Gravel cycling is good for the lungs, good for the soul, and generally safer than riding in traffic. You can pedal for hours without ever seeing the dusty trace of a car. Outside of the right bike and a protective helmet, a good pair of gravel bike shoes is one of the best investments you can make.
The feet are one of three contact points with the bike. Butt in the saddle and hands on the bars, your shoes are critical for comfort, control, and transferring your pedaling power into forward momentum. Having a well-fitting pair of gravel riding shoes that suit the type of riding you’re doing can help enhance your efficiency and enjoyment out on the road.
Our gravel riding experts, Steve Graepel and Jeremy Benson, rounded up 13 of the best gravel bike shoes on the market to test and compare. Our testers rode in these shoes for months — and in some cases years — to assess important factors like fit, comfort, pedaling efficiency, walkability, closures, and durability.
From the high-end, race-ready Shimano S-Phyre XC9 to the budget-friendly Crankbrothers Candy Lace, we’ve got recommendations to suit your needs and budget.
Editor’s note: We updated our gravel bike shoes buyer’s guide on May 7, 2025, with the addition of the supremely comfortable Giro Empire SRC and the completely redesigned Rapha Pro Team Powerweave Gravel Shoes.
The Best Gravel Bike Shoes of 2026
Fi’zi:k Vento Ferox Carbon
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stiff
- Lightweight
- Well ventilated
- Cost less than other top-shelf race shoes
- Easy on-off
Cons
- Still not cheap
- Minimal padding may cause discomfort for those with sensitive feet
The Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) is the brand’s top-of-the-line off-road riding shoe. Whether you’re racing XC, cyclocross, or all-day gravel events, these shoes are designed to meet the demands of high-output riding. And, while other brands’ top-tier shoes often cost upward of $400, the Vento Ferox beats them in price by a fair margin — not that $300 is exactly cheap.
We found the Vento Ferox Carbon to fit true to size in length and about average in terms of volume. They are on the narrower side overall, but they aren’t exactly low on the volume scale. They’re also super easy to get on and off the feet and adjust with the broad hook and loop strap over the top of the tongue, and the lower BOA Li2 dial to customize the fit over the top of the foot.
Inside the shoe, small dots on the inside of the heel help to lock it in place, and we never had issues with heel lift. The ankle cuff is also cut just right to avoid any hot spots or irritation.
Fizik’s X1 carbon sole is unyieldingly stiff, and along with the secure fit of the uppers, gives these shoes impressive pedaling efficiency. There is virtually zero energy wasted during the pedal stroke, making these a fine option for racers and those with racing aspirations.
The carbon midsole is almost completely covered in rubber sole lugs to protect it from damage. Those rubber lugs provide good walking and hiking grip while a slight rocker through the toe allows for a relatively normal gait despite the sole stiffness. The Ferox Carbon also accepts toe spikes, but they aren’t included.
The generally thin woven mesh upper and perforated synthetic tongue allow for surprisingly good breathability on warm days. The woven material is robust and PU-laminated for added durability in high-wear areas. The heel cup and toebox are also nicely reinforced for a little bit of foot protection. Beyond that, however, the Ferox Carbon shoes have minimal padding, so riders with particularly sensitive feet could potentially develop hot spots.
Otherwise, the Vento Ferox Carbon are stellar gravel riding shoes that are ready for race day or long adventure rides. They’re also stiff and light enough to be a one shoe quiver for those who ride XC and road as well.
Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO Shoes
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Affordable compared to other top-of-the-line models
- Efficient power transfer
- TX laces and padded tongue are comfy on tarsal bones
- Sleek looking
- Good ventilation
- Sturdy toe protection
Cons
- Exposed carbon on sole is prone to scratching
- Heel cups need a few rides to break in
- Have to release BOA dials to loosen
Hear us out. The Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO ($260) shoes aren’t the least expensive shoes around, but we feel they are an excellent value for the level of performance they deliver. In a market where top-of-the-line carbon-soled shoes often break the $400 mark, the price tag of these shoes bucks the trend while still delivering in pretty much every department.
The Expedition PRO is Pearl Izumi’s top-tier off-road shoe made for discerning cross-country and gravel riders and racers. As such, it boasts a stiff 1:1 EX PRO carbon sole that doesn’t flex at all under power. Whether you’re mashing all day in a gravel race or out for a fun journey with friends, your pedaling effort is certainly not being wasted.
Up top, the synthetic leather uppers are quite supple and conform easily to the feet. The dual BOA L6C dials pull tension evenly and allow for independent adjustment over the mid and forefoot. The soft TX laces, lace guides, and padded tongue are also quite comfortable over the tarsal bones.
The tongue is not gusseted, so these shoes are incredibly easy to put on and take off, but they can drift a bit from side to side. We never had issues while testing, but depending on how tightly you wear your shoes, the tongue has the potential to move around a bit.
We found the fit to be true to size in length, with an average but accommodating width in the forefoot. Lots of smaller perforations in the uppers provide respectable airflow, especially above the toes. A hefty toe bumper and reinforced heel offer a good level of foot protection for such a light and stiff shoe of this style.
Off the bike, the Expedition PRO performs much like similarly stiff gravel shoes. TPU rubber lugs at the toes, heel, and around the cleat box provide respectable traction. Still, these shoes are super stiff, so walking isn’t their forte, but they get the job done. The exposed carbon on the sole is also prone to scratching, so you’ll want to be careful when walking around in rocky terrain.
Our only other complaint about these shoes is that the heel cup is quite firm initially, and it took a couple of rides to break in for our sensitive heels. Beyond that, we were impressed by the top-level performance of these mid-priced shoes. If the price of other race-ready gravel bike shoes is tough to stomach, check out the Expedition PRO.
Crankbrothers Candy Lace
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Affordable
- Great looking
- Grippy, walkable soles
- Stiff enough for most riders
- Well reinforced toebox
Cons
- Relatively low volume; – might not work well for wider feet
- Not the stiffest
- Not the lightest
Crankbrothers is better known for its mountain bike components and tools, but in recent years, the brand has been growing its gravel lineup. The new Crankbrothers Candy Lace ($160) shoes launched in the spring of 2024 and are a very impressive effort for the brand’s first gravel and XC shoe. We got our hands on a pair just after they came out and quickly set about testing them on both gravel and XC rides.
One of the first things that stands out about the Candy shoes is how good they look. Style isn’t everything, but these are some seriously classy-looking shoes. We especially liked the black color we tested with the contrasting gum soles — and the lace closure — that gives them a timeless appeal. They also come in blue and white.
Our size 43.5 (10 US) test pair fits perfectly true to size with a nice snug fit for our tester’s relatively low-volume feet. Slipping into these shoes is super easy with the laces loose and a tongue that opens up nice and wide. While laces are a little more cumbersome to deal with than BOA dials, they are comfortable and make it easy to get perfect tension over the top of the foot. An elastic lace retainer also keeps the ends tidy while you ride.
The fiber-reinforced nylon midsole is stiff enough for just about any type of riding short of professional-level racing. It doesn’t feel like any energy is wasted through sole flex, yet it is a bit more forgiving to the feet on longer or rougher rides. Other than the cleat box, the entirety of the sole is covered in Crankbrothers’ MC1 rubber with fairly aggressive tread lugs. This rubber is relatively soft and provides a touch of cushion when you walk and a great grip on rocks or loose dirt.
The synthetic uppers are heavily perforated over the toes, sides of the foot, and the tongue, and the Candy shoes breathe better than expected. The front of the toebox and the heel cup are also nicely reinforced for added protection.
So, while the new Candy Lace shoes aren’t the absolute stiffest or lightest, they happen to be the least expensive and arguably the best-looking shoes we tested. If you’re looking for comfortable, versatile, and affordable all-around gravel shoes, look no further.
Shimano S-Phyre XC9
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Lightweight
- Super stiff and efficient
- Comfortable
- Well-ventilated
- Also comes in a wide version
Cons
- Expensive
- Not the best for walking long distances
- Regular version is fairly narrow
Okay, so the Shimano S-Phyre XC9 ($450) shoes are technically made for cross-country mountain bike racing, but that’s exactly what makes them our top choice for gravel racing, too. They are super lightweight, very stiff, well-ventilated, and fit like a glove. They are also very expensive but potentially worth the asking price for high-performance riders and racers seeking maximum efficiency and marginal gains.
The foundation of the S-Phyre XC9 shoes is the super-stiff carbon midsole. These soles don’t flex (like at all), so all of your precious pedaling power goes straight into the cranks. The synthetic uppers conform very nicely to the feet with a wrap-style tongue and dual BOA Li2 closure that hugs snugly but doesn’t constrict.
In the well-shaped heel pocket, a textured material helps prevent any unwanted heel movement when you’re laying down surges of power. Hundreds of perforations in the uppers also allow air to move around the foot and breathe in warm conditions and during high-intensity rides.
On the bottom of the shoes, Shimano’s ULTREAD XC rubber covers nearly all of the carbon fiber except for the cleat mount area. If and when you’re forced off the bike and need to walk or hike the bike, the carbon won’t get all scratched up, and the grippy rubber lugs provide great traction.
They also accept toe spikes and are a popular choice among cyclocross riders for racing in muddy conditions. While the soles provide good grip, the midsoles are super stiff, so walking or hiking in these for an extended period isn’t the most pleasant experience.
Our test pair fit perfectly true to size in length. The uppers have some give, and they break in over the first few rides, but they are pretty low-volume in the standard width. Fortunately, Shimano also makes a wide version of the S-Phyre XC9. At 616 g for the pair in size 43.5, these are some of the lightest shoes we tested, which almost seems surprising given how stiff and comfortable they are.
At $450, the Shimano S-Phyre XC9 shoes are a significant investment in race day and training speed. They’re definitely not the right choice for everyone, but if you’re seeking to maximize your efforts and shave some seconds off the clock, this is our recommendation.
Giro Empire SRC
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Super comfortable
- Excellent pedaling efficiency
- Adjustable footbed
- Respectable walkability
- Classic style
Cons
- Expensive
- Minimal ventilation
- Not super light
The Empire VR90 was a staple in Giro’s off-road shoe lineup for years and gained somewhat of a cult following among gravel riders. The updated Giro Empire SRC ($350) builds on that legacy and continues to deliver top-tier performance and impressive comfort on par with its predecessor.
Giro didn’t stray too far from the formula that made the Empire VR90 an iconic gravel and cross-country mountain bike shoe. That starts with the uppers. Built with a one-piece Teijin Evofiber synthetic leather material, the Empire SRC is supple and supportive. These shoes are comfortable out of the box, and after a few rides, they conform perfectly to your feet. Still, they provide excellent lateral support and overall stability when mashing on the pedals.
Although BOA closures may be dominating the high-end of the cycling shoe market, laces still work well and appeal to many riders. Not only do they give the shoes some retro vibes, but they also happen to look classy and timeless. Aesthetics aside, laces are also super comfortable. We found it easy to get even tension over the top of the feet with no hot spots or pressure points. They may lack the on-the-fly adjustability of BOA, but we were too comfortable to care.
Our size 43.5 test pair fit true to size, with a relatively average width and volume that is perhaps a touch more accommodating than the previous version. Inside, Giro’s excellent SuperNatural footbed comes with three levels of arch inserts to optimize the support and the fit even further. This level of customization is appreciated, but also expected in a high-end shoe.
The carbon composite plate provides race-ready stiffness but miraculously avoids feeling punishing underfoot. When combined with the secure uppers, these soles provide excellent pedaling efficiency for your next race or long-distance ride. A Sensor rubber tread has been co-molded to the carbon plate, providing ample traction and respectable walkability for such a stiff shoe.
The one-piece uppers are very comfortable, surprisingly tough, and super easy to clean, but they aren’t the most breathable. You’ll want to look to shoes like the Giro Sector or the Rapha Pro Team Powerweave if airflow is high on your list of priorities. At 720 g for the pair (size 43.5), they’re also around 100 g heavier than many similarly priced shoes.
The Empire SRC continues to prove that laces will never go out of style and that comfort and performance are not mutually exclusive. From race day to daily training rides or your next gravel fondo, these shoes look good, feel great, and perform alongside the best of ’em.
Giro Sector
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Highly breathable and well ventilated
- Easy on and off
- Grippy soles
- Stiff enough but still walk well
Cons
- Too breathable for colder temps
Giro combined a relatively stiff midsole, grippy rubber outsole, and highly breathable Synchwire mesh upper to create the Giro Sector ($240). Those ingredients result in a great all-around gravel and XC mountain bike shoe that tops the charts for its impressive ventilation and breathability.
What truly sets the sector apart is Giro’s use of its proprietary Synchwire material. The whole upper of the shoe is made from this supportive yet super porous material that allows maximum airflow to the feet. While the Synchwire is relatively supportive on its own, it also has a thermobonded exo-structure, which adds additional support and durability.
If you’re prone to sweaty feet or regularly ride in hot temperatures, these might be your new best friend. Ride with them in temperatures closer to freezing, however, and it might be the opposite.
The other benefit of Synchwire is that it is fairly supple and it conforms nicely to your foot shape. Not that it needs to, given Giro’s years of experience making great-fitting cycling footwear. Our size 43.5 test pair fit true to size and the dual BOA L6 dial closure makes snugging them up on the feet quick and easy. And for the female riders, Giro also makes the Sector in a women’s version.
The Sector shoes aren’t the absolute stiffest, but they are close enough that most riders won’t notice or care. There’s no discernable sole flex under power, yet they manage to feel a bit more damp than some of the stiffer competition. This is nice on those all-day epics and when tackling rougher surfaces.
A softer rubber compound forms a full rubber sole around the carbon composite midsole. The lugs aren’t especially aggressive, but they grip well and feel comfortable underfoot while walking.
At $240, the Giro Sector is moderately priced but provides a high level of performance and ventilation that’s hard to beat. These versatile shoes have you covered for everything from cross-country mountain biking to long gravel rides and races to bike packing through the desert.
Rapha Pro Team Powerweave Gravel Shoes
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Lightweight
- Great pedaling efficiency
- Well-ventilated
- Comfortable sock-like fit
Cons
- Powerweave material isn' the easiest to clean
- Very expensive
Rapha may be better known for its high-end cycling apparel, but it’s been making some of the best shoes on the market for several years. The Pro Team Powerweave Gravel ($480) is its top-tier off-road shoe with the price tag to match. This shoe recently got a complete redesign, improving on its predecessor in several ways. It looks nearly identical to Rapha’s Pro Team road shoes, but with some gravel-specific features.
The namesake 3D woven upper, or Powerweave, is at the core of these shoes. This woven synthetic material not only looks great, in a unique kind of way, but it also helps make these shoes incredibly breathable. Not only that, but they are impressively comfortable as well since the woven material easily conforms to the shape of your foot.
The only obvious drawback we can see is that the rigors of off-road riding may impact its longevity. We experienced some early fraying in the previous version, so we were happy to see the addition of 40% TPU yarn added to the weave to boost durability. Still, the texture of the material does tend to hang onto dust, dirt, and mud a bit more than smoother uppers.
Fit-wise, the supple Powerweave uppers are very accommodating to varying foot shapes and widths. The width and volume are pretty average, but the material has a bit of give to it. The stock footbed also has adjustable arch support so you can further customize the fit. It is worth mentioning that Rapha states the shoes run small and suggests going up a half size. Our size 44 test pair fits just a tiny bit longer than a typical 43.5 in most other brands.
While many companies use a single-dial system to “lace” the shoe shut, the Explore Powerweave uses BOA’s incremental Li2 dial platform. The two-dial system creates a custom fit around both the forefoot and instep. Combined with the Powerweave uppers’ sock-like fit, these shoes essentially become an extension of your foot. We took them straight from the box for a 40-mile ride and had no issues whatsoever.
The carbon midsole is stiff and felt plenty efficient on the pedals. We never noticed any flex under power, yet the soles didn’t feel harsh underfoot. These shoes could mix it up in a long-distance bike race one day and embark on a multi-day bikepack tour the next. At the same time, they walk pretty well. Thankfully, the tread is toned down a bit compared to the previous version, but the Vibram Megagrip rubber still provides plenty of off-the-bike traction.
At $480, the Pro Team Powerweave Gravel Shoes are undoubtedly a splurge. But if money is no object and you want shoes that look, feel, and perform fantastically across the board, then they are certainly worth checking out.
Other Great Shoes for Grinding Gravel
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Very lightweight
- Super stiff and efficient
- Tune-able pedal interface
- Very slick looks
Cons
- Very expensive
- Might be too stiff for non-racers
- Lots of exposed carbon on soles
Read Review: WorldTour Winning Cycling Shoe Gets Gravel Treatment: Specialized S-Works Recon First Look
Specialized makes some of the best products in the industry across all genres of cycling. The Specialized S-Works Recon ($450) is its latest top-of-the-line shoe designed for XC and gravel riding and racing. Of all the shoes we tested, these are the most like its road bike sibling.
They are essentially the S-Works Torch road bike shoes with some more aggressive toe/heel lugs and “pontoons” around the cleat box. In most ways, that’s a good thing, but it does have its downsides.
When Specialized launched the redesigned S-Works Recon shoes in early 2023, they didn’t just update the shoe. They completely overhauled it. Lots of changes were made with the goal of creating an ultra-high-performance off-road shoe — but one of the biggest was the fit.
While the previous version was quite narrow, the current version has a significantly wider forefoot that should work well for many more riders. The narrow-footed among us, however, might find them a bit roomy.
Specialized also ditched the Velcro strap by the toes and now uses two BOA S3 dials to pull tension evenly over the foot. This system cinches the sleek-looking seamless synthetic uppers nicely around the feet and only adds to their classy (read: expensive) looks. What Specialized hasn’t done away with is its Body Geometry technology. While it may sound like a gimmick, it does work to align the foot and lower leg more naturally.
The midsole is a super-thin and super-stiff carbon plate that’s borrowed directly from Specialized’s top-shelf road racing shoes. This gives the Recon some of the stiffest soles you can imagine, and there’s absolutely no wasted pedaling power when these puppies are on your feet. It also means that they aren’t the most forgiving, a tradeoff for their ruthless efficiency.
Specialized tried to “off-road” the soles of these shoes by adding some toe and heel lugs as well as “pontoons” that border the cleat. While they are okay for walking around on flat surfaces, they are not great for hiking, and the exposed carbon on the soles gets scratched easily when you come anywhere near sharp rocks.
At 590 g for the pair in size 43.5, the S-Works Recon are some of the lightest off-road shoes we’ve tested. They’re also one of the stiffest and a great choice for performance-oriented riders and racers who want to look fancy, especially if you have wider-than-average feet.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Reasonably priced
- Comfortable
- Easy on and off
- Moderate stiffness is good for most riding
Cons
- Low profile outsole has less traction than more aggressive options
- Run a bit warmer than other options
- Not the stiffest soles
The Terra Powerstrap X4 ($170) is a wonderfully comfortable shoe that keeps the price low by securing the foot with two wide hook-and-loop straps. The lower strap zigzags over the toes, with the second closing over the foot’s instep. With both straps released, the tongue opens wide, making it easy to pull over the feet.
Velcro straps can often show early signs of wear and tear and can easily get caked in mud. But after two years of abuse, the edges of these straps are still going strong with no signs of early retirement.
The upper is made from a durable synthetic material with a light TPU bumper that inconspicuously protects the toe. What the shoe gains in durability, it takes back in breathability. While the material is perforated, these shoes run warmer, and we found them best suited for spring and fall rides.
Fit-wise, the Terra Powerstrap X4 is the widest of the bunch we tested, and pedals toe-to-toe with the Quocs. These are a solid option for those with wider than average feet. However, we found the minimal lugs (and no lugs under the toes where the toe flexes) lacked traction for any significant hike-a-bike. The toes have some flex that makes them walkable on tame terrain, but the narrow tread platform can feel a little tippy underfoot.
For riders with above-average-width feet who spend the majority of their riding time in the saddle, the Fizik Terra Powerstrap X4 is a great pair of shoes and a solid value at just $170. If your feet are on the narrower side, the Crankbrothers Candy Lace is a better bet with a similar price and performance.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Durable
- Good-looking
- Locking laces are comfy and stay put
- Stiff enough – but not too stiff
- Grippy lugged outsole
Cons
- Racers may want something a little stiffer
- Not the lightest
The problem with most cycling shoes is, well, they feel like cycling shoes. Somewhere, somebody thought that in order to eke out the watts, feet should be locked inside a coffin. To maximize power, it’s not uncommon for cycling shoes to squeeze into a stiff, narrow fit that runs long for some amount of comfort.
Why do we love the Quoc’s Gran Tourer Lace ($235)? They feel normal. The width is natural, the length is appropriate, and the heel stays locked in place. This fit is most noticeable on all-day tours where every other part of the body is begging for mercy. And when you finally pull into the coffee shop, the Gran Tourer is classy enough to brush off the pain in style.
A traditional lace-up cycling shoe, Quoc’s Gran Tourer might look too nice to dirty up. But when the weather is in full mud season, this is the shoe we reach for first. Encased in a protective TPU rand, the synthetic upper is waterproof (up to the rand) and incredibly durable. And if you prefer the convenience of BOA closures, Quoc also makes the Gran Tourer II ($265).
We wore them on a late-winter 50-miler where the gravel turned to mud, and the mud turned to ice. We rode, we grunted, and we walked a lot. At the end of the day, the shoes were caked in mud but our feet remained dry. Back home, we rinsed them under the hose, and they washed off looking unscathed.
Flip them over, and the sole is a great combination of durability and protection. The rubber sole wraps the entire bottom of the shoe. The traction is soft enough to walk in, but after 2 years of abuse, they still show little evidence of the thousands of miles we’ve put on ours.
The Gran Tourer Lace isn’t the stiffest of the bunch, but if you aren’t overly concerned with watts and KOMs, they hit the sweet spot of pedaling efficiency and comfort. And for most riders, that’s exactly what they want and need. At $235, this is a mid-priced shoe. You can easily drop $400 on carbon platform racing shoes, but they probably won’t last as long as Quocs.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Lightweight
- Stiff soles
- Glove-like fit
Cons
- Not the best for walking due to stiff sole
- Velcro strap isn't that useful
One of the lightest shoes we tested, Shimano’s RX8 ($275), at 265 g per shoe, has a killer price-to-weight ratio. Shockingly, these shoes are lighter than the Shimano XC9 and $175 less expensive. They also happen to fit like a glove, have soles stiff enough for racing, and do pretty well when you’re forced off the bike and have to walk.
There isn’t really a huge difference between these shoes and Shimano’s models marketed as cross-country mountain bike shoes. The primary differentiation is honestly the colors and “graphics” on the uppers. And that’s not a bad thing, given that the brand’s XC shoes are some of the best in the business.
The RX8 has supple synthetic uppers and a BOA Li2 dial that tightens nicely over the instep. Down by the toes, a small Velcro strap adds some tension over the forefoot.
The carbon composite soles are plenty stiff — a hair less stiff than the XC9 — with a stiffness rating of 10 on Shimano’s scale. You’d be hard-pressed to notice a difference between the two, and they certainly don’t lack in pedaling efficiency.
A lugged outsole covers the carbon midsole for durability and off-the-bike traction. These shoes walk and hike reasonably well for what they are. They also happen to be relatively well-ventilated with ample perforations in the uppers to let the feet get some air.
The Shimano RX8 is a staff favorite and our go-to shoe for fast rides and races where stiffness and low weight are the priority. They strike a strong balance of comfort, stiffness, performance, and durability. Now, if we could only get Shimano to put a second BOA over the toes — but that would come at a weight penalty, of course.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stiff soles
- Moderately priced
- Good toe protection
- Plenty of waling grip from soles
Cons
- Not the lightest
- Higher volume fit
The new Five Ten Kestrel BOA ($230) represents a significant departure from the brand’s more gravity-oriented mountain bike shoe line. Known more for its legendary flat pedal shoes, this is the first stiff-soled cross-country/gravel shoe that the brand has made. We’ve been riding in a pair off and on for the past year, and it turns out that they’re a great pair of shoes that’s plenty stiff and offers a bit more foot protection than most.
Unlike more expensive shoes that typically use carbon fiber, the Kestrel BOA uses a glass fiber midsole that’s plenty stiff and helps to keep the price down. It might be a touch less stiff, but we never noticed a lack of pedaling efficiency or support or felt the soles flexing under power.
Five Ten also added some serious lugs to the sole made from Stealth Marathon rubber. While this is one of the firmer compounds they make, there’s no lack of walking/hiking traction due in large part to the aggressive toe and heel lugs.
The upper is comprised of a couple of different synthetic materials. A tough, Cordura-like fabric wraps around the whole shoe and allows for decent breathability over the toes and sides of the midfoot.
That’s wrapped in an abrasion-resistant material around the toes and capped with a thick rubber toe bumper to provide some serious rock strike protection. The heel also has a healthy amount of reinforcement along with padding around the ankle cuff, making these shoes more protective of the feet than others on this list.
Five Ten chose to use a BOA dial to tighten the shoes over the upper foot and two Velcro straps to secure them over the mid and forefoot. This system is quick and easy to use and allows you to snug the shoes around the whole foot. The Velcro straps do make us a little wary, however, as they tend to wear out more quickly than other closures — ours are still fine after a year, though.
It’s also worth noting that the fit of the Kestrel BOA is more voluminous than others. They aren’t too wide, necessarily — there’s just quite a bit of volume. We found that replacing the thin stock footbed with a thicker aftermarket option helped tremendously to dial in the fit for our lower-volume feet.
Beyond that, the Five Ten Kestrel BOA shoes are an excellent first XC/gravel effort from the brand. These rugged shoes are quite versatile, with uses spanning from trail and cross-country mountain biking to long and adventurous days on the gravel bike. Anyone with somewhat higher-volume feet seeking something a bit more protective than typical gravel shoes will find a lot to like here.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Comfortable – accommodating fit
- Dual BOA for easy adjustments
- Stiff soles
- Easy to walk in
Cons
- Moderately expensive
- Cleat recess is a little too shallow
Another comfortable gravel shoe we tested, Garneau’s Baryum ($300), is a fine implementation of BOA’s dual-lace systems. The micro-adjustments make dialing in your fit simple and easy, and the X-Comfort zone makes them accommodating to a range of shapes and widths. Essentially an off-road version of its Course Air Lite II road shoes, the Baryum combines great pedaling efficiency, lightweight, and a streamlined design with a grippy walkable sole.
A carbon midsole provides plenty of power transfer and stiffness. That’s completely wrapped in a heavily lugged T-flex rubber outsole that protects the carbon and offers plenty of off-bike traction. The heel and toe sections of the shoe have extra protection for durability for the scrapes and scuffs you’re sure to encounter.
We found the Baryum to be super comfortable. The synthetic uppers conform to the feet nicely, and the dual BOA L6 dials make it really easy to achieve perfect tension over the foot. The X-Comfort zones can also stretch a bit to fit a range of foot widths. A small mesh panel over the toes and perforation on the midfoot help keep some air moving and prevent your feet from overheating.
We found the Louis Garneau Baryum a solid choice for everything from long gravel century rides to quick evening spins or XC mountain bike sessions. As a bonus, these shoes are quite comfortable and easy to walk in while off of the bike if your rides turn more adventurous than expected.
Gravel Bike Shoes Comparison Chart
| Shoe Model | MSRP | Weight | Closure | Midsole | Upper | Outsole |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon | $300 | 662 g/pair (size 43.5) | BOA Li2 dial and Velcro strap | Carbon fiber | PU-laminated woven mesh | Rubber |
| Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO | $260 | 684 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA L6C dial w/ TX laces | 1:1 EX PRO Carbon | Synthetic leather | TPU lugs |
| Crankbrothers Candy Lace | $160 | 746 g/pair (size 43.5) | Laces | Fiber-reinforced nylon shank | Synthetic | MC1 Rubber |
| Shimano S-Phyre XC9 | $450 | 616 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA Li2 dials | Carbon fiber | Microfiber | ULTREAD XC Rubber |
| Giro Empire SRC | $350 | 720 g/pair (size 43.5) | Laces | Carbon composite plate | Teijin Evofiber | Sensor rubber |
| Giro Sector | $240 | 708 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA L6 dials | Carbon composite | Synchwire w/thermobonded exo-structure | Rubber |
| Rapha Pro Team Powerweave Gravel | $480 | 621 g/pair (size 44) | Dual BOA Li2 dials | Carbon plate | 3D-Woven Powerweave | Vibram Megagrip |
| Specialized S-Works Recon | $450 | 590 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA S3 dials | carbon | Synthetic | Rubber |
| Fizik Terra Powerstrap X4 | $170 | 624 g/pair (size 43) | Dual Powerstraps | Nylon | Synthetic | Rubber |
| Quoc Gran Tourer Lace | $235 | 730 g/pair (size 43) | Laces | Nylon composite | Microfiber w/TPU | Rubber |
| Shimano RX8 | $275 | 530 g/pair (size 43) | BOA Li2 dial and Velcro strap | Carbon composite | Synthetic | TPU |
| Five Ten Kestrel BOA | $230 | 724 g/pair (size 9.5 US) | BOA dial and 2 Velcro straps | Glass fiber | Synthetic | Stealth Marathon Rubber |
| Louis Garneau Baryum | $300 | 624 g/pair (size 43) | Dual BOA L6 dials | Carbon | Synthetic | T-flex Rubber |
How We Tested Gravel Bike Shoes
At GearJunkie, we love all kinds of cycling. Our testers jumped on board the gravel train years ago and have been riding it ever since. Fortunately, we’re also gear nerds who are obsessed with finding the best products to make our gravel rides better. We’re fortunate to be in a position that allows us to test out the latest and greatest gear, and we’ve been doing our best to provide honest and trustworthy product recommendations to our readers for years.
Our Expert Testers
Our gravel bike shoes buyer’s guide is the combined effort of two gravel-obsessed professional gear testers — Steve Graepel and Jeremy Benson. Steve is an all-around outdoorsman from the Boise, Idaho, area. He’s been testing and reviewing all sorts of outdoor gear for GearJunkie for the past 10 years. Steve is an avid gravel cyclist and bike-packer, and he knows the importance of choosing the right footwear to make his rides the best they can be.
Benson is an editor at GearJunkie, and he’s been professionally testing and reviewing bikes and related accessories full-time for 8 years. He’s an obsessive cyclist and gravel racer who participates in numerous endurance cycling events each year. He has tested over 40 pairs of mountain and gravel biking shoes and has a great ability to tease out the performance differences in the products he tests. He lives in the greater Lake Tahoe area, where he has hundreds of miles of world-class singletrack and gravel roads right out the door.

Our Testing Grounds
Our testers live in the mountain west, where there is a wealth of gravel riding accessible from the towns where they live. In addition to frequently riding the seemingly endless dirt and fire roads surrounding his home city of Boise, Idaho, Steve enjoys traveling internationally to exotic locations for extended bike-packing adventures.
Jeremy has lived and played in the Lake Tahoe area for over 20 years, where there is no shortage of fantastic gravel riding. His test loops start from the garage and feature every gravel surface and terrain imaginable. From smooth to super chunky, meadows to mountains, you name it, and its there.
The area is also home to some excellent endurance gravel racing, with events like the Lost & Found Gravel Grinder and Truckee Tahoe Gravel providing training motivation and racing to test these shoes to their — and his — limits.
Our Testing Process
After exhaustively researching the market, we chose 13 gravel bike shoe models to test and compare. After examining each shoe’s materials and construction and weighing them for consistency, Steve and Jeremy thoroughly tested them the only way they knew how — gravel riding.
OK, well, these shoes also saw their fair share of road and singletrack miles, too, but that’s the beauty of gravel riding. This isn’t a one-dimensional sport; gravel riding is whatever you want it to be.
Every model included in this guide was tested for a minimum of several months, and most were used for a year or more. From quick after-work gravel grinds and week-long bikepacking missions to 100-mile gravel races, these shoes were put through their paces while analyzing important factors like fit, comfort, closures, pedaling efficiency, and walkability. Rest assured, no pedal has been left unturned, and these shoes have all been put through the wringer.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Gravel Bike Shoes
Gravel biking has exploded in popularity in the past decade, and there are lots of different gravel bike shoes to choose from. While cross-country mountain bike shoes were previously the only option — and are still great options — there are now quite a few shoes designed and marketed toward the gravel rider.
Since gravel riding and cross-country mountain biking share similar performance demands, we’ve tested shoes designed for each discipline and several that claim to be great at both.
There’s much to consider when looking for the best gravel bike shoes. Here, we’ll discuss important factors like fit, closures, ventilation, stiffness, and outsole designs. Of course, the type of riding you’re doing will also affect the shoes you choose.
Do You Need a Gravel Shoe?
Gravel riding borrows aerodynamics, stiffness, and weight savings from the road and pulls in durability and traction from the mountain. We want our shoes to provide plenty of pedaling efficiency and support, but we also need them to be rugged enough to handle the added stresses of off-road riding.
Because we all end up pushing the bike at some point, they should be comfortable enough to walk in without slipping around on loose terrain.

If money is tight and you already have a pair, cross-country mountain bike shoes are a great start. In fact, the lines are becoming increasingly blurry, and many modern cross-country shoes are now being touted as ideally suited to gravel and XC mountain bike riding.
If you ride more roads than mountains, you can split the difference and get away with one shoe for both gravel and road. If you go that route, we’d recommend looking at a stiffer model, like the Shimano S-Phyre XC9, Specialized S-Works Recon, or Shimano RX8. While you can ride road bike shoes and pedals on gravel, we’d only recommend that if you’re sure you won’t need to do any walking whatsoever.
Fit
A well-fitting shoe will be snug — but not excessively tight — with some room for the toes to wiggle. Ideally, you can find a width and volume that matches your foot shape, and the uppers should secure snugly around the feet like a good hug.
You don’t want the foot to feel constricted, but excessive movement is also undesirable as it can cause discomfort and instability or rob you of efficiency. The heel should also feel locked in the shoe’s heel pocket and shouldn’t slip up or down.
Laces and BOA systems can fine-tune a fit, but it’s always best to start with a shoe that generally fits well. If you’re ordering online, be sure to look at the sizing guides. Some Euro sizing puts shoes between U.S. sizes (if that’s the case for you, it’s usually better to size up). Some brands also offer wide sizes.
Closure System

Shoes generally close with one or two of four systems. Most modern shoes use a single or double-dial — BOA is most common — closure system. You push the knob shut and spin the dial to get a custom fit around the foot. To release it, you pull the knob, and the spool unravels.
- BOA seems to dominate the dial market and has come a long way. In our experience, it’s a bombproof system that makes shoes quick and easy to get in and out of and allows you to micro-adjust the fit over the ride. Our favorite shoes use a twin BOA system, allowing you to further tweak the fit over both the midfoot and forefoot independently.
- Hook-and-loop straps use Velcro over the foot. Many shoes use a combination of Velcro over the toes and a BOA system over the upper and midfoot. This combination saves a few grams (and some pocket change) but doesn’t typically lock the foot in as well as a twin BOA system. In muddy conditions, crud can get trapped in the hook and loop, reducing their effectiveness. Velcro also tends to wear out faster.
- Good old-fashioned shoelaces are making a comeback. They are light, cheap, replaceable, and winning on the fashion front. The best applications will often vary the eyelets so you can lock a section and loosen another. This allows a custom fit over different parts of the foot.
We didn’t review any shoes that use this, but it’s worth sharing that a few older models use a ratchet system that incrementally tightens a strap over the foot, like a ski boot buckle.

Sole Stiffness
Linking the rider to the bike, a proper gravel shoe is stiff enough to transfer force from the legs into the drivetrain, is durable enough to endure the rough terrain, and has lugs for traction. The shoe’s stiffness comes from the midsole plate, sometimes called a shank.
Higher-end models often use carbon fiber, which is light, stiff, and expensive. Less pricey shoes will use a durable nylon or fiberglass plate. While stiffness is often talked about in terms of performance, super stiff soles aren’t necessarily the best thing for all riders.
Racers or performance-minded riders typically steer toward very stiff soles with the goal of transferring every drop of pedaling power from their legs to the drivetrain. That said, the stiffer sole, the less forgiving it is, so race shoes can be a bit less comfortable, especially over rough surfaces. The majority of the stiffest shoes we tested have a carbon fiber midsole and also happen to be the most expensive. The Shimano S-Phyre XC9 and Specialized S-Works Recon are great examples. While not exactly in the budget category, shoes like the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon and the Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO cost a bit less than the aforementioned models while still featuring stiff carbon midsoles.

If you’re not racing, soles that are slightly less stiff than race shoes are often the best bet. They are still stiff enough to be efficient, yet they are a bit more forgiving and comfortable for most riders. They also make walking a bit easier.
If you’re more interested in the experience and comfort over PRs and watts, then a more balanced sole stiffness is likely the way to go. Shoes like the Crankbrothers Candy Lace and Quoc Gran Tourer both fit into this category.
There is such a thing as shoes that are not stiff enough. If you can see or feel the sole flexing under your foot while pedaling, it is also sapping a tiny bit of your pedaling energy. Soft soles can also cause foot and calf fatigue over time. Otherwise, softer-soled shoes are generally quite comfortable and make walking around much easier.
Some shoes run the composite footplate just short of the toes, giving the shoe a little flex in the toebox. A little extra mobility in the toes makes it easier to walk around in the shoes. Many shoes also put a rocker in the front of the sole, allowing you to “roll” your gait in a fully rigid shoe.
Outsole

Put enough time in the saddle, and you’ll put more than enough time out of the saddle. Adventurous gravel riding can be equal parts pushing and pedaling. A solid gravel shoe should not only be comfortable to walk in but also have enough traction so you aren’t slipping around.
We found two general kinds of lugs — a harder lug compound and a softer lug compound. For rides that walk over hard rock, we prefer the outsole with softer rubber lugs. They grip rock better, add a touch of cushion, and tend to hold up better over time.
For mud and muck, we appreciated the sharper edge retention found on a harder rubber lug. They bite in better, but they tend to flake off sooner.
If your rides don’t pull you out of the saddle, you have a lot more leeway with traction. Low-traction shoes will be lighter (by a few grams) and still be comfortable enough to walk around the parking lot or coffee shop.
Cleat Compatibility
Gravel and cross-country mountain bike shoes all share one thing in common: the two-bolt cleat interface. This means they are compatible with two-bolt cleats typical of clipless (clip-in) mountain bike pedals. There aren’t too many true “standards” in cycling, but luckily, the two-bolt “mountain” cleat interface is one of them.
Even though there is some variation in the cleat designs between pedal manufacturers, they all use the two-bolt standard. This interface consists of two parallel tracks in the sole of the shoe under the forefoot. Inside the cleat tracks are cleat mount plates that can slide fore and aft to find the optimal position of the cleat to suit your preference.

Gravel and cross-country mountain bike shoes use the two-bolt cleat standard because the cleats are smaller and can fit in between the tread blocks that border the cleat box. These tread blocks aid in walking, protect the cleats, and often interface with the pedal body for lateral stability.
This is in contrast to road bike shoes, which use much larger three-bolt cleats. Road bike shoes don’t prioritize walking. Instead, the goal is to maximize surface area contact between the shoes, cleat, and pedal body.
Price & Value
The gravel bike shoes we tested vary pretty widely in price, from more affordable models, around $160, to super high-end race shoes that cost $400 or more. Realistically, if you’re not racing or super concerned with having the absolute stiffest and lightest shoes imaginable to eke out every precious watt of your pedaling power, then any of the more affordable shoes will likely serve you just fine while keeping some money in your bank account.
Budget
Budget-friendly shoes typically use less exotic materials and have simpler closure systems that help to keep the price down. This is evidenced in a couple of the less expensive models we tested, the Crankbrothers Candy Lace ($160) and Fizik Terra Powerstrap X4 ($170). These shoes both use nylon shanks in the midsole to provide stiffness and support, as opposed to carbon fiber or composite.
Likewise, the Candy Lace uses traditional laces, and the Fizik employs two hook-and-loop straps to secure them around the feet. Both closures are comfortable and functional, even if they aren’t as fancy as BOA dials.
Compared to their higher-end competition, these more affordable shoes aren’t quite as stiff or “high-performance,” but they are comfortable and absolutely get the job done.

Mid-Tier
As we climb above the $200 mark but stay below $300, we begin to see fancier materials like carbon fiber, BOA closures, an increase in sole stiffness, and potentially a reduction in weight. This will likely be the sweet spot for most riders seeking a higher level of performance without totally breaking the bank.
While it is priced in the mid-tier, the Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO ($260) boasts similar features and performance to the premium models at a more easily palatable price point. With a dual BOA closure, supple uppers, and stiff carbon soles, these shoes are ready to mix it up in races or provide you with great efficiency on far-flung adventures.
The Giro Sector ($240) slots nicely into this price bracket as well. While they aren’t the stiffest shoes, they provide a balanced sole stiffness along with the unique Synchwire uppers that top the charts for ventilation and breathability.
Premium
For those looking to be at the pointy end of races or atop the Strava leaderboards, it may be worth the investment in a high-end pair of shoes to maximize your efficiency and performance. For others, simply looking and feeling fast may justify the expense.
If you’re seeking the pinnacle of performance through fit, weight, and pedaling efficiency, you can find it in the Shimano S-Phyre XC9 ($450) and the Specialized S-Works Recon ($450). These shoes are incredibly light, have impeccable fits, and super stiff soles that help provide efficient transfer of pedaling power into forward momentum.
Leave it to Rapha to break the price ceiling with its new Pro Team Powerweave Gravel ($480) shoes. These top-of-the-line shoes boast carbon soles, dual BOA dials, and a super unique Powerweave upper material. They provide a sock-like fit, impressive comfort, excellent breathability, and stellar pedaling efficiency. If you’ve got money to burn, these shoes are tough to top.
Even then, not all light and stiff race-ready shoes cost over $400. The Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) stands up well against its more expensive competitors while keeping a little money in your wallet. They may be a tad heavier than the abovementioned models, but their performance is otherwise spot-on.

Frequently Asked Questions
If you ride gravel, then you could benefit from having some gravel or cross-country mountain bike shoes when you ride. The combination of stiff soles, grippy and walkable outsoles, lightweight uppers, and comfortable closures make this style of shoe the ideal footwear for riding gravel.
Trail riding shoes are heavier, bulkier, and often not adequately stiff for gravel riding. Road bike shoes don’t have walk-friendly outsoles, and they will get trashed when you dismount your bike on a rough gravel road. Gravel shoes combine pedaling efficiency, comfort, and walkability to make them perfectly suited to the task.
Realistically, gravel and cross-country mountain bike shoes are essentially the same. In fact, lots of shoes these days claim to be suited to both disciplines since the footwear demands for each are basically the same. Other types of mountain bike shoes, like those for trail, enduro, or gravity riding are quite different, however.
These shoes tend to be bulkier, heavier, and not quite as stiff through the sole, making them less ideal for pounding out miles on gravel roads. Likewise, unless you ride the smoothest gravel ever and never put your feet down, road bike shoes aren’t ideal for gravel either.
While plenty stiff and light, road bike shoes typically have smooth, hard soles that are not ideal for walking on gravel or trails and they will get all scratched up if you do.
The fancier the materials, technologies, and components incorporated into a gravel bike shoe, the more they cost. Carbon fiber midsoles, BOA closures, and ultralight materials aren’t cheap, and combining them into a shoe drives the cost up. Not to mention the research, development, and testing that goes on to make them 1% lighter and faster than the previous version.
We won’t lie; it does seem ridiculous to pay $400+ for a pair of bike shoes. We’ll also admit that they are usually incredibly nice and have even improved our performance by using them. That’s not to say that everyone needs to spend that much to have a good time. You don’t. But, those shoes exist for those who want them.
Our top pick for gravel racing is the Shimano S-Phyre XC9. Yes, this is a cross-country mountain bike race shoe, but they’re still the best we’ve used for gravel races. But, the best gravel race shoe for you may be different depending on what fits your foot the best.
The important factors for race shoes are a stiff sole, precise and comfortable fit, and lightweight. While stiff and light shoes are great, a good fit is arguably the most important piece of the puzzle for long-term comfort while trying your hardest.
Also, consider your goals. If you’re fighting for a podium, then shelling out big bucks for the trickest shoes may be worth it. If you’re just starting out or you enter races more for fun than competition, then it may not make as much sense to go so high-end. Budget is another consideration since race-oriented shoes are often quite expensive.
