Ready to explore the mountains in winter powered by your lungs and legs? Then, you’ll want to find the best backcountry ski bindings for your needs and goals. Our testing team made up of backcountry powder hounds Aaron Bible, Ryan Kempfer, and Will Brendza, skinned resorts, glades, steeps, and switchbacks across Colorado and Wyoming.
We climbed up and skied down peaks from the Tetons to the Rockies in all conditions to find you the best backcountry bindings for any use and budget. Whether you need the all-around performance of the Salomon MTN Pure or something a bit more budget-friendly like the Dynafit Seven Summits, we’ve got the spread covered.
Lightweight and efficient, touring bindings are an integral part of any backcountry setup, so don’t overlook this crucial technology that connects your feet and boots to your skis and the snow uphill and down. Read on to evaluate our top selections for the best backcountry ski bindings so you can find which model is best for you this coming season.
Editor’s Note: We updated this guide on February 14, 2025, by adding the newly released ATK Freeraider 15 Evo, our top pick for the backcountry ski binding with the most innovative design.
The Best Backcountry Ski Bindings of 2025
- Best Overall Backcountry Ski Bindings: Salomon MTN Pure/Atomic Backland
- Best Budget Backcountry Ski Bindings: Dynafit Seven Summits
- Most Innovative Design for Backcountry Ski Bindings: ATK Freeraider 15 Evo
- Most Reliable Backcountry Ski Bindings: G3 Ion 12
- Most Durable Backcountry Ski Bindings: ATK Raider 13 Evo
- Best Hybrid Touring Ski Bindings: Salomon/Atomic Shift² MN
- Weight: 590 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: NA
Pros
- Very light
- Durable
- Easy to click in toe
Cons
- Not the best for beginners
- Weight: 640 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 4-10
Pros
- Great value
- Durable
- Reliable entry with improved toe piece technology
- Safe brake system
Cons
- Might be too lightweight for some resort use
- DIN only goes to 10
- Weight: 790 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 7-15
Pros
- Top-notch uphill and downhill performance
- Thoughtful features
- Relatively lightweight
- Easy and intuitive to use
- Super fun color options
Cons
- High-performance pricing
- Weight: 1158 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 5-12
Pros
- Easy step-in
- Extremely versatile
- Tried and true; icon in the industry
- Optimal heel lift
- Very skier-friendly and intuitive to use
Cons
- To the extreme weight-saver, may be a tad heavy
- Weight: 740 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 5-13
Pros
- Simple
- Light
- Versatile for all types of skiers
- Durable
- Easy to click in
Cons
- Lesser-known brand
- Some larger skiers may want a higher DIN rating
- Not the lightest on the market
- Weight: 1840 g/pair
- Type: Tech Hybrid
- DIN: 6-13
Pros
- Allows for more aggressive skiing
- Versatile for more skiers
- Accommodates alpine, grip walk, tech, and touring boot soles
Cons
- Though lighter than frame bindings, these are still on the heavy side for touring
- A bit more to fiddle with, and more steps to transition than traditional tech pins
Other Backcountry Ski Bindings We Trust
- Weight: 840 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 4-12
Pros
- Very easy heel transition from walk to ski mode
- Lightweight, high-performance bindings
- Easy to line up boot and pins with "toe stopper"
- Automatic brake engage/disengage with heel transition
Cons
- Some small, moving parts that could be affected by severe/prolonged cold
- Require special Dynafit jig to mount that not every shop carries
- Weight: 570 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 4-10
Pros
- Easier to engage pins in deep snow
- A good balance of weight and features
- Great price
Cons
- Toe lock for touring can be tough to engage
- Weight: 540 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 6-12
Pros
- Good downhill performance
- Lightweight
Cons
- Release values are not DIN certified
- Weight: 716 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 5-12
Pros
- Good range of adjustment
- Easy to engage heel risers
- Good value
Cons
- Just a touch on the heavy side
- Weight: 320 g/pair
- Type: Tech
- DIN: 4-13
Pros
- Ultralight
- Durable
Cons
- Heel piece requires rotation to adjust riser height
- Weight: 2600 g/pair
- Type: Hybrid
- DIN: 4-13
Pros
- A good compromise of uphill and downhill performance
Cons
- Heavy
- Expensive compared true tech pin bindings
Backcountry Ski Bindings Comparison Chart
Binding | Price | Weight (per pair) | Type | DIN Range |
---|---|---|---|---|
Salomon MTN Pure/Atomic Backland | $650 | 590 g/pair | Tech | NA |
Dynafit 7 Summits | $350-430 | 640 g/pair (without brakes) | Tech | 4-10 |
ATK Freeraider 15 Evo | $760 | 790 g/pair | Tech | 7-15 |
G3 Ion 12 | $664 | 1158 g/pair | Tech | 5-12 |
ATK 13 Raider Evo | $700 | 740 g/pair | Tech | 5-13 |
Dynafit Ridge | $600 | 840 g/pair | Tech | 4-12 |
Salomon/Atomic Shift 2 | $600-650 | 1840 g/pair | Tech Hybrid | 6-13 |
Fristchi Xenic 10 | $520 | 570 g/pair | Tech | 4-10 |
G3 Zed 12 | $572 | 716 g/pair | Tech | 5-12 |
Marker Alpinist 12 | $550 | 540 g/pair | Tech | 6-13 |
Dynafit Superlite 150 | $600 | 320 g/pair | Tech | 4-13 |
Marker Duke PT 13 | $650 | 2600 g/pair | Hybrid | 4-13 |

How We Tested the Best Backcountry Ski Bindings
Our Expert Testers

Our Testing Grounds
Our Testing Process

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose the Best Backcountry Ski Bindings

How Will You Use Your Bindings Most?

Ease of Use


Risers

Weight

Durability

Boots

Price & Value
Budget
Mid-Tier

Premium

Frequently Asked Questions
Backcountry ski bindings are, in many ways, completely unlike your traditional downhill bindings. It’s good to consider them in a different light, although the goal of affixing your boots to your skis remains the same.
Backcountry bindings are different from resort or downhill bindings in that they employ a releasable heel but, in most cases, not a releasable toe. At least, that’s how they started out, and many of the more touring-focused bindings are still this way. When clicking out of most backcountry ski bindings, you will release from the toe instead of the heel, but that’s not universally true.
Alpine touring (AT) bindings allow you to change your settings so you can stomp down and lock into the heel and ski down. The bindings work by holding the boot in two distinct ways: from the toe only, with the heel piece out of the way for uphill touring, or locked in, with both the toe and the heel secure for downhill skiing.
The simple answer is that bindings work by holding your boot to your skis. They are the critical connection between your two most important assets: your boots and your skis. It’s crucial that your bindings are mounted by a professional to your specific boots.
So, we do recommend starting with your boots. You will have your boots for several seasons at least, whereas you could end up getting new skis every year. The bindings are an expensive and important investment in this system. They can easily be pulled off and remounted onto other skis at any shop.
With that, AT or backcountry ski bindings have essentially evolved into two modern camps. Camp one is born from the traditional Dynafit system, where the bindings release from the toe and are held to the boots with two contracting, nonadjustable pins. These snap together into holes on both sides of the toe, or welt, that sticks out about a half-inch from the toe of the ski boot.
The rear features another female insert that two pins fit into to hold the heel down during ski mode (downhill). The rear pins rotate out of the way when touring uphill, and this is also where you adjust for sole length and DIN.
Meanwhile, the second camp uses the rear heel welt like a traditional alpine binding to lock the heel down in ski mode. This newer type of backcountry touring binding also employs a way to use the front welt to lock the toe down in addition to the pins.
Yes and no. As long as your ski boot has tech inserts, the boots are essentially universal, but you can’t put a traditional alpine boot in backcountry ski bindings. Nearly 50% of all ski boots sold today have tech inserts. Alpine touring bindings typically fall into two categories: tech bindings and frame bindings.
Tech bindings use pins to attach to the front of your boot at the toe, and the heel piece is separate. In contrast, frame bindings look more like a traditional downhill binding.
The name refers to the frame that runs from the toe to the heel underneath the sole of your boot. This is the part of the binding that will raise and lower with your feet while you are touring uphill.
Every binding is designed to adjust to fit the sole length of your boot. While some bindings let you make small length adjustments, say 6-10 mm, others only allow for more minor adjustments to accommodate boot fit to the original mount.
If you do alternate boot sizes, consider a binding like the Marker Alpinist that gives you 15 mm of adjustability, so you can use boots with different sole lengths. That said, this should truly be done at a shop to ensure that the bindings are adjusted exactly to your sole length and that DIN has not been compromised.
Your binding DIN settings take several factors into account, including your boot size, the terrain you ski, your height and weight, and your level of experience. While you can make small adjustments on your own, you should go to a certified ski technician to mount your bindings and make major adjustments.
Bindings have a range of about 25-30 mm of adjustability to allow you to change boot size a little bit up or down. Brands in the same shoe size can vary 3-5 mm in length difference, so your binding will accommodate that.
Some people start with a more alpine-centric binding, such as a Salomon, their first year, and then a Dynafit or a more touring-focused binding the next year because they want to go farther, longer, and stay more out of bounds.
In a perfect world, you should buy your bindings based on your objective. If you are planning for mostly uphill skinning at your local ski resort with groomers on the way down, you should consider something lighter, with a lower DIN, maybe simpler, and possibly less expensive.
The farther and more extreme your terrain, the more important other factors — including weight and features — come into play. Look for multiple levels of heel risers (simpler race-style bindings may only have one level of heel riser, while more full-featured bindings might have three levels).
Consider whether or not you really need brakes (for resort skiing, you do need brakes to legally board a lift). A multiday high alpine tour would call for a lighter, simpler binding than hike-to or short side-country runs.
Less aggressive skiers need to worry less about ejecting from their bindings in an untimely manner. Hopefully, you can extrapolate this into what you want to do, what you can afford, and what’s actually available. Then, pair that with the right skis and make sure you’ve got compatible boots — and go skiing!

The Best Backcountry Skis of 2025
We tested the best backcountry skis from Atomic, Weston, Voile, and more to help you find the best option for your needs and budget.

The Best Cross-Country Skis of 2025
We tested the best cross-country skis from Atomic, Rossignol, Salomon, and more to help you find the best option for your needs and budget.