As frequent trail runners, hikers, road runners, and adventure racers, the GearJunkie team logs a lot of miles. From Colorado mountain trails to long Oregon road runs and everything in between, we love running. And as soon as the temps climb, we live in running shorts.
The primary things we look for in a running short are that it doesn’t budge while running and stays comfortable for hours on end. We also give high marks to shorts that dry quickly, remain stink-free, and are a good value. And we give bonus points for anything that looks good enough to wear as we swing by the farmer’s market or grab a cold coffee on the way home.
That said, not every pair of shorts will fit every woman. Bodies and preferences vary, which is why we’ve divided the best running shorts into categories. They’ve been thoroughly tested and vetted by runners Conni Mahoney and Rebecca Ross.
Editor’s Note: Updated March 10th, 2025, we’ve added the unlined Vuori Halo Performance Short 2.0 and the Nike Swift Dri-fit mid-rise to our lineup.
The Best Women’s Running Shorts of 2025
- Inseam: 3.5”
- Pockets: 3
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 90% recycled polyester, 10% spandex
- Weight: 3.47 oz.
- Size range: XXS-XL
Pros
- Lightweight
- Doesn’t bunch
- Comfortable waistband
- No chafing
Cons
- Some testers claim they run small
- Inseam: 3″ or 3.5″
- Pockets: None
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 100% polyester
- Waterproof: No
- Weight: 10.9 oz.
- Size range: XS-3XL
Pros
- Good value
- Lots of sizing options
- Fun colors
Cons
- Lighter colors are see-through
- The waistline is not the most comfy
- Only one small key pocket
- Inseam: 4”
- Pockets: 2 (1 zip pocket, 1 mesh storage in waistband)
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 86% recycled polyester, 14% spandex
- Weight: 3.1 oz.
- Size range: XS-XXL
Pros
- Extremely airy feel
- Feminine articulation of waistband and hem
- Mesh detail across hamstring
- Dries fast
- Small zippered pocket
Cons
- Scrambling through dense vegetation could pose risk to fabric
- Thicker waistband might not be your jam
- Inseam: 9"
- Pockets: 1
- Liner: No
- Material: Nylon/elastane
- Weight: N/A
- Size range: XS-XL
Pros
- Flat seams
- Reflective detailing
- Internal drawstring
Cons
- Limited sizing
- Inseam: 1.58” – 3.94”
- Pockets: 1
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 87% Polyamide 13% Elastane Inner brief: 65% recycled Polyamide 35% Elastane
- Weight: 4.76 oz.
- Size range: XS-XL
Pros
- Provides excellent coverage
- Comfortable waistband
- Reflective detailing
- Key loop
Cons
- Liner slightly rides
- Inseam: 5”
- Pockets: 4
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 73% nylon, 27% spandex
- Weight: Unknown
- Size range: XS-3X
Pros
- Flat seams
- Non-irritating liner and waistband
- Loose, comfortable fit
Cons
- Not quick-drying
More Run-worthy Shorts, Field Tested
- Inseam: 3"
- Pockets: 2
- Liner: No
- Material: 89% Recycled Polyester, 11% Elastane
- Weight: 5 oz
- Size range: XXS-XXL
Pros
- Super Comfortable
- Drawstring
- Relaxed fit
Cons
- Thicker fabric
- Shows sweat
- Heavy
- Inseam: 2.5"
- Pockets: 1
- Liner: Yes
- Material: Body: 80% polyester/20% spandex. Lining: 100% polyester
- Weight: 3.7 oz
- Size range: XS-XXL
Pros
- Stay in place
- Internal drawstring
- Quick dry
Cons
- No sweat proof pocket
- Some testers feel they run small
- Inseam: 2.5"
- Pockets: 3
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 88% polyester, 12% elastane
- Weight: 4 oz.
- Size range: XS-XL
Pros
- UPF 30+
- Lightweight
- Reflective detailing
Cons
- Rides low on some
- Not the best waistband
- Back zippered pocket will not fit iPhone 13 with case
- Inseam: 7"
- Pockets: None
- Liner: N/A
- Material: 65-72% nylon, 28-35% Lycra
- Weight: Unknown
- Size range: XS-S
Pros
- Superb compression
- Wide waistband that doesn’t dig
- Flatlock seams that don’t chafe
- Aerodynamic
Cons
- Not everyone’s cup of tea
- Costly
- Limited Sizing
- Inseam: 3"
- Pockets: 1
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 88% recycled polyester/12% spandex with four-way stretch
- Weight: 3.1 oz.
- Size range: XS-XL
Pros
- Comfortable, loose fit
- Weightless feel
- Bonded hems for zero chafing
- Cool, bold prints
Cons
- May cling when wet
- Inseam: 3.25"
- Pockets: 1
- Liner: Yes
- Material: 86% nylon, 14% elastane
- Weight: 3.2 oz
- Size range: XS-XL
Pros
- Flattering
- Non-restrictive
- Lightweight
- Liner stays put
Cons
- Expensive
- Some colors are sheer
Women’s Running Shorts Comparison Chart
Running Short | Price | Weight | Number of Pockets | Inseam | Liner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts | $79 | 3.47 oz. | 3 | 3.5″ | Yes |
Under Armour Fly By Shorts | $25 | 10.9 oz. | 0 | 3” – 3.5” | Yes |
HOKA Glide 4” Short | $68 | 3.1 oz. | 2 | 4″ | Yes |
CEP The Run Support Shorts | $80 | N/A | 1 | 9″ | No |
On Running Shorts | $80 | 4.76 oz. | 1 | 1.58” – 3.94” | Yes |
REI Co-op Swiftland 5″ Running Shorts | $60 | N/A | 4 | 5″ | Yes |
Vuori Halo Performance Short 2.0 | $68 | 5 oz | 2 | 3″ | No |
Swift Dri-FIT Mid-Rise 2.5″ | $60 | 3.7 oz | 1 | 2.5″ | Yes |
Nathan Essential 2.0 Shorts | $65 | 4 oz. | 3 | 2.5″ | Yes |
2XU Mid-Rise Compression Shorts | $70 | N/A | 0 | 7″ | N/A |
Janji 3″ AFO Middle Shorts | $64 | 3.1 oz. | 1 | 3″ | Yes |
Tracksmith Session Speed Shorts | $72 | 3.2 oz. | 1 | 3.25″ | Yes |

How We Tested Women’s Running Shorts
Our Expert Testers
Our Testing Process
Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Running Shorts

Loose vs. Fitted

Liner or No Liner?

Feel and Weight


Material
Pockets

Waistband

Length

Price & Value
Budget
Mid-Tier
Premium
Frequently Asked Questions
We’ve mentioned a lot of the big factors above, but it bears repeating: for running — whether trail or race or road — you want something that fits well, isn’t restrictive, moves with you, and is lightweight. Running shorts made from a synthetic blend or wool with added elastane for stretch are some of the best we discovered in testing.
So, what shorts should you wear? Consider a few personal preferences. Do you want a liner? Do you want a longer or shorter inseam? Do you want a pocket? Then, check out our best picks above — there are different styles and something for everyone! But at the end of the day, they all felt great and worked great for running.

Many women’s running shorts have a built-in brief, or liner, so that underwear is not required. Liners both provide coverage underneath your shorts and are usually made of a thin, highly breathable, and wicking fabric.
For women, they can also provide some support and compression. Most liners are sewn in. A good liner won’t restrict motion, will wick well, and keeps you cool.
This varies by preference, but most runners will say that their most comfortable shorts fit well, don’t restrict motion, and are comfortable against skin — in other words, they are soft.
Some of our favorites on the list went it came to fit and soft feel include the Janji Middle Shorts, Patagonia Strider Pro shorts, and REI Co-op Swiftland.
Another factor that determines if a short is comfortable is the waistband. This has a little to do with sizing and fit, but also a lot to do with the material. Choosing a short that has a nice wide, flat, elastic waistband is always a safe bet.
This boils down to personal preference, but it also depends on where you are running. If you are running in a very hot and humid environment, looser shorts with lighter fabric and more breathability will be a better option.
If you are competing or racing, you may want to choose tighter compression shorts for comfort and aerodynamics. Our female editors preferred looser short styles so they can better move with your body as you move, twist, and run.
For women, running short inseams vary wildly. Most shorts are either in the 2- or 3-inch inseam range or the 5-7-inch range. Some compression shorts and a few regular shorts are breaking into the longer range of 7+ inches.
Compression shorts can come in shorter or longer lengths, but will not have an additional liner. Because of the tight fit, a liner is essentially already built into the shorts. But most shorter inseam shorts will have a liner.
If you are taller, or prefer more coverage in your running wear, we’d suggest looking for a short with at least a 5-inch inseam.
Our staff members have tested lower-budget shorts whose elastic waistband has disintegrated within a year, and we’ve tested other shorts that have lasted more than 6 years. When purchasing running shorts, it’s a good idea to check the durability of the fabrics they are made of, and also check fabric care.
Washing and hanging or air-drying running shorts immediately after sweating is always a good way to keep your shorts lasting as long as possible.

The Best Running Shorts of 2025
Our experts compiled a list of the best men’s running shorts available today, including options from Padagonia, Adidas, and more!

The Best Trail Running Shoes for Women in 2025
From muddy local trails to epic mountain runs, we’ve found the best trail running shoes for women.