Support us! GearJunkie may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Venturing off-road can provide a mental lift to your weekly routine and reap huge fitness gains. While we’ve all taken our road shoes to the trail, having the best trail running shoes will elevate your off-road game.

The perfect trail running shoe is the calculus of individual fit and the type of trail you run on. To collect feedback, we had our team of testers from across the country run in diverse terrain.

From rocky scrambles to mellow hikes to the Leadville 100, we’ve worn these trail running shoes through rain, summer heat, and everything in between. And while there isn’t a single shoe that’s perfect for everyone, we’ve categorized our top picks to help you find the best fit.

To curate this exhaustive list, our team of dedicated trail runners clocked endless miles in a broad range of conditions and landscapes to bring you the streamlined selection of fifteen shoes you see today. For our most recent update, gear-tester and contributing writer Canaan Vallejos took the latest trail runners from Nike into the High Sierra for some serious use and abuse.

Editor’s Note: Ready for the trails this summer? We updated this guide on June 5, 2025, adding reviews of the latest and greatest from Nike. The updated Nike Terra Kiger 10 makes for a great on and off-trail shoe, while the Wildhorse 10 provides plenty of cushion for pounding singletrack.

The Best Trail Running Shoes of 2026


Specifications

Price
$169
Weight
10.2 oz.
Drop
4 mm
Best for
Any trail, any terrain, any speed

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Springy and responsive midsole
  • TPU exoskeleton keeps foot secure
  • Versatile performance across variety of trails and conditions
  • Best shoe to pack for a trip if you can only choose one

Cons

  • Less aggressive lugs than others on this list
Chris Carter

Scarpa’s shoe may be called the Golden Gate, but we fell in love with its Goldilocks-style performance after racking up the testing miles. Making a do-it-all trail shoe is hard to pull off, thanks to the variety of terrains and demands across ecosystems. However, the Scarpa Golden Gate ATR 2 ($169) consistently performed through all trail conditions and climates, delivering ideal results and superior grip.

The shoe bears so little resemblance to the original model it almost merits a whole rename. While we liked the first version, we found it bulky and slightly over-cushioned. It was good for heavy plodders but not for the nimble, quick scramble kind of runners.

The ATR 2 reduces the stack height to a much more reasonable 24mm, still granting cushion but not sacrificing underfoot feel. This makes the ATR 2 a moderately cushioned, light, and nimble shoe ready to support all-day mountain efforts or quick hill runs alike.

The shoe derives its Golden Gate moniker from the truss-like TPU exoskeleton, weaving a pattern of structural support across the breathable mesh upper. But it’s also a nod to the ATR’s adaptability to tackle trails that dart off the pavement and into urban parks. SCARPA built this shoe for the street to trail runner. But with the new shoe update, they might have cracked the code for a quiver-killing shoe that handles technical and casual terrain with equal aplomb.

Most notable on the Scarpa Golden Gate ATR 2 is the secure fit. Scarpa calls this tech SockFit, and it works by constructing the tongue as a single piece of elastic fabric that wraps over the top of the foot, increasing lateral stability and guaranteeing a snug midfoot fit. 

As a bonus, it also does a good job of preventing pebbles and debris from slipping into the shoe. The fit is so snug you could probably pull the laces and run in it like a slipper. Yet, through some genius engineering, the shoe is easy to loosen for foot swelling and get in and out of.

If we had to have a gripe, the 4mm lugs could leave something to be desired in more technical terrain. That said, it handled the scree and rocky terrain of Northern Arizona just fine and has performed admirably in the soupy mud of Midwestern trails.

It tested well enough to knock our previous favorite, Nike’s Terra Kiger 9, from top billing. And because of its versatility, our testers consistently favored it for all types of terrain and types of runs, the real mark of versatility.

Best Budget Trail Running Shoe

Saucony Peregrine 15

Specifications

Weight
9.7 oz
Drop
4mm
Stack
28mm/ 24mm

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Excellent traction
  • Comfortable from day one, with little to no break-in time
  • Precise in technical terrain
  • Great price-to-value

Cons

  • Precise, narrow fit not ideal for wider feet
Chris Carter

Are there technically cheaper shoes out there than the Peregrine 15 ($140)? Yes. Are there any that deliver the same price-to-value? No.

You’ll have to look hard to see any major changes on the Peregrine 15. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. The 14 was another nice update to the iconic line of fast, precise trail running shoes, and the 15 continues this tradition. For this iteration, Saucony gives runners an updated upper, improving the overall fit, and a foam compound that feels both softer and more responsive than the 14

This addresses some concerns about the 14’s speed capacity while keeping us right in our wheelhouse for fast, precise, technical trails, where the Peregrine 15 feels right at home.

In the past, we’ve tested the Peregrine through the iconic Apex Park, including the Enchanted Forest, through some mixed snowy and rocky conditions, including sections of glare ice (not recommended). We were blown away by the excellent traction of Peregrine’s PWRTRAC rubber outsole with 5mm lugs. Climbing through the mixed rock and icy conditions, we found a nice flow and gained altitude quickly. The 15 upgraded the outsole compound and our testing found it elevated the grip. An already great shoe got something even better.

On the descent, the Peregrine 15 offers a lot of fun and security with a precise package. The lower volume upper and relatively narrow design make tricky rock sections a breeze. The lively midsole and small heel-to-toe drop puts the runner in the driver’s seat for sporty descents.

But with a fun, sporty, firm ride, the Peregrine 15 comes with a downside. On any runs over about 8 to 10 miles, we noticed friction, or downright blisters, between our front toes. The precise, narrow design is just too thin for wider feet to splay. Our tester found the redesigned upper helps mitigate this effect but doesn’t solve it.

While this is fine on short runs, we personally wouldn’t make this shoe our long-distance racer. It might be our choice for an upcoming 20K because it’s fast and confidence-inspiring, but we know our feet will pay. Those aiming for ultra distances should probably steer away unless they have fairly narrow, low-volume feet.

But if you want a precise shoe for short, fast, technical trail runs, the Saucony Peregrine 15 lives up to its speedy name. It’ll be high on our shoe rack for days when speed and spice are on the docket.

Best Trail Running Shoe for Huge Days

Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide

Specifications

Weight
10.2 oz
Drop
6mm
Stack Height
41mm / 35 mm

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Comfortable midsole, especially over long distances
  • No rock plate, no problem

Cons

  • Heavy for shoes at this price point
Chris Carter

Foam, foam, and more foam. Sure, carbon plates are the flashy element in our current super-shoe zeitgeist, but the foams are the undersung heroes in the mix, powering the midsole and activating the carbon plate’s energy-return potential. Salomon dialed into that with the S/Lab Ultra Glide ($250) by skipping the plate altogether and stacking the foam sky-high. The result? A plush, comfortable shoe that can go all day.

Two separate pieces of foam in the midsole are joined via another foam compound, Energy Foam Plus, to create a downright cozy underfoot feel. The downside? All this extra material adds up to extra weight. Not a ton, this is foam, after all, but more than runners have come to expect at this high price point normally reserved for race-ready super shoes. All this foam uniquely combines with the outsole design, festooned with golf-ball-like divots that absorb, marshmallow-like, around rocks and scree kicked up on the trail.

No rock plate in sight, no rock plate needed. Salomon sticks to the classics with the upper: a mesh upper and a Quicklace system complete the kind of upper we’ve come to expect from the brand. It’s branded (and priced) as a race shoe, and our testers found that the midsole responded well when pushing for speed, which is not always the case with high-stack shoes. But we found the value in staying in this shoe all day, on long efforts across varied terrain with multiple pace goals.

Best Nike Trail Running Shoe

Nike Terra Kiger 10

Specifications

Weight
9.1 oz.
Drop
5mm
Stack
29mm (heel) 24mm (forefoot)

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Mesh upper breathes while keeping dust out
  • Has a rock plate and plenty of cushion
  • Vibram Megagrip outsole

Cons

  • Lugs wore down faster than we'd have liked
Chris Carter

The Nike Terra Kiger 10 ($170) offers a secure and precise yet comfortable fit to a wide range of foot types. The Cushlon 3.0 foam feels stable and energetic even when standing or walking in the shoe. The Terra Kiger 10 performs impressively well on just about any terrain on and off trail. However, given its softer lugs, the shoe is really designed to shine specifically on the trail. 

If we had to describe the Kiger 10 in one word, it would be versatile. It delivers outstanding race performance across a wide spectrum of terrains and conditions. We recommend it to just about any runner looking for fast and precise race performance on most types of terrain.

However, if you have a wide forefoot (say, 110+ mm) or have a square-shaped toe box (where your foot length measures roughly equal across all toes), then the Kiger 10 may not be the best fit for you. Additionally, we’d advise heavy runners to consider a shoe with more cushioning underfoot for ultra distances. That all being said, the Nike Terra Kiger 10 is one of the most versatile trail shoes we’ve tested to date, making it a great shoe choice for many runners to add to their quivers.

Rating Details

Support 7/10
Durability 8/10
Style 8/10
Performance 9/10

Specifications

Weight
1 lb. 6.4 oz.
Heel-to-toe drop
Upper
Ripstop mesh
Outsole
MaxTrac rubber

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Light weight
  • Wide forefoot for swelling feet
  • Zero drop promotes a healthy stride
  • Quick gaitor attachment points
  • Good, fast trail running shoe

Cons

  • Zero drop takes some getting used to and isn't for everybody
  • Modest support
Chris Carter

Newly updated to increase durability, the Altra Lone Peak 9 ($140) is the most recent version of the much-beloved zero-drop classic. Fit is similar and remains polarizing. If you’ve long been on board with minimalist shoes and the zero-drop design, you’ll revel in the comfort over hundreds of miles as your feet swell and your toes splay in this comfy, roomy shoe. If you’re more used to more supportive techy trail runners like the Speed Goat 6 or the Scarpa Golden Gate, you may find them downright sloppy.

A popular running shoe and perhaps even more popular as a long-distance hiking shoe, the Lone Peak 9 has a more robust upper than the Lone Peak 8. While this feels like a slight loss of breathability, most folks should be happy that their Lone Peaks will last longer, especially the thru-hiker crowd.

From a runner’s perspective, this is a big advantage when you need to go off-trail or are tackling a scree field. The shoes also have a built-in gaiter clip, so your gaiters will stay secure if you opt for those in sandy or gravelly terrain.

The Lone Peak has a MaxTrac outsole, a compound that isn’t as hard as Vibram but has no trouble gripping rock slabs and hard-pack single track. The Chevron-shaped lugs aren’t as deep as the ones on the HOKA Speedgoat 6, and they didn’t feel as grippy during a short snow crossing but feel equally capable on most other surfaces.

Zero-drop takes some getting used to, and while these shoes don’t provide that sense of propulsion that shoe with a 5mm difference between the heel and the toe, it will change how you run, possibly for the better. Heel strikers will be forced to adjust or be punished. It takes a concentrated effort to change habits and strike with the mid or forefoot. This will strengthen your calves and Achilles and hopefully adopt a springier, lower-impact stride. Give yourself plenty of time to adjust before putting in huge miles.

Fastest Trail Running Shoes

HOKA Tecton X3

Specifications

Price
$275
Weight
10 oz.
Drop
5 mm
Best For
Crushing your Strava time and race day performance

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Nimble, lightweight, and fast on technical terrain
  • Great balance of comfort and trail feedback
  • Parallel carbon plates with winglet addition
  • Excellent Matryx upper (secure and durable)
  • Tacky and surprisingly durable outsole

Cons

  • Narrow fit (especially in the midfoot)
  • Heavier than the previous model
  • Knit collar caused heel rub on some testers
  • Expensive
Chris Carter

The X2 was a very fast, very good shoe that the team at GJ loved. We were more than a little surprised to see that the X3 almost totally revamped the silhouette for 2024. What’s new? HOKA updated the lug shape and positioning, upgraded the PEBA midsole compound, added a new plate design/positioning, and rounded it out with a gaiter-like tongue/collar design. Yep, almost totally redesigned. And pricier. But still fast. 

The HOKA Tecton X 3 ($275) holds down the ultrafast field with its own carbon whip, designed to keep the turnover revving toward a PR. In our opinion, the Tecton X2 set the current bar for carbon-plated trail shoes and is worthy of consideration, and the X3 continues this innovative approach. 

Like all HOKAs, the PEBA cushion is top shelf, with a softer layer against the foot and a denser, responsive layer closer to the ground. Sandwiched between the foams are a pair of carbon plates that give you the stiffness and spring you’d expect from carbon while yielding lateral compliance to negotiate the changing terrain.

These carbon plates are reshaped from last year’s model, the brand adding winglets — a term usually saved for the vertical or angled extension on the tip of an aircraft wing, which helps aerodynamic performance. It’s fitting that aerospace terms are used here because there’s aerospace tech involved.

Laced down over to just above the toes, a Matryx upper hugs the foot, weaving in breathability and adjustable comfort for long days on the trail. A Vibram Megagrip outsole with an early-stage MetaRocker is studded with spaced 4mm lugs to shed mud without sacrificing traction.

Our only pause on the updated X3 is the tall knit collar, which divided testers. While it held off dust and debris, even in Sedona’s famous red sand, the fit caused problems depending on sock length. This led to heel rub on uphill sections, a problem our tester also had with HOKA’s road-oriented Mach X2. If the high ankle collar gives you pause, we’d recommend Adidas’ Agragiv Speed Ultra — another fast shoe that our testers loved.

The bigger question is, do you need a carbon trail shoe? Well, with the release of the Tecton X 3 — maybe! If you are a racer who’s been on the fence with carbon fiber plates, this is the shoe we’d recommend pulling the trigger on.

Best Trail Running Shoes for Mountain Runs

HOKA Speedgoat 6

Specifications

Price
$155
Weight
9.8 oz.
Drop
5 mm
Best For
Technical trails, ultras, thru-hikes

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Fantastic traction
  • Lighter than previous models
  • Superior cushion
  • Durable

Cons

  • Firmer underfoot than previous models
Chris Carter

Every family has a favorite. Toeing across finish lines for years, the Speedgoat 6 ($155) is Hoka’s beloved classic. The Speedgoat 5 overhauled the shoe from the ground up. The 6 is a gentler but still impactful redesign, realigning some overcorrections from the previous model. A redesigned midsole and a new upper combine with last year’s stellar outsole update. This directly addressed durability complaints Hoka fielded on the Speedgoat. 

Crossovers from the previous version include a bolstered heel collar, more comfortable features, and what feels like a more responsive midsole with what Hoka calls a “late-stage meta-rocker.” The updated upper features a breathable woven textile upper paired with a foot-hugging internal chassis, resulting in a breathable, secure fit that holds up to wear and tear.

Best of all, the tongue has been redesigned. We found the 5’s gusseted tongue to be a little short and thin, while the 6 is plush and comfortable but still breathable.

The updated midsole shaves even more weight and is everything you could want in a trail shoe: lightweight, supportive, and responsive. It’s firmer underfoot than the previous model but still bouncy and comfortable for running on all forms of terrain.

The soles are fitted with Vibram Megagrip and 5mm lugs, somehow providing even more traction than previous iterations. Our reviewers lauded its ability to tackle varying, loose, and rocky terrain.

While the Speedgoats let you push the pace, their durability and comfort over the long haul make them a good value. Legions of long-distance hikers have picked up on this. The Speedgoat 6 was one of the most popular shoes for thru-hiking in 2022. One of our testers walked over 5,000 miles in the Speedgoats last year, eking out about 700 miles a pair.

If you aren’t used to shoes with a higher stack, runners may want to experiment with a different model first. Hoka’s upped the drop to 5mm on this version, and the stack can be tippy on technical trails. But as a mega-comfortable performer over challenging terrain, it’s hard to find a better ride out there.

Most Durable Trail Running Shoe

NNormal Kjerag

Specifications

Weight (per shoe)
8.6 oz.
Drop
6 mm (23.5/17.5 mm)
Best for
Runners seeking a long-lasting shoe

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Quality build
  • Balances comfort and speed

Cons

  • Pricey
  • Snug fit for wide feet
Chris Carter

“Built to last” is a tagline from NNormal, a company founded in partnership with the world’s top trail runner, Kilian Jornet. The tagline comes with a 2-year warranty, which is unusual in a category known for products that can wear out after a few months of hard use.

To back up the claim, the company put its NNormal Kjerag ($195) trail running shoes on 500 runners for a long-term test. The result was shoes that lasted for up to 800 miles of use before enough damage that they needed to be replaced.

We didn’t put that many miles on the Kjerags. But after around 75 miles of testing, the white shoes, though a bit dirtier, feel like new. The company sells the Kjerag as a distance shoe capable of ultra-endurance courses up to 100 miles.

The shoes’ midsole is touted to promote stability and energy return, and they indeed feel supportive and alive underfoot on the run. The upper is a clean jacquard with Kevlar-coated yarn. Pull the shoe on, and it feels snug with arch support and a thin tongue.

Despite the support, the shoes are light — our test pair of men’s size 12 weighed in at a feathery 8.6 oz. per shoe. The tread on the Vibram outsole is on the more minimal side. The lugs function perfectly for dry singletrack and regular trails. However, they are less effective in mud and wet terrain.

Overall, though, the NNormal Kjerag ranks among the best shoes we’ve tested, thanks to its feel and durability. 

Best Race Day Trail Running Shoe

Merrell MTL Skyfire 2 Matryx

Specifications

Weight (per shoe)
8.6 oz. (size 12)
Drop
6 mm (25/19 mm)
Best for
Sprint-level speeds on trails

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Fast, light, and grippy
  • Eye-catching look

Cons

  • Very pricey
Chris Carter

It’s among the more minimal of shoes on this list. But despite a streamlined design, the Merrell MTL Skyfire 2 Matryx ($210) offers protection on any trail. But more than that, you get speed.

And you get a lot of speed — this is a race car of a shoe. From its light materials to its wild aesthetic, every millimeter feels built for forward momentum on the trail.

That speed build starts at the upper. The stark white, Kevlar-enforced material is emblazoned with a pink dash and a logo. The material is thin and breathable, and it feels gritty at a touch. It’s streamlined, precise, and unlike any other upper we’ve seen.

Underfoot, a web pattern of Vibram rubber gives traction via 25+ chevron lugs. The sole looks minimal but delivers a sure grip on rock and dirt. That sure grip leads to less hesitation and speedier traverses over sketchy terrain.

At under 9 ounces for a men’s size 12, it’s incredibly light — this shoe won’t weigh you down. That low weight translates to more speed because it encourages a faster turnover and lessens fatigue over long distances. 

Who’s it for? This Merrell is not for the faint of heart. It can seem minimal and bare — you feel air through the upper. And with very little cushioning, the Skyfire 2 will be harsh for anyone accustomed to thick soles.

Despite its minimalism, we wouldn’t call it “barefoot-style.” A two-part foam midsole and a rock plate separate a runner from the ground. Its flex (lateral and torsional) is average, which is to say compared to the VJ or Xero shoes in this roundup the Merrell is stiff.

Our tester loved the Merrell MTL Skyfire 2 Matryx shoe for speed work and race days up to 10k. Buy it if you need a Ferrari-like shoe that excels on days when speed and efficiency are the paramount concerns.

Other Great Trail Running Shoes

Specifications

Weight (per shoe)
9.9 oz.
Drop
0 mm (14/14 mm)
Best for
Minimalist runners

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • On-the-ground feel
  • Natural foot movement

Cons

  • Minimal protection
  • Wide, looser fit
Chris Carter

Step on a sharp stone with the Xero Mesa Trail II ($120), and you will feel it. In this case, that is a feature, not a bug.

The point of these shoes is “connection” to the ground. As such, there is minimal protection or support. The toe box is wide. The sole is so flexible you can roll it up.

It takes a particular runner to embrace this shoe. Luckily, our testing is among them. While it may take a bit of getting used to, the “barefoot” feel can be freeing after a few miles.

The shoe is light and minimally engineered compared to many models. There is no arch support, for example, and the heel has scant cushion. (There is a foam layer and 3.5mm outsole lugs, which do cushion the blow.)

Being “zero drop,” the shoe will feel flat to anyone used to traditional designs. Your gait will change in these shoes, with posture and foot-strike similar to what it’d be like without any shoes on at all.

Lace the Mesa Trail on, and you will have something near the quintessence of the “barefoot” trail running experience. The design is svelte, including welded TPU touches on the upper and a low-to-the-ground look.

Xero touts better balance, “proper” posture, and agility in the Xero Mesa Trail II, and after copious testing, we can attest to that. Anyone committed to the minimal path should try the Mesa Trail for a ground-feel experience rare in the footwear space.

We test dozens of trail running shoes for each iteration of this guide, and we’ve found plenty of excellent shoes that don’t fit into any specific category. Here are some more of the best shoes we tested.

Specifications

Weight (per shoe)
10.9 oz.
Drop
4 mm (19/15 mm)
Best for
Race day in the mountains

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Fast & light
  • Excellent protection
  • Top-tier grip

Cons

  • Minimal padding/support
  • Might be too minimal for everyday runs
Chris Carter

Dynafit may be most known for its ski gear. But when the snow melts, the company brings out a top-end line made for running, including the Dynafit Sky DNA ($200).

As the name hints, this model is built for “sky running.” That is the Euro-centric genre of trail racing where steep ascents, peaks, rugged terrain, scree, talus, and killer descents are common.

In our tests, we ran mostly lower elevations, but we formed an opinion on the shoe on dirt trails and rougher, rockier terrain.

The shoe is a cousin to the Merrell MTL Skyfire 2 Matryx — both are made-for-racing speed demons. And it has the same outsole type (the Vibram Litebase) as the NNormal Kjerag.

But the Sky DNA is its own beast. It is the most aggressive footwear in this roundup, including a precise fit, minimal drop, solid grip, and a low-to-the-ground build that’s unforgiving to a lazy stride.

This is an advanced shoe. We found it the harshest in the review, meaning it trades comfort for an aggressive design focused on pure speed, winning races, or conquering an FKT.

It cinches on the foot with what Dynafit calls an “intelligent double-speed lace.” We didn’t love the system, as tucking in the ends is a hassle — the tiny pocket to stow the string needs more space.

But once on, the thin web of laces keeps you secure over miles of rough terrain. Its toe box is generous, allowing foot bones to spread a bit for control on speedy descents.

In the end, the Dynafit Sky DNA is a quiver shoe for race days, specifically in the mountains. Athletes and dedicated alpine runners should take a close look at the Sky DNA if grip, speed, and protection on alpine terrain are the operative words.

Specifications

Weight (per pair)
13.4 oz.
Drop
5mm (30/25mm)
Best for
Trail races, fast trail runs

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Aggressive lugs
  • Responsive
  • Very breathable

Cons

  • Knit collar may be uncomfortable for some
  • Narrow for a Hoka shoe
Chris Carter

Firmer, lower, and a few dollars cheaper than the Tecton X, HOKA’s Zinal 2 ($160) is the Tecton’s trimmed-down sibling. This shoe boasts solid traction, generous energy return, and a cozy stretch-knit collar. With its lower lug height (compared to others on this list), the Zinal 2 is our go-to for quick door-to-trail runs.

The light, breathable engineered mesh upper and stretch-knit collar replace the tongue found on the shoe’s previous iteration. This upper pleasantly hugs the foot and provides exceptional comfort. It also keeps the foot connected with the shoe, allowing wearers to speed through terrain with precision. While we appreciate these “sock-like” silhouettes — they are admittedly not for everyone.

Out front, the shoe is minimally protected with a pliable toe rand and narrow bumper. Compared to the previous version, it has a slightly higher stack height, an inch boost in heel-toe drop, and a more responsive EVA midsole to provide greater energy return in each stride.

The new model also shaves 0.5 ounces from the original Zinal, and feels feathery light as you cruise over mild singletrack or rolling backroads. It’s purpose-built for speed over durability. Still, after clocking significant miles in the shoes, there’s plenty of life left in our pair.

Flip the shoe over, and you’ll notice the rubber tread is dispersed under the ball of the foot and heel. The previous Zinal had rubberized foam spread under the arch and midfoot between two platforms of Vibram plates — which has thankfully been altered in the update. While the midfoot is still devoid of tread, the Vibram Megagrip (hands down our favorite outsole) extends the entire length of the foot and now features numerous, deeper lugs (now 5mm).

These shoes still serve as a great road-to-trail option, but they definitely have a more aggressive, trail-ready design than their predecessor. The lugs are tightly packed and occasionally struggle to shed mud.

The Zinal 2s are an ideal choice for runs that start at the front door and loop the local trail. They run effortlessly, feel smooth on the tarmac, and are easy, fun shoes for days when you struggle to fit it all in.

Specifications

Weight
10.4 oz.
Drop
8 mm
Best For
Runners who want to go far, fast

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Well engineered
  • Nice looking
  • Clever lace solutions including a FlipRelease providing extra room for an expanding foot over long distance
  • Sock-like inner construction keeps dust and debris out

Cons

  • Heavier than some of its ultra running competitors
  • Initially feels firm underfoot before breaking in
Chris Carter

Chances are, you have seen more of On’s shoes on coffee runs than actual runs. Incredibly popular with the athleisure crowd, On Running has proved that its shoes don’t just look good; they run well. On’s running team has quietly picked up podiums across the UTMB series, all while decked out in the Swiss brand’s gear. Our top pick from On for the trail is its Cloudultra 2 ($180).

Core to the shoe is On’s Helion foam. It’s engineered to provide rigid cushioning underfoot and flexibility in the toes. This rigidity provides good rock protection and a structural rocker. On the brand’s original Couldsurfers, our tester found that the foam could feel harsh underfoot, but the new generation balances out this rigidity with both a softer foam and more cushion to absorb impact.

Also new to this version’s construction is a TPU speedboard, which purportedly loads the shoe with energy every time the foot lands. While our tester didn’t feel a noticeable spring in his step, he did notice the redesigned outsole. The new grip touts an updated stud layout that results in 50% more ground contact than its predecessor’s already luggy grip.

For feet that swell over the miles, On has integrated a nifty FlipRelease adjustment knob on the laces over the toebox. When untoggled, the release adds a few millimeters of space over the top of the foot. Our tester found this incredibly helpful, not just for long runs; but also for cool downs.

We’ve found that, across the line of On shoes, the brand’s collar feels stiff. The Cloudultra 2 is different. While we wouldn’t go as far as calling its collar pliable, the brand has reengineered the collar and heightened the heel padding, which helps mitigate the previous version’s stiffness.

The bootie construction makes the shoe a struggle to get into, but once you’re in, the knit portion locks around the foot and remains very breathable. This makes the Cloudultra ideal for hot, dry trail runs where dust and debris can often kick into the shoe.

On simply hasn’t slapped a new name and colors on a slightly tweaked shoe. The Cloudultra 2 directly addresses (and solves) issues we had with its predecessor, resulting in a shoe that stays comfortable and fast over long days on the trail. And, of course, the Cloudultra 2 still looks great après run.

Specifications

Weight
11 oz.
Drop
9.5mm
Stack
38mm heel/ 28.5mm forefoot

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • More foam and less weight than predecessors
  • Nimble despite stack height

Cons

  • Not very durable
  • Not a good choice for frequent off-trail use
Chris Carter

The Nike Wildhorse 10 ($165) has an energetic and inspiring feel with a widely accessible and adaptable fit. While the Wildhorse 10 is likely going to fit mid- to high-volume foot profiles best, the shoe still did an excellent job locking our tester’s low-profile foot to its frame. However, the Wildhorse 10’s performance limits its use to moderate trails, at best. The Wildhorse 10’s materials and construction fail to meet the demands of mellow off-trail terrain, technical trails, and unmaintained trails. 

The Wildhorse 10 rides well and feels surprisingly nimble despite the 1.5 inches of shoe underfoot on mild to moderate trails. It distributes weight forward and returns energy best for strides landing anywhere from the midfoot to the heel. This added engineering in materials and construction can prove to be quite useful when the body and mind are tired.

Despite its maximal 38 mm reactX foam midsole, the Nike Wildhorse 10 delivers an impressive amount of energy return and ground feel, making for a confident and comfortable ride on mild to moderate trails. By switching from the brand’s react foam to its reactX foam, Nike managed to add 3 mm of foam to the Wildhorse 10’s midsole while reducing the shoe’s weight by 35 g when compared to its predecessor. 

The allure of 38 millimeters of lightweight cushioning can be quite intoxicating, but the Wildhorse 10’s rocker geometry and soft, energetic reactX foam make for quite the unstable experience in scree and most off-trail surfaces. This shoe’s rocker geometry and dramatic heel-to-toe drop work against a forefoot strike, making for an unstable ride that overengages the calves, especially on steep terrain. We don’t recommend the Wildhorse 10 to forefoot strikers, especially when steep terrain is mandatory. 

The Wildhorse 10’s thick perforated 3D mesh upper and TPU reinforced toe cap offer uncompromising protection against hard, smooth surfaces.

Despite improvements made to its All Terrain Compound focused on grip and durability, Nike’s ATC outsole fails to grip a variety of surfaces in both wet and dry conditions. 

For those looking for a maximal on-trail shoe with a generous amount of responsive cushioning and uncompromising protection, Nike’s Wildhorse 10 may be the right shoe for you. Additionally, the Wildhorse 10’s rocker geometry greatly benefits strides landing from the midfoot to the heel with a secure and controlled stride on mild to moderate variable trails.

Trail Running Shoes Comparison Chart

Trail Running ShoesPriceWeightDropStack HeightBest For
Scarpa Golden Gate ATR 2$16910.2 oz.4 mm28/24 mmAny trail, any terrain, any speed
Saucony Peregrine 15 $140 9.7 oz4 mm28/24 mm Fast, technical trail runs,
Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide$25010.2 oz.6 mm41/ 35 mmNeutral runners who want a medium riding cushion; great for road-to-trailhead and gravel roads
Nike Terra Kiger 10$170 9.1 oz5mm29/24 mmLong of trail-runs and scrambles
Altra Lone Peak 9 $14011.2 oz0 mm25 mmBig days, Zero Drop
HOKA Speedgoat 6 $1559.8 oz.5 mm38/33 mmTechnical trails, ultras, thru-hikes
NNormal Kjerag$1958.6 oz.
6 mm23.5/17.5 mmRunners seeking a long-lasting shoe
HOKA Tecton X 3 $27510 oz.5 mm40/35 mmCrushing your Strava time and race day performance
Merrell MTL Skyfire 2 Matryx$2108.6 oz6 mm25/19 mm
Sprint-level speeds on trails
Xero Mesa Trail II $1209.9 oz.0 mm14 mmMinimalist runners
Dynafit Sky DNA
$18010.9 oz.4 mm19/15 mmRace day in the mountains
HOKA Zinal 2 $1608 oz.5 mm30/25 mmNeutral runners who want medium riding cushion; great for road-to-trailhead and gravel roads
On Running Cloudultra 2 $18010.4 oz.5 mm30/25 mmRunners who want to go far, fast
Nike Wildhorse 10$16511 oz.9.5 mm38/28.5 mmGravel and single track
GearJunkie_Best_Trail_running_shoes_2022_BuyersGuide
Each of the shoes on this list was taken out on real-world tests on the trail; (photo/Steve Graepel)

How We Tested Trail Running Shoes

Steve Graepel, the primary author of this guide, has been running for 30 years. During his time on his feet, he’s clocked a sub-3-hour marathon, won the Superior Trail Ultra 50 miler, and made the first known rim-to-rim-to-rim of Hells Canyon — North America’s deepest canyon. Steve can be found lugging a backpack with a spare pair of shoes in and around the Boise foothills with his two dogs.

To complement Steve’s personal expertise, GearJunkie has a crew of five runners collecting miles and feedback throughout the year.

A fitness-focused runner who logs miles for both cardio and agility, Adam Ruggiero run-commutes on pavement daily, and adds box jumps and stairs to his regular routine. Ruggiero logs 20-25 miles a week, with mid-distance trail runs at elevation on the weekends.

Fast is slow, and slow is M.T. Elliott. A recreational runner — and our resident Clydesdale runner — Elliott prefers the crunch of dirt over asphalt but runs on both.

Sean McCoy is a middle-of-the-pack ultra runner who, when not leading the Denver-based GearJunkie team, gets lost running and racing in the Colorado high country.

Chris Carter is an avid ultra runner who is coming out of a season of constant competition in trail races along the East Coast. He can’t quite find the gumption to get into road running, but he is a trail hog through and through.

Matthew Medendorp is a trail runner constantly looking for an excuse to venture off the tarmac. He cut his trail running teeth while living in Flagstaff, exploring the high alpine desert’s steep and dusty trails. These days, you can find him in the Midwest, grinding out weekly miles over gravel and behind a running stroller (a Thule Urban Glide 2 Double, since this is GearJunkie) and diligently sneaking pre-dawn trail miles.

Stephen Regenold is an ultrarunner and multisport athlete who has completed 100+ competitive events around the world, from the NYC Marathon to wilderness epics like the Patagonian Expedition Race. He is a road and trail runner who trains year-round from a home base in Minnesota. He has been testing footwear for GearJunkie and other media outlets for over 20 years.

In 2024, we further refined this list by sending Matt on two testing trips for our trail-focused running gear (including hydration packs, vests, and winter running shoes).

The first trip was in the high desert of Northern Arizona, where he put shoes head-to-head in the ponderosa pines of Flagstaff and red rocks of Sedona, base-camping out of an Outdoorsy rental to be first on the trail each morning or facilitate a mid-run shoe change.

For the second, we sent Matt to the alpine passes of Mammoth Lakes, Calif., in the Eastern Sierra to test outsole and insulation on the frigid scree bordering Yosemite. This ensured we accurately assessed shoe performance in a variety of environments and usage occasions.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose a Trail Running Shoe

GearJunkie_Best_trailrunning_shoes_2022_Where_run
Finding the perfect trail running shoe for your foot shape and type of running will greatly improve comfort on the trail; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Staring at a wall of shoes or endlessly browsing an online retailer can be overwhelming. We’ve broken down some helpful tips to find the right shoe.

Consider Where You Run

These days, manufacturers have dialed in shoes for nearly every niche of running. A quick way to hone in on the right shoe is to identify where you run.

Road running shoes are primarily suitable for hard surfaces, with breathable uppers and smooth traction for pavement, track, and treadmills. Cushion and stability can vary (we’ll cover that more below).

Trail running shoes have an aggressive lug pattern that bites into dirt, sand, and mud. But not all treads are the same. A blocky, cleat-like tread will shed mud in the Pacific Northwest but can feel clunky on hardpack found in the Southwest and can cause trips and falls.

Trail shoes also have a more durable upper, a robust toe bumper, and a firmer sole or even a rock plate — all to protect the feet from underlying roots and rocks.

Roadrunner or trail shoe? These aren’t hard-and-fast rules. All the editors at GearJunkie run to the trailhead on the road, and we are all guilty of taking a road shoe for a spin on the trail. If that sounds like you, we’ve indicated where a shoe can cross over effectively.

Identify Your Running Gait

A closeup view of trail running shoes
Understanding your gait will help you narrow in on the perfect trail running shoe for your needs; (photo/Steve Graepel)

According to Dr. Michael Hahn, director of the Bowerman Sports Science Clinic at the University of Oregon and a specialist in neuromechanics and human locomotion, “Everybody has a natural gait, and it leaves a thumbprint on your shoes.”

To get an idea of how you run, flip your shoes over and take a look at the wear pattern on the soles.

  • Neutral pronation shows a wear pattern that scuffs the outside of the heel and the ball of the foot. A neutral shoe will probably be your best bet.
  • Overpronation shows wear along the inside edge of your shoe (meaning your feet are rolling off the big and middle toes). Hahn added that “people with low arches pronate and that can poorly load joints up the chain.” A stability shoe may help, “but don’t overdo it. Just find a comfortable shoe that feels good and naturally supports the foot,” adds Hahn. That is, learn to listen to your body and buy accordingly.
  • Supination, or underpronation, is identified by long wear patterns along the outside edge of your shoes (caused by the feet rolling out). It can also be caused by inflexible, rigid, or high arches. Typical wear patterns will show light wearing on the outside of the heel. Supination is more drastic rolling outward, cupping inward, and is less common. But the evidence is pretty clear. “It always comes down to cushioning,” shared Hahn. If you supinate, “the number one thing you can do is buy a cushion shoe.”

Stack and Drop

GearJunkie_Best_trailrunning_shoes_2022_stack_drop
Trail running shoes vary in stack heights and drops for different runners’ preferences; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Unless you’re running barefoot, every shoe has a stack. Measured in millimeters (mm), the stack refers to how high the insole sits off the ground.

Shoes with more cushion inherently have a higher stack. Furthermore, most shoes have a “drop” in stack height from the heel to the toe. Zero drop refers to a shoe whose toe and heel stack are the same measurement. Zero-drop shoes mimic a more natural, “barefoot” running feel. Both Altra Lone Peak 8 and Altra Timp 5 are zero-drop shoes, but have different stack, and thus a very different feel.

The lower the stack, the closer you are to the ground, and hence the lower your center of gravity. Lower stack shoes, like Nike’s Terra Kiger 9 or Topo Athletics MTN Racer 3, may feel more “racy,” faster, and better equipped to tackle technical terrain.

If you’re new to running or younger, experts recommend a lower heel drop. It builds a wider range of motion and strength, which makes you a healthier runner overall.

For experienced runners who grew up on a generation of high-drop shoes, your legs will appreciate a more judicious stack.

Cushion

Stepping into a high-cushion shoe can feel like walking on a cloud. Those running longer distances (or who supinate) will prefer more cushion to damp the repetitive pounding and provide support. But it can become a penalty. Extra foam adds extra weight.

So, is more cushion better? Not always. It’s about finding the right balance between speed and comfort. If you’re aiming for a new PR, look for a light, stiffer shoe with a harder cushion and minimal lug friction. Hoka’s Tecton X 2 provides a fantastic combination of cushion and weight.

Stability

Stability has drastically changed over the last decade. Bob Coll, owner of the Eugene Running Company, ranked as the top running store in Oregon by Runner’s World, explained that “shoes have become more homogenous. Today’s neutral shoe is just as stable as the best ‘stability’ shoe from 10 years ago.”

The gap between neutral and stability has narrowed. “And the approaches to stability are different,” added Coll. “Max cushion shoes, like a Hoka, use more cushion to seat you deep in a saddle surrounded by foam.” And The North Face wraps its TPU plate outside the shoe to help serve as rails for a neutralizing stride. Regardless of labeling or engineering, the best shoe is the one that feels natural to the N of one: you.

Rock Plate

To help buffer the feet from rough trails, some shoes embed a firm, protective “rock plate” in the midsole. Made from plastic, or in more expensive models, carbon, the flexible plate protects the feet from getting banged up on sharp rocks and repetitive pounding on erratic terrain while adding some spring to the step. A good rock plate will work with the shoe without compromising flexibility or cushion.

Flexibility

GearJunkie_Best_trailrunning_shoes_2022_flexibility
Some trail running shoes are way more flexible than others; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Flexibility is your friend on the trails. Trail running shoes need variability to match the variable terrain. Not all shoes are created equally flexible, and different runners prefer different degrees of flexion.

Mountain runners who frequently find themselves bounding over loose scree or uneven, sludgy terrain may want a slightly stiffer shoe to instill more confidence, while those cruising over mellow singletrack or rolling backroads may lean toward greater flexibility for all-day comfort. If you’ve already developed a personal flexibility preference over many years and miles, it’s wise to stick to your guns.

Most trail runners prefer a shoe with a firm outsole and comparatively less cushion, with a firm toebox to push off of. This allows you to feel more in tune with the undulations you come across on trail, and affords a more stable, secure stride. Some flexibility and torsion can help the foot adapt to the trail and prevent injuries like a rolled ankle.

Waterproofing

GearJunkie_Best_trailrunning_shoes_2022_waterproof
Running in sludgy snow or mud? Waterproof trail running shoes may be the move; (photo/Steve Graepel)

For most trail running, we prefer a shoe that breathes well. Waterproof membranes will cause your feet to sweat faster than the waterproof membrane can keep up. This leaves your feet wet, clammy, and exposed to hot spots.

Obvious exceptions include really muddy or snowy trails at ultra lengths and cold, wet conditions. To see our pick for waterproof trail runners, give our winter running shoe buyer’s guide a look.

Breathability

In general, we prefer a breathable upper that allows cooling air to flow in, and hot sweat to move out. The compromise is keeping dirt and grime out of the shoe. Porous mesh uppers, like those found on The North Face Vectiv Enduris 3, will let more cheat grass and sand particles to ingress.

Materials

Man runs down trail with trail running shoes
Trail running shoes must be made with durable but breathable and light materials for long days on rocky trails; (photo/Ethan Chen)

Most trail-ready shoes are constructed from a synthetic upper mesh. Materials can be simple weaves or complexly engineered, adding more durability and better breathability in different zones on the upper.

Added materials overlays and rubber rands (like those found on Salomon’s Pulsar) provide protection and deflection but will reduce airflow in a shoe. The best apply overlays that strike a balance of support, breathability, and weight. The rougher the trail, the more protection you’ll need. For optimal protection, it’s tough to beat the NNormal Kjerag.

Runners looking for a PR will likely want fewer materials. It’s a decision that cuts both ways. You drop the weight but have to open the wallet a little more. To keep the weight down, manufacturers start adding more expensive materials, like carbon plates. With minimal protective overlays, these welterweight trail runners may not last as long as a more robust shoe.

Lastly, dark-colored material will soak up more solar heat than lighter-colored material. We don’t mind this in winter, but it may sway your choice if you run in hot, sunny regions.

Lugs & Traction

GearJunkie_Best_trailrunning_shoes_2022_traction
Thick, deep lugs are key for confidence and traction on uneven terrain; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Compared to road running shoes, trail runners will want grippy soles to navigate the slick, uneven, rocky, and muddy terrain. Look carefully at the trails you plan to run. If they’re mostly covered with stones and hard dirt, a short lug pattern will be great.

Those who run on lots of muddy or soft surfaces will appreciate a deeper lug pattern. 4-5mm lugs are best for most trail runners. The loamier the trail, the more you will appreciate deeper lugs. Anything more than 6 will start to feel cleat-like, making hard-pack less fun and road downright unbearable.

Lug patterns will also vary across brands. Salomon’s Pulsar uses narrow, mud-shedding treads that dart from toe to heel. Many shoes use a multidirectional patterned lug that provides breaking traction (under the heel) and gripping traction (under the toes).

Outsole compounds vary from soft to hard rubber, and choosing the right lug material depends on where you run. Softer blends will provide better grip and traction on harder surfaces and run better on the road, but they will wear down more quickly. Harder lugs feel clanky on hardpack and can cause tripping hazards in rock, but they bite down into mud like crampons.

The best traction on the list is Speedgoat 6. Made from Vibram Megagrip rubber, the multi-directional 5mm lugs are cut to create arrowhead-shaped barbs. The result gives the lug more gripping surface area and an impressive amount of traction.

Weight

GearJunkie_Best_trailrunning_shoes_2022_weight
A lightweight shoe helps greatly with fatigue on trail; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Running shoes should be as light as possible while still offering the protection you desire. This matters both for the fast runner as well as the ultra-distance runner, where those added ounces add up over the day.

Anything over about 12 ounces (for a men’s size 9) is just too heavy. Lighter is better, but lightweight shoes tend to wear out more quickly than thicker, more overbuilt shoes.

Price & Value

Budget

For trail shoes on a budget, you’re looking at spending anywhere from $120 to $140. Of course, you can double up saving by shopping past season models or holiday sales, but for full retail value, $120 is our bottom market. For this range, we like the Saucony Peregrine 15 ($140), which has a good mix of support and traction but won’t break the bank.

At this price range, you sacrifice some of the more trail-oriented tech like GORE-TEX waterproofing or Vibram outsoles. If you’re a serious trail runner, you’ll want to jump up to the mid-tier range. But if you’re just getting your toes wet, this is a great entry point. 

Mid-Tier

Mid-tier shoes sit squarely in the $140-190 price range. Our top pick, Scarpa’s Golden Gate ATR 2, sits directly in the middle of that range at $169, while our favorite mountain running shoe, the HOKA Speedgoat 6, is a great better value at $155. This is the sweet spot for most consumers — you’ll get a versatile, technically capable shoe showcasing some of the best tech available.

We’ll get into this later, but trail shoes have yet to make the space-age leap that road shoes have in the year of the super-shoe. Most brands don’t shirk on bells and whistles for this price range. You’ll see rock plates, premium tread materials like Vibram MegaGrip, and other proven performers.  

You’re not losing much by not spending more. The ceiling is still firmly on the trail shoe market, though we expect that to change by 2026. You won’t get carbon in this range, but that tech has limited trail benefits for the everyday runner anyway. 

Premium

Trail shoes haven’t quite caught up to the marathon super-shoe boom, but they’re coming. HOKA’s Tecton X3 jumped the price ceiling from $225 to $275, a meteoric leap that signals industry tailwinds. For trail shoes, premium prices are in the $190-275 range, with a few brands like Speedland even pushing a little higher. 

For our money, the best product in this range is the HOKA Tecton X3. The Tecton X3 is a highly engineered shoe built for speed with excellent energy return, thanks to the addition of parallel carbon plates. You also get a great Matryx upper and an extremely tacky Vibram MegaGrip outsole with 4mm lugs.

What is the sweet spot for most people?

Keep it simple and keep it mid-tier. Come next season, we may see an explosion of tech in the trail shoe space that will push runners into higher price brackets. For now, there’s a reason our top pick of Scarpa’s Golden Gate ATR 2 is in the mid-tier price range. Reliability is important for trail runners, and shoes in the mid-tier range are versatile and dependable performers capable of setting FKTs. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Which trail running shoes should I buy?

With so many options to choose from, it can be challenging to choose the right trail shoes. Here are three things to consider as you shop:

  1. Set realistic running goals. If you dream of running a 100-miler one day, but realistically will use the shoes for 5-mile training loops around your local park, buy shoes for the latter use first.
  2. Consider shoe width. For folks with wide feet or those running very long distances, a wide forefoot can be a bonus that lets toes splay. The downside is that wider shoes are less precise, can be a little more clumsy, and won’t fit well on people with narrow feet.
  3. Test out the tongue. Does it fit comfortably? Will it keep rocks out of your shoe?
How long do running shoes last?

The life of a shoe depends on a variety of factors, including running style, weight, and how often they’re used. But in general, 300 to 500 miles is a good rule of thumb.

So if you run 10 miles per week, your shoes could last 8 months to a year. If you’re logging 20 miles per week, plan on replacing your running shoes every 4 to 6 months.

And if you see excessive wear patterns, holes, and tears or notice a decrease in footbed comfort, it’s probably time to grab a new pair of sneakers.

Can you run on the road with trail shoes?

You can certainly run anywhere in your trail shoes or bring your road shoes trailside. That said, most find the aggressive lug pattern of a trail shoe uncomfortable on pavement. Hard surfaces like cement or pavement also quickly wear down the sole of a trail running shoe.

If your runs require a short amount of road to get to your trail, you’ll be fine in most of the shoes we’ve listed. Some brands offer hybrid road-to-trail offerings. 

If you plan to run mostly on roads, it would be better to get a dedicated road running shoe.

Can I use running shoes for hiking?

We have seen a big shift on the trail from hiking boots to lighter-weight shoes, including trail running shoes for hiking. Trail running shoes offer up excellent traction in a lighter, more nimble package.

While many backpackers still prefer a boot, we know thru-hikers who make major miles in trail running shoes. If you’re looking for something in between, it’s worth considering a hiking shoe.

Durable, cozy trail running shoes, like Hoka’s Speedgoats, serve both hikers and trail runners well; (photo/Conor Hayden)