Any trail running shoe worth its lugs has enough traction to keep you upright in sloppy conditions. But a good pair of winter running shoes takes it up a notch.
While summer conditions call for lighter, airy kicks, winter shoes will sacrifice breathability for waterproof membranes, shells, higher collars, and gaiters that shed the icy snow and mud.
Steve Graepel, the primary author of this guide, has been running for 30 years. He worked with other GearJunkie staff writers, putting countless miles on just as many shoes to narrow in on the best of the best for those brisk winter romps. And because winter in Minnesota is heaps different than in Portland or Boston, weโve identified a gamut of shoes that meet multiple definitions of winter.
For 2024, we brought in contributing writer (and fellow Midwesterner) Matthew Medendorp. He ran icy roads and whiteout conditions over Michiganโs long winters. To supplement these day-to-day tests, he brought a selection of finalists to a post-blizzard Mammoth Lakes, Calif., to test the shoes in the high-altitude snowpack.
Our editors and testers have clocked endless miles on each of these runners. From icy Minnesota road running to wintry Colorado trail running, these shoes have held up. Here are our best picks as you run into winter this year.
Scroll through to see all of our recommended buys, or jump straight to the category youโre looking for. Also, be sure to check out our handy Comparison Chart, Buyer’s Guide, or Price & Value sections at the bottom of this article.
Editorโs Note: For our November 13, 2024, update, we added a Price & Value section to show what buyers get at different price points.
The Best Winter Running Shoes of 2024
- Best Overall Winter Running Shoe: Saucony Peregrine 14 GTX
- Best Winter Road Running Shoe: Nike Pegasus Shield 39
- Best Winter Zero Drop Running Shoe: Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR Low 2
- Most Supportive and Grippy Running Shoe: inov-8 Roclite G 345 GTX
- Best Running Shoe for Road to Trail: Arc’teryx Norvan 3 GTX
- Best Running Shoe for Icy Conditions: La Sportiva Blizzard GTX
- Lugs: 5 mm
- Drop: 4 mm (28 mm heel/24 mm forefoot)
- Weight: 10.6 oz. (301 g)
Pros
- Plenty of toe volume
- Firm, supportive ride
Cons
- Lacks full-tongue protection from moisture
Nike Pegasus Shield 39
- Fit: True to size
- Weight (per shoe): 12 oz.
- Drop: 10 mm (28-18 mm)
Pros
- Stellar upper fit
- Smooth, cushioned ride
Cons
- Minimal traction
- Sizing can be tricky
Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR Low 2
- Fit: Runs wide; otherwise, true to size
- Weight (per shoe): 13.2 oz.
- Drop: Zero (25mm stack height)
Pros
- Spacious toebox
- Superior traction and protection
Cons
- Can be an adjustment for those not used to zero drop
inov-8 Roclite G 345 GTX
- Fit: Narrow
- Weight (per shoe): 12.6 oz. (on our scales)
- Drop: 8 mm (16-8 mm)
Pros
- Super supportive and comfortable
- Solid stability over rough terrain
Cons
- On the heavy side
- Awkward lacing system
Arcโteryx Norvan LD 3 GTX
- Fit: On the narrow side
- Weight (per shoe): 10 oz. (size 10)
- Drop: 6 mm
- Lugs: 4 mm
Pros
- Extremely comfortable fit
- Firm and protective
Cons
- Not the best traction
- Not super cushioned
La Sportiva Blizzard GTX
- Fit: Narrow. Go up a half size from street shoes.
- Weight (per shoe): 13.3 oz.
- Drop: 6 mm (18-12 mm)
- Lugs: 7 mm
Pros
- Lightweight for what it offers
- Carbide spikes for added traction
Cons
- Expensive
- Somewhat difficult to put on
HOKA Speedgoat 5 GTX
- Fit: True to size
- Weight (per shoe): 12 oz.
- Drop: 4 mm (32-28 mm)
- Lugs: 5 mm
Pros
- Max cushion and comfort
- Roomy toebox
Cons
- Not super stable
- Not the most aggressive traction
- Fit: Comfortably snug
- Weight (per shoe): 15 oz.
- Drop: ย Unavailable
- Lugs: 4 mm
Pros
- Stellar full-winter protection
- Super comfortable
- Pulls on and off easily
Cons
- On the heavy side
- Expensive
- Fit: True to size with a wider toe box
- Weight (per shoe): 11.7 oz.
- Drop: 8 mm
Pros
- Durable
- Great on technical terrain
Cons
- Stiff underfoot
- Not super fast
- Not great on hard surfaces (i.e roads)
- Fit: Snug but true to size
- Weight (per shoe): 10.2 oz.
- Drop: 12 mm
Pros
- Grippy
- Pretty breathable for a waterproof shoe
Cons
- Not super cushioned
- Somewhat constricting toebox
- Fit: True to size
- Weight (per pair): 24 oz. (size 10)
- Drop: 6 mm
Pros
- Durable
- Roomy and comfortable
Cons
- Can often feel stiff
Winter Running Shoes Comparison Chart
Winter Running Shoes | Price | Weight | Drop | Fit |
---|---|---|---|---|
Saucony Peregrine 14 GTX | $160 | 10.6 oz. (per shoe) | 4 mm | True to size |
Nikeโs Pegasus 39 Shield | $135 | 12 oz. (per shoe) | 10 mm | True to size |
Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR Low 2 | $180 | 13.2 oz. (per shoe) | 0 mm | True to size with wider toebox |
inov-8 Roclite G 345 GTX | $190 | 12.6 oz. (per shoe) | 8 mm | Narrow |
Brooks Cascadia 17 GTX | $170 | 11.7 oz. (per shoe) | 8 mm | True to size with wider toebox |
La Sportiva Blizzard GTX | $245 | 13.3 oz. (per shoe) | 6 mm | Narrow |
HOKA ONE ONE Speedgoat 5 GTX | $170 | 12 oz. (per shoe) | 4 mm | True to size |
Adidas Agravic Tech Pro | $250 | 15 oz. (per shoe) | 4 mm | Comfortably snug |
Arcโteryx Norvan LD 3 GTX | $200 | 10 oz. (per shoe) | 6 mm | N/A |
Brooks Ghost 15 GTX | $160 | 10.7 oz. (per shoe) | 12 mm | Snug but true to size |
Scarpa Ultra Spin GTX | $200 | 24 oz. (per pair) | 6 mm | N/A |
How We Tested Winter Running Shoes
Our Expert Testers
Steve Graepel, the author of this guide, has been running for 30 years. During his time on his feet, heโs clocked a sub-3-hour marathon, won the Superior Trail Ultra 50-miler, and made the first known rim-to-rim-to-rim of Hells Canyon, North Americaโs deepest canyon. Steve can be found lugging a backpack with a spare pair of shoes in and around the Boise foothills with his two dogs.
Matthew Medendorp is a runner who hates treadmills with a fiery passion. As such, youโll find him outside in all types of inclement weather. He tested 2024โs shoes in a combination of locales: day-to-day running in Michigan’s lake-effect snowstorms, running vacations in Flagstaffโs high-altitude trails, and on a dedicated testing trip in the Eastern Sierra where he pitted the finalists head-to-head in a post blizzard Mammoth Lakes, Calif.
Our Testing Process
Our testers took winter running shoes on a wide range of terrain from pavement to singletrack and beyond in inclement weather that included rain, snow, ice, and sub-freezing temperatures. During testing, we considered factors like each shoe’s comfort, waterproofness, and grip on wet and icy surfaces. Any shoe that didn’t hold up to winter weather didn’t make the list.
Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose a Winter Running Shoe
Staring at a wall of shoes or endlessly browsing an online retailer can be overwhelming. Here are some important things to consider when choosing the right winter running shoe.
Terrain
These days, manufacturers have dialed shoes for nearly every niche of running. This even applies to winter. A quick way to hone in on the right shoe is to identify where you run.
Winter road running shoes tend to be built off of a brand’s stalwart training shoe. Brands want to invest in a winner, and a winter winner will be a shoe that is also a summer winner. The traction on these trainers will already be beefier than a racing flat and are suitable for running on wet roads.
But they’ve added a waterproof, breathable membrane to keep dedicated runners on the road through winter on a familiar last. If you already run in Brooks or New Balance, their winterized road shoes will be a good bet for cold, wet conditions.
Tread
Winter trail running shoes have an aggressive lug pattern that bites into dirt, sand, and mud. But not all treads are the same. A blocky, cleat-like tread will shed mud in the Pacific Northwest but can feel clunky on hardpack found in the Southwest and can cause trips and falls.
Some brands, like Salomon and La Sportiva, offer shoes with integrated spikes. These are for runners who live in regions prone to ice, like the Northeast or the Columbia River Gorge.
Spikes can be wonderful on ice but feel sketchy on rocky terrain and godawful on the pavement. Another option is to buy aftermarket crampons. We’ve paired our running shoes with Yaktrax and Black Diamond’s Distance Spike.
These aren’t going to feel as stable as lugs embedded with carbide spikes, but they provide more flexibility in your winter quiver, pairing with a variety of shoes. We’ve found these lightweight crampons capable of crossing over into fast and light mountaineering junkets, too.
Durability
Trail shoes also have a more durable upper, a robust toe bumper, and a firmer sole or even a rock plate โ all to protect the feet from underlying roots and rocks. Trail shoes with lower lugs can be a little more runnable on roads, making them a suitable choice for snow-choked road runs.
All of the shoes on this list have a waterproof, breathable membrane to keep melting snow and water from creeping in while keeping the toes warm.
Like spikes, integrated gaiters are a fantastic addition and worth the cost for those who frequently run in deep, snowy conditions. They shed snow weight quickly and keep feet warmer and drier. But because they trap heat, they can quickly become uncomfortable on milder days. Like crampons, gaiters can be purchased aftermarket for $25-50.
Price & Value
Budget
Winter running shoes can cost anywhere from $100 to $250 and beyond. At the lower end of the spectrum, you may find fewer features like gaiters and carbide spikes, but there are still solid winter running shoes in the $100-150 price range. Our budget pick, Nikeโs Pegasus 39 Shield ($135), is an excellent winter road runner, thanks to its weatherized toecap, insulation, and siped outsole.ย
Mid-Tier
In the $160-200 range, you can find burlier traction for trail running, full-shoe waterproofing, and rock plates. At the low end of the mid-tier spectrum lies the Cascadia 17 GTX ($160), which offers aggressive lugs, full GORE-TEX coverage, and plenty of underfoot protection. It also offers a unique set of roll bars under the forefoot and heel to help increase stability on uneven terrain.ย
Premium
If you want all the bells and whistles, be prepared to spend $250 or more, and you’ll be in the market for a durable and sturdy stroller with plenty of bells and whistles. One look at the feature-rich Agravic Tech Pro ($250) from Adidas, and you can see where the moneyโs going. It offers an over-ankle gaiter to keep ice and debris out of your shoe, a BOA mechanism to (ahem) dial in your fit, and a soft midsole that delivers a comfortable, bouncy stride.
Frequently Asked Questions
With so many options to choose from, it can be challenging to choose the right trail shoes. Here are three things to consider as you shop:
- Set realistic running goals. If you dream of running a 100-miler one day but realistically will use the shoes for 5-mile training loops around your local park, buy shoes for the latter use first.
- Consider shoe width. For folks with wide feet, or those running very long distances, a wide forefoot can be a bonus that lets toes splay. The downside is that wider shoes are less precise, can be a little more clumsy, and wonโt fit well on people with narrow feet.
- Test out the tongue. Does it fit comfortably? Will it keep rocks out of your shoe? Shoes with gusseted tongues help keep snow and debris from creeping into the shoe.
- Go with what you know. If you run in the dead of winter, youโre probably more than an armchair enthusiast with a few pairs of running shoes in your closet. Check whether your go-to model also has a waterproof model, often signified by GTX (GORE-TEX) in the title. If you love the fit of the Brooks Ghost 15, chances are youโll also like the Brooks Ghosts 15 GTX.
Stack & Drop
Unless youโre running barefoot, every shoe has a stack. Measured in millimeters, the stack refers to how high the insole sits off the ground. Shoes with more cushion inherently have a higher stack. Furthermore, most shoes have a drop in stack height from the heel to the toe.
If youโre new to running, experts recommend a lower heel drop; it builds a wider range of motion and strength, which makes you a healthier runner. We also find a lower stack keeps your center of gravity closer to the ground. This becomes even more important on unstable terrain, with snow covering hidden obstacles.
Flexibility
Flexibility is your friend on the trails. You need variability to match the variable terrain. Trail runners and those running in winter โ where obstacles can be hidden under snow โ will prefer a shoe with a firm outsole and less cushion but a firm toebox to push off of.
Flexibility and torsion can help the foot adapt to the trail and objects obscured by snow. But, too much flexibility can feel unstable. Without stability, the ankle can be exposed to rolling.
The life of a shoe depends on a variety of factors, including running style, weight, and how often theyโre used. But in general, 300 to 500 miles is a good rule of thumb.
So, if you run 10 miles per week, your shoes could last 8 months to a year. If youโre logging 20 miles per week, plan on replacing your running shoes every 4 to 6 months.
And if you see excessive wear patterns, holes, or tears, or if you notice a decrease in footbed comfort, itโs probably time to grab a new pair of sneakers.
Durability aside, we typically don’t wear our winter shoes daily. Winter-specific running shoes supplement our running quiver, rotating into the queue as the weather calls for it. This increases the shelf life of our winter shoes and stretches our dollars out over several years of use.
The Best Trail Running Shoes for Women in 2024
From muddy local trails to epic mountain runs, we’ve found the best trail running shoes for women.
The Best Trail Running Shoes of 2024
We tested and ranked the best trail running shoes for every style and budget. Top picks include shoes from Nike, HOKA, and more!