Ditching industry standards isn’t something that can be done quickly and is usually done discreetly. But the folks at SRAM, bless their dear hearts, are not very good at keeping secrets.
I first heard a rumor about the new direct mount derailleur last fall through a pro rider. It was substantiated a week later by a bike tester close to the brand. By early winter, photos started to leak online. As a lifelong cyclist and a devout cynic of the derailleur hanger (I’ve bent and broken three in the last 2 years), this was Mozart-level music to my ears.
SRAM formally announced the Eagle Transmission on March 21, and I was fortunate to get a demo bike about a week later to test for this review. They call the system a “transmission” instead of a “drivetrain” because it is integrated and simple, seamlessly connecting to AXS shifters, derailleur, and brakes.
For context, I’ve been riding electronic AXS components since they launched 4 years ago and one-by groupsets for almost a decade, giving me a direct comparison between the new and the old. And I put one month and 300 miles on the new SRAM XO Eagle Transmission.
In short: The SRAM XO Eagle Transmission removes almost every negative of rear derailleurs. It was simple to install and required no adjustments or maintenance beyond charging batteries. Most importantly, it proved incredibly robust, something unattainable until now.
- Gear range: 520%
- Weight: 3 lbs., 9.9 oz. (including battery)
- Cog sizes: 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32, 38, 42, 52t
- Cranks: 165/170/175mm, 34T chainring, power meter available
Pros
- Incredibly durable
- Faultless shifting
- No adjustments
- Costs less as a system than predecessors
Cons
- Still expensive
- Requires UDH
- No sacrificial hanger
- Not backward compatible
How Big Is This Update?

SRAM XO Eagle Transmission Review

First Impressions
What I Liked the Most

Room for Improvement
Who Is SRAM XO Eagle Transmission For?
