Gravity, speed, ice, and snow — the ingredients of a freestyle ski session are a recipe for adrenaline and possible disaster. Last season, my son learned the hard way by breaking a wrist on one of his first days out.
At Christmas, he had a cast on his arm, and he was sidelined as his friends grabbed the rope tow at our local ski hill.
This year, we’re upgrading Levi, age 11, head to toe in an attempt to keep him safer on the snow.
Skiers of any age should consider looking closer at safety-oriented gear. A trend that started with helmets years ago is expanding down the body with back protectors, pads, “crash shorts,” mouth guards, and more.
“No one wore helmets when I was growing up,” said Atle Enberget, a founder at Sweet Protection. “Today, it’s standard, and you look strange if you don’t wear one.”
Sweet Protection, based in Norway, started in helmets and has since expanded to pads, goggles, apparel, and other protective ski gear.
For this article, I interviewed Enberget and multiple experts. I also talked with Martin Sundquist, a former member of the U.S. Freestyle Ski Team who now serves as head coach of Nybora, my son’s ski club. The goal was to provide an updated look at the state of safety for kids and anyone hitting the slopes this year.
Taking a Look at Protective Ski Gear

Back Protection
Jumps, rails, boxes, and other obstacles in the park pose risks to the spine. As a first move this season, we got Levi measured for a back-protecting vest. We ordered the Vest Junior model from Sweet Protection, which touts a foam panel made to absorb shock on impact in a fall.
The foam is 13mm thick, and the vest slips under a jacket as you ski. It fits close and has a flexibility more akin to a midlayer fleece than a protective shell.
The zip-on armor, once specialized racing gear, is trending with freestyle skiers and normal folks on the slopes. Henrik Björkman, a designer at POC, said his company recommends a back-protecting vest as “the minimum requirement” in addition to a helmet.
We outfitted my older son, Will, in the Oseus VPD Vest from POC, designed for skiing or mountain biking. Like the Sweet Protection model, it zips on and fits more like a shirt than foam-equipped body armor.
POC emphasizes its EN1621 rating on this vest, which denotes a testing standard for impact absorption by the European Committee for Standardization, or CEN. (Sweet Protection also boasts the CEN certification.)
Björkman noted the testing standards are useful. But the right fit is equally important.
“This is for protection reasons as well as ergonomic reasons,” he said. “Naturally, the protector should not restrict the user’s movements.”
The equipment adds protection for a skier in a crash. Another scenario is safety if a rogue skier crashes into you. That’s becoming more common on crowded hills, Enberget said.
Numerous brands now sell back protection products. Shred, Atomic, Flaxta, Evoc, and other companies offer vests and rigid back protectors of similar design and pricing, commonly between $125 and $200.
Martin Sundquist of Nybora said back protectors are not yet common on his youth freestyle team. The team requires helmets, but other gear is optional. He added that they “always encourage any safety equipment a skier is interested in wearing.”
Enberget takes it further. “Back protectors should be standard gear,” he said. “There is no reason not to wear one anymore.”

Helmets Evolve

Mouthguards & Wrist Protection

Padded shorts are one of the latest trends in protective ski gear; (photo/Inhuman)
Padded shorts
Protective Ski Gear: The Final Word
