Analog Face, Outdoor Build: Wenger 'Commando' Watch

By T.C. WORLEY

I glanced at my wristwatch, peered into a wall of fog, then back at my watch again — if my calculations were right, I would soon see the dagger shape of a kayak piercing through the mist on a plane of ocean ahead. It was a few days into the Wenger Patagonian Expedition Race in Chile, an eight-day endurance event I’d been assigned to cover as a journalist and photographer. Appropriately, as the company was the head sponsor, I’d been outfitted with some Wenger swag to try out during the week.

wenger wper watch2.jpg

Commando series’ Wenger Patagonian Expedition Race edition watch

On my wrist, a watch from the company’s Commando series, the race’s namesake Commando Wenger Patagonian Expedition Race watch, might at first have seemed an odd choice. There was no alarm and no altimeter. The analog watch, which costs $450, lacked a barometric sensor, a compass, and other features you might need in the wilds.

But the Commando, I came to appreciate, functioned as a simple, solid timekeeper in Patagonia and then also back home as an “everyday” watch as well. It is made to take some knocks but it looks good at the same time — the Swiss-made watch comes with a strong rubber strap, a stainless steel case, and a mineral crystal face that resists scratches. It is waterproof to 330 feet, Wenger cites.

The watch’s striking white-on-black face regularly draws complements from friends and strangers alike. It works as a “business” watch for regular during-the-week wear, though I also find myself wearing it into the woods and even for training sessions — I regularly use it as a stopwatch, the small hands ticking and keeping time as I run.

Maybe I am a bit old-school, but I like moving watch hands and a clean analog face. Indeed, aesthetically the Commando line is a great alternative to the digital look that prevails with outdoor types. Beyond timekeeping, the Wenger watch has a date window and a tachymeter scale that measures speed over a known distance.

Wenger_Comm_02.jpg

Wenger Patagonian Expedition Race logo on back of watch

In Patagonia, as night fell, I looked to the watch and its glow-in-the-dark hands and markers. It rained for days in Chile, and I abused the watch for a week straight.

My Commando watch today is still looking nearly as good as new. At $450, I would expect as much. This is a durable but pricey watch in search of a unique demographic of buyers who might love the clean look combined with a solid build and (just enough) chorographical features to sneak by on a hike or, perhaps, a rainy trip in Chile down near the end of the Earth.

T.C. Worley is a contributing editor for GearJunkie.com. He reported from Chile and the Wenger Patagonian Expedition Race in 2010 and 2011.

Shop the Gear Junkie store »
Commenting on post : Analog Face, Outdoor Build: Wenger 'Commando' Watch
Posted by plinko - 09/14/2011 06:42 PM

Lame dude. Way to sell out for a watch that has no place in the backcountry. But, you say, it keeps time AND it’s waterproof?!? Wow. Groundbreaking. rolling eyes

Posted by Joey - 09/14/2011 07:25 PM

How is wearing a watch selling out? Do you prefer a watch that has GPS tracking, chronograph and other kinds of other useless features? Talk about selling out and lame.

Posted by T.C. Worley - 09/16/2011 01:09 PM

I honestly like this watch and it keeps time – exactly what I need it to do every day. The only thing I wish it did more was tell me elevation. What features are paramount in the backcountry anyway?

Posted by Plinko - 09/16/2011 04:28 PM

I like the look of the Wenger as well, but a watch that only tells time is not exactly revolutionary. A $10 Casio is going to give you the same data and leave you with $440 in your pocket to spend on ‘real gear’.

Joey – Wenger is not only the title sponsor of the race, they’re also a Gearjunkie sponsor and they give the products free of charge. Quid pro quo? I certainly hope not.

T.C. – Besides time of day, features I seek in a watch include barometric altimeter, current elevation, rate of ascent/descent, cumulative ascent/descent, elevation profile, heart rate, etc. I’m a big fan of using the gear right tool for the job. For cubicle life, or a casual stroll down a maintained path, the Wenger or most other watches will suffice. If you’re trail running, adventure racing, mtb’ing, backcountry skiing, etc, then a more advanced feature set becomes critical.

GPS watches have been less-than-inspiring for off-trail use due to limited satellite reception from minuscule internal antennas, and also because most require recharging after each use, making multi-day outings problematic. The myriad data they provide however can be inimitable when it comes to training purposes.

Posted by Joey - 09/16/2011 06:21 PM

Companies give reviewers all kinds of free stuff. Do you think that the blogger standing to make 10 or 20 bucks on a post is spending $400 on a watch or ski jacket to test it? Or do you think the multi-million-dollar company is sending it for free.

I don’t see T.C. claiming it’s anything revolutionary. In fact, he described it as a “simple, solid timekeeper”

I’ve had two sports watches in my time—a basic Wenger (much more entry level than this one) and a High Gear stuffed with a barometer, altimeter, chronogaph, weather alert, etc. etc. I used them both to tell time, and the Wenger looked a lot better and was a tougher design. I’ll never understand what people do with all that other crap half the time, but if you want it, there are plenty of other watches for it.

I do agree that this watch is way overpriced, though.

Posted by T.C. Worley - 09/16/2011 11:16 PM

To clear the air a bit: I work as a photographer as well as a reporter for the WPER. They get me there, but pay me not a red cent to shoot and share images with them. The “experience” is the payment. This watch was a VERY small token of appreciation from Wenger for the total 5 weeks of my life I give to this race for free. I was never olbigated to write about it, I actually recently volunteered to do so because it’s the best watch I’ve had in years. It’s the truth that I’ve worn it since the race, on dozens of adventures and races. I stand behind all my comments as forthright.

Posted by steven - 09/22/2011 09:17 AM

It might be just me, but plinko sounds like a troll. Any self proclaimed “outdoorsman” can scan obscure gear reviews and try to appear knowledgeable by touting paranoid sounding conspiracy theories and unfounded accusations of corporate backscratching. I have been reading gearjunkie’s reviews and have always found them to be objective and useful. So If anyone wants to listen to plinko, champion of the gear review, go ahead. I prefer to listen to the opinions of a seasoned outdoorsman/photographer/writer. Plinko, where are your expedition photos? Where are your gear reviews? My guess is that they are non existent, but we all know where we can find TC’s. My advice for you, Plinko, is to go to Office Depot, pick out a new stapler, and write a “gear review” of your own about something you are more familiar with. And maybe, just maybe, next month you can review a wireless scanner/printer combo. I’m sure we will all be interested.

Posted by Jimmy - 10/09/2011 12:16 AM

You guys wear watches in the backcountry? I usually just tear off my sleeves and go.

Add Comment

  1. Add link by using "LinkText":http://google.com
« Back to the Blog
Follow TheGearJunkie on Twitter

Death toll on Everest now = 11 people for this season. So sad. (via @alan_arnette)  http://t.co/Qj6QE5Gr

Pretty rad ad for waterproof cases (yep, you read right) -  http://t.co/rl96V2AG