choosing the right tool for the job. Since I live in the snow 6-7 months out of the year a fat bike is one of the best tools i own, besides my 4X4 truck with plow.
Okay, I have to chime in here. I own a Mukluk 2 since last fall and all I can say is Wow! I love to mountain bike, but I moved away from the trails and now live by the beach where there is no way you can ride. My options are an hour drive one way to hit any MTB trails, so I was no longer riding. Now enter the Fat bike. I have some sweet trails that I have been running on in the sand dunes right out of my back yard. I am now riding them. My love of MTB is back and I can not be happier. Granted, you don’t go as fast, but hey you can go anywhere and I mean anywhere! Right now I have the trails to myself with the exception of occasional hikers and horseback riders. I would like to ride with others, but I also like having this region all to myself for now. Snow riding is a blast too. In the past I would hang up my riding in the winter for cross country skiing, no longer. Yes there is a niche for this kind of bike and I have found it here. I love FTB!
Fat bikes are kinda like the new Metallica album… whenever it comes out, you say you hate it. You don’t think it’s as good as your old stuff. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it. But then it grows on you and there is a time and a place for both. Winter in MN will be more fun this year. It makes a great 7th bike.
I’ve snow/ice biked for 15+ years on regular MTB tires (studded and not). Have done quite well, but find it a struggle unless the snow is either fresh (untracked), or hardpacked (after days of foot/ski traffic). Anything that is soft/trampled/unsettled sends my wheels awry and has me sawing at the bars to stay upright. This year, I just bought a 2013 Mukluk 3 and can’t wait to give it a go on snow. I have taken it out on dirt/rocks/gravel/pavement so far. While I have to agree with the comments about sluggish steering and heft on the climbs, I expected this. But the fun factor far outweighs these penalties IMHO. It isn’t the quiver-killer for me that it seems to be for other riders, but that’s just fine. I enjoy an SS, 1X9, FS or HT ride just as much as a Fat ride…only now I hope to truly slay the snow!
I bought a Pugsley in November, and then a Santa Cruz Tallboy in MARCH. If I would have known how great the Fat bike runs on dirt here in Maine, I would not have bought the Santa Cruz. The only drawback I see here is on rocky descents my arms gets sore from the upper body workout on the Pugs. And claiming that someone won a race on a traditional mountain bike doesn’t carry weight with me. How do you know they would not have won on a fatbike?
You people are funny. The likers and the dislikers. Ride one and I mean really ride one and you will know what I mean when I say riding a fatty is assume. I live in the Twin City area. Bought a Fatback, received it in March 2012. Unfortunately I have not ridden in snow yet but I have singletrack ridden in Cuyuna Rec. Area, http://cuyunalakestrail.org/index.cfm/pageid/40, over 30 miles in world class SS on my Fatback with Big Fat Larry’s and it was incredible. The MN river bottoms in sand and hard pack just a blast. Smiling all day long. Commuting 20+ miles/day is a gas. Saying they are slow. Well I am over 50 and averaging 16+mph with 11 psi hitting 22-28 mph on the flat streets. During the warm days I am a roddie, Bianchi Sempre and my normal commuter is a Bianchi AXIS. Granted they all have their time and place but the Fatback will go almost anywhere. Give one a try before you say they are overrated.
There are some bicyclists (like me) who have always purchased the fattest tires they could buy… but for the goofy bike cliques, those tires weren’t fat enough until recently…this forum is no different; the so-n-so’s continue to bad mouth the what-ever’s endlessly – typifying their own elitist market. Once you’ve experienced fat-biking, you too may have justifiable contempt for all the genres of elitist cyclers that hold back variety and progress in cycling. Now somebody has the guts to mention ‘a 4kW e-bike’? I ride a 9kW Astro-Flight 3220 powered Mukluk…. Wanna join my clique? I win all the competitions I enter; my 9kW is bigger than his 4kW.
Just purchased a fatty after two rides. One ride pavement demo 1/2 hr or so in summmer, other was rental ride and had for three days in winter (last weekend). Yeah wicked fun that has no equal on two wheels in winter. Amazed at the ability it has with riding along (not on) set xc ski trails, barely any penetration. Great way to excersize the dog with only needing one hand on bar due to stability of fats. I ride a norco range 1 in summer (no weight wennie)so weight is not an issue with the mukluk 3 build. I Live in banff national park and the biking season truly continues all year now. yippie!
I picked up a surly pugsley 5 months ago. It is the most fun bike I’ve ever ridden. You can hit a curb head on and you’ll go bouncing over. Had my 2nd ride tonight in snow. As expected it’s a little more work getting through the thick layers but a ton of fun to get out and ride in December in Michigan. I bought my wife one and she loves it. We are going to a fat tire race tomorrow www.winterrush.com
hands down fat tires are worth it! Get one!!
I found a used Fatback a couple of weeks ago. I have only missed a few days of riding it since. I now know what the saying “ more fun than a barrel of monkeys” communicates. The Fatback rides as well as my other mountain bikes. It is surprisely nimble and goes as fast as my legs can spin it. Wouldn’t be a stretch to go all fat with some of the new tires becoming available.
I’m 63 and wanted to ride in the winter. I ride a 29er in the spring, summer and fall on the biking trails and single tracks around the Twin Cities. But my wife was concerned about the danger of winter riding. The fat tire was the answer. Slower and far more stable than the 29er on the packed snow of the trails and the lakes, it provides a great way of getting out and biking in the cold season. The slower speed is also a help in sub zero temp as I get less wind chill.
I added a Mukluk 3 to my collection just a month ago. I live in Western Wisconsin and looked forward to snow. What a blast. I enjoy not worring about going fast, just getting out and going. I ride rode bike during the warm weather and this was a big change, but one I would recommend. By the way I am 66 so don’t think this is just for the kids. (Anyone under 50)
interesting the percieved need for a fatty in winter. I ride about 3 to 4000 km per year (in winter) on a basic single speed 2.1” solid frame in all winter conditions. Cost $300. Spending $1500 for a bike that will be abused by cold, salt and sand is lunacy. At 40 below, which we have had plenty of this year, basic is best!
One brand not mentioned is Fat Sand Bikes. Just ordered mine and really look forward to getting on it. These bikes are bada$$ and come in pretty much any configuration and color you could possibly want. Chromoly, aluminum or ti frames and the biggest tires at 30“x4.8”.
I love my Fat Sand Bikes. I have one for trails, one for bar hoping and an electric one for just crusing around. The trail one is a GREAT ride. You can feel the extra weight but the extra “cushion” you get from the tires is great. Plus living in S FL the tire goes right through the sofest sugar sand or slick mud puddles. The bar hopper is great cause it gets so much attention, people are just amazed by the tires and the 25” ape hangers, lol. Fun and practical bikes all around. I almost never ride my old trek mtn bike anymore… Once you go Fat you never go back, lol.
Funny, I wonder how many here have actually ridden a properly set-up 29er and a fat bike back to back in the snow. I have, a couple times. The fat back is much more tolerant of poor weight distribution and will get a few feet further when the snow is soft and deep before stalling out. Other than that the 29er was better- rolling inertia being the big difference, obv. Tried the Pugsley at 5-9 PSI- same result. 29er was a hardtail with Flow rims and Rampage 2.35 running 18 PSI (200 lb rider weight). For AK I have no doubt they make sense (lots of sand AND snow) for other locations? Seems more like a fad. Urban fixie for the Field and Stream set?
Hey guys check out Bikeboards.net
We are bike ski attachment that works with your own tire size.
Mtb bikes or fat bikes does not matter, 1 ski hit the trails and yes even bomb downhills take it off throw it in your pack and ride home!
Simplest design out there and yes affordable!!!!
Yes 2 skis work for downhill as well!!
We are a Colorado based company
Thanks!
this bike is NOT overrated for me this is the perfect bike for me keeps me riding in the winter where most of the trails are under snow 6 months of the year and the ride able trails are are sandy and pumice. plus they are fun to take to the beach and ride the coast. They are also more forgiving thru ruts and rocks.
- Weekly E-Newsletter
Sign up for our e-news for a weekly update on new gear, adventure travel, and prize giveaways.
- Latest Articles
- 10 'Dirtbag' Climbers Convert Vans into Mobile Homes
- $15k Prize Pot brings Olympians, National Champs to Mountain Games MTB
- 'Sexy Bodies, Naughty Words' are Hallmarks in Pearl Izumi Campaigns
- 100+ Years as 'Adventure Equipment' (yes, the Thermos)
- Shoelace of the Future? Tour of Boa Technology in Denver
- 100 Miles of Twisting, Climbing, Gravel Road Biking at Almanzo Race
- Hot or Cold? Thermos 'Travel Tumbler' Test
- Video: 'Gear Junkie Challenge" Urban Adventure Race
- Winners! 'Ragnar Trail' Sweepstakes with Salomon
- 'Pro-Level' Air Attack Helmet Put to Test
- Popular Articles
- 10 'dirtbag' climbers convert vans into mobile homes
- 'Sexy Bodies, Naughty Words' are Hallmarks in Pearl Izumi Campaigns
- World's 10 Most Dangerous Mountains
- 'Fat Bike' Trend: Overrated or For Real?
- Camping Gear Reviews | Gear Reviews
- Survival Gear: 10 Items To Survive
- Workout Wear
- Climber makes couch out of old rope (and 9 other odd uses)
- Fat Bike trend Dead? Walmart sells 'Beast' bike for $199
- 'Pro-Level' Air Attack Helmet Put to Test
- SylvanSport GO Camper Trailer Review
- You’re Grounded! 'Earthing Sandals' Provide Electrical Link To Planet
- 100 Years as 'Adventure Equipment' (yes, the Thermos)
- First Look: Suunto 'Ambit 2' for multisport market
- Shoelace of the Future? Tour of Boa Technology in Denver
- The Lukla Airport Experience | Everest Expedition
- Chimney Stove: Boil Water with Sticks and Grass
- First Look: Bear Grylls unveils line of Camping gear
- Hot or Cold? Thermos 'Travel Tumbler' Test
- 10 Knives You can (soon) bring on a Plane
- Friends of Gear Junkie
- Monopoint Media
- The Goat
- Alpinist
- Adventure Blog
- YogaSlackers
- Checkpoint Tracker
- Outdoorzy
- Get Outdoors
- Gear Flogger
- Feed The Habit
- Gear.com
- Adventure Journal
- SuperTopo
- Trailspace
- Outside Online
- iRunFar.com
- UpADowna
- About Adventure Travel
- Cold Splinters
- UpNorthica
- Sender Films
- Venture There
- Wend Magazine
- No Boundaries
- Breathe Magazine
- Elevation Outdoors
- Rock and Ice Magazine
- Trail Runner Magazine
- REI Blog
















Overrated…for those of us without the funds to buy a dozen specialty bikes for every possible condition, versatility is a virtue. Normal mountain bike tires get you through plenty of snow and they work great on singletrack when the snow melts.