Support us! GearJunkie may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Thanks to advancements in fabric technology and design, today’s running shorts are better than ever. Overall, materials are lighter, more comfortable, and offer better mobility.

All running shorts should allow you to move freely — that’s a given. The best running shorts, however, should not only provide freedom of movement but also keep moisture at a minimum to ward off chafing and keep items like your phone, keys, and fuel secure without bouncing around.

After months of testing, even years in some cases, we’ve narrowed down the best for whatever type of running you’re into. The shorts on this list are the ones we kept reaching for time and time again.

If you’re interested in broadening your knowledge about running shorts, check out our comprehensive buyer’s guide and price & value sections at the end of this article. And be sure to look at our comparison chart when it’s decision time.

Editor’s Note: For our November 8, 2024, update, we made sure that all the selections are current and added notes on price and value to our buyer’s guide.


Specifications

Length
5" and 7"
Shell
73% nylon, 27% spandex; Bluesign approved
Liner
Brief (80% nylon, 20% spandex; Bluesign approved)
Pockets
1 rear zipper, 2 side drop-ins

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extremely lightweight and airy
  • Secure, bounce-free main pocket
  • Next-to-nothing feeling

Cons

  • Small zippered pocket opening
Cory Smith

This is the second iteration of REI-branded running shorts that we’ve tested, and we have to give a hats-off to the design team — these are top-notch running shorts. Offered in both a 5-inch and 7-inch inseam, the REI Co-op Swiftland running shorts ($60) checked all the boxes that we look for in a quality pair of running shorts — comfortable, supportive, and moisture-wicking with plenty of carrying capacity.

The 73% nylon and 27% spandex shell is remarkably light and airy with excellent mobility. Not once was the stretchy fabric confining. The shorts pretty much felt unnoticeable, and the brief-style liner was comfortable, offering a good amount of support without feeling restrictive.

A wide but comfortable waistband securely anchors the shorts around your waist. The rear zip pocket on the waistband is capable of holding a smartphone, and two drop-in side pockets can hold snacks or keys — all bounce-free.

If we had to nitpick, one concern is their long-term durability. Take this with a grain of salt, as we haven’t put them through a long-term durability test yet. We only mention this because the shell fabric is really thin — much thinner than most of the shorts tested — and they softened up a bit with each wash cycle.

We’d also like to see the rear zippered pocket have a slightly larger opening. Stuffing a large Samsung smartphone in the pocket took a little force, and we could certainly imagine busting a seam trying to fit it in if you’re not careful.

It’s clear REI put a lot of thought into the Co-op Swiftland running shorts. No matter what type of running you do, whether it’s road, trail, or track, everything about these is designed for comfort and functionality — you’ll put them on and forget about them. They’ll work for beginners and elite runners alike, and we’re confident you’ll appreciate having them in your drawer.

Specifications

Length
5" and 7"
Shell
89.7% polyester, 10.3% spandex
Liner
Brief (91.7% polyester, 8.3% spandex)
Pockets
1 rear zippered

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Well-priced
  • Stretchy

Cons

  • Baggy
Cory Smith

If you’re looking for well-priced running shorts for basic running and gym sessions, the Baleaf 5″ Running Athletic Shorts ($22) will provide the most bang for your buck. There’s nothing particularly special about them — they just work.

The shell is extremely lightweight with a moderate amount of stretch, and the liner provides a moderate amount of support and adequate comfort for short outings. The rear-zip pocket was one of the largest tested, easily fitting a super-large smartphone, but it did bounce a bit more than other shorts.

We could go down a long list of features we’d like to see, but for under 20 bucks, we wouldn’t expect them anyway. The biggest knock is fit. They size extremely large and baggy, nearly two sizes too big.

If you’re typically a large, go at least to a medium — maybe even a small. If you struggle to find running shorts with enough volume, these should work really well for you.

If you’re doing any amount of volume, we’d steer toward other shorts listed here. But if you’re not picky on the finer details and just need a pair of treadmill shorts, or shorts for quick, hassle-free runs, the Baleaf 5″ Running Athletic Shorts are for you.

Specifications

Length
5"
Shell
86% nylon, 14% elastane
Liner
Brief (89% polyester, 11% spandex)
Pockets
1 rear zipper

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Unbelievably comfortable
  • Polygiene anti-odor, antimicrobial treated
  • Great for post-run outings

Cons

  • Somewhat heavyweight fabric compare to others tested
Cory Smith

Imagine taking the most comfortable pair of sweatpants (or shorts, for that matter) and infusing them with a highly technical moisture-wicking fabric. That only begins to paint the picture of how comfortable the Tracksmith Session Shorts ($70) are.

The lightweight four-way stretch nylon and elastane blend shell is freaking amazing. Beyond running, these are the type of shorts ideal for lounging around the house in. As a bonus, they’re Polygiene anti-odor, antimicrobial treated.

While these are one of the most comfortable running shorts we’ve tested, we wouldn’t wear them on race day or on a big mountain run. Instead, we’d want something that’s more lightweight and with better pockets. Speaking of pockets, while the rear pocket will fit a phone, it takes a little work to shove it through the small zippered opening, which we wish was a little larger.

Still, the Tracksmith Session Shorts have a place in every runner’s rotation based on comfort alone. If you ever find yourself with a social event after a run or workout, these are the perfect shorts for the occasion. With eight colors to choose from, you’re bound to find a pair to match your shirt.

For comfort and functionality from the track to the pub, these are some of the best running shorts available.

Specifications

Length
5" and 7"
Shell
88% nylon, 12% elastane w/DWR
Liner
Brief (100% polyester)
Pockets
2 rear zippered, 3 drop-in

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Well-designed pockets
  • Wind-resistant shell is great for mountain running
  • Comfortable waistbelt

Cons

  • Retains moisture more than most
Cory Smith

Let’s be clear — most of us hate carrying stuff when we run. It feels restricting, off-balance, and slower. Many of us will go out of our way to avoid wearing a hydration vest or waist belt. If you have similar feelings, you’ll love the Black Diamond Distance Short ($95). These shorts are our go-to for light and fast mountain runs.

When we don’t feel like being bogged down wearing a vest or belt, but still need to carry the typical items like water, fuel, an emergency shell, and phone, these are our go-to shorts. The thick but well-vented waistband with a drawstring provides a secure foundation for five pockets: three drop-in pockets and two rear zipper pockets.

These shorts can easily carry a phone, 500mL soft flask, emergency wind shell, and enough fuel for over 3 hours with a dedicated pocket for trash. We were highly impressed with how supportive and comfortable the polyester liner felt, even when the waist pockets were stuffed.

While the stretch nylon plain-weave face shell is durable as hell, it’s terrible at wicking and retaining moisture. On really hot days the DWR-treated shell became absolutely drenched with sweat, retaining the moisture and feeling a bit like heavy swim trunks.

You may want to opt for shorts with better breathability on steamy runs. But on chilly, windy days, the DWR-treated shell acted much like a wind shell, blocking the wind better than any other shorts we’ve tested. With exceptional storage and wind protection, the Black Diamond Distance Short is ideal for high alpine mountain running.

Rating Details

Value 8/10
Durability 10/10
Breathability 9/10
Performance 10/10

Specifications

Length
5” and 7"
Shell
90% recycled polyester, 10% spandex
Liner
Brief (100% Recycled polyester double knit)
Pockets
One rear zipper, four envelope enclosure drop-in

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Newly added four-way stretch
  • Carrying capacity
  • Comfortable waistline
  • Breathable and quick-drying
  • Great storage

Cons

  • Back pocket smaller than before
Cory Smith

The Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts ($85) were a huge hit when they first came out. They were comfortable, mobile, and had enormous carrying capacity. Then, a few years back, Patagonia updated the Strider Pro, and fans went wild ripping the updated shorts for being too tight, lacking mobility, and having poor durability. 

We’re pleased to report that Patagonia has once again updated its flagship running shorts, and we can confidently say that this is their best version yet. Patagonia replaced the tough, non-stretchy DWR coated 100% recycled polyester with 90% recycled polyester blended with 10% four-way stretch spandex. That little bit of spandex and dropping the DWR made all the difference. The new shell is soft and offers excellent mobility. These shorts are night and day compared to the previous version. 

The waist belt remains largely unchanged, with four drop-in pockets and one rear zipper. It’s not too thin or thick and maintains comfort when the drawcord is tight. In the previous version, we couldn’t fit our phone in the rear zip, but we were pleased to find out an iPhone 14 Pro just fit with a little work getting it in and out. 

In terms of sizing, we found the Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts fit larger, as our one lead tester wore a medium in the previous version, but the small seemed to fit better and offer better support in the HeiQ Pure odor control brief.

Specifications

Length
Above the knee
Shell
83% recycled polyester, 17% elastane doubleknit
Liner
N/A
Pockets
None

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Great compression
  • Reinforced crotch area

Cons

  • Lack of pockets
Cory Smith

There is no better type of running shorts for complete mobility and freedom than half tights. Running tights are somewhat of an acquired taste, but in the right application, they are far better than running shorts. The best use is when it’s cold and rainy. Wet shorts can get heavy in a downpour and start to feel cumbersome. Tights, on the other hand, stay put when wet and won’t feel as heavy. They also keep your quads and hamstrings warmer on chilly days.

Adidas absolutely nails the perfect half-tight with the Adizero Control Short Tights ($100), which have some pretty cool added tech built in. Of all the tights we tested, these provided the best support and compression. Not once did they start to ride up, and they offered a good amount of warmth and protection during a longer, cold, rainy run. 

At its most basic level, the tights provide compression that hugs your body, moisture-wicking AEROREADY fabric, and strategically placed perforations for enhanced breathability. For added support to aid your muscles during intense runs, Adidas incorporated Adizero control featuring RHEON technology. RHEON technology works by optimizing your running performance by minimizing unnecessary muscle movements, commonly referred to as shearing, thus allowing them to conserve energy effectively. 

Did it work? It’s impossible to tell, but we can say with certainty that we noticed the extra support, especially in the quads. Tech aside, if you’re an avid runner who doesn’t let the weather hold you back, give the Adidas Adizero Control Short Tights a try.

Specifications

Length
5"
Shell
100% polyester
Liner
Brief (86% polyester 14% elastane)
Pockets
1 side drop-in, 1 side zipper & 1 rear envelope drop-in

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Useful pocket configuration for gym use
  • No chemical additives used

Cons

  • Rear pocket doesn't fit a phone
Cory Smith

Making strides into the U.S. running market, Diadora is an Italian sportswear company founded in 1948 and is focused on a blend of heritage, innovation, and performance. With advanced technology, quality craftsmanship, and stylish designs, Diadora offers runners gear that stands out for both its functionality and aesthetic appeal. The Diadora Super Light Shorts ($70) are no exception. 

Crafted from a robust 100% polyester outer shell, the Super Light shorts incorporate Diadora’s Coolcore technology, delivering dynamic heat regulation, quick sweat evaporation, and fast drying times. Although not as lightweight as some alternatives, our trials along the sunny beach paths of Santa Barbara, Calif., substantiated these assertions. The best part is that all this is achieved through technology without chemical additives.

A standout feature rarely found in most running shorts is the addition of side hand pockets. Although not particularly practical for running, we found the Diadora Super Light Shorts incredibly useful when wearing the shorts for general athletic activities or in the gym. Moreover, one of the pockets even includes a full-length zipper for added security for your belongings.

Specifications

Length
5"
Shell
100% polyester
Liner
Compression mesh liner: (85% nylon, 15% elastane)
Pockets
1 rear drop in & 1 linear

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extremely supportive liner
  • Comfortable

Cons

  • Heavy
Cory Smith

If you’re not familiar with SAXX underwear, boy, are you missing out. Their claim to fame is something called the Ballpark Pouch, a built-in soft, supportive pouch for your boys. This unique design keeps your parts securely and comfortably tucked away and free from rubbing.

The Hightail 2-in-1 ($68) basically takes their award-winning underwear and wraps a moisture-wicking polyester stretch running shell on top. The Ballpark Pouch design works especially well when running. It’s more supportive than any other brief or liner, and it layers in extra prevention around your male parts.

Overall, we would have liked to see better pockets in these shorts. There’s one rear drop-in pocket that’s large enough to hold a few gels and a key, but not a phone. One really smart feature is the built-in key string to prevent your key from accidentally falling out when accessing items. We wish more companies would do this.

If you struggle with any kind of chafing, whether it be between the legs or around your male anatomy, or if you’re simply looking for a more supportive hold, the Hightail 2-in-1 is by far one of the best-fitting running shorts we’ve tested.

Specifications

Length
3” and 5"
Shell
88% recycled polyester, 12% elastane
Liner
Brief (94% polyester, 6% spandex)
Pockets
One rear zipper, one internal; drop-in w/ bungee cord

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Fast drying time
  • Bungee securely attaches keys
  • 14 colors to choose from

Cons

  • Some may find them too short
Cory Smith

The Janji AFO Middle Shorts ($64) are as close as you’ll get to a next-to-nothing feeling from a pair of five-inch running shorts. Made with an ultra-thin recycled polyester and elastane blend shell, these were the shorts we kept reaching for during the hottest of days. Even when they were sweat-drenched, the shorts didn’t feel bogged down and, in direct sunlight, they dried quicker than most shorts we tested. 

Offered in both a three and five-inch inseam, our tester found them to run on the shorter side of five-inch running shorts. Still, thanks to a mild amount of stretch, they never felt constricting. The brief liner offers a decent amount of support and hold for such a lightweight pair of shorts. 

The Janji AFO Middle Shorts come with two pockets, a rear-zip pocket that barely fits an iPhone 14 Pro, and an internal drop-in pocket along the waist for cards, cash, or keys. One of the more brilliant features is the bungee cord that allows you to store your keys securely, so it’s impossible to lose them while running. 

If you’re looking for a comfortable, lightweight pair of running shorts for hot, humid weather, you’re not going to find too many as good as these.

Specifications

Length
7"
Shell
86% polyamide, 14% elastane.
Liner
Boxer brief (85% polyamide, 15% elastane)
Pockets
one rear zipper, on an extra-large front drop-in, one tiny internal waist drop-in, and one side leg drop in pocket

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • High-performance material
  • Comfortable waistline

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Heavy items in pockets will bounce around
Cory Smith

Based out of the U.K., Rab has quickly become one of our favorite mountain apparel brands. The fabric is the best part of the shorts, which won us over. Rab’s Matrix fabric is phenomenal for any high-powered activity, such as running, hiking, or climbing.

The Talus Trail Shorts ($100) feature Matrix Aero, the lightest, fastest-drying version of Matrix. On the trails, the high-stretch fabric felt virtually unnoticeable. 

The waist belt is one of the most comfortable we tested. It’s thick with mild compression and tons of space to carry fuel and an emergency layer. There’s an extra large front mesh drop-in pocket for easy access with the ability to carry long items that don’t fit in most running shorts. 

While we prefer a brief style liner, the boxer brief was comfortable and features silicone grip dots to prevent it from riding up. The Trail Talus Light is a shorter inseam version with a brief liner. 

That said, there are a couple of areas where we think the Talus Trail Shorts could be improved. For starters, while we found the waist belt extremely comfortable, it doesn’t have a drawcord. This caused a lot of bouncing around when carrying multiple items in the waist belt pockets, especially heavier items like a phone.

In general, we don’t recommend buying these if you want to carry your phone in your shorts. Like most European companies, the fit is much slimmer than US apparel. Our slim 5’8″ tester with a 29-inch waist fell between a small and medium, but ultimately sized up.

Specifications

Length
1”
Shell
100% polyester
Liner
Brief (100% polyester)
Pockets
1 internal drop-in

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Fantastic price point
  • Excellent range of motion
  • Large pick of colors and prints

Cons

  • Only one small pocket
  • Uncomfortable waistband
Cory Smith

These budget-friendly split shorts have become a staple for high schoolers and serious runners looking for good-quality, affordable training — and racing — split shorts. Free from the bells and whistles, such as zippered pockets, perforated waist belts, and high-tech fabric found on more expensive shorts, the BOA 1″ split short ($32) has everything you need and nothing you don’t in a pair of split shorts at a great price point.

While the 100% polyester shell isn’t stretchy, they offer superb freedom of movement thanks to a generous side split. Offered in six sizes, from extra small to extra extra large, we found they fit on the larger side compared to other split shorts we tested. Our tester regularly wears a men’s small and would want an extra small.

For under $40, the durability these shorts boast is somewhat astounding. While they aren’t necessarily designed for long-distance hiking, one of our editor gravitates to these for his thru-hiking exploits due to their ultralight, barely-there feel, and funky colorways. Three pairs of these shorts lasted over 5,000 miles of torture on a recent trek back and forth across the country, with only the liner showing true signs of deterioration. Pretty impressive for any short at this price point.

The elastic waistband with drawstring wasn’t the most comfortable and breathable, but it displayed enough holding power to avoid sliding down. We found the 100% polyester crepe brief mesh liner was comfortable and offered decent hold. The shorts only feature one drop-in internal pocket that’s relatively small and suitable for a key, card/cash, and maybe two GU gels.

The best part is the massive selection of colors and printed styles the BOA split shorts offer, such as red flannel, American flag, and Hawaiian print. Bottom line — if you run every day and split shorts are your go-to, having a few of these in your rotation is the investment.

Specifications

Length
3”
Shell
100% polyester
Liner
Brief (100% polyester)
Pockets
1 rear zipper

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Great mobility
  • Perfect in-between length

Cons

  • Only one pocket
  • Waistband doesn’t have good elasticity
Cory Smith

For those seeking a not-too-short, not-too-long fast-looking pair of running shorts but don’t like the show-it-all style of true split shorts, the Salomon Cross 3” ($45) shorts offer the perfect medium length between the split short and a 5” pair. They are made with a breathable and fast-drying 100% polyester shell that’s lightweight and extremely comfortable. Despite not having any stretch, they offer excellent mobility and range of motion thanks to a two-inch side split.

We found the flat elastic waistbelt with internal drawstring comfortable — but wished it had a little more stretch. Still, even with the draw cord fully cinched tight around our waist, there weren’t any hot spots or irritation. As a bonus, the waistbelt has a loop in the rear to hang dry when not in use. 

Regarding storage on the Salomon Cross 3”, one rear zip pocket is large enough to fit our iPhone 14 Pro and maybe a few gels. If you’re going out for a long run that requires fuel, you’ll need to bring a hydration vest or waist belt to carry it. We highly recommend the Surf the Web blue colorway we tested, as we got a number of compliments as we trotted around town.

Running Shorts Comparison Chart

ShortsPriceLengthsShellLinerPockets
REI Co-Op Swiftland Running Shorts$605″ and 7″73% nylon, 27% spandex; Bluesign approvedBrief (80% nylon, 20% spandex; Bluesign approved)1 rear zipper, 2 side drop-ins
Baleaf 5″ Running Athletic Shorts$225″ and 7″89.7% polyester, 10.3% spandexBrief (91.7% polyester, 8.3% spandex)1 rear zippered
Tracksmith Session Shorts$685″86% nylon, 14% elastaneBrief (89% polyester, 11% spandex)1 rear zipper
Black Diamond Distance Short$955″ and 7″88% nylon, 12% elastane w/DWRBrief (100% polyester)2 rear zippered, 3 drop-in
Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts$855″ and 7″90% recycled polyester, 10% spandexBrief (100% recycled polyester double knit)1 side zippered, 4 envelope enclosure drop-in
Adidas Adizero Control Short Running Tights$100Above the knee83% recycled polyester, 17% elastane doubleknitBrief (83% recycled polyester, 17% elastane doubleknit)None
Diadora Super Light Shorts$705″100% polyesterBrief (86% polyester 14% elastane)1 side drop-in, 1 side zipper & 1 rear envelope drop-in
Saxx Hightail$685″100% polyesterCompression mesh liner: (85% nylon, 15% elastane)1 rear drop-in
Janji AFO Middle Shorts$643” and 5″88% recycled polyester, 12% elastaneBrief (94% polyester, 6% spandex)1 rear zipper, 1 internal; drop-in w/ bungee cord
Rab Talus Trail Shorts$1007″86% polyamide, 14% elastaneBoxer brief (85% polyamide, 15% elastane)1 rear zipper, on an extra-large front drop-in, 1 tiny internal waist drop-in, and 1 side leg drop-in pocket
BOA 1” Split Short$321″100% polyesterBrief (100% polyester)1 internal drop-in
Salomon Men’s Cross 3″ Shorts$453″100% polyesterBrief (100% polyester)1 rear zipper
We tested running shorts in a variety of environments; (photo/Eszter Horanyi)

How We Tested Running Shorts

Our Expert Tester

Cory Smith has been a runner since 1992. He’s a full-time running coach who has been reviewing running gear since 2014. In addition to running shorts, he covers road running shoes and GPS watches, and he writes training articles for GearJunkie.

Our Testing Process

To find the best running shorts, we start with hours of online research. We attend trade shows such as The Running Event and Outdoor Retailer for newly released shorts, such as the SAXX Hightail, and keep our eye out for up-and-coming brands like Ten Thousand.

For this test, our research resulted in over 20 pairs of running shorts tested. We then conducted a thorough field test to evaluate each short on fit, comfort, mobility, moisture-wicking, and carrying capacity. Testing locations included up and down the coast of California as well as trails in Mammoth Lakes, Moab, and Seattle.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Running Shorts

Man runs in the White Mountains of NH while wearing running shorts
Testing shorts in the White Mountains of New Hampshire; (photo/Christian Adam)

It can be hard to sort through what’s really important when finding a pair of running shorts. To help, here are the key things you need to know about running shorts.

Material

Running shorts follow the same rules as every other technical sports apparel — moisture-wicking fabric is a must. The two most predominant are polyester and nylon blends.

I prefer shorts that have a blend of stretch fabrics such as spandex or elastane in them. This gives the shorts greater flexibility and mobility, ultimately limiting restriction.

Higher percentages of these flexible fabrics do have a downside — they tend to absorb and retain more moisture. Moisture-ridden fabric and poor fit are the top causes of chafing.

If chafing is an issue for you, pay attention to the fabric and look for a pair of shorts that has a slightly different makeup. Half tights and 2-in-1s are great options for between-the-leg chafing protection.

The REI Swiftland shorts are the perfect combination of nylon and spandex; (photo/Cory Smith)

Inseam Length

The inseam indicates how far down the leg the short sits. It measures the length from the crotch to the end of the shorts and usually comes in 3-inch, 5-inch, and 7-inch options.

Most of the shorts tested, with the exception of the 3-inch version, come in both a 5-inch and 7-inch option. The ideal inseam length is as much a matter of personal preference as whether you enjoy running road, track, or trail. However, the 5-inch option seems to be the most popular.

Short shorts, such as a 3-inch inseam, are often known as split shorts and tend to be the coolest and least restrictive. Longer shorts such as the 5-inch or 7-inch version are our go-to when traveling because of their all-purpose versatility, easily doubling as gym shorts, hiking shorts, or even swimming shorts.

For long, hot days, we recommend a short with a 3-inch inseam; (photo/Nick Presniakov)

Liners & Shells

Most running shorts have two layers: an outer shell and an inner liner. The inner liner’s primary focus is built-in support and is either a mesh brief or spandex-type compression tight, called a 2-in-1.

If you’re someone who struggles with between-the-legs chafing, we recommend looking at a 2-in-1 short such as the SAXX Hightail or a half tight like the Adidas. Having a built-in quarter-length compression liner will protect your legs from rubbing together. Liners are a much-debated feature, but every runner eventually settles on one or the other after a few uncomfortable miles.

The outer shell is always made with some sort of moisture-wicking material such as polyester, nylon, or wool. Some are treated with DWR to help repel water. DWR-treated shorts great for wind protection, but they can absorb and hold moisture longer than non-DWR-treated shorts.

Most shorts these days will blend in a stretchy fabric such as spandex or elastane to give the shorts extra mobility. If you struggle with finding shorts that fit properly or experience shorts riding up, we recommend you look for shorts with spandex and/or elastane.

Shorts with a compression lining can help reduce chafing; (photo/Cory Smith)

Pockets

If you want to carry items such as your phone, keys, or fuel during your run, you’ll want a pair of shorts with pockets. Look for shorts with pockets that are close to the waistline. The tension used to hold the shorts up serves as a great anchor point to prevent them from bouncing around as you run.

Shorts with a thicker waistline and/or 2-in-1s are better at holding items tightly against your waist. Pockets with zippers are ideal for storing keys, credit cards, and your phone.

How many pockets you need depends on what you want to carry. However, there is a tipping point where you’ll want to start using a vest or waist belt to hold your items.

It’s a good idea to invest in at least one pair of shorts with a large carry capacity like the Black Diamond Sprint. These are great for runs when you’re traveling and may need to carry more items than usual.

Pockets are great for small items like energy gels or a car key, but you should consider a running vest or backpack for larger items; (photo/Cory Smith)

Waistbands & Drawcords

Running shorts are made with various waistband styles for comfort and fit. Drawcords are built into the waist, inside or outside, allowing for a tighter fit. Things to look for in a waistband are thickness, material, and elastically. However, in the end, it all comes down to personal preference and what works for you. 

Waistband thicknesses generally range from just under one inch to two and a half inches. We prefer shorts with a thin piece of highly elastic material that rests flat against the skin. Ideally, if a pair of shorts fit well, you should not need to tighten the drawstring, as they often come loose when running — and stopping to tighten it can be a real pain. 

If you’re hot around the waist or find the fabric rubbing, we suggest finding a waistband with perforations like the Janji AFO Middle Shorts. Perforations are small holes along the waistband that enhances breathability by allowing heat to escape.

If you need to carry items such as your phone or gels for fueling, we recommend shorts with a thick waistband like the REI Swiftland or Black Diamond Distance Short. A thicker waistband can hold more items securely without bouncing around because it provides a better anchor around your waist.

A closeup image of the waistbands of running shorts.
A look at the various waistbands; (photo/Cory Smith)

Price & Value

Budget

You can get by with a pair of budget running shorts, which usually run anywhere from $20 to $40, but often, these shorts are pretty bare bones. You’re usually sacrificing features like zippered pockets, lightweight materials, and liners in this price range. One excellent pair of budget running shorts are the Baleaf 5″ Running Athletic Shorts ($22), which are made with lightweight materials, offer a liner with moderate support, and have a zippered pocket that’s big enough for a smartphone. They do run large, so if you go with these, make sure to size down.

Mid-Tier

A solid mid-tier pair of running shorts will usually run anywhere from $40 to $80. Upping the price range means lighter materials, more supportive liners, and excellent moisture wicking. The Tracksmith Session Shorts ($70) are a perfect example of what you’d get in this price range. They are highly effective at wicking moisture, extremely stretchy and comfortable, and are the most comfortable shorts on this list. On top of that, they’re Polygiene anti-odor microbial treated as well.

Premium

When you get near and over the $100 mark, you start creeping into specialty territory. At the higher end of the price range, you’ll find perks like top-tier materials, ultra-lightweight fabric, and especially shorts like half-length tights. The Adizero Control Short Tights ($100), for example, provide outstanding support and compression and they never rode up during runs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What kind of shorts are best for running?

The best running shorts are made with a performance moisture-wicking fabric, such as polyester or nylon, have a built-in liner for support, and offer a secure place to store items like your phone, keys, or fuel. Some running shorts are blended with a stretchy fabric such as spandex or elastane to allow for unrestricted mobility when running.

Running shorts come in all different lengths from 2 to 7 inches, but 5 inches seems to be the most popular length.

Should running shorts be tight or loose?

It depends on the type of shorts. Half-tights, or compression shorts, are designed to fit skin-tight.

The close-to-the-skin fit makes them ideal for runners who struggle with chafing, keeping your quads, hamstrings, and glutes warm during cold and/or rainy runs. All other shorts should fall somewhere between tight and loose, but to what degree they fit is somewhat of a personal preference.

What are the best running shorts to prevent chafing?

Chafing is a really painful problem for a lot of runners that can be solved with the proper pair of running shorts. The uncomfortable skin irritation is caused by two surfaces excessively rubbing together and is more likely to happen when a fabric has been soaked with moisture.

If you’re struggling with chafing, we recommend trying a pair of shorts with a built-in compression liner such as a 2-in-1 like the SAXX Hightail. The longer liner can provide extra protection against friction.

If that doesn’t work, we suggest trying a pair of shorts with a different fabric makeup. The part wool liner of the Smartwool Merino Sport Lined 5″ Short can be a good option.

What do you wear under running shorts?

The large majority of running shorts are designed to be worn without underwear. They have a built-in mesh liner or compression tight that provides the support needed while running. If you find the built-in liner does not provide enough, you can wear a pair of brief underwear for added support.

Man runs up a hill while wearing running shorts
Testing during a trail race in the Santa Monica Mountains; (photo/Nicholas Gales)