Support us! GearJunkie may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

A quality helmet is the most important piece of gear you can wear while cycling, especially when mountain biking. While we all try to avoid them, crashes happen, and a good helmet can help prevent injuries to your head and brain. 

We rounded up a diverse selection of 18 of the best mountain bike helmets available in 2025 and put them through the paces on a wide range of trail types, riding styles, and weather conditions. From desert XC loops to loamy forest laps, shuttle runs, and gravel rides, we spent ample time riding in each model while assessing key performance elements. 

Our opinions on each model are supported by hundreds, if not thousands, of helmets used by our testers over decades of cycling. From commuting to elite levels of racing, both on pavement and off, an excellent and vast amount of experience supports our reviews.

While testing, we scrutinized essential characteristics on the trail, like fit, comfort, coverage, visors, ventilation, and durability. We took detailed notes and narrowed down the field to our favorite models and those that excelled for specific reasons compared to the rest. Though no one helmet will be perfect for every type of riding or rider, we’re confident you’ll find something to suit your needs and budget. 

Editor’s Note: We updated this guide on May 2, 2025, adding the updated Fox Speedframe Pro, redesigned Smith Forefront 3, and the all-new POC Cularis.

The Best Mountain Bike Helmets of 2025

Best Overall Mountain Bike Helmet

Giro Manifest Spherical

Giro Manifest Spherical

9.5/10 RATING
BUY OPTIONS

Best Budget Mountain Bike Helmet

Specialized Camber

Specialized Camber

7.1/10 RATING

Highest Safety Rating

POC Cularis

POC Cularis

9.0/10 RATING

Most Comfortable Mountain Bike Helmet

Troy Lee Designs A3 MIPS

Troy Lee Designs A3 MIPS

8.7/10 RATING

Best XC Mountain Bike Helmet

Giro Aries Spherical

Giro Aries Spherical

8.9/10 RATING
BUY OPTIONS

Runner-Up XC Mountain Bike Helmet

POC Octal MIPS

POC Octal MIPS

8.0/10 RATING
See more picks

Best Overall Mountain Bike Helmet

Giro Manifest Spherical

Specifications

Weight
362 g (Medium)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Spherical
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
19
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Comfortable
  • Great ventilation
  • Good coverage
  • Eyewear integration

Cons

  • Expensive
Jeremy Benson

Giro has been a leader in the mountain bike helmet industry for years, and that continues with its flagship model, the Manifest Spherical ($260). This well-rounded helmet quickly earned high regard among our testers and rose to the top of a stacked selection of models in this review. 

Boasting a 5 out of 5-star rating in Virginia Tech’s independent helmet impact testing, the Manifest brings high protection. It employs MIPS Spherical for rotational impact protection and has dual shells connected with elastomers that function as a slip plane during an impact. It has a relatively deep fit with extended coverage at the back of the head and temples, and a snug fit enhanced by Giro’s Roc Loc Trail harness that tensions evenly around the head. 

Ventilation was among the best we tested, with a whopping 19 vents and wide open channels that allowed air to freely pass over the scalp and out the back of the helmet. Comfort was enhanced with well-placed antibacterial Ionic+ padding and strap splitters that held the straps flat around the ears. At 362 g (size Medium), it’s also relatively lightweight considering its coverage and went largely unnoticed on the trail. 

Features like an adjustable visor allowed us to effectively position the helmet to keep the sun out of our eyes or stash sunglasses or goggles under it when not in use. Integrated rubber grippers worked with most (but not all) sunglasses, and an additional patch of grippy rubber at the rear of the helmet helped keep goggle straps in place. A Fidlock magnetic buckle secured the chinstrap and allowed for easy one-handed operation.

The Giro Manifest Spherical is available in various colors to suit your taste or match your kit. It is also offered in three shell sizes, S, M, and L, to fit heads between 51cm and 63cm. Although it has a high price tag, the cost is justified considering its well-rounded performance, protection, and features.

Specifications

Weight
400 g (Large)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS
Adjustable visor
No
Number of vents
13
Available sizes
XS, S, M, L, XL
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Very reasonably priced
  • High-end look and feel
  • Comes in 5 shell sizes
  • Surprisingly comfortable
  • 5-star Virginia Tech safety rating

Cons

  • Non-adjustable visor isn't great at blocking the sun
  • Basic strap design
  • Moderate ventilation
Jeremy Benson

Specialized isn’t exactly known for making budget-friendly products, but they’ve chosen to create a helmet that everyone can afford with the Camber MIPS ($75). This helmet is easily the best value we’ve ever seen, with a look and feel far exceeding the asking price. It looks nearly identical to its more expensive siblings, the Ambush 2 and the Tactic. Adding to its appeal is the 5-star rating in Virginia Tech’s independent impact testing, besting many models that cost significantly more. 

The Camber has a standard MIPS liner for rotational impact protection inside the streamlined in-mold shell. It comes in a whopping five shell sizes to fit heads ranging from 49 to 63 cm, and our size Large test helmet fit true to size. The Headset SX fit system worked well to dial in the fit for unique head shapes.

The thin and minimal padding proved surprisingly comfortable, and the Y-shaped strap splitter yoke prevented unwanted and annoying contact with the ears. Though not advertised as a feature, we found some sunglasses could be stashed in the two lowest vents above the brow.

While the Camber’s price-to-performance ratio is very impressive, this helmet does have some quirks. The straps attach at three points inside the helmet, at the back of the head and above the temples, and while that didn’t seem to affect its impact protection, it felt less refined than higher-end helmets.

The 13 vents did a decent job keeping the head cool, but it felt a little stuffy compared to the best-vented helmets we tested. Finally, the non-adjustable visor placed high on the helmet did very little to block low sun angles compared to other visor designs. 

Still, the Specialized Camber truly impressed our tester for the price, and we feel it is an excellent option for anyone just getting into the sport, those operating on a tight budget, or anyone who appreciates a good value. Willing to spend just a little more? The Specialized Tactic 4 has a little more coverage, better ventilation, and a better strap design and retails for $120.

Specifications

Weight
384 g (size M/L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Evolve
Adjustable Visor
Yes
Number of Vents
13
Available sizes
S/M, M/L, L/XL
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
Not yet rated

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Comfortable fit
  • Lighter than Bushwhacker
  • Good ventilation
  • Looks pretty good
  • Fair price
  • Breakaway visor

Cons

  • Visor could use one lower position
  • No dedicated sunglass storage
Jeremy Benson

The Sweet Protection Primer MIPS ($150) is the Norwegian brand’s more affordable half-shell model. While it looks similar to the higher-end Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS, the Primer costs $100 less, and we liked riding in it just as much.

One of the best things about the Primer MIPS was the comfortable fit. While many helmets seem to better fit oval or round head shapes, the Primer has a more neutral shell shape that should work well for most people. Our primary tester has a 59 cm head, so he often falls between shell sizes and swims in the larger size.

Fortunately, despite being at the upper end of the size range, the M/L (56-59 cm) offered ample space with zero pressure points. The 360 Occigrip Fit System pulled tension evenly around the head with the turn of a dial. It also has three vertical adjustment stops to optimize its position on the occipital lobe.

The Primer’s in-mold shell has a relatively deep fit and extended coverage at the back of the head. The lower edge of the outer shell completely wraps the EPS foam, and the finish, attention to detail, and quality control appear top-notch. Inside, the MIPS Evolve liner provides rotational impact protection, and we didn’t have any issues with it making any noise while testing. Unfortunately, Virginia Tech hasn’t tested this helmet yet, but other Sweet Protection models score well, so we expect similar results.

Inside, the padding is minimal but well-placed, and the cushy brow pad absorbed sweat well and didn’t drip too much on our sunglasses’ lenses. The strap splitter is well-executed and held the straps flat against the head. The Sweet Primer MIPS straps didn’t contact the ears, and a simple buckle under the chin secures them.

Thirteen vents do a solid job of ventilating, and we never found the Primer to feel too hot on the head. The visor offered easy adjustment to any of its three positions. It goes up high enough that you can easily stash goggles when not in use. The visor also has a breakaway feature that allows it to release at the hinges in the event of a crash.

We found little to dislike about the Primer MIPS, but we have some minor things to mention. The first is the adjustable visor. While it is better than some visors on other models, we found that the lowest position was still a bit high to block the sun at low angles.

One lower position would be great for riding around sunset, or anytime the sun is lower in the sky. The second thing is the lack of dedicated sunglass storage. Other helmets can easily and securely hold your shades, but we never found a good way to stash them on this helmet.

Beyond those concerns, the Sweet Protection Primer MIPS is an excellent helmet for a fair price. It looks good, fits comfortably, and provides excellent coverage for your noggin. If $150 is your spending limit, this is the helmet we recommend. And right now, it’s on clearance at many retailers, making it even a better value.

Specifications

Weight
440 g (Large)
Rotational Impact Protection System
Mips Air Node
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
13
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Currently #1 rated helmet in Virginia Tech testing
  • Well ventilated
  • Features – eyewear storage, Fidlock buckle, breakaway visor
  • Lightweight

Cons

  • Moderately expensive
  • Forehead coverage could interfere with goggles
  • Many find POC aesthetics quirky
Jeremy Benson

The just-released POC Cularis upholds the Swedish brand’s reputation for safety by nabbing the top spot on Virginia Tech’s trusted bicycle helmet safety ratings. This is no small feat, as this rating system is highly regarded and competition for the top spots is fierce. For example, the helmet with the top spot before the Cularis held that position for only a few weeks.

The highest safety rating would be hard to stomach if the trail-oriented helmet didn’t fit, was too heavy, or didn’t ventilate well enough. But the POC Cularis checked all the boxes and was exceptionally airy. We first noticed that the frontal coverage was generous, with the helmet protecting the forehead to our tester’s eyebrows. But, this could be a concern if you run goggles. The side and rear coverage is extensive, and overall, the Cularis felt like it comprehensively wrapped around our tester’s noggin.

The POC Cularis indeed looks open and airy, and this is true even in the hot and humid conditions of Central Texas. The front of the helmet gulped air at an impressive rate, and our tester perceived that the airflow easily passed through to exit out the back and sides. The super minimal Mips Air Node rotational impact mitigation system was unnoticed and didn’t block the passage of air like some other systems.

To top it all off, despite the generous coverage and wider dimensions, our large (medium and small also available) POC Cularis sample weighed a verified 440 g. This is impressive given the #1 safety rating, coverage, and feature set.

Other worthy additions include a magnetic Fidlock chin strap buckle, which, after some practice, can be operated by a single hand. POC embeds a RECCO reflector in the Cularis, aiding search and rescue teams in locating you should the worst happen. The adjustable visor is a breakaway version, and there are sunglass ports. Finally, POC offers the Cularis in nine colorways.

Most Comfortable Mountain Bike Helmet

Troy Lee Designs A3 MIPS

Specifications

Weight
412 g (MD/LG)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS (B-Series)
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
16
Available sizes
XS/SM, MD/LG, XL/2XL
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Super comfortable
  • Extended coverage
  • Sweat management system
  • Adjustable visor
  • 5-star Virginia Tech rating

Cons

  • Slightly heavier than some helmets
  • Expensive
Jeremy Benson

Not content to rest on its laurels and the success of its popular models, the A1 and A2, Troy Lee Designs (TLD) introduced its latest half-shell, the A3 MIPS ($250). Though it maintains the signature styling of those older models, the A3 is an improvement in virtually every way. Not only does it feature more coverage at the back of the head and the temples, but it also earned a 5-star safety rating from the independent test lab at Virginia Tech.

The A3 has more coverage than previous TLD helmets, extending further over the occipital and temporal lobes. It also has a B-Series MIPS liner to help dissipate rotational forces in a crash. They’ve also employed dual-density foam with co-molded EPP and EPS intended to better handle the forces of both high-speed impacts and low-speed impacts.

What stood out to our testers was the high level of comfort. TLD describes it as “so comfortable you’ll never want to take it off,” while that might be a stretch, it’s one of the most comfortable helmets we’ve tested. This has a lot to do with the agreeable shape of the helmet, the way the fit system wrapped around the head, and the generous padding inside. The X-static antimicrobial pads are also trimmable, so you can dial them exactly how you like. Plus, TLD includes an extra set.

The ventilation of the A3 MIPS was quite good as well. It’s not the best we’ve ever tested, but it’s not far off either. When things get sweaty, the TLD Sweat Glide System (an EVA foam pad at the brow) actually helps to direct sweat off to the sides of your face instead of into your eyes. The 3-position Magnajust visor allows you to leave it low to block the sun, up out of sight, or to stash goggles. A FidLock chinstrap buckle, a set of extra visor screws, and a helmet bag round out the features of the Troy Lee Designs A3 MIPS.

Best XC Mountain Bike Helmet

Giro Aries Spherical

Specifications

Weight
270 g (Medium)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Spherical
Adjustable visor
N/A
Number of vents
24
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Super lightweight
  • Excellent ventilation
  • Highest-ranked model in Virginia Tech’s impact testing
  • Comfortable

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Less coverage than dedicated trail riding helmets
Jeremy Benson

While it is technically a road cycling model, the Giro Aries Spherical ($300) is a great cross-country mountain bike helmet. Chosen by some of the top pros in gravel and XC mountain bike racing, the Aries is a super lightweight and well-ventilated helmet that doesn’t skimp on protection. In fact, it has a 5-star Virginia Tech rating with one of the lowest scores (lower score = better protection) of the 268 models they have tested.

The Aries is very lightweight, at just 270 g in the medium size we tested. It’s so light that it almost felt like we weren’t wearing a helmet at all. It has an excellent fit with minimal but well-placed padding and an adjustable harness that wrapped tension evenly around the whole head. The Drycore padding above the brow wicked seat effectively and has Ionic+ antimicrobial treatment. It was one of the best-ventilated helmets we’ve ever used, with 24 total vents and massive channels that kept air flowing and our heads cool. 

The Aries uses the same MIPS Spherical design as the trail-oriented Manifest Spherical. This design is comprised of outer and inner shells connected with rubber elastomers that allow them to move independently to help dissipate rotational forces in the event of a crash. Given the Aries’ Virginia Tech rating and score, it seems like it must be pretty effective. 

Compared to trail or enduro-oriented half-shells, it doesn’t have as much head coverage, but it is comparable to other XC and road helmets. Like other XC helmets, it gives up a visor in favor of aerodynamics and weight savings. It’s also one of the most expensive helmets we’ve tested. That said, if you’re looking for a featherlight and extremely well-ventilated lid for XC racing or cross-country riding, the Aries Spherical is an excellent choice that works just as well on the road or gravel bike.

Specifications

Weight
278 g (Medium)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS
Adjustable visor
N/A
Number of vents
21
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
Not tested (previous version with SPIN: 5-star)

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Very lightweight
  • Excellent ventilation
  • Secure eyewear storage
  • Moderate price point

Cons

  • Less coverage than trail-oriented helmets
  • Sizing runs a little small
Jeremy Benson

The Octal MIPS ($200) has been a mainstay in POC’s helmet lineup for years. This versatile model is used by XC mountain bikers, road, and gravel riders. It delivers with a super-light, 278 g weight (size medium) and excellent ventilation. Previous versions used SPIN for rotational impact protection, but POC has switched to a more standard MIPS liner. 

Coming in at a feathery 278 g, the Octal MIPS is so light that it barely felt like it was on our heads. The fit harness is highly adjustable to properly cradle the occipital lobe, plus it wraps the whole head for a snug, secure, and comfortable fit.

Factor in the impressive cooling properties of the recognizable ventilation design with 21 vents and deep airflow channels, which made it easy to stay cool on hot days and during hard efforts. The strap splitter also did a great job of keeping the straps flat and away from the ears, and the chin strap secures with a standard buckle.

POC designed the Octal to be lightweight and airy, but it still prioritizes protection. A fully wrapped unibody shell protects the EPS foam lining and gives it structural support, and POC optimizes the EPS to handle impacts with added thickness in important zones. The MIPS liner is relatively standard and helps dissipate rotational forces in the event of a crash. 

Much like other XC-style helmets, the Octal leaves more of the head exposed compared to modern trail-riding helmets. It comes in three shell sizes to fit heads between 50 and 61 cm. Our size medium claims to fit heads between 54 and 60 cm.

Our tester with a size 59 cm head is near the upper end of that range and found the fit to be manageable but tighter than expected. This is in contrast to the Kortal Race MIPS, which we found tends to run a little larger than advertised.

The POC Octal MIPS sells for $200 and costs a fair bit less than the Giro Aries, yet it only weighs a paltry 8 g more. We think this helmet is an excellent choice for XC-style riders looking for a lightweight and breathable lid for riding or racing.

Other Mountain Bike Helmets to Protect Your Head

Specifications

Weight
394 g (Large)
Rotational Impact Protection System
Mips Air Node
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
17
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Amazing score in Virginia Tech impact testing
  • Slick looks
  • Good ventilation
  • Comfortable
  • Feature-packed

Cons

  • Visor takes 2 hands to adjust
  • Sunglass storage could be improved
  • Not the deepest fit
Jeremy Benson

Fox Racing is one of only a few brands that can outfit riders from head to toe with everything they could possibly need for mountain biking. They’ve been making helmets for years, but it wasn’t until they launched the Speedframe helmet lineup 5 years ago that they had a contender for the best half-shell model on the market.

Fox came out swinging in 2025 with a revamped lineup of three Speedframe models. While they look nearly identical to their predecessors, Fox made some updates and increased protective performance. In fact, the top-of-the-line Speedframe RS and the mid-range Speedframe Pro currently hold the second and fourth best Virginia Tech after rating scores, respectively.

We’ve been testing the Speedframe Pro ($200) for the past couple of months and have been quite impressed. The style and head coverage are roughly the same as the previous version, but with enhanced protection and design features to maintain its spot as one of the best all-around helmets on the market.

The Speedframe has the coverage you’d expect from a modern half-shell helmet, particularly in the back where it drops low around the occipital lobe. Inside, Fox chose the low-profile MIPS Air Node system for rotational impact protection.

This system is integrated into the padding. It kept the helmet closer to the head and didn’t impede any airflow. The dual-density EPS foam is visible inside the shell, aiming to handle the forces from both high and low-speed impacts. All combined, these features helped this helmet earn its coveted 5-star Virginia Tech rating.

Fit-wise, the Speedframe Pro was very agreeable and super comfortable. The padding is well-placed, and the BOA fit system made it easy to dial in the tension around the head. The Fidlock SNAP buckle made the chinstrap a “snap” to open and close, even one-handed. The straps were also well executed, with a Y-shaped yoke around the ears that held them flat and away from the lobes.

The updated vents and internal channels provided impressive airflow and kept us cooler on warm rides. The 3-position visor effectively blocked the sun at low angles while moving high enough to accommodate goggles or sunglasses underneath. Fox also integrated sunglass-specific storage for a secure hold on your eyewear.

While Fox claims one-handed adjustability, we found the visor was a bit stiff when moving it between its three positions, often requiring two hands. We also found the sunglass storage to be secure, but it was a bit fiddly to get the sunglass arms into the right spot.

Overall, the Fox Speedframe Pro is a well-executed trail riding helmet that is well-designed, well-ventilated, and highly protective without any serious drawbacks. If you’ve got a little more to spend, the Speedframe RS ($280) looks identical, but uses the dual shell MIPS Integra Split system and is backed with the NTA-8776 e-bike certification. Or, if you’re on a tighter budget, the Speedframe ($110) uses a standard MIPS liner and isn’t quite as feature-rich, but it’ll keep some money in your account for bike parts.

Specifications

Weight
397g (Medium)
Rotational Impact protection System
MIPS Air Node
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
20
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
Not yet rated

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Expanded coverage
  • Cool futuristic style
  • Visor is actually effective
  • Better ventilated than previous version
  • Easy sunglass storage

Cons

  • Koroyd limits airflow slightly
  • Not tested by Virginia Tech for comparison
  • Expensive
Jeremy Benson

With its unique looks and liberal use of the Koroyd material, Smith made waves when it launched the original Forefront helmet. Fast-forward about a decade, and Smith recently released the third generation, the redesigned Forefront 3 ($270). The latest iteration of this popular trail riding helmet gets a refreshed look, more coverage, and a different MIPS liner, improving on its predecessor while maintaining its futuristic aesthetic.

One of the main changes Smith made to the Forefront 3 was to increase its coverage. Not only does it have a slightly deeper fit, but the shell extends a bit lower on the sides and the back of the head. We appreciated the extra coverage while out on the trail and think that it is competitive with the highest-coverage half-shells we have listed here.

Smith’s use of Koroyd is still one of the main things that differentiates the Forefront 3 from most other helmets on the market. This honeycomb-like material is designed to crumple on impact while remaining air-permeable, therefore providing protection and allowing heat and moisture to escape from the head.

The majority of the helmet has a layer of Koroyd that is bordered by and then covered with a thin layer of EPS foam and the helmet’s outer shell. A “roll cage” supports all this to help distribute the forces from impact.

One large open vent down the center of the helmet aims to improve ventilation, and Smith claims it is 25% better than the Forefront 2 in that regard. That’s hard to quantify, but we found it felt just a little cooler on the head in comparison.

Inside, Smith upgraded to the MIPS Air Node padding for rotational impact protection. Not only is this MIPS system low profile, but it also doesn’t make any noise, unlike the MIPS liner in the previous version. Smith also updated the adjustment harness with a BOA dial, super low-profile lace, and a Flexible Fit System. This includes an occipital cradle made from a soft, flexible material that conforms to the head easily and is very comfortable.

The three-position visor, which can be adjusted with one hand, effectively blocked the sun at low angles. When not in use, it shifts high enough to fit goggles and glasses underneath. Sunglass arms fit into the halo-shaped vent that rings the top of the shell and can be stashed on both the front and back of the helmet.

The Y-shaped strap splitters are a step up from Smith’s previous strap designs. They held the straps comfortably flat and away from the ears. The straps are connected with a standard buckle, although a magnetic closure would be nice at this price.

While the Forefront 3’s ventilation is an improvement, it still can’t compete with the airiest helmets on the market. The Koroyd and lack of dedicated airflow channels simply didn’t allow air to move that freely from front to back. Some riders will also surely lament the loss of the fixed GoPro/light mount on top of the helmet, too. That said, the structural bridge in the center vent provided a good spot to mount bike lights.

Over the years, we’ve tried every version of the Smith Forefront. It’s always been a solid helmet, but the Forefront 3 is by far the best version yet. It’s still got the cool style and comfortable fit that’s its known for, but with extended coverage and an unobtrusive MIPS liner that further enhances its protective qualities.

Specifications

Weight
401 g (M-L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Integra
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
17
Available sizes
XS-S, M-L, XL-XXL
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
Not tested

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Generous coverage
  • Lots of safety features
  • Great ventilation
  • Meets Dutch NTA 8776 e-bike standard
  • Comes in multiple colors

Cons

  • Extended coverage at temples can conflict with some sunglass arms
  • Sizing runs a little big
Jeremy Benson

POC has been producing quality protective gear for years, and the Kortal Race MIPS ($250) is its latest half-shell model that puts an emphasis on protection. Designed for aggressive trail and enduro riders, the Kortal has a deep fit and loads of coverage over the occipital and temporal lobes.

It comes packed with safety features integrated into the design, including MIPS Integra, which is an evolution of its previous SPIN system. POC also makes a standard version of the Kortal that doesn’t come with MIPS and will save you a few bucks.

Overall, the Kortal Race MIPS is a comfortable helmet, though we found its sizing to run a little bigger than advertised and slightly narrower than most. One of our testers has a 59 cm head and easily fits into the M-L, which is listed as 55-58 cm. Regardless, in the correct size, it had a snug fit with a 360-degree adjustment system that wraps around the whole head with soft and squishy MIPS Integra pads.

Ventilation was also top-notch, with 17 wide-open vents that effectively drew air in, over, and away from the head. The MIPS integrated padding doesn’t restrict airflow. The strap splitter yoke held the straps flat against the side of the face with no unwanted ear contact, and a simple buckle secures the chinstrap. 

The large visor is adjustable to accommodate stashing goggles beneath it, and the rear vents fit a goggle strap without blocking them. The rear vents also function as an “eye garage” to stash glasses when not in use. While the visor does adjust, we found that its lowest position is already pretty high, so we mostly kept it down.

The visor also has a highly effective breakaway feature to help reduce the chance of a neck injury in a crash, and it snaps back into place if/when it comes off. The POC Kortal Race MIPS has an EPS foam lining surrounded by a unibody shell reinforced with aramid bridges for additional structural support. It also has a RECCO Reflector and a twICEme NFC Medical ID chip. 

POC designed the Kortal Race MIPS to work seamlessly with its Devour sunglasses, but we found that the extended temporal coverage could conflict with the arms of some other sunglasses. It’s not the lightest helmet around, but it’s pretty reasonable, given its protective qualities and features.

It carries all the standard safety certifications as well as the Dutch NTA 8776 e-bike standard. It’s not cheap, but we feel the Kortal Race MIPS is among the best and most protective half-shell models on the market.

Specifications

Weight
427 g (M/L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Air
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
13
Available sizes
S/M, M/L, L/XL
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Great coverage
  • Good looks
  • Carries Dutch e-bike certification
  • Lower profile than other e-bike-certified helmets
  • Secure and user-friendly sunglass storage
  • 8 color options

Cons

  • Slightly heavier weight
  • Fairly expensive
  • Not the best sweat management
  • Visor could use one lower position
Jeremy Benson

The Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS ($250) is an updated version of the Norwegian brand’s top-of-the-line half-shell mountain bike helmet. It packs the safety tech, coverage, and features you’d expect for the premium price.

While the new Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS shares some of the distinctive styling of other Sweet Protection helmets, it ups the ante of protection in several ways. First, it has the most coverage of any half-shell in its line, competitive with the highest coverage models from other brands. It has a deep fit and extended coverage at the back of the head, at the temples, and unique sections over the ears.

Sweet Protection also incorporates the 2Vi Technology, which includes a variable elasticity shell, strategically placed EPS foam impact shields on the inside, and the MIPS Air rotational impact protection system integrated into the liner and padding.

While 2Vi Technology may sound like jargon, an independent impact test by Virginia Tech backs up the claims with a 5-star rating and one of the best scores of all the mountain bike helmets tested. Additionally, the Bushwhacker earned the Dutch NTA 8776 e-bike certification, meaning it has been tested for impacts at higher speeds associated with riding electric bikes. Compared to other helmets with this certification, which tend to be a bit higher volume in appearance, the Bushwhacker maintains a sleeker profile.

Like the less expensive Primer MIPS, the Bushwhacker 2Vi has a similar accommodating fit. Our 59 cm-headed tester fit nicely into the M/L (56-59 cm) shell, despite being at the top end of the size range. The Integrated 360 fit system was easy to adjust and pulled tension around the entire head.

The MIPS Air system is integrated into the helmet’s liner and padding, with small elastomers that allow for rotational movement. Not only was this type of MIPS silent, but it also didn’t impede airflow in any way.

Other great features include the eyewear storage system, which securely holds sunglasses below the visor. The Fidlock magnetic buckle allows for one-handed operation, and the well-designed straps lay flat, avoiding the ears. Speaking of ears, the unique flaps above the ears actually kept the sun off them to prevent burning.

Ventilation was pretty good, but this isn’t the airiest helmet around. The three-position adjustable visor worked well enough, but like the Primer, it could use one lower position to block the sun more effectively at lower angles. We also found that sweat dripped onto our sunglass lenses more than in other models. At 427 g (size M/L), it’s not the lightest helmet around, though it is similar to other e-bike-certified models.

Regardless, if you’re looking for a protective half-shell helmet for aggressive riding, the Sweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS stands out as one of the best. Not only does it look good, but it has a robust feel backed up by safety certifications and a 5-star test rating.

Specifications

Weight
448 g (size L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Evolve Core
Adjustable Visor
Yes
Number of Vents
19
Available Sizes
S, M, L, XL
Virginia tech Helmet Safety rating
Not tested

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Great coverage
  • E-bike certified
  • Comfy fit
  • Sunglass storage
  • Great straps
  • Can be purchased with or without crash sensor

Cons

  • Heavier weight
Jeremy Benson

Smith’s latest half-shell mountain bike helmet, the Payroll MIPS ($200-220), ups the ante of protection for aggressive riders. The new Payroll has the most head coverage of any Smith half-shell, plus it comes with a MIPS liner, zonal Koroyd, and can be purchased with or without an Aleck crash sensor. 

Smith has been making mountain bike helmets for years, and the unique-looking Forefront 3 still sits at the top of its line of half-shell models. The Payroll is a completely new model geared toward aggressive trail, enduro, and e-MTB riders. In fact, it’s the first mountain bike helmet Smith has made that complies with the new Dutch NTA 8776 e-bike safety standards and is tested at higher, e-bike-assisted speeds. The POC Kortal Race MIPS and Sweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS are the only other models we’ve tried that also carry that certification.

One of the first things that stands out about the Payroll is its extended coverage and deep fit. It covers more of the occipital lobe at the back of the head and drops lower over the temples than most other Smith models. The shell is also a bit thicker, adding to its robust, protective feel, which adds a bit of volume without looking excessively bulky.

Like most Smith helmets, the in-mold shell also has zones of Koroyd, a honeycomb-esque material that provides impact protection while still allowing air to pass through. Inside, a MIPS Evolve Core liner provides rotational impact protection.

We found the Payroll to be super comfortable. It has a deep fit that surrounded the head rather than sitting up on top of it, and the 270-degree Vaporfit harness system snugged up nicely. The padding is minimal but very well placed, and the Y-shaped strap splitter kept things annoyance-free around the ears.

A total of 19 vents provided great airflow over the head. It wasn’t the best-ventilated helmet we tested, but it was pretty breezy for how protective it felt. The adjustable visor worked very effectively to keep the sun out of the eyes and flips up high to stash goggles or glasses. The outermost vents at the front also have channels to hold glasses, and they did so securely.

Smith sells the Payroll MIPS for $200, or you can get it with an integrated Aleck crash sensor for $20 more. We tested the version with the sensor, which is integrated into the dial of the adjustment harness. This little disc-shaped sensor goes virtually unnoticed in this spot and weighs a scant 8 g.

It syncs to the Aleck app on your phone, and if it detects an impact hard enough, it will alert an emergency contact if you are unable to do so yourself. Whether that’s something you want is entirely up to you, but we think it’s nice to have the option.

Smith’s new Payroll MIPS helmet is the burliest half-shell model in its lineup and a great option for anyone seeking a stylish, protective lid for aggressive riding. With great coverage, the Dutch e-bike certification, and an optional crash sensor, the Payroll is about safety first and foremost.

Specifications

Weight
423 g (L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
14
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
Not Tested

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Lots of coverage
  • Good ventilation
  • Highly adjustable harness system
  • Quality construction
  • ActiCage reinforced EPS

Cons

  • Light pressure points at top/back of head
  • Hard to stash sunglasses in front vents
Jeremy Benson

The ABUS CliffHanger MIPS ($200) is one of the German brand’s latest models and sits at the top of their line of trail and all-mountain half-shells. Designed with the modern trail and enduro rider in mind, this helmet has a deep fit with loads of head coverage and a robust, quality feel. It also happens to look pretty darn good, and it retails for less than many other brands’ flagship models. It comes in three shell sizes to fit heads between 51 and 61cm and multiple colorways to suit your tastes.

ABUS didn’t skimp when it came to coverage, and the CliffHanger certainly covers a lot of your head. The shell sits fairly low over the brow, temples, and ears, and the rear extends way down over the occipital lobe and behind the ears. They incorporated ActiCage into the EPS foam, a system that is intended to provide structural reinforcement and strength while allowing them to limit the amount of material and weight.

On the topic of weight, our large test helmet tipped our scales at 423 g, which is fairly standard for its size and level of coverage. Inside, there is a relatively standard MIPS liner for rotational impact protection. It’s also compatible with QUIN, a crash-detection sensor that can be purchased separately and added to the helmet.

ABUS’s Zoom Ace adjustment system is incorporated into the MIPS liner and pulls even tension around the whole head, plus it can be moved up or down to find the perfect placement at the back of the skull. The fixed strap splitter yoke holds them flat and away from the ears and the magnetic chinstrap buckle makes for one-handed buckling convenience.

The large, 3-position adjustable visor works very effectively for keeping the sun out of your eyes, and it flips up plenty high to stash goggles when not in use. Ventilation is pretty good, but not amazing, with a total of 14 vents and deep channels that allow air to pass from front to back.

We found the overall comfort of the CliffHanger to be quite good, although our lead tester found that he could feel the shell pressing slightly against the top/back of the crown of his head. Fit and comfort will be different for everyone, however, so we don’t expect this to be an issue for all users.

Unlike many helmets that have dedicated sunglass storage, we found it somewhat difficult to stash sunglasses securely in the front vents. You can make it work, but it isn’t ideal. Otherwise, we think the ABUS CliffHanger MIPS is a great new option for aggressive trail and enduro riders seeking a well-made half-shell with loads of head coverage.

Specifications

Weight
375 g (Large)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS SL
Adjustable visor
No
Number of vents
15
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Excellent coverage, especially at the back of the head
  • Outstanding ventilation
  • Effective eyewear integration
  • Less expensive than many other top-of-the-line helmets
  • Competitively lightweight

Cons

  • Non-adjustable visor; doesn’t block sun effectively
  • Styling may not be for everyone
Jeremy Benson

When Specialized redesigned its trail riding helmets, the Ambush 2 ($180) got a complete overhaul to the point that it doesn’t even resemble its predecessor. This helmet checks most of the boxes, feels light on the head, and virtually disappears while riding. It also manages to come in at a price that’s a little lower than many other brands’ flagship models. 

Specialized increased the level of protection with the Ambush 2, as evidenced by its 5-star rating in Virginia Tech’s independent testing. The coverage is impressive, with a deep fit that extends way down the back of the head over the occipital lobe. The MIPS SL system is integrated into the pads with little rubber elastomers that allow them to shift to reduce rotational forces in the event of a crash, and dual-density EPS foam has also been strategically placed inside the shell.

Well-placed padding, an adjustment system that pulls tension very evenly around the whole head, and a low-profile dial integrated into the shell ensure high comfort levels. The padding also effectively wicks moisture and helps keep sweat out of the eyes, and it doesn’t block airflow whatsoever.

On that note, the Ambush 2 has some of the best ventilation of any helmet on the market. The vents at the front of the helmet bring air in, and the large internal channels draw it over the head and out to the back. This ventilation is noticeable at any speed and was nearly too effective when riding on cool days. 

The Tri-Fix strap splitters keep the straps comfortably away from the ears. Goggles play well with the Ambush 2, and there is ample room to stash them below the visor when they are not in use. The two outer/lower vents at the front of the helmet also feature sunglass storage with rubber flaps that hold sunglass arms very securely when stored. Additionally, a Specialized ANGi crash detection sensor (sold separately) can be added to the helmet if you choose. 

Our biggest complaint about the Ambush 2 is the high position of the non-adjustable visor, which we found to do little to block the sun at low angles. We found you’ve really got to tip your head to keep the sun out of your eyes at certain times of day, which is not ideal. It also has somewhat bold, stormtrooper-esque styling (especially in the white color we tested), which may not suit everyone’s tastes.

Otherwise, the Specialized Ambush 2 is a protective and very well-ventilated helmet that we’d highly recommend. Look for last seasons colors for one of the best deals you can find.

Specifications

Weight
478 g (L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Spherical
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
21
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
Not tested

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Robust, protective feel
  • Good coverage
  • Comfortable fit
  • Sweat Guide Pad actually works to manage sweat
  • Comes with camera/light mount
  • Can add chin bar to make it a convertible

Cons

  • Comparatively heavier weight
  • Not the best ventilation
Jeremy Benson

Bell has been in the mountain bike helmet game since the beginning, and the Super Air Spherical ($235) is its current top-of-the-line half-shell model. This beefy helmet is also the basis of the convertible Super Air R Spherical, just without the removable chin bar.

It has great coverage, a robust, protective feel, and features like MIPS Spherical, a camera mount, and an effective sweat management system that makes it stand out from the crowd. It comes in three sizes for heads between 52 and 62 cm and is offered in a whopping 11 different color options.

Bell and Giro are two brands that incorporate MIPS Spherical into their designs for rotational impact protection. For the Super Air, this involves two distinct shells, inner and outer, that are connected with small elastomers that allow them to shift independently of each other. This adds a little bulk and weight, but it does seem to work quite effectively (at least in hand and when moving it atop the head).

The deep fit surrounds the head with great coverage, particularly at the back of the head. It also just feels beefy and well-made, adding to the sense of protection it provides.

We found it to be quite comfortable, with generous padding throughout that has a soft, pillowy feel. Bell’s Float fit system does a fine job of fine-tuning the tension around the head to achieve a snug fit. Bell has also managed to create a sweat management system that actually works with its Sweat Guide Pad. The padding extends slightly forward on the inner shell, which draws moisture out and away from the face, making it less likely to drip directly onto your sunglass lenses.

The Super Air has a large 3-position visor, and it works well with goggles. It even has a small rubber patch at the rear of the helmet to keep your goggle strap in place. The front vents easily accommodate sunglass arms, but they don’t feature grippers or anything to add extra security.

The Super Air Spherical has decent ventilation, but the dual-shell design hinders airflow a little compared to other models. At 478 g, it’s also the heaviest half-shell model we tested, and the weight is somewhat noticeable on the head. That said, it is designed to pair with a removable chin bar to work as a convertible full face, so the added heft makes sense.

Regardless, if you’re an aggressive rider seeking a fully featured half-shell and don’t mind a little extra weight, the Bell Super Air Spherical is a solid option to consider.

Specifications

Weight
420 g (L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
WaveCel
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
13
Available sizes
S, M, L, XL
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Moderate price point
  • Comfortable fit
  • BOA adjustment system
  • Scores better in Virginia Tech testing than the more expensive Bontrager Blaze

Cons

  • Straps could be improved
  • WaveCel adds bulk
  • Doesn’t have the best ventilation
Jeremy Benson

Trek made waves (pun intended) a few years ago when they introduced a new rotational impact protection system called WaveCel. They incorporated it into a number of their cycling helmets, including the half-shell mountain bike helmet — the Rally WaveCel ($160). The brand makes some pretty big claims about the effectiveness of this system, and given its 5-star rating in Virginia Tech’s impact testing, it seems like it must be relatively effective.

Otherwise, this mid-priced model has a relatively traditional style, and it comes in four shell sizes. The XL size is claimed to fit heads all the way up to 66cm, which is significantly larger than 62 or 63 cm, where most other models max out.

WaveCel is the primary thing that sets the Rally apart from the other helmets we’ve tested. This cellular structure resembles a bunch of tightly packed waves, and it comprises the majority of the inside of the helmet, which is surrounded by a thinner outer shell of EPS foam. According to Trek, WaveCel is designed to function in three steps — flex, crumple, and glide.

So, it is intended to absorb impact force like a more traditional foam lining while also functioning as a slip-plane for the reduction of rotational forces. At the same time, it allows air to pass through, so it remains breathable despite the full head coverage.

We found the Rally to have a very comfortable fit that seems like it should work well for most head shapes. The Boa adjustment system works well to snug it up around the head, and the thin Boa wires don’t conflict with sunglass arms as much as some other systems. The adjustable visor has three positions, one of which is very low, and we kept ours in the middle or all the way up while testing. The highest visor position doesn’t allow enough space for stashing goggles, but we were able to wedge our sunglass arms into the front vents under the visor.

While WaveCel is certainly an interesting feature, it does add a little weight and bulk to the Rally, and it is generally just a bit larger overall than most of the other models we tested. The cellular structure does allow air to pass through, but it does inhibit the flow of air somewhat. It is similar to the Smith Forefront 2 in this regard, where the airflow is okay but far from the best.

We also found the strap design to be a little quirky, as the single attachment point at the back of the head required a little extra care to be taken when donning the helmet so they didn’t hang up on the adjustment harness.

Beyond that, we feel the Trek Rally WaveCel is a quality helmet for everyday trail riding that brings a unique approach to head protection with the WaveCel system.

Specifications

Weight
345 g (L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
KinetiCore
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
19
Available sizes
S, M, L
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
5-star

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Well-ventilated
  • Good coverage
  • Comes with camera mount
  • Works with removable rear light (sold separately)

Cons

  • Experienced some pressure points on the head
Jeremy Benson

Lazer is one of several brands that’s making an effort to reinvent rotational impact protection through new designs with KinetiCore. They’ve implemented this design across many of their mountain and road helmets, including their flagship mountain bike half-shell, the Lazer Jackal KinetiCore ($220). Though it looks identical to the previous version with MIPS, it’s a bit lighter weight, and what’s going on inside the helmet is actually quite a bit different.

The easiest thing for most brands to do is just stick a MIPS liner in their helmets, so we applaud Lazer for stepping outside the box and developing their own new safety technology. KinetiCore is intended to work in a similar way to other rotational impact protection systems, though the design is completely different. Instead of a liner or elastomers, they have essentially incorporated it into the shell itself with controlled crumple zones built into the EPS foam.

These small, isolated blocks of foam are intended to crush and crumple both vertically and laterally in the event of an impact. Our tester even crushed some of them with her hand to see how it in action. New technology is great if it works, and it seems like it does based on the Jackal KinetiCore’s 5-star Virginia Tech rating.

Beyond KinetiCore, the Jackal has a modern shape with ample coverage. It has great ventilation with 19 well-placed vents, and the air is able to pass through the empty space between the KinetiCore blocks. The one-piece interior padding is comfortable and treated with Polygiene Biostatic, and the Advanced TurnSys adjustment system provides a secure fit.

The straps are highly adjustable, and the magnetic buckle makes for easy one-handed operation. It also comes with a camera mount that attaches to the top of the helmet with a Velcro strap, and Lazer’s Universal LED light can be mounted to the back of the helmet for enhanced visibility.

The Lazer Jackal KinetiCore has an adjustable visor that is designed to stow goggles when not in use and it has no problem accommodating them when flipped up in its highest position. At the back of the helmet, a rubber goggle grip pad keeps your strap securely in place. By the temples, they’ve specifically shaped the shell with recesses to prevent sunglass arms from making contact.

If you’re interested in trying something different, the Lazer Jackal KinetiCore is worth a serious look. It’s priced lower than most high-end models while offering good looks and highly rated protection.

Specifications

Weight
405 g (L)
Rotational Impact Protection System
MIPS Evolve Core
Adjustable visor
Yes
Number of vents
21
Available sizes
S, M, L, XL
Virginia Tech Helmet Safety Rating
Not tested

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Reasonable price
  • Reasonable weight
  • Good ventilation
  • Sunglass storage

Cons

  • Strap splitter could be better
  • Sunglass storage doesn’t work with all sunglasses
Jeremy Benson

Smith makes a full range of cycling helmets, with the Engage 2 ($130) falling at the lower end of the price spectrum in their line of mountain bike half-shells. Unlike the futuristic Forefront 2, the Engage 2 has a more traditional look with significantly less Koroyd in its design, and it costs less than half the price.

Still, it has everything we look for in a modern half-shell helmet with a look and feel that exceeds the asking price. It comes in four shell sizes to fit heads between 51 and 65 cm, and six color options, including the Matte Slate/Fools Gold we tested.

The shell has a fairly deep fit with good coverage at the sides and back of the head. The polycarbonate shell wraps all the way around the EPS foam, and there are two strips of Koroyd strategically placed on the sides of the helmet. Smith incorporated a MIPS Evolve Core liner for rotational impact protection, and the Vaporfit harness connects to it for a nice 360-degree adjustment system. It has a well-made feel and the judicious use of Koroyd isn’t a negative, in our opinion.

Less Koroyd in the construction means that more of the vents are wide-open, and the Engage 2’s ventilation is quite good. The 21 vents allow plenty of air to pass through, with the 4 at the front providing a nice breeze at the top of the forehead. It has an agreeable shape that should work for most heads, and we never experienced any pressure points or quirks in the fit. The padding is minimal but well-placed, adding to the comfort.

The visor is adjustable with three positions to suit your needs. The highest position makes it possible to fit goggles when not in use or stash some sunglasses. You can squeeze some sunglass arms into the outermost front vents as well, although we found this didn’t work with all the sunglasses we tried. The straps offer plenty of adjustability at the ears and the chin, but we found it difficult to get the splitter to make the straps sit completely flat by the ears.

Regardless, we feel the Smith Engage 2 is a great helmet that will suit most riders’ needs and sells for a budget-friendly price of just $130.

Mountain Bike Helmets Comparison Chart

Mountain Bike HelmetMSRPWeightRotational Impact ProtectionAdjustable Visor?Number of Vents
Giro Manifest Spherical$260362 g (M)MIPS SphericalYes19
Specialized Camber$75400 g (L)MIPSFixed13
Sweet Protection Primer MIPS$150384 g (M/L)MIPS EvolveYes13
POC Cularis$240440 g (L)MIPS Air NodeYes13
Troy Lee Designs A3 MIPS$250412 g (MD/LG)MIPS (B-Series)Yes16
Giro Aries Spherical$300270 g (M)MIPS SphericalNone24
POC Octal MIPS$200278 g (M)MIPSNone21
Fox Racing Speedframe Pro$200394 g (L)MIPS Air NodeYes17
Smith Forefront 3$270397 g (M)MIPS Air NodeYes20
POC Kortal Race MIPS$250401 g (M/L)MIPS IntegraYes17
Sweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS$250427 g (M/L)MIPS AirYes13
Smith Payroll MIPS$200-220448 g (L)MIPS Evolve CoreYes19
ABUS CliffHanger MIPS$200423 g (L)MIPSYes14
Specialized Ambush 2$180375 g (L)MIPS SLFixed15
Bell Super Air Spherical$235478 g (L)MIPS SphericalYes21
Trek Rally WaveCel$160420 g (L)WaveCelYes13
Lazer Jackal KinetiCore$220345 g (L)KinetiCoreYes19
Smith Engage 2$130405 g (L)MIPS Evolve CoreYes21
Scroll right to see more specs.
Review author Jeremy Benson takes his riding and his safety very seriously; (photo/Jeff Schertz)

How We Tested the Best Mountain Bike Helmets

At GearJunkie, we take cycling very seriously, and no matter what type of riding we’re doing, our safety is of the utmost importance. For that reason, a quality helmet is the most important piece of gear we put on before every mountain bike ride. We’re always seeking the most protective, comfortable, and best-looking mountain bike helmets we can find so we can have fun on the trails with the peace of mind a good helmet provides.

Our editorial staff has been testing the latest and greatest mountain bike helmets for over a decade. Sure, we’ve all got our favorites, but the market is ever-changing, with new and updated models coming out all the time. Fortunately, we get to try them all out, often before they are even available to the public.

This experience has given us unique insight as to what makes a great helmet, along with the ability to discern the differences in performance and functionality between the different models we test. If you’re a roadie, our team has also thoroughly tested and reviewed the best road bike helmets, too.

Review author Jeremy Benson has been professionally testing and reviewing mountain bikes and accessories for the past 8 years. In that time, he has tried over 30 different helmets. Whether for XC rides, shuttle laps, or adventurous backcountry loops, he has honed in on the specific performance attributes that make a great helmet. For the purposes of this review, he tested the majority of the models in this guide side by side to directly compare things like fit, comfort, ventilation, coverage, and visors.

Those findings, combined with other models our editors have recently tested, are presented here to help inform your important mountain bike helmet purchase decision. In addition to helmets, Jeremy has also tested and reviewed the best dropper posts to keep your saddle in the ideal position, clipless mountain bike shoes, and our favorite mountain bike shorts.

Getting a helmet that suits your riding style, fits right, and meets your budget can be tricky, but we’re here to help; (photo/Heather Benson)

Mountain Bike Helmet Buyer’s Guide

There’s a lot to consider when choosing a new mountain bike helmet. Here, we break down some important factors that may help you find the right model to suit your needs.

Different Types of Mountain Bike Helmets

As there are several styles of mountain biking, there are just as many helmets to meet the needs of different riders. As the sport has evolved, so too has the protective equipment we use, and these days, helmets are safer than ever. In general, mountain bike helmets fall into three different categories, and we explain the differences below.

Wearing the Smith Payroll MIPS mountain bike helmet
Half-shell helmets for trail riding have evolved over time and provide lots of head coverage and safety features to protect modern trail riders. The new Smith Payroll MIPS has loads of coverage and meets the new Dutch e-bike safety standards; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Trail, All-Mountain, and Enduro Half-Shells

Half-shells for trail, all-mountain, and enduro riding are the most common type of helmets we see out on the trails. These “open-face” models cover the top of the head with modern shell designs offering extended coverage on the back and side of the head to better protect the occipital and temporal lobes. These helmets almost always have a visor (peak), and many are designed to work with both sunglasses and goggles.

The added materials involved with extended coverage, visors, and other features typically result in helmets that are slightly heavier than their XC-oriented counterparts. Examples of modern trail riding helmets include the POC Kortal Race MIPS, the Troy Lee Designs A3 MIPS, and the Specialized Ambush 2.

XC helmets like the Giro Aries Spherical are typically lighter, well-ventilated, have less coverage, and no visor; (photo/Heather Benson)

XC Helmets

Cross-country riders and racers often prioritize lightweight and aerodynamics, so XC helmets are somewhat different than their trail-oriented counterparts. In fact, most professional XC racers are using what are technically considered road bike helmets. This style of helmet is typically sleek, low-profile, and well-ventilated, and they provide a bit less coverage of the head than the extended coverage models.

They also generally do not come with a visor, although some riders will wear a cycling cap underneath to act as a visor in certain conditions. Examples include the Giro Aries Spherical and the POC Octal MIPS.

specialized gambit helmet review smith squad goggle compatible
Full-face helmets have traditionally been worn in gravity disciplines, but a new breed of lightweight options is expanding their appeal; (photo/Ellie Lawton)

Full Face and Convertible Helmets

Full-face helmets provide the most head protection, with shells that extend over the ears and large chin bars that provide protection for the front of the face. Convertible helmets are those that have a removable chin bar, allowing the user to choose when they want half-shell or full-face coverage.

This style of helmet has traditionally been worn by those in gravity-oriented disciplines like downhill and enduro racing, although a new breed of lightweight and well-ventilated models has expanded their appeal to a broader range of users. Full-face models now come in a range of designs, styles, materials, and weights, with models geared toward virtually every type of rider or protective needs.

Getting the Right Fit

A properly fitting helmet is critical for it to not only be comfortable but to work properly in the event of a crash. If it is too loose or too tight, its protective qualities may be compromised, or its protective features may not function properly. Additionally, a properly fitting helmet is more comfortable, allowing you to focus your attention on the trail ahead.

It is important to note that fit and comfort are subjective, and not every individual’s head shape will work with every helmet. If your head is very round, very narrow, or your forehead very pronounced, you will probably want to try a helmet on before buying it to ensure that it fits your specific head shape.

If you don’t know what size you need, measure your head. 60cm usually falls into a size Large fit range, though it varies a bit by brand; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Sizing

Just like people’s heads, most helmets come in multiple sizes. Helmet manufacturers almost always have a size guide on their website for reference. Each helmet size typically fits a small range of head sizes, and these are usually shown as head circumference in centimeter measurements. As a general rule, the best way to determine if a helmet fits is to try it on before you buy. This will ensure you get the proper fit the first time.

If you are unsure of your head’s size, all you need to do is measure it. A flexible measuring tape is the best tool to do this. Otherwise, a length of string and a ruler will also do the trick. Measure the circumference of your head in a circle above the eyebrows, ears, and across the occipital lobe (back of the skull). Record this measurement in centimeters, and you should be able to identify the appropriate size helmet.

Most adult helmets come in several sizes to cover heads ranging from 51-63cm in circumference (give or take), with each shell size covering a smaller range. For example, the Giro Manifest Spherical comes in three shell sizes: S: 51-55cm, M: 55-59cm, and L: 59-63cm. Most people will fall within one of these sizes. If you are on the cusp between sizes, it is typically better to size up than squeeze into the smaller shell size, in our experience.

If you get a helmet that is too tight or too loose, try to exchange it for the correct size before you wear it and get it sweaty or dirty.

Adjustable harness systems allow the user to fine-tune the fit of the helmet with the turn of a dial; (photo/Heather Benson)

Fit Adjustments

Most quality helmets have fit adjustment systems to help you dial them into your exact head shape to keep them stable, secure, and comfortable when in use. An adjustable harness is one such feature that is used to snug the helmet up against the occipital lobe/back of the skull.

These harnesses usually have a small dial that you can turn to tighten or loosen it, and most have a vertical adjustment inside the helmet so you can be sure to position the harness properly under the occipital lobe as well. When tightened properly, the harness should feel snug but not uncomfortable, and it should keep your helmet from bouncing around as you ride over rough terrain.

Likewise, the chin strap is another important adjustment that helps to keep your helmet on your head in the event of a crash. Too tight, and it can be uncomfortable. If it is too loose, your helmet can come off your head. Most chin straps can be tightened or loosened to fit your specific needs, and this adjustment is quick and easy to make.

A general rule of thumb is to be able to fit a finger or two between the strap and your neck so that it is tight enough while still avoiding irritation. The straps should also split around the ears, and we prefer them not to touch our ears at all, if possible. Many strap splitters allow for some adjustment, so you can fit them to your ears for comfort.

Wear It Correctly

Even if you get a helmet that is the right size, it is important to wear it properly for it to work as intended. Modern helmets are designed to be worn level on the head and snug enough so that they don’t move around. Most of your forehead and the crown of your head should be inside the helmet, as opposed to the helmet sitting up too high or off the back.

The author wearing the Sweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS to demonstrate a proper mountain bike helmet fit.
Getting a helmet that fits well and wearing it properly are critical for your comfort and protection; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

How Mountain Bike Helmets Work

Mountain bike helmets protect the head by providing a barrier from direct impact and dissipating the forces from impact. At the most basic level, mountain bike helmets are comprised of two parts: an inner foam layer (usually EPS foam) and an outer polycarbonate shell. Combined, these layers provide a protective layer that takes the brunt of an impact.

The firmer outer shell performs the important task of protecting the softer foam underneath and, when impacted, helps to spread the force of the impact over a greater area. The softer EPS foam compresses and absorbs those forces and it often crushes, cracks, or deforms in the process.

Always Replace Your Helmet After a Crash

Due to the fact that helmets are designed to partially destruct when absorbing the forces of an impact, they are meant to be replaced after a crash. Often, cracks or other signs of damage will be obvious, but not always. Even low-speed impacts can result in damage that can compromise the integrity and protective qualities of a mountain bike helmet.

For your safety, it is recommended that you always replace your helmet after a crash. Thankfully, many brands offer discounts for crash-replacement helmets.

MIPS now comes in many forms, although the main idea is the same: to provide a slip-plane to reduce the rotational forces that reach the brain. It often looks like this thin yellow liner inside the POC Octal MIPS; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Rotational Impact Protection

Since the introduction of MIPS (Multi-Directional Impact Protection System) several years ago, rotational impact protection has become commonplace in mountain bike helmets. MIPS was the originator and is still the most common, although it has developed over the years into numerous iterations, such as MIPS Air, MIPS SL, MIPS Evolve, MIPS Spherical, and MIPS Integra, to name a few.

The basic idea, however, remains the same. MIPS and similar technologies strive to enhance head protection by reducing the rotational forces that reach the brain during certain impacts. They do this by creating a slip-plane that allows the helmet to shift around the head and absorb some of those forces before they reach the brain.

Many other brands have also developed their own rotational impact protection systems that are intended to work much the same as MIPS. 100%’s SmartShock system relies on small rubber elastomers built into the shell that are intended to absorb both rotational and direct impact, and Leatt’s Turbine 360 works similarly.

Trek/Bontrager’s WaveCel design has a zig-zag honeycomb-like structure that is intended to crumple and shear on impact, and KinetiCore was developed by Lazer to work in much the same way, with isolated columns of EPS foam.

Some brands use Koroyd, the honeycomb-like structure shown here in the Smith Forefront 2, in the construction of their helmets, along with a MIPS liner; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Which one of these technologies works the best is hard to say, but we’re glad that helmet manufacturers are trying to improve helmet safety. We don’t have our own impact testing equipment, so we refer to Virginia Tech’s Bicycle Helmet Ratings for more insight. Their testing shows that sometimes the most expensive helmets are the “safest,” but other studies have shown that price and safety are not directly related.

For years, Virginia Tech has been a leader in helmet impact testing, and they do it independently and provide their findings free to the public. They test each helmet for its ability to reduce linear acceleration and rotational velocity with 24 different tests. Of course, they haven’t tested every model on the market, but they do have 190 models of cycling helmets currently tested and rated on their site.

The extended coverage of the Sweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS
Modern helmets, like the ASweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS, provide lots of head coverage with shells that extend further down the sides and back of the head; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Coverage

As mountain bike helmets have evolved over time, the amount of head coverage has increased. For half-shell models like those reviewed here, this is most noticeable on the sides and back of the head, where the shells drop down further to better protect the sensitive temporal and occipital lobes. This is particularly apparent in trail, all-mountain, and enduro-oriented models that are often referred to as “extended coverage” half-shell helmets.

Unlike old-school helmets that sat high atop the head, modern helmets now surround much more of the skull. Models like the Abus Cliffhanger, POC Kortal Race MIPS, Smith Payroll MIPS, and the Sweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS are great examples of this trend. In general, we typically equate more head coverage with better head protection, and we feel this is a welcome advancement.

Ventilation is more than just the number and size of the vents. Good designs allow for air to flow over the head and allow heat and moisture to escape; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Ventilation

Depending on the climate where you live and ride and how much you sweat, ventilation may or may not be a high priority. For those who live in warm climates, ride in the heat of the day, or simply perspire a lot, how well a helmet allows air to pass through to cool the head may be of the utmost importance.

Not only does good ventilation reduce the amount of sweat running down your face or dripping onto your lenses, but it helps to keep you from overheating. Fortunately, most helmet manufacturers do their best to make their helmets well-ventilated, though they are not created equal.

While important, the number of vents is not the only factor when it comes to ventilation. Instead, a well-executed design that involves adequate air intake vents at the front of the head, internal channels that move air over the head, and exhaust vents at the back of the head for air to escape is generally the most effective.

Most trail helmets have visors, like on the Abus CliffHanger shown here, which help keep the sun out of your eyes and add a little protection from branches and weather; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Visors

Visors, sometimes referred to as “peaks,” are a common feature on most mountain bike helmets and serve several purposes. Many visors are adjustable, allowing the rider to position them at various angles. This makes it possible to drop them down low to help keep the sun out of the eyes at low sun angles or move them up and out of the field of view at high sun angles. They also serve to deflect trailside branches and can help keep light rain from reaching the eyes while riding.

Adjustable visors and those positioned higher on the helmet typically also accommodate a pair of goggles or sunglasses stashed beneath them when not in use. Some visors are also designed to break away in the event of a crash to reduce the chance of injury.

Many helmets have special features designed to store eyewear when not in use. The front events of the Specialized Ambush 2 have rubber flaps that effectively grip your sunglass arms to hold them in place; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Eyewear Compatibility

Since most of us wear cycling sunglasses to protect our eyes while we ride, many helmet manufacturers are designing and marketing their helmets with integrated sunglass storage and goggle compatibility. It has long been the case that you could wear goggles with many helmets and stash sunglasses in the front vents, but now, these features are often a part of the design.

The spacing of the front vents is pretty critical for stowing sunglasses, and some manufacturers have taken to adding rubber grips or other materials to better hold sunglass arms. At the rear of the helmet, many now feature a rubber strip or pad of some kind to add grip for a goggle strap. As mentioned above, visor adjustability or placement is also a factor when stowing either sunglasses or goggles when not in use.

Brands like Specialized, Smith, and ABUS are making their helmets compatible with safety tech like the ANGi and QUIN crash detection sensors; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Additional Safety Features

The whole point of making helmets for cyclists is to help prevent injury, and manufacturers are seeking additional ways to protect the people who buy their products. They do this in a variety of ways, including the implementation of new technologies.

Brands like Specialized and ABUS make small crash detection sensors, called ANGi and QUIN, respectively, that can be attached to the helmet. These small units can sense the forces associated with a crash and send a notification to your contacts in an emergency situation.

Likewise, Smith has partnered with Aleck and includes a crash sensor on several of their helmets, including the new Payroll MIPS. POC includes a twICEme NFC medical ID chip in certain helmets, which can be read by first responders to find important personal, medical, and contact information if the individual is unresponsive or unable to communicate effectively.

As mentioned in the visors section above, some models have visors that are designed to break away in the event of a crash, which may help reduce the chance of injury. Other brands use structural reinforcement in their designs, such as aramid bridges or ActiCage integrated into the EPS foam to add strength.

The foam itself can be varied, with some companies using dual-density foams like EPS and EPP, which absorb the energy from high and low-speed impacts differently. Koroyd is another interesting material used by brands like Smith and Endura. This honeycomb-like structure is intended to crush and crumple on impact while remaining porous and allowing air to pass through and heat and moisture to escape.

Exposed foam can be easily damaged, so most quality helmets have shells that wrap around the lower edge, improving durability compared to older models; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Durability

Unless you crash often or are careless with your gear, helmets tend to have a pretty good lifespan. Quality helmets have in-mold constructions with the inner foam well bonded to the outer shell, and most now have full shell coverage over the lower edge of the foam. Exposed foam is more susceptible to damage, so the more it is covered, the better.

The durability of the outer shells of helmets can vary, however, with some being quite resilient and others being more prone to denting if struck by a branch or dropped in a truck bed with too much force, for example. Remember, your helmet may prevent serious injury or even save your life, so treat it with care.

If you don’t ride that often, most helmets will last for several years without issue. If you ride every day, you’ll probably want to replace your helmet more frequently, every couple of seasons or so. Always remember, if you crash and impact the helmet, it should be replaced.

A look at a Fidlock magnetic buckle on a high-end mountain bike helmet
Higher-end helmets often come with features like Fidlock magnetic buckles for one-handed operation; (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Price & Value

The half-shell mountain bike helmets we tested range in price from $75 all the way up to $300. While any of these helmets will protect your head much better than none at all, it’s fair to wonder why there is such a wide price range when they essentially perform the same function. What we’ve learned is that you don’t have to spend a lot to get quality head protection, but it’s your head we’re talking about there, so you make the call.

Budget

If you’re operating on a budget, that doesn’t mean you can’t find a helmet that looks good and will protect your head. In recent years, modern construction methods, materials, and safety features have been trickling down to more affordable models. The Specialized Camber ($75) is a prime example. This helmet looks nearly identical to its top-of-the-line sibling, the Ambush 2, yet costs less than half the price.

To keep the price lower, it uses a more simplified MIPS liner and strap system. It has a bit less coverage at the back of the head. Still, it has a 5-star rating in Virginia Tech’s impact testing, which means it performed better than many helmets that cost double or more. We consider helmets between roughly $75 and $125 to be in the budget category.

Mid-Tier

Between around $125 and $200, there are lots of options that fall into the middle of the price range. This is often the sweet spot for many riders, especially those who want performance and features but don’t want to shell out the big bucks for any of the premium models.

In general, we start to see more refined helmets, different types of MIPS, more coverage, and also some unique materials and designs. For example, the Trek Rally Wavecel ($160) uses a proprietary material in its construction that is designed to crumple and shear in the event of an impact.

Or, check our favorite mid-range helmet, the Sweet Protection Primer MIPS ($150). It has a deep fit, great coverage, good ventilation, an adjustable visor, and comfortable straps. It performs nearly as well as its more expensive sibling, the Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS, but costs $100 less. Similarly, the POC Octal MIPS ($200) is a super-light XC helmet with excellent ventilation. It uses a simpler form of MIPS but costs two-thirds of the price of the Giro Aries.

Premium

Once we break the $200 mark, we’re getting into the high-end of half-shell mountain bike helmets. Helmets in this price range start to include features like magnetic buckles, eyewear integration, or more expensive versions of MIPS or other rotational impact protection systems. Protective features like dual-density foam, internal structures, or materials like Koroyd may be incorporated into the designs.

Some models are even designed and tested to survive higher speed impacts and meet the new Dutch NTA 8776 E-bike safety standard. The POC Kortal Race MIPS ($250), Smith Payroll MIPS ($200-220), and the Sweet Protection Bushwhacker 2Vi MIPS ($250) are three models we’ve tested that carry the Dutch e-bike certification.

At the top of our list, you’ll see the Giro Manifest Spherical ($260). It earned that spot by providing an excellent blend of coverage, ventilation, comfort, and features, plus the MIPS Spherical system and a 5-star Virginia Tech impact test rating. Yes, they may be expensive, but these helmets may be worth their weight in gold when you need them.

The author testing the Sweet Protection Primer MIPS mountain bike helmet high above lake Tahoe
Testing the Sweet Protection Primer MIPS helmet high above Lake Tahoe; (photo/Heather Benson)

Frequently Asked Questions

What type of mountain bike helmet should I choose?

It all depends on the type of riding you’re doing and how much protection you think you need. If you’re an XC rider who isn’t getting too gnarly and wants a lightweight and well-ventilated helmet, go for an XC model. If you’re a trail, all-mountain, or enduro rider who wants some more coverage for rowdier riding, an extended coverage half-shell is probably the best bet.

If you’re getting into really aggressive terrain, massive jumps, and high speeds, or are simply worried about crashing on your face, then a full-face helmet may be the right choice. Want the option to choose? Convertible helmets can work as both a full-face and half-shell.

How much should I spend?

It’s hard to put a price on the protection of your head and brain. While you don’t need to shell out for the most expensive helmet on the market to protect your head, many people will choose to do so regardless. Most quality bike helmets range between $100 and $300, with a select few coming in below the $100 mark that we would actually recommend. So, even if you’re on a tight budget, a helmet like the Specialized Camber is a great option.

Do MIPS and other rotational impact protection systems actually work?

There is a bit of speculation as to whether or not rotational impact protection systems actually do anything. If you look at MIPS’s own research along with the fact that the 50 top-ranked bike helmets in the Virginia Tech impact test ratings have MIPS or something similar, we feel that it’s safe to say that yes, there is something to it. It’s our brains we’re talking about here, and even the slightest increase in protection is something that we’re on board with.

If I crash and hit my head, should I replace my helmet?

Yes! Helmets protect your head by absorbing forces that typically cause the shell and foam to deform, crack, and compress. This often causes the helmet’s integrity and protective qualities to be compromised. A helmet should always be replaced after it has been impacted in a crash.

What about women’s mountain bike helmets?

After a strong push toward gender-specific cycling gear several years ago, many brands have returned to unisex models. This is particularly true in the helmet market, where color is often the primary difference between men’s and women’s models. While some brands do make women’s models that may accommodate long hair and ponytails better, there is little else to require gender specificity in mountain bike helmets.

Related Content