Gravel cycling is good for the lungs, good for the soul, and generally safer than riding in traffic. You can pedal for hours without ever seeing the dusty trace of a car. Outside of the right bike and a protective helmet, a good pair of gravel bike shoes is one of the best investments you can make.
The feet are one of three contact points with the bike. Butt in the saddle and hands on the bars, your shoes are critical for comfort, control, and transferring your pedaling power into forward momentum. Having a well-fitting pair of gravel riding shoes that suit the type of riding you’re doing can help enhance your efficiency and enjoyment out of the roads.
Our gravel riding experts, Steve Graepel and Jeremy Benson, rounded up 12 of the best gravel bike shoes on the market to test and compare. Our testers rode in these shoes for months โ and in some cases years โ to assess important factors like fit, comfort, pedaling efficiency, walkability, closures, and durability.
From the high-end, race-ready Shimano S-Phyre XC9 to the budget-friendly Crankbrothers Candy Lace, we’ve got recommendations to suit your needs and budget. If you’re not sure exactly what you need, our Buying Advice explains important factors to consider, while our Price & Value section provides cost-related information. To see the specs of all the models we tested at a glance, take a look at our Comparison Chart.
Editor’s note: We updated our gravel bike shoes buyer’s guide on October 24, 2024, with the addition of the Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO and a new Price & Value section.
The Best Gravel Bike Shoes of 2024
- Best Overall Gravel Bike Shoes: Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon
- Best Value Gravel Bike Shoes: Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO
- Best Budget Gravel Bike Shoes: Crankbrothers Candy Lace
- Best Gravel Bike Shoes for Racing: Shimano S-Phyre XC9
- Best Ventilated Gravel Bike Shoes: Giro Sector
- Lightest Weight Gravel Bike Shoes: Specialized S-Works Recon
Fi’zi:k Vento Ferox Carbon
- Weight: 662 g/pair (size 43.5)
- Closure: Li2 BOA dial and hook and loop strap
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: X1 carbon
- Upper: PU-laminated woven mesh
- Outsole: Rubber
Pros
- Stiff
- Lightweight
- Well ventilated
- Cost less than other top-shelf race shoes
- Easy on-off
Cons
- Still not cheap
- Minimal padding may cause discomfort for those with sensitive feet
Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO Shoes
- Weight: 684 g/pair (size 43.5)
- Closure: Dual BOA L6C dials w/ TX4 laces
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: 1:1 EX PRO Carbon
- Upper: Synthetic leather
- Outsole: TPU lugs
Pros
- Affordable compared to other top-of-the-line models
- Efficient power transfer
- TX laces and padded tongue are comfy on tarsal bones
- Sleek looking
- Good ventilation
- Sturdy toe protection
Cons
- Exposed carbon on sole is prone to scratching
- Heel cups need a few rides to break in
- Have to release BOA dials to loosen
Crankbrothers Candy Lace
- Weight: 746 g/pair (size 43.5)
- Closure: Laces
- Cleat compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Fiber-reinforced nylon shank
- Upper: Synthetic
- Outsole: MC1 rubber
Pros
- Affordable
- Great looking
- Grippy, walkable soles
- Stiff enough for most riders
- Well reinforced toebox
Cons
- Relatively low volume; – might not work well for wider feet
- Not the stiffest
- Not the lightest
Shimano S-Phyre XC9
- Weight: 616 g/pair (size 43.5)
- Closure: Dual BOA Li2 dials
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Carbon fiber
- Upper: Microfiber
- Outsole: ULTREAD XC rubber
Pros
- Lightweight
- Super stiff and efficient
- Comfortable
- Well-ventilated
- Also comes in a wide version
Cons
- Expensive
- Not the best for walking long distances
- Regular version is fairly narrow
Giro Sector
- Weight: 708 g/pair (size 43.5)
- Closure: Dual BOA L6 dials
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Carbon composite plate
- Upper: Synchwire mesh with thermobonded exo-structure
- Outsole: Rubber
Pros
- Highly breathable and well ventilated
- Easy on and off
- Grippy soles
- Stiff enough but still walk well
Cons
- Too breathable for colder temps
Specialized S-Works Recon
- Weight: 590 g/pair (size 43.5)
- Closure: Dual BOA S3 dials
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Carbon
- Upper: Synthetic
- Outsole: Rubber
Pros
- Very lightweight
- Super stiff and efficient
- Tune-able pedal interface
- Very slick looks
Cons
- Very expensive
- Might be too stiff for non-racers
- Lots of exposed carbon on soles
Best of the Rest
- Weight: 624 g/pair (size 43)
- Closure: Dual hook and loop "powerstraps"
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Nylon
- Upper: Synthetic
- Outsole: Rubber
Pros
- Reasonably priced
- Comfortable
- Easy on and off
- Moderate stiffness is good for most riding
Cons
- Low profile outsole has less traction than more aggressive options
- Run a bit warmer than other options
- Not the stiffest soles
- Weight: 730 g/pair (size 43)
- Closure: Laces
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Nylon Composite
- Upper: Microfiber with TPU
- Outsole: Rubber
Pros
- Durable
- Good-looking
- Locking laces are comfy and stay put
- Stiff enough – but not too stiff
- Grippy lugged outsole
Cons
- Racers may want something a little stiffer
- Not the lightest
- Weight: 709 g/pair (size 43)
- Closure: Dual BOA Li2 dials
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Carbon
- Upper: 3D-Woven Powerweave (100% polyester)
- Outsole: Natural rubber
Pros
- Easy to put on and adjust
- Customizable fit with dual Boa dials
- Comfortable
- Breathable
- Stiff soles but still walkable
Cons
- Expensive
- Woven upper collects dust and seems prone to damage
- Not the lightest
- Weight: 530 g/pair (size 43)
- Closure: BOA Li2 dial and hook and loop strap
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Carbon composite
- Upper: Synthetic
- Outsole: TPU
Pros
- Lightweight
- Stiff soles
- Glove-like fit
Cons
- Not the best for walking due to stiff sole
- Velcro strap isn't that useful
- Weight: 724 g/pair (size 9.5 US)
- Closure: BOA dial with 2 hook and loop straps
- Cleat compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Glass fiber
- Upper: Synthetic
- Outsole: Stealth Marathon rubber
Pros
- Stiff soles
- Moderately priced
- Good toe protection
- Plenty of waling grip from soles
Cons
- Not the lightest
- Higher volume fit
- Weight: 624 g/pair (size 43)
- Closure: Dual BOA L6 dials
- Cleat Compatibility: 2-bolt
- Midsole: Carbon
- Upper: Synthetic
- Outsole: T-flex rubber
Pros
- Comfortable – accommodating fit
- Dual BOA for easy adjustments
- Stiff soles
- Easy to walk in
Cons
- Moderately expensive
- Cleat recess is a little shallow
Gravel Bike Shoes Comparison Chart
Shoe Model | MSRP | Weight | Closure | Midsole | Upper | Outsole |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon | $300 | 662 g/pair (size 43.5) | BOA Li2 dial and Velcro strap | Carbon fiber | PU-laminated woven mesh | Rubber |
Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO | $260 | 684 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA L6C dial w/ TX laces | 1:1 EX PRO Carbon | Synthetic leather | TPU lugs |
Crankbrothers Candy Lace | $160 | 746 g/pair (size 43.5) | Laces | Fiber-reinforced nylon shank | Synthetic | MC1 Rubber |
Shimano S-Phyre XC9 | $430 | 616 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA Li2 dials | Carbon fiber | Microfiber | ULTREAD XC Rubber |
Giro Sector | $240 | 708 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA L6 dials | Carbon composite | Synchwire w/thermobonded exo-structure | Rubber |
Specialized S-Works Recon | $450 | 590 g/pair (size 43.5) | Dual BOA S3 dials | carbon | Synthetic | Rubber |
Fizik Terra Powerstrap X4 | $170 | 624 g/pair (size 43) | Dual Powerstraps | Nylon | Synthetic | Rubber |
Quoc Gran Tourer Lace | $235 | 730 g/pair (size 43) | Laces | Nylon composite | Microfiber w/TPU | Rubber |
Rapha Explore Powerweave | $380 | 709 g/pair (size 43) | Dual BOA Li2 dials | Carbon | 3D-Woven Powerweave | Natural Rubber |
Shimano RX8 | $275 | 530 g/pair (size 43) | BOA Li2 dial and Velcro strap | Carbon composite | Synthetic | TPU |
Five Ten Kestrel BOA | $230 | 724 g/pair (size 9.5 US) | BOA dial and 2 Velcro straps | Glass fiber | Synthetic | Stealth Marathon Rubber |
Louis Garneau Baryum | $300 | 624 g/pair (size 43) | Dual BOA L6 dials | Carbon | Synthetic | T-flex Rubber |
How We Tested Gravel Bike Shoes
At GearJunkie, we love all kinds of cycling. Our testers jumped on board the gravel train years ago and have been riding it ever since. Fortunately, we’re also gear nerds who are obsessed with finding the best products to make our gravel rides better. We’re fortunate to be in a position that allows us to test out the latest and greatest gear, and we’ve been doing our best to provide honest and trustworthy product recommendations to our readers for years.
Our Expert Testers
Our gravel bike shoes buyer’s guide is the combined effort of two gravel-obsessed professional gear testers โ Steve Graepel and Jeremy Benson. Steve is an all-around outdoorsman from the Boise, Idaho, area. He’s been testing and reviewing all sorts of outdoor gear for GearJunkie for the past 10 years. Steve is an avid gravel cyclist and bike-packer, and he knows the importance of choosing the right footwear to make his rides the best they can be.
Benson is an editor at GearJunkie, and he’s been professionally testing and reviewing bikes and related accessories full-time for 8 years. He’s an obsessive cyclist and gravel racer who participates in numerous endurance cycling events each year. He has tested over 40 pairs of mountain and gravel biking shoes and has a great ability to tease out the performance differences in the products he tests. He lives in the greater Lake Tahoe area, where he has hundreds of miles of world-class singletrack and gravel roads right out the door.
Our Testing Grounds
Our testers live in the mountain west, where there is a wealth of gravel riding accessible from the towns where they live. In addition to frequently riding the seemingly endless dirt and fire roads surrounding his home city of Boise, Idaho, Steve enjoys traveling internationally to exotic locations for extended bike-packing adventures.
Jeremy has lived and played in the Lake Tahoe area for over 20 years, where there is no shortage of fantastic gravel riding. His test loops start from the garage and feature every gravel surface and terrain imaginable. From smooth to super chunky, meadows to mountains, you name it, and its there. The area is also home to some excellent endurance gravel racing, with events like the Lost & Found Gravel Grinder and Truckee Tahoe Gravel providing training motivation and racing to test these shoes to their โ and his โ limits.
Our Testing Process
After exhaustively researching the market, we chose 12 gravel bike shoe models to test and compare. After examining each shoe’s materials and construction and weighing them for consistency, Steve and Jeremy thoroughly tested them the only way they knew how โ gravel riding. OK, well, these shoes also saw their fair share of road and singletrack miles, too, but that’s the beauty of gravel riding. This isn’t a one-dimensional sport; gravel riding is whatever you want it to be.
Every model included in this guide was tested for a minimum of several months, and most were used for a year or more. From quick after-work gravel grinds and week-long bikepacking missions to 100-mile gravel races, these shoes were put through their paces while analyzing important factors like fit, comfort, closures, pedaling efficiency, and walkability. Rest assured, no pedal has been left unturned, and these shoes have all been put through the wringer.
Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Gravel Bike Shoes
Gravel biking has exploded in popularity in the past decade and there are lots of different gravel bike shoes to choose from. While cross-country mountain bike shoes were previously the only option โ and are still great options โ there are now quite a few shoes designed and marketed toward the gravel rider. Since gravel riding and cross-country mountain biking share similar performance demands, we’ve tested shoes designed for each discipline and several that claim to be great at both.
There’s much to consider when looking for the best gravel bike shoes. Here, we’ll discuss important factors like fit, closures, ventilation, stiffness, and outsole designs. Of course, the type of riding you’re doing will also affect the shoes you choose.
Do You Need a Gravel Shoe?
Gravel riding borrows aerodynamics, stiffness, and weight savings from the road and pulls in durability and traction from the mountain. We want our shoes to provide plenty of pedaling efficiency and support, but we also need them to be rugged enough to handle the added stresses of off-road riding. Because we all end up pushing the bike at some point, they should be comfortable enough to walk in without slipping around on loose terrain.
If money is tight and you already have a pair, cross-country mountain bike shoes are a great start. In fact, the lines are becoming increasingly blurry and many modern cross-country shoes are now being touted as ideally suited to gravel and XC mountain bike riding.
If you ride more roads than mountains, you can split the difference and get away with one shoe for both gravel and road. If you go that route, we’d recommend looking at a stiffer model, like the Shimano S-Phyre XC9, Specialized S-Works Recon, or Shimano RX8. While you can ride road bike shoes and pedals on gravel, we’d only recommend that if you’re sure you won’t need to do any walking whatsoever.
Fit
A well-fitting shoe will be snug โ but not excessively tight โ with some room for the toes to wiggle. Ideally, you can find a width and volume that matches your foot shape, and the uppers should secure snugly around the feet like a good hug.
You don’t want the foot to feel constricted, but excessive movement is also undesirable as it can cause discomfort and instability or rob you of efficiency. The heel should also feel locked in the shoeโs heel pocket and shouldnโt slip up or down.
Laces and BOA systems can fine-tune a fit, but it’s always best to start with a shoe that generally fits well. If you’re ordering online, be sure to look at the sizing guides. Some Euro sizing puts shoes between U.S. sizes (if that’s the case for you, it’s usually better to size up). Some brands also offer wide sizes.
Closure System
Shoes generally close with one or two of four systems. Most modern shoes use a single or double-dial โ BOA is most common โ closure system. You push the knob shut and spin the dial to get a custom fit around the foot. To release it, you pull the knob, and the spool unravels.
- BOA seems to dominate the dial market and has come a long way. In our experience, it’s a bombproof system that makes shoes quick and easy to get in and out of and allows you to micro-adjust the fit over the ride. Our favorite shoes use a twin BOA system, allowing you to further tweak the fit over both the midfoot and forefoot independently.
- Hook-and-loop straps use Velcro over the foot. Many shoes use a combination of Velcro over the toes and a BOA system over the upper and midfoot. This combination saves a few grams (and some pocket change) but doesn’t typically lock the foot in as well as a twin BOA system. In muddy conditions, crud can get trapped in the hook and loop, reducing their effectiveness. Velcro also tends to wear out faster.
- Good old-fashioned shoelaces are making a comeback. They are light, cheap, replaceable, and winning on the fashion front. The best applications will often vary the eyelets so you can lock a section and loosen another. This allows a custom fit over different parts of the foot.
We didn’t review any shoes that use this, but it’s worth sharing that a few older models use a ratchet system that incrementally tightens a strap over the foot, like a ski boot buckle.
Sole Stiffness
Linking the rider to the bike, a proper gravel shoe is stiff enough to transfer force from the legs into the drivetrain, is durable enough to endure the rough terrain, and has lugs for traction. The shoe’s stiffness comes from the midsole plate, sometimes called a shank.
Higher-end models often use carbon fiber, which is light, stiff, and expensive. Less pricey shoes will use a durable nylon or fiberglass plate. While stiffness is often talked about in terms of performance, super stiff soles aren’t necessarily the best thing for all riders.
Racers or performance-minded riders typically steer toward very stiff soles with the goal of transferring every drop of pedaling power from their legs to the drivetrain. That said, the stiffer sole, the less forgiving it is, so race shoes can be a bit less comfortable, especially over rough surfaces. The majority of the stiffest shoes we tested have a carbon fiber midsole and also happen to be the most expensive. The Shimano S-Phyre XC9 and Specialized S-Works Recon are great examples. While not exactly in the budget category, shoes like the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon and the Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO cost a bit less than the aforementioned models while still featuring stiff carbon midsoles.
If you’re not racing, soles that are slightly less stiff than race shoes are often the best bet. They are still stiff enough to be efficient, yet they are a bit more forgiving and comfortable for most riders. They also make walking a bit easier.
If you’re more interested in the experience and comfort over PRs and watts, then a more balanced sole stiffness is likely the way to go. Shoes like the Crankbrothers Candy Lace and Quoc Gran Tourer both fit into this category.
There is such a thing as shoes that are not stiff enough. If you can see or feel the sole flexing under your foot while pedaling, it is also sapping a tiny bit of your pedaling energy. Soft soles can also cause foot and calf fatigue over time. Otherwise, softer-soled shoes are generally quite comfortable and make walking around much easier.
Some shoes, like Rapha’s Explore Powerweave, run the composite footplate just short of the toes, giving the shoe a little flex in the toebox. A little extra mobility in the toes makes it easier to walk around in the shoes. Many shoes also put a rocker in the front of the sole, allowing you to “roll” your gait in a fully rigid shoe.
Outsole
Put enough time in the saddle, and you’ll put more than enough time out of the saddle. Adventurous gravel riding can be equal parts pushing and pedaling. A solid gravel shoe should not only be comfortable to walk in but also have enough traction so you aren’t slipping around.
We found two general kinds of lugs โ a harder lug compound and a softer lug compound. For rides that walk over hard rock, we prefer the outsole with softer rubber lugs. They grip rock better, add a touch of cushion, and tend to hold up better over time.
For mud and muck, we appreciated the sharper edge retention found on a harder rubber lug. They bite in better, but they tend to flake off sooner.
If your rides don’t pull you out of the saddle, you have a lot more leeway with traction. Low-traction shoes will be lighter (by a few grams) and still be comfortable enough to walk around the parking lot or coffee shop.
Cleat Compatibility
Gravel and cross-country mountain bike shoes all share one thing in common: the two-bolt cleat interface. This means they are compatible with two-bolt cleats typical of clipless (clip-in) mountain bike pedals. There aren’t too many true “standards” in cycling, but luckily, the two-bolt “mountain” cleat interface is one of them.
Even though there is some variation in the cleat designs between pedal manufacturers, they all use the two-bolt standard. This interface consists of two parallel tracks in the sole of the shoe under the forefoot. Inside the cleat tracks are cleat mount plates that can slide fore and aft to find the optimal position of the cleat to suit your preference.
Gravel and cross-country mountain bike shoes use the two-bolt cleat standard because the cleats are smaller and can fit in between the tread blocks that border the cleat box. These tread blocks aid in walking, protect the cleats, and often interface with the pedal body for lateral stability.
This is in contrast to road bike shoes, which use much larger three-bolt cleats. Road bike shoes don’t prioritize walking. Instead, the goal is to maximize surface area contact between the shoes, cleat, and pedal body.
Price & Value
The gravel bike shoes we tested vary pretty widely in price, from more affordable models, around $160, to super high-end race shoes that cost $400 or more. Realistically, if you’re not racing or super concerned with having the absolute stiffest and lightest shoes imaginable to eke out every precious watt of your pedaling power, then any of the more affordable shoes will likely serve you just fine while keeping some money in your bank account.
Budget
Budget-friendly shoes typically use less exotic materials and have simpler closure systems that help to keep the price down. This is evidenced in a couple of the less expensive models we tested, the Crankbrothers Candy Lace ($160) and Fizik Terra Powerstrap X4 ($170). These shoes both use nylon shanks in the midsole to provide stiffness and support, as opposed to carbon fiber or composite. Likewise, the Candy Lace uses traditional laces, and the Fizik employs two hook and loop straps to secure them around the feet. Both closures are comfortable and functional, even if they aren’t as fancy as BOA dials.
Compared to their higher-end competition, these more affordable shoes aren’t quite as stiff or “high-performance,” but they are comfortable and absolutely get the job done.
Mid-Tier
As we climb above the $200 mark but stay below $300, we begin to see fancier materials like carbon fiber, BOA closures, an increase in sole stiffness, and potentially a reduction in weight. This will likely be the sweet spot for most riders seeking a higher level of performance without totally breaking the bank.
While it is priced in the mid-tier, the Pearl Izumi Expedition PRO ($260) boasts similar features and performance to the premium models at a more easily palatable price point. With a dual BOA closure, supple uppers, and stiff carbon soles, these shoes are ready to mix it up in races or provide you with great efficiency on far-flung adventures. The Giro Sector ($240) slots nicely into this price bracket as well. While they aren’t the stiffest shoes, they provide a balanced sole stiffness along with the unique Synchwire uppers that top the charts for ventilation and breathability.
Premium
For those looking to be at the pointy end of races or atop the Strava leaderboards, it may be worth the investment in a high-end pair of shoes to maximize your efficiency and performance. For others, simply looking and feeling fast may justify the expense.
If you’re seeking the pinnacle of performance through fit, weight, and pedaling efficiency, you can find it in the Shimano S-Phyre XC9 ($430) and the Specialized S-Works Recon ($450). These shoes are incredibly light, have impeccable fits, and super stiff soles that help provide efficient transfer of pedaling power into forward momentum.
Even then, not all light and stiff race-ready shoes cost over $400. The Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) stands up well against its more expensive competitors while keeping a little money in your wallet. They may be a tad heavier than the abovementioned models, but their performance is otherwise spot-on.
Frequently Asked Questions
If you ride gravel, then you could benefit from having some gravel or cross-country mountain bike shoes when you ride. The combination of stiff soles, grippy and walkable outsoles, lightweight uppers, and comfortable closures make this style of shoe the ideal footwear for riding gravel.
Trail riding shoes are heavier, bulkier, and often not adequately stiff for gravel riding. Road bike shoes don’t have walk-friendly outsoles, and they will get trashed when you dismount your bike on a rough gravel road. Gravel shoes combine pedaling efficiency, comfort, and walkability to make them perfectly suited to the task.
Realistically, gravel and cross-country mountain bike shoes are essentially the same. In fact, lots of shoes these days claim to be suited to both disciplines since the footwear demands for each are basically the same. Other types of mountain bike shoes, like those for trail, enduro, or gravity riding are quite different, however.
These shoes tend to be bulkier, heavier, and not quite as stiff through the sole, making them less ideal for pounding out miles on gravel roads. Likewise, unless you ride the smoothest gravel ever and never put your feet down, road bike shoes aren’t ideal for gravel either.
While plenty stiff and light, road bike shoes typically have smooth, hard soles that are not ideal for walking on gravel or trails and they will get all scratched up if you do.
The fancier the materials, technologies, and components incorporated into a gravel bike shoe, the more they cost. Carbon fiber midsoles, BOA closures, and ultralight materials aren’t cheap, and combining them into a shoe drives the cost up. Not to mention the research, development, and testing that goes on to make them 1% lighter and faster than the previous version.
We won’t lie; it does seem ridiculous to pay $400+ for a pair of bike shoes. We’ll also admit that they are usually incredibly nice and have even improved our performance by using them. That’s not to say that everyone needs to spend that much to have a good time. You don’t. But, those shoes exist for those who want them.
Our top pick for gravel racing is the Shimano S-Phyre XC9. Yes, this is a cross-country mountain bike race shoe, but they’re still the best we’ve used for gravel races. But, the best gravel race shoe for you may be different depending on what fits your foot the best.
The important factors for race shoes are a stiff sole, precise and comfortable fit, and lightweight. While stiff and light shoes are great, a good fit is arguably the most important piece of the puzzle for long-term comfort while trying your hardest.
Also, consider your goals. If you’re fighting for a podium, then shelling out big bucks for the trickest shoes may be worth it. If you’re just starting out or you enter races more for fun than competition, then it may not make as much sense to go so high-end. Budget is another consideration since race-oriented shoes are often quite expensive.
Related Content
The Best Cycling Bibs of 2024
We tested 16 of the best men’s cycling bibs on the market to help you find the right pair for your perfect ride.
The Best Mountain Bike Helmets of 2024
Our experts put the best mountain bike helmets of 2024 to the test. Whether you need a budget pick or overall winner, we’ve got you covered.