The best running shorts for women can be the difference between a smooth run and a workout spent tugging and adjusting. From daily road miles to steep technical climbs, our team puts in the weekly mileage to find the pairs that truly deliver when the pace picks up and the temperatures rise.
To make our list, the best women’s running shorts must stay put, resist chafing, dry quickly, and offer smart storage for essentials without feeling bulky. We also look closely at durability, price, sustainability, and style, because the shorts you reach for most should perform as well on mile 20 as they did on mile one.
Because every runner’s body and preferences are different, there is no single pair that works perfectly for everyone. However, if you want the ultimate do-it-all option, our new best overall pick, the Patagonia Strider Pro stands out for its elite breathability and mountain-ready storage. For runners who want solid performance at a more accessible price, the REI Co-op Swiftland or the Decathlon Kiprun Run 500 prove you don’t have to spend a fortune to get a reliable pair.
Editor’s Note: On March 18, 2026, we recalibrated our ratings and shifted our “Best Overall” award to the Patagonia Strider Pro to better reflect long-term durability and storage performance. We also added Quick & Dirty summaries and a more helpful Comparison Chart to help you find the right fit faster.
The Best Women’s Running Shorts of 2026
Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Newly added four-way stretch
- Carrying capacity
- Comfortable waistline
- Breathable and quick-drying
- Great storage
Cons
- Back pocket smaller than before
The Quick & Dirty: The undisputed gold standard for both road and trail miles, offering elite breathability and an unbeatable pocket system. The only catch? They carry a premium price tag, and the built-in brief runs a bit snug.
The Patagonia Strider Pro ($79) earns our top spot for its standout mix of comfort, performance, and thoughtful storage in a lightweight package that feels ready for just about any run. Made with a stretchy, recycled polyester blend, these shorts breathe exceptionally well, dry fast, and stay comfortable through sweat, stream crossings, and long miles on hot days. The fabric feels featherlight without riding up or causing chafing, and the seamless hem and built-in brief kept us comfortable even during high-output efforts on steep, variable terrain.
We reached for these shorts again and again because they felt equally capable on smooth trail runs, scrambly mountain routes, and anything in between. On one hot mountain outing that involved running, hiking, and multiple river crossings, they handled every shift in pace and terrain with ease. The minimalist waistband looks barely there, but it sits securely without digging in or feeling restrictive, which was a pleasant surprise. Storage is also better than expected, featuring multiple stretchy envelope pockets that make it easy to stash gels and small essentials on the move.
The updated rear pocket no longer fits larger phones as well as older iterations did, and longtime fans may notice the material feels a bit lighter than before. Still, neither change was enough to knock these out of the top position. For runners who want a short that disappears on the body, performs across a wide range of conditions, and holds up to serious mileage, the Strider Pro remains the most well-rounded option out there.
Decathlon Kiprun Run 500 Dry Shorts
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Good value
- Doesn't ride up
- Fast-drying fabric
Cons
- Moderately short rise in the fit
- Only one useful pocket
The Quick & Dirty: Need something light and reliable for daily training miles? This is an absolute steal, even if the materials won’t survive quite as many seasons as the premium brands.
Sometimes you just want a pair of shorts that work without draining your wallet, and that’s where the Decathlon Kiprun Run 500 ($30) shorts shine. They aren’t the flashiest or most technical option out there, but they deliver more than you’d expect for the price. The waistband is slimmer than on premium picks like the Oiselle High Rise Rogas, but it’s surprisingly comfortable; secure with digging or squeezing. And, the drawstring actually does its job. Despite what we expected, the Run 500s stay put while running and hiking. Never once did we have to pick the shorts out of our backside — a total win.
The pocket design is less successful, but still functional. Technically, you get four pockets, but only the rear zippered one is useful. The two hand pockets and tiny key pocket are shallow and unzippered, so items bounce out way too easily. On the move, though, the Run 500s feel light enough and dry quickly, even when we were sweating buckets on a hot, 85-degree day in the Colorado Rockies. The front rise (distance from waistband to crotch) runs a bit short, and the lack of a liner won’t make everyone happy. But for a budget-friendly training short, we think the Kiprun Run 500s are absolutely good enough.
Oiselle High Rise Long Roga Shorts
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Comfortable waistband that doesn't dig
- Plenty of functioning storage
- Non-irritating liner
- No riding up or bunching
Cons
- Lack of sustainability transparency
- Premium price point
The Quick & Dirty: A flattering, high-waisted staple that looks just as good at the coffee shop as it does on the track. It’s the perfect everyday short, though long-distance runners might find the minimal pocket storage lacking.
The Oiselle High Rise Long Rogas ($79) delivers an appealing mix of comfort, performance, and style that makes them one of the easiest pairs to reach for day after day. The standout is the wide, high-rise waistband, which sits securely without pinching or squeezing and creates a smooth, flattering fit that stays put whether you are logging miles, walking the dog, or heading straight to town afterward.
During testing in Colorado’s summer heat, including 25 miles of running and another 5 to 10 miles of hiking, the Rogas felt nearly invisible on the body. The lightweight stretch fabric moves easily, dries quickly, and stays comfortable on sweaty climbs without causing chafing. Our tester liked the 6-inch inseam for its extra coverage, especially for everyday wear, and Oiselle also offers shorter inseam options for runners who want a racier fit.
A zippered back pocket adds enough room for small essentials like a key or gel, though storage is still fairly limited compared to more run-focused options built for long days out. The premium price may also give some runners pause, and these are not the most sustainability-minded shorts in the category. Still, with inclusive sizing, a flattering cut, and a design that transitions easily from workouts to everyday life, the High Rise Long Roga is a standout choice for runners who want one short that can do a little bit of everything.
On Performance 2/1 Shorts
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Incredible all-around comfort
- Breathable and quick to dry
- Secure fit with no bounce or riding up
Cons
- Not the most flattering fit
- Limited storage
The Quick & Dirty: The ultimate solution for runners who battle thigh chafing but hate the look of plain spandex. You’ll stay chafe-free, but you’ll trade some breathability for the heavier double-layer design.
The On 3″ Performance 2/1 Shorts ($80) stood out in testing for one reason above all else: comfort. From the first run, they stayed put, never dug in, and completely avoided the rubbing and bunching that can ruin a good day on the move. These are the kind of shorts you stop noticing once you start running, which is exactly what we want from a top anti-chafe pick.
The two-layer design works especially well. The fitted inner shorts stay in place without tugging or requiring mid-run adjustments, while the light outer layer adds coverage without extra bulk. Together, the combo feels airy, secure, and easy to move in whether you are picking up the pace or heading out for a relaxed daily run. They are also impressively lightweight, which only adds to that barely-there feel.
Storage is better than expected, with a zip pocket that fits a phone and an additional inner pocket for keys or a gel. We did find ourselves wishing for one more liner pocket for extra storage on the go. And while these are not the most flattering shorts in the bunch, the comfort and chafe-free performance easily outweigh that drawback.
For runners who care most about staying comfortable mile after mile, the On 3″ Performance 2/1 Shorts are an easy top choice.
REI Co-op Swiftland 5″ Shorts
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Excellent value
- Secure, comfortable waistband
- Stays in place on the move
- Light fabric
Cons
- Most pockets are too shallow to trust
- Short rise may fit awkwardly for some
- Not as quick-drying as others
The Quick & Dirty: A comfortable, budget-friendlier short with a secure waistband, breathable feel, and enough coverage for daily miles. The wider leg openings can lead to some thigh chafing on longer runs, and they do not dry as quickly as some higher-performing options.
The REI Co-op Swiftland Running Shorts ($60) punch above their price with a comfortable fit, a reliable waistband, and easy everyday performance. What stood out most in testing was the mid-rise waistband, which stayed in place without rolling, digging in, or creating pressure points. It is wide enough to feel smooth and secure without drawing attention to itself, which made these shorts an easy favorite for regular runs.
The lightweight fabric feels breathable, and the 5-inch inseam offers a nice balance of coverage and mobility. These shorts never felt too loose or baggy, and they moved well through a range of paces and conditions. The built-in liner also impressed us with its soft, comfortable feel. It stayed in place and never pinched or caused chafing.
The biggest drawbacks showed up on hotter, sweatier runs. The wider leg openings can lead to thigh rub over longer distances, and the fabric took longer to dry than some of the other shorts we tested, both after runs and in the dryer. Still, for runners who want a dependable, comfortable pair of shorts at a more approachable price, the Swiftland is a strong value and one of the easiest pairs to recommend
Oiselle Pockito 6″ Shorts
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Tons of useful storage
- No chafing or rubbing
- Supportive, comfortable fit
- Lightweight compression that isn't tight or constrictive
Cons
- Very expensive
- Biker short-style may not be for everyone
The Quick & Dirty: These are the shorts we kept grabbing when we wanted to carry everything without adding a belt or pack. The storage is exceptional, though the slower-drying fabric may be less ideal in humid climates or for runners who frequently encounter wet conditions.
The Oiselle Pockito 6” Shorts ($86) stood out for their impressive storage, comfortable fit, and easy versatility across runs and hikes. Over roughly 25 miles of testing in hot Colorado conditions, they handled road miles, trail runs, and shorter hikes with equal ease. The biggest draw is the sheer number of pockets, which made it easy to carry gels, keys, and a phone without bounce or bulk.
The wide waistband adds to that practicality by holding everything securely while still feeling soft and supportive against the body. The fabric offers a nice balance of stretch and compression, giving the shorts a secure fit without feeling restrictive. They also stayed breathable in warm weather and felt substantial without being heavy.
I have not always loved the bike-short look for running, but these came close to changing my mind. I kept reaching for them because they performed well and made it easy to head out without overthinking what to carry. The one real downside is that they do not dry especially fast, which could be a drawback in wetter climates or for runners who want a short that is ready to go again quickly. Still, for women who prioritize storage and want a high-performing short that can handle more than just daily miles, the Pockito is a standout.
More Run-Worthy Shorts, Field-Tested
While the following shorts didn’t podium, we’ve put plenty of miles on them and they’re worthy of your consideration.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Provides excellent coverage
- Comfortable waistband
- Reflective detailing
- Key loop
Cons
- Liner slightly rides
The Quick & Dirty: A great pick for runners who prefer a modest, compression-style liner with extra coverage; just be aware the inner brief can ride up slightly during higher-intensity efforts.
For runners who prefer a bit more coverage, the On Running Shorts (now $45) deliver a modest yet comfortable fit. With a built-in compression-style liner, they keep you covered without sacrificing ease of movement or causing irritation. The mid-rise waist is another win — its wide, soft waistband stays put without digging in or creating that dreaded bulge effect.
The inner brief is made with 65% recycled polyamide and 35% elastane, giving you four-way stretch and reliable moisture-wicking to keep you dry. While we did notice the liner riding up slightly during activities like jogging or climbing, the shorts still managed to maintain solid coverage overall.
If you’re after shorts that balance modesty, comfort, and performance, these are a strong pick.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- All-around sustainable business practices
- Ultralight and breathable
- Plenty of useful pockets
Cons
- Very expensive
- LImited size range
The Quick & Dirty: Eco-conscious athletes will love this durable, ultralight option for rugged trails; however, the premium price tag and unforgiving waistband make sizing a bit tricky.
Sustainability and durability take center stage in the Norrona Senja Flex1 shorts ($99). Made from 86% recycled nylon with elastane for stretch, the fabric is light yet tough and finished with a PFC-free DWR for mini squalls. They breathe well on hot runs and hikes, and the pocket setup is smart; the zippered back pocket with two waistband gel slots on either side give you plenty of room for the essentials.
But no, the Senja Flex women’s running shorts aren’t perfect. They come with a premium price tag and a skinny waistband that feels snug. Pulling them over wider hips can be tricky, making them feel a bit small overall. Still, for eco-conscious athletes wanting durable, functional trail shorts, they’re a good bet — if you’re willing to pay for them.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Super Comfortable
- Drawstring
- Relaxed fit
Cons
- Thicker fabric
- Shows sweat
- Heavy
The Quick & Dirty: Unbelievably soft and cozy for recovery days or light neighborhood jogs. Keep in mind, the thicker fabric holds sweat and lacks the secure pocketing needed for serious mileage.
The Vuori Halo Performance Short 2.0 ($68) is hands down one of the most comfortable pairs of shorts we’ve ever worn. The recycled DreamKnit fabric feels unlike any other running shorts — it’s incredibly stretchy and soft, like lounge shorts, yet still offers the performance technology expected from workout gear.
Despite the ultra-comfy feel, these shorts hold up well during a run. We were initially skeptical since they feel more like something you’d wear for a lazy day at home than for a workout, but after a few runs—both speed sessions and long runs — they proved their worth.
The tulip-cut hem, which curves around the leg, adds a touch of style while maintaining full freedom of movement. The new, wider waistband is another highlight. It’s about the same width as the REI Co-op Swiftland Running Shorts, but the fabric is softer and more comfortable.
While the shorts have two open-hand pockets, we found them impractical during a run. Without any closures, they aren’t ideal for keeping keys or cards secure, which is a downside. The fabric is thicker than typical running shorts, and we noticed it collected more sweat around the waistband during treadmill runs. It wicks moisture away well but doesn’t evaporate as quickly as more technical shorts.
While we wouldn’t typically describe running shorts as “cozy,” these definitely fit that description. The Vuori Halo Performance Short 2.0 is a great option for both training and rest days, offering a combination of comfort and functionality. However, due to their moisture retention, they may not be the best choice for hot and humid environments.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- UPF 30+
- Lightweight
- Reflective detailing
Cons
- Rides low on some
- Not the best waistband
- Back zippered pocket will not fit bigger phone
The Quick & Dirty: A lightweight, highly breathable option featuring UPF 30+ sun protection; the downside is it rides a bit low on the hips and the back pocket won’t fit a modern plus-sized phone.
Nathan updated its already solid Essential Shorts to be even better. The Essential 2.0 ($65) has an updated fabric blend that allows for more stretch and less restriction. As a bonus, it now includes added sun protection with UPF 30+. Our tester loved running in these shorts, especially in hotter weather.
They have lightweight fabric, mesh liner, good breathability, and multiple stash pockets. The zippered pocket on the Essential 2.0 is located on the back right, at a slight angle. The pocket runs straight across the back of the shorts, below the waistline. When items are stashed in there, the weight can be spread out evenly. It did fit the tester’s iPhone 13 sans case. The pocket also has a nice, easy-to-locate paracord loop pull — better than a standard zipper.
The two other pockets are incorporated into the side panels. A phone only fits halfway, making these pockets better suited for storing energy chews and gels.
The waistband is on par in terms of fit with several other shorts on our list. It does ride a little low on the hips (a note for those who prefer more coverage), but it is still comfortable with the adjustable drawstring. An unfortunate update was eliminating the elastic loop for keys in the side pocket; however, the zippered back pocket can be used to secure valuables. If you’re looking for a lightweight short with excellent pockets, you may want to check out the HOKA Glide 4″ Shorts.
These shorts performed great, from stair workouts to hot trail runs — even workday commutes. The performance, coupled with the price point, makes this a great option for summer running.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Superb compression
- Wide waistband that doesn’t dig
- Flatlock seams that don’t chafe
- Aerodynamic
Cons
- Not everyone’s cup of tea
- Costly
- Limited Sizing
The Quick & Dirty: Elite muscle support designed for long-haul endurance efforts and rapid recovery. That said, the intense compression fit isn’t for everyone and the sizing options are limited.
Every runner needs a good pair of compression shorts. And no one knows compression better than 2XU ($70).
Whether it’s for a long-haul run or a recovery run, one tester never heads to a big race without these shorts. She’s done multiple 24-hour adventure races and 20-mile runs in these. They compress the thighs and butt in all the right places, making the muscles get less fatigued and able to recover faster.
The wide waistband hugs the waistline in a flattering way that doesn’t ever slide down. The seams are a non-issue and strategically placed so there is never a problem with chafing, even as they get wet from sweat or river crossings. While the price and limited sizing kept it from placing higher on our list, these are still a solid choice for compression shorts.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Comfortable, loose fit
- Weightless feel
- Bonded hems for zero chafing
- Cool, bold prints
Cons
- May cling when wet
The Quick & Dirty: The closest you’ll get to feeling like you’re running in the nude thanks to the weightless fabric; just know the flowy material tends to cling to your skin when soaked with sweat.
These shorts are as close as it comes to feeling like you’re running in the nude. The ultralight and airy material of Janji’s Middle Shorts ($64) coupled with the thin, non-chafing, breathable brief make us look down and make sure we’re wearing something.
These provide full coverage in a flattering and fun way. The mesh is highly breathable, and the stretchy waistband has a built-in drawstring cord for a custom fit.
If you don’t like any restrictions or prefer a looser fit, these shorts are the ones to beat. Although one mention is that due to their flowy material, they may cling to your skin when wet.
Women’s Running Shorts Comparison Chart
| Product Name | Price | Rating | Liner Type | Storage / Pockets | Best For |
| Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts | $79 | 9.4 | Built-in Brief | 5 (1 zip, 4 drop-in) | Mountain Routes & Heavy Storage |
| Decathlon Kiprun Run 500 Dry Shorts | $30 | 7.0 | Unlined | 4 (1 zip, 3 stash) | Casual Neighborhood Jogs |
| Oiselle High Rise Long Roga | $79 | 8.5 | Built-in Brief | 1 Zip | Workouts to Coffee Shop |
| On Performance 2/1 | $80 | 8.1 | 2-in-1 Compression | 2 (1 zip, 1 inner) | Thigh-Rub Prevention |
| REI Co-op Swiftland | $60 | 8.8 | Built-in Brief | Shallow Stash | Daily Base Mileage |
| Oiselle Pockito 6″ | $86 | 7.9 | Unlined (Compression) | Multiple Drop-in | Beltless Marathon Training |
| On Running Shorts | $45 | 7.0 | Compression Brief | 1 Key Loop | Modest Coverage Seekers |
| Norrona Senja Flex1 Shorts | $99 | 6.9 | Built-in Brief | 3 (1 zip, 2 gel slots) | Rugged Alpine Trails |
| Vuori Halo Performance 2.0 | $68 | 6.8 | Unlined | 2 Open Hand | Rest Days & Lounging |
| Nathan Essential 2.0 | $65 | 7.4 | Mesh Brief | 3 (1 zip, 2 stash) | High Sun Exposure (UPF 30+) |
| 2XU Compression Shorts | $70 | 7.1 | Unlined (Compression) | None | 24-Hour Adventure Races |
| Janji 3″ AFO Middle Shorts | $64 | 7.6 | Breathable Brief | 1 Hidden Key | Hot Weather Speedwork |

How We Tested Women’s Running Shorts
Our Expert Testers
Our female testers at GearJunkie do a whole array of activities — but one of the most popular is running. Whether trail running, adventure racing, road running, or speed hiking, we’ve worn, washed, sweated in, and tested eons of shorts.
Heather Balogh Rochfort is a once-upon-a-time ultrarunner who has enjoyed distances ranging from mellow 5Ks up to 40-mile trail adventures. These days, her cranky hips don’t love the big miles, but she still loves to explore the backcountry on foot, whether it’s trail running or traipsing along an unknown mountainside. She also recently got a rescue pup who — for better or worse — really needs his daily miles.
Constance Mahoney is an experienced runner who has completed distances from local 5Ks to trail ultramarathons. In 2021, she founded and continues to lead the Trail Sisters Crested Butte, Colorado chapter. Constance has been a GearJunkie contributor since 2019, after she reviewed outdoor gear for FitnessTravelGear.com for 2 years.
GearJunkie Senior Editor Morgan Tilton started dabbling in mountain ultra trail running races in 2016, rotating through the Leadville Race Series, including the Leadville Trail 100 Run, among other incredible events. While she still stacks miles on foot, her favorite adventures involve a mix of scrambles, alpine lakes, and ridgelines.

Our Testing Process
For many, style is a preference, which is why we made sure to test and include running shorts of different lengths, coverage, and compression — and even a running skirt. We chose the best running shorts in these categories by weighing their fit, performance, fabrics, price, and more.
We tested these shorts on trails in Oregon, Colorado, California, Florida, New Mexico, Utah, and beyond — in all sorts of temperatures, humidity, and conditions. Aside from our editors and testers, we also gathered input from other women on staff to make sure we didn’t miss a short.
For our latest update, GearJunkie Contributor Heather Balogh Rochfort tested these shorts on runs in southern Utah and her home outside of Aspen, Colorado.
Our Running Shorts for Women Rating System
When evaluating women’s running shorts side by side, we break down the ratings into four important categories. This helps us find a balance between all the variables and determine which shorts truly should come out on top.
Value
Value considers how much performance and quality you’re getting for the price. A good pair of running shorts for women doesn’t have to be the most expensive, but it should deliver dependable comfort, thoughtful design, and longevity that justifies the cost. We look at construction, materials, and versatility across different running conditions to determine which shorts truly earn their price tag.
Durability
Durability measures how well a pair of shorts holds up to real-world use: repeated washes, long training cycles, and high-mileage days. We examine the strength of stitching, fabric integrity, and how well elastic waistbands and liners maintain their shape over time.
Style
While performance comes first, style matters to all of us. We evaluate how flattering the fit is across a range of body types, how colors and cuts align with current trends, and whether the design transitions easily from workout to everyday wear. The goal: shorts that look as good as they feel.
Performance
Performance is the heart of any running short. We assess comfort during movement, breathability, moisture management, and freedom of motion. Pocket design, liner comfort, and waistband stability all factor into how well a pair performs in training or on race day. The best running shorts should almost disappear once you start moving, with nothing to distract you from your run.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Running Shorts
You can run in just about anything, but having a comfortable pair of shorts sure does make pounding the pavement more enjoyable. Here are some things to consider when looking for the best running shorts.
Loose vs. Fitted
Choosing between loose versus fitted running shorts is more of a personal preference. However, there are a few things to consider when deciding.
Those who want to ensure a full range of motion or who want that bare minimal feel should aim for something flowy and loose like the Norrona Senja Flex1 shorts. A looser fit is also ideal in warm weather, allowing for more air circulation.
Fitted shorts that tend to hug the body often have more stretch to them. Although there is a potential for chafing, especially on ultra runs, make sure the seams are flat and designed to mitigate chafing. An option would be the Oiselle Pockito Shorts or the 2XU Compression Shorts. Another benefit of fitted shorts is that they tend to provide more storage room to hold your items.
One other option is going for a hybrid approach, like the On Performance 2/1 Shorts. You get the loose comfort and modesty with the outer shorts, but they still won’t chafe or rub thanks to the inner liner short.
Ultimately, the fit depends on what works for you and how confident you will feel while running in it.

Liner or No Liner?
First, decide if you want a liner or not. A perfectly fitting liner will tend to be less chafe-inducing over long miles than inappropriate underwear. Thus, a liner eliminates the need to change undies before a run. Just throw on your shorts and go! Many of the running shorts on our list come with a liner (like our favorites, the Oiselle High Rise Roga Shorts), with the exception of the compression shorts like the Oiselle Pockito Shorts and the Vuori Halo Performance Short 2.0. Also, budget-friendly options like the Decathlon Kiprun Run 500 Dry shorts do not come with a liner.
For many runners, a lined short is just simpler to deal with. But some runners find choosing the perfect underwear for their shorts works better. Look for underwear with laser-cut seams to prevent chafing in sensitive areas. However, it really is based on trial and error, so you may have to try several pairs before you find your perfect match.
Some shorts have a skintight inner liner, and others have a looser, brief-style liner. Try on a few and see what you prefer.

Feel & Weight
When you run, weight is an enemy. You want the lightest shorts you can find, and that starts with materials. Options we recommend that are lightweight and strike that nice balance are the Janji Middle Shorts and the Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts. But you may want to avoid super-wispy fabrics that can bunch or stick to skin or snag, as they can be annoying on long runs.
Choose synthetic shorts for their quick-drying properties. Cotton is nice and soft but will get bogged down with sweat.
Consider antimicrobial treatments, as many brands add a silver salt to their product to minimize odor-causing bacteria. Most brands have swapped over to ensure their liners are antimicrobial as well.
Finally, many running shorts have a small amount of reflectivity built in, like Nathan Essential 2.0 Shorts and the On Running Shorts — whether on the logo, rear, or pull tabs. It’s a nice touch and helps you stay a little safer at night.

Material
As we said earlier, we boast about shorts being water-repellent, water-resistant, and quick-drying. If you go outside in erratic weather, you’ll want something that doesn’t retain moisture and can even resist it.
The majority of running shorts have the aforementioned material characteristics; two excellent examples are the Oiselle High Rise Roga Shorts and the Norrona Senja Flex1 shorts.
Breathability is another aspect you should take into account. Once more, most shorts today are made with breathable material, but some are specially designed to add even more ventilation.
SPF protection, four-way stretch, anti-microbial (which we highly recommend), and snag and tear resistance are additional qualities to think about but are not necessary.

Pockets
Even if you carry a vest pack, pockets can really set a pair of shorts apart. Consider first any waist-belt-style pockets like with the Oiselle High Rise Rogas or the Oiselle Pockito shorts. When executed well, a good waist pocket will allow you to leave a pack at home for many runs. And for shorter runs, it’s nice to toss your keys and phone in your shorts and go.
Consider if pockets have zippers or other fail-safe measures for security. Can you access them on the go? Zip pockets are great, but also consider the zipper quality or zipper pull, as this is a possible failure point.
Larger thigh pockets are great for daily wear, but they become useless while running. Who wants a bunch of stuff bouncing off their legs? So don’t worry much about big pockets on the thighs. They usually don’t hurt, and do come in handy for post-run life like a stop in a coffee shop. But you won’t use them while running. Unless — here’s the kicker: it’s a loose pair of shorts with built-in compression shorts underneath and pockets. The more elastic, the more compression, the better those pockets are.

Waistband
The waistband needs to fit your body perfectly. Too tight, and it’s going to hurt. Too loose, and your pants fall down. Some waistbands are made entirely of elastic and are bonded to the short; some have an internal elastic band that you can adjust or tighten as needed.
You’ll want to find one with the right fit, but also look for a band that lies flat against the skin. We particularly liked the waistband on the Oiselle High Rise Roga Shorts, REI Co-op Swiftland, Hoka women’s 4″ Shorts, and even the On Performance 2/1 Shorts. Cheap shorts will often bunch at the waistband. You want a smooth, continuous layer of fabric against the skin. Quality shorts will not behave like a scrunchie on your waist.
Length
The preferred length of running shorts depends on the wearer. Would you prefer something with a long inseam like the 7” inseam found on the 2XU Compression Shorts? Or do you prefer a short inseam that makes it feel like nothing’s there, like the Decathlon Kiprun Run 500 Dry shorts and its 3″ inseam?
Additionally, taking individual choice into consideration, a person’s height will affect where shorts will fall on them. A 5″ inseam could feel too lengthy on a petite person, and vice versa. Shorts with a 2” inseam will feel more like underwear on you if you’re tall. We like shorts that come with inseam options because they work for a wider variety of women.

Price & Value
Budget
For the budget price of $20 to $45, you’ll be giving up some durability and features, but there are still some great shorts to be found in this price range. At $30, the Decathlon Kiprun Run 500 Dry shorts sit on the low end of this price range, and it is heavier than a lot of the shorts on this list. But it still offers some solid features like a liner, mesh side vents, and quick-drying capabilities.
Mid-Tier
Spending a little more gets you into the $45 to $65-ish range, which will deliver lighter shorts like the 4-ounce Nathan Essential 2.0 Shorts ($65). Or if you are looking for both comfort and performance, you have the option of Vuori Halo Performance Short 2.0 ($68) or the REI Co-op Swiftland 5″ Running Shorts ($60). This also gets you into the special features category, like the 2XU Compression Shorts ($70) for those who want more support.
Premium
Those willing to shell out $70 or more will find top-end materials like those you’ll find in the high-end Oiselle High Rise Rogas ($79), the Norrona Senja Flex1 Shorts ($99), or the On Performance 2/1 Shorts ($80). You’ll also be in range of high-end compression shorts like the excellent Oiselle Pockito Shorts ($86).
Frequently Asked Questions
We’ve mentioned a lot of the big factors above, but it bears repeating: for running — whether trail or race or road — you want something that fits well, isn’t restrictive, moves with you, and is lightweight. Running shorts made from a synthetic blend or wool with added elastane for stretch are some of the best we discovered in testing.
So, what shorts should you wear? Consider a few personal preferences. Do you want a liner? Do you want a longer or shorter inseam? Do you want a pocket? Then, check out our best picks above — there are different styles and something for everyone! But at the end of the day, they all felt great and worked great for running.

Many women’s running shorts have a built-in brief, or liner, so that underwear is not required. Liners both provide coverage underneath your shorts and are usually made of a thin, highly breathable, and wicking fabric.
For women, they can also provide some support and compression. Most liners are sewn in. A good liner won’t restrict motion, will wick well, and keeps you cool.
This varies by preference, but most runners will say that their most comfortable shorts fit well, don’t restrict motion, and are comfortable against skin — in other words, they are soft.
Some of our favorites on the list went it came to fit and soft feel include the Janji Middle Shorts, Patagonia Strider Pro shorts, and REI Co-op Swiftland.
Another factor that determines if a short is comfortable is the waistband. This has a little to do with sizing and fit, but also a lot to do with the material. Choosing a short that has a nice wide, flat, elastic waistband is always a safe bet.
This boils down to personal preference, but it also depends on where you are running. If you are running in a very hot and humid environment, looser shorts with lighter fabric and more breathability will be a better option.
If you are competing or racing, you may want to choose tighter compression shorts for comfort and aerodynamics. Ultimately, choose the style that is most likely to keep you comfortable, happy, and running.
For women, running short inseams vary wildly. Most shorts are either in the 2- or 3-inch inseam range or the 5-7-inch range. Some compression shorts and a few regular shorts are breaking into the longer range of 7+ inches (largely thanks to ultrarunning superstar Courtney Dauwalter!)
Compression shorts can come in shorter or longer lengths, but will not have an additional liner. Because of the tight fit, a liner is essentially already built into the shorts. But most shorter inseam shorts will have a liner.
If you are taller, or prefer more coverage in your running wear, we’d suggest looking for a short with at least a 5-inch inseam.
Our staff members have tested lower-budget shorts whose elastic waistband has disintegrated within a year, and we’ve tested other shorts that have lasted more than 6 years. When purchasing running shorts, it’s a good idea to check the durability of the fabrics they are made of, and also check fabric care.
Washing and hanging or air-drying running shorts immediately after sweating is always a good way to keep your shorts lasting as long as possible.
As mentioned above, most women’s running shorts are designed with a built-in liner that replaces underwear. If you buy a pair like this, then no, you can ditch your underwear and never look back. These liners are designed to wick away sweat and minimize chafing. Plus, you don’t want to double up, as that will cause bunching, discomfort, and more hot spots than you can handle.
However, compression shorts and women’s running shorts without liners are a different story. Here, it really comes down to personal preference. If you want to wear underwear, go right ahead. Just be sure that they are breathable, wick sweat away, and don’t cause chafing. If underwear feels too bulky or you prefer to go commando and let your bits breathe, that is also totally fine. One word to the wise, though: mind your manners. If you’re wearing a loose pair of shorts with no liner or even a running skirt, make sure your nether regions aren’t flashing everyone as you run by.
