Home > Winter > Skiing

The Best Backcountry Ski Bindings of 2026

Ready to explore the mountains in winter powered by your lungs and legs? We put the best backcountry ski bindings to the test, with top picks from Salomon, Atomic, Dynafit, ATK, and more.
best backcountry ski bindingsWe tested the best backcountry bindings so you don't have to; (photo/Aaron Bible)
Support us! GearJunkie may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Chasing winter lines under your own power starts with the best backcountry bindings. The right backcountry ski bindings can make all the difference in how far you climb and how confidently you descend. Our testing crew — backcountry powder hounds Aaron Bible and Ryan Kemper — put bindings through the wringer on resorts, glades, steeps, and switchbacks across Colorado and Wyoming.

From the Tetons to the Rockies, we skinned up and skied down in every snow condition imaginable to pinpoint the best options for every style and budget. Whether you want the all-around versatility of the Salomon MTN Pure or the value-packed performance of the Dynafit Seven Summits, these picks will keep you climbing higher and skiing harder all season.

Editor’s Note: We updated this guide on February 5, 2026, by adding the Atomic Backland Tour, a simple, highly reliable touring binding built for consistent, predictable performance. We completely revamped our buying advice to make it simpler and refreshed the comparison chart , awards and ratings to make them more helpful.

The Best Backcountry Ski Bindings of 2026


  • Ease of Use
    9.0
  • Durability
    9.0
  • Weight
    8.5
  • Performance
    9.5

  • Weight: 590 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: NA

Pros

  • Very light
  • Durable
  • Easy to click in toe

Cons

  • DIN may not be high enough for aggressive riders
Best Value Backcountry Ski Binding

Dynafit Seven Summits

  • Ease of Use
    8.0
  • Durability
    8.0
  • Weight
    7.0
  • Performance
    6.5

  • Weight: 640 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 4-10

Pros

  • Great value
  • Durable
  • Reliable entry with improved toe piece technology
  • Safe brake system

Cons

  • Might be too lightweight for some resort use
  • DIN only goes to 10

  • Ease of Use
    8.0
  • Durability
    9.0
  • Weight
    8.0
  • Performance
    9.0

  • Weight: 740 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 5-13

Pros

  • Simple
  • Light
  • Versatile for all types of skiers
  • Durable
  • Easy to click in

Cons

  • Some larger skiers may want a higher DIN rating
  • Not the lightest on the market

  • Ease of Use
    6.0
  • Durability
    8.5
  • Weight
    4.0
  • Performance
    9.0

  • Weight: 1840 g/pair
  • Type: Tech Hybrid
  • DIN: 6-13

Pros

  • Allows for more aggressive skiing
  • Versatile for more skiers
  • Accommodates alpine, grip walk, tech, and touring boot soles

Cons

  • Though lighter than frame bindings, these are still on the heavy side for touring
  • A bit more to fiddle with, and more steps to transition than traditional tech pins

  • Ease of Use
    5.0
  • Durability
    7.0
  • Weight
    10.0
  • Performance
    6.0

  • Weight: 320 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 4-13

Pros

  • Extremely lightweight, race-ready design
  • Durable all-metal construction
  • Fast, no-fuss riser engagement
  • Excellent crampon compatibility for icy climbs

Cons

  • Heel piece requires rotation to adjust riser height
  • Fixed toe release with limited safety margin
  • Less elasticity on descent

  • Ease of Use
    8.5
  • Durability
    9.0
  • Weight
    8.0
  • Performance
    9.5

  • Weight: 790 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 7-15

Pros

  • Top-notch uphill and downhill performance
  • Thoughtful features
  • Relatively lightweight
  • Easy and intuitive to use
  • Super fun color options

Cons

  • High-performance pricing

Other Backcountry Ski Bindings We Trust

  • Ease of Use
    7.0
  • Durability
    9.0
  • Weight
    6.0
  • Performance
    8.0

  • Weight: 1212 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 7-14

Pros

  • Rotating toe releases reliably when needed
  • Stays composed in firm and variable conditions
  • Heel risers and ski-walk mode work well with gloves
  • Solid construction stands up to multi-season use

Cons

  • Heavier than minimalist tech bindings
  • Stepping in takes practice

  • Ease of Use
    8.0
  • Durability
    9.0
  • Weight
    6.0
  • Performance
    7.0

  • Weight: 796 g
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: N/A

Pros

  • Simple, reliable design
  • Intuitive click-in aid
  • Works with standard ski crampons

Cons

  • Hard to flip ski/walk switch with pole
  • Brakes can drop in tour mode

  • Ease of Use
    8.0
  • Durability
    6.5
  • Weight
    7.5
  • Performance
    8.0

  • Weight: 840 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 4-12

Pros

  • Very easy heel transition from walk to ski mode
  • Lightweight, high-performance bindings
  • Easy to line up boot and pins with "toe stopper"
  • Automatic brake engage/disengage with heel transition

Cons

  • Some small, moving parts that could be affected by severe/prolonged cold
  • Require special Dynafit jig to mount that not every shop carries

  • Ease of Use
    8.0
  • Durability
    8.0
  • Weight
    5.0
  • Performance
    7.0

  • Weight: 1158 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 5-12

Pros

  • Easy step-in
  • Extremely versatile
  • Tried and true; icon in the industry
  • Optimal heel lift
  • Very skier-friendly and intuitive to use

Cons

  • Heavy

  • Ease of Use
    7.0
  • Durability
    7.5
  • Weight
    9.0
  • Performance
    6.5

  • Weight: 540 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 6-12

Pros

  • Exceptionally light with a stiff, responsive toe
  • Active length compensation improves control on firm snow
  • Strong performance-to-weight value

Cons

  • Release values are not ISO certified
  • Ride feels firm in rough or variable conditions

  • Ease of Use
    8.0
  • Durability
    6.0
  • Weight
    8.0
  • Performance
    6.5

  • Weight: 716 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 5-12

Pros

  • Beginner-friendly design with easy step-in
  • Elastic toe provides a forgiving, confidence-inspiring release feel
  • Strong value for a lightweight touring binding

Cons

  • Brakes are sold separately
  • Feels less durable than all-metal alternatives

  • Ease of Use
    4.0
  • Durability
    8.5
  • Weight
    3.0
  • Performance
    7.0

  • Weight: 2600 g/pair
  • Type: Hybrid
  • DIN: 4-13

Pros

  • Extremely burly, alpine-like downhill performance
  • Convertible toe reduces swing weight on the climb
  • High DIN retention inspires confidence for aggressive skiing

Cons

  • Heavy compared to true touring bindings
  • Slow, fiddly transitions in stormy conditions

  • Ease of Use
    7.5
  • Durability
    8.0
  • Weight
    6.8
  • Performance
    8.0

  • Weight: 1040 g/pair
  • Type: Tech
  • DIN: 4-10

Pros

  • Proven tech binding design with solid reliability
  • Lightweight enough for full-day tours
  • Predictable release
  • Good value for skiers who want a no-frills binding

Cons

  • Transitions feel slower due to manual heel rotation
  • Feels stiffer on the descent in variable conditions

Backcountry Ski Bindings Comparison Chart

ModelPriceBest ForDIN RangeWeight (Per Binding)Brakes Included?
Salomon MTN Pure/Atomic Backland Pure$680Versatile Touring & MountaineeringSprings (W, M, Exp)295 gLeash (Brake Opt.)
Dynafit Seven Summits$450Classic Touring on a Budget4 – 10320 gYes
ATK Raider 13 Evo$750High-Mileage Daily Drivers5 – 13370 gYes
Salomon / Atomic SHIFT 2$650-680Resort and Sidecountry6 – 13920 gYes
Dynafit Superlite 150$550Skimo Racing & Fitness Laps4 – 13 (Springs)160 gNo (Sold Sep.)
ATK Freeraider 15 Evo$800Aggressive Big Mountain Lines7 – 15395 gYes
Dynafit ST Rotation 14$600Maximum Safety & Retention7 – 14606 gYes
Atomic Backland Tour$680All-around touringSprings (W, M, Exp)398 gYes
Dynafit Ridge$600Fast & Efficient Transitions4 – 12420 gYes
G3 ION 12$730User-Friendly Reliability5 – 12579 gYes
Marker Alpinist 12$600Fast-and-Light Alpinism6 – 12270 gOptional
G3 ZED 12$660First-Time Lightweight Touring5 – 12358 gNo (Sold Sep.)
Marker Duke PT 13$700Heavy-Duty Sidecountry4 – 131,300 gYes
Dynafit Radical$400Reliable No-Frills Touring4 – 10520 gYes
We pitted the best backcountry bindings against each other to figure out how they ranked; (photo/Aaron Bible)

How We Tested the Best Backcountry Ski Bindings

Testing backcountry bindings involves thousands of vertical feet of climbing, scouting lines, evaluating couloirs, making smart choices on hut trips, quiet powder turns in the trees, and our fair share of unintended releases on the skin track.

For the ski-touring experts at GearJunkie, the real work also involves mounting and adjusting bindings, route finding on tours, waxing, familiarizing themselves with new technology, and stepping into unfamiliar toe pieces in deep snow.

Our Expert Testers

Writer, photographer, and lifelong ski bum Aaron Bible has been curating this guide from the beginning back in 2020. Aaron is an award-winning journalist who’s been covering the ski and outdoor industries for decades, and he brings his keen eye for detail and a knack for the written word to provide solid assessments of each binding in our list.

Calling Eldora Ski Resort home base for almost 20 years and another almost dozen years between Summit County and Steamboat Springs, Aaron has been testing touring bindings since they became readily accessible in North America, and he’s ridden the wave of technical advances in bindings, boots, skins and apparel which has led to the massive growth in the sport.

As the touring boot and binding technology kept improving, he permanently switched from telemark to alpine touring about seven years ago, and he hasn’t looked back. Typically racking up triple-digit ski days each season, he currently calls Monarch Mountain his home hill. However, when he’s not traveling around the country and the world for turns, he can also be found at Arapahoe Basin for mid-week uphill missions.

In 2024, we enlisted the help of backcountry enthusiast, ski tech, and master boot fitter Ryan Kempfer. Spending over 100 days in the backcountry each year, Ryan is the ideal person to put backcountry ski gear through the wringer. Will Brendza also contributed to this guide.

best backcountry ski bindings
Aaron Bible tested many of these bindings in the backcountry and at the resort where he could do lap after lap up and down; (photo/Aaron Bible)

Our Testing Grounds

This year’s testing included many spring skiing, deep winter missions, and early-season excursions. We spent multiple days camped out in the trailheads of some of the best-known and lesser-known spots around the Rocky Mountains, skinning uphill at our favorite resorts around Colorado and many forays into the backcountry.

We also had to hit enough lifts to understand how these bindings and skis perform on the downhill in all types of conditions. These missions included Steamboat and Vail — including time spent in the backcountry off of Vail Pass; the Powder Highway and Red Mountain in Rossland, British Columbia; and from Monarch Pass and Monarch Ski Area to Mammoth Mountain in California; Copper Mountain and Loveland Pass, Jackson Hole, and more. All of this new tech has seen some serious wear and tear at the hands of our testers.

Our Testing Process

The best way we’ve found to evaluate backcountry ski bindings thoroughly is to simply go touring. Through miles walked, countless kick turns, and transitions, the user experience becomes clear. We pay close attention to how difficult it is to click into each binding (after a reasonable amount of practice), how it feels to adjust the risers from a standing position, and how they perform on the downhill.

Finally, we consider the weight of each product. In human-powered travel, a few grams can really add up. Like in all performance gear, it’s a game of compromises: the lightest bindings won’t have the best downhill performance, and the burliest bindings with the most features will never be a top choice for a multi-day tour. Typically, our favorite bindings fall somewhere in the middle, functional without weighing us down.

Complete your backcountry kit by consulting some of our other guides, including the best backcountry skis, the best avalanche beacons, the best backcountry ski boots, and the best climbing skins.

best backcountry ski bindings
While backcountry skiing requires you to “earn your turns” with thousands of feet of climbing, the adventure and the setting can’t be beat. Our testers get to enjoy plenty of turns while testing bindings, along with plenty of trudging; (photo/Elk Raven Photography)

Our Backcountry Ski Binding Rating System

We rate backcountry ski bindings across four key categories: overall performance, ease of use, weight, and durability. Performance reflects how well the binding balances uphill efficiency with downhill power, whether that means climbing steep skintracks or driving wide skis in variable snow. Ease of use considers how intuitive the binding is to step into, switch modes, and operate in harsh winter conditions with gloves on.

Weight matters because every gram counts on long tours, so we evaluate how the binding stacks up for fast-and-light missions as well as bigger days with more gear. Finally, durability measures how well the binding holds up after repeated tours, abuse in cold conditions, and contact with rocks or ice.

Note: Each category is scored on a scale of 1 to 10, but the overall rating is not an average: it reflects our testers’ judgment of how the binding performs overall in the backcountry.

There are many moving parts on a backcountry ski binding. We tested some of the newest on the market to keep you safe, happy, and earning your turns all winter long; (photo/GearJunkie)

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose the Best Backcountry Ski Bindings

The freedom of skiing without lifts has lured more people into the backcountry than ever. But buying bindings online is tricky because they fall on a massive spectrum: from ultralight racer clamps to heavy-duty freeride machines.

We tested these bindings on everything from sub-zero dawn patrols to slushy resort laps to help you decide. Here is what matters most.

The best backcountry bindings are the ones that meet your needs best, so be sure to think about how you will use your skis and where; (photo/Aaron Bible)

Define Your Objective

How you access the snow dictates what you should buy.

  • The Uphill Athlete: If you skin resort groomers for fitness or race skimo, weight is your enemy. You want minimalism. We recommend ultralight options like the Dynafit Superlite 150. You sacrifice release elasticity and brakes for raw speed.
  • The All-Rounder: If you spend 90% of your time out of bounds, you want the “Goldilocks” binding—durable and safe, but light enough for long days. The Salomon MTN Pure and G3 ION 12 shine here.
  • The 50/50 Skier: If you ride lifts to access backcountry gates, you need a hybrid. Bindings like the Salomon/Atomic SHIFT 2 offer the safety certification of an alpine binding but are significantly heavier on the climb.
best backcountry ski bindings
An easy-to-use binding like the ATK Freeraider 15 Evo makes skinning, skiing, and transitioning a breeze so you can enjoy skiing and worry less about how to get into and out of your skis; (photo/Elk Raven Photography)

Ease of Use & The “Fiddle Factor”

Tech bindings can look intimidating, but the best ones are intuitive.

  • Stepping In: Everyone fiddles and misses the first time they try to click in. We love bindings like the G3 ZED 12 or Salomon MTN Pure that feature alignment “bumpers” to guide your boot toe into the pins.
  • Transitions: You will transition thousands of times. Ease of spinning the heel tower matters. The ATK Freeraider 15 Evo is intuitive and smooth, while some Dynafit models require a bit more “elbow grease” and practice to master the rotation.
The Salomon/Atomic MTN Pure makes transitions super simple; (photo/Aaron Bible)

Risers: The Secret to Efficiency

Heel risers (or “climbing lifts”) are crucial for maintaining efficient posture on steep grades. Every grizzled backcountry skier has an opinion on these, but here is our take:

  • Pole-Flick vs. Rotation: We prefer risers you can flip with a ski pole basket (like on the Salomon/Atomic MTN Pure). It keeps you moving. Some minimalist bindings require you to bend down and rotate the heel unit by hand, which breaks your rhythm.
  • Options Matter: Some race bindings only have one height. We prefer versatile bindings like the ATK Freeraider, which offers three distinct heights for variable terrain. Being able to micro-adjust your angle makes a massive difference on a long, steep skin track.
Heel risers make a world of difference on steep climbs. Some, like those on the ATK Freeraider 15 Evo flick up with your poles, while other designs require you to kneel down and rotate the heel piece; (photo/Elk Raven Photography)

Weight vs. Safety (Brakes vs. Leashes)

There is a direct trade-off here. Heavier bindings generally offer better elasticity and safety retention.

  • Brakes: We highly recommend brakes for most skiers. They add weight (approx. 100–300g per pair), but they prevent runaway skis during a transition—a nightmare scenario on a steep, icy peak.
  • Leashes: Ultralight users (using the Dynafit Seven Summits, for example) often opt for leashes to save weight. Just know that in an avalanche, a leash keeps the ski attached to you, which acts as an anchor dragging you down.
Durable, light, and high-performance, Dynafit’s Seven Summits binding is new to the scene this year, and we expect great things; (photo/Aaron Bible)

Boot Compatibility

Before you buy, check your boots. You cannot use a standard alpine boot in a tech binding.

  • The Tech Insert Requirement: Look for the metal dimples (fittings) on the toe and heel of your boot. These are required for all the bindings on this list (except the Duke PT in downhill mode). If your boots don’t have them, you can’t tour.
  • Crossover Boots: If you want one boot to do it all, look for “Hybrid” or “Crossover” boots (like the K2 Mindbender or Tecnica Cochise). These have tech inserts for the uphill and alpine soles for driving powerful resort skis.
  • Stiffness vs. Weight: Just like bindings, boots are a trade-off. Ultralight skimo boots climb like sneakers but feel soft on the downhill. Four-buckle freeride boots ski like race boots but feel heavy on the skin track. Match your boot category to your binding category.
The Salomon/Atomic Shift² MN may weigh more, but it performs extremely well and can handle a bit of a burlier bootl; (photo/Aaron Bible)

Price & Value

Backcountry gear is expensive, but paying more doesn’t always mean “better”—it often just means “lighter” or “more features.”

  • Budget ($300 – $450):
    • What you get: Minimalism and proven reliability.
    • Top Pick: The Dynafit Seven Summits ($450) is the best value here. It strips away bells and whistles to give you a simple, functional tool. The trade-off is usually a harsher ride on the way down (less vibration damping).
  • Mid-Tier ($500 – $600):
    • What you get: A sweet spot of durability and features.
    • Top Picks: Bindings like the G3 ZED 12 ($660) offer helpful features like snow-clearing channels and better elasticity than budget models. They are reliable workhorses that get the job done without the “jewelry” pricing of the top tier.
  • Premium ($650+):
    • What you get: Zero compromise.
    • Top Picks: The ATK Freeraider 15 Evo ($800) and Salomon MTN Pure ($680) sit here. You are paying for high-tech materials (aerospace aluminum/carbon) that allow a binding to be incredibly light and incredibly strong. If you want a binding that tours like a feather and skis like a hammer, you have to pay for it.
To access the goods, sometimes you’ll go miles before you can put your skis on. If you’re more into covering a lot of ground than ripping the gnarliest lines, choose one of the lighter bindings on our list; (photo/Elk Raven Photography)

Frequently Asked Questions

How do alpine touring ski bindings work?

Backcountry ski bindings work differently than traditional downhill bindings and should be thought of as their own category. While their job is still to connect your boots to your skis, they’re designed to switch between two modes: free-heel touring on the way up and locked-in performance on the way down.

Most backcountry bindings hold the boot at the toe while the heel lifts for climbing, then lock both the toe and heel for skiing. Some release differently than resort bindings, and release behavior can vary by design, which is why choosing the right system matters.

Because bindings interface directly with your boots, we recommend starting with boots first. You’ll likely keep them longer than your skis, and most bindings can be remounted on future setups by a shop.

Today’s backcountry bindings fall into two main camps: traditional tech bindings that use pins at the toe and heel for lightweight efficiency, and hybrid designs that ski more like alpine bindings by locking the heel down with a traditional mechanism while still allowing uphill touring

Are ski bindings universal?

Yes and no. As long as your ski boot has tech inserts, the boots are essentially universal, but you can’t put a traditional alpine boot in backcountry ski bindings. Nearly 50% of all ski boots sold today have tech inserts. Alpine touring bindings typically fall into two categories: tech bindings and frame bindings.

Tech bindings use pins to attach to the front of your boot at the toe, and the heel piece is separate. In contrast, frame bindings look more like a traditional downhill binding.

The name refers to the frame that runs from the toe to the heel underneath the sole of your boot. This is the part of the binding that will raise and lower with your feet while you are touring uphill.

Can ski bindings be adjusted for larger boots?

Every binding is designed to adjust to fit the sole length of your boot. While some bindings let you make small length adjustments, say 6-10 mm, others only allow for more minor adjustments to accommodate boot fit to the original mount.

If you do alternate boot sizes, consider a binding like the Marker Alpinist that gives you 15 mm of adjustability, so you can use boots with different sole lengths. That said, this should truly be done at a shop to ensure that the bindings are adjusted exactly to your sole length and that DIN has not been compromised.

Your binding DIN settings take several factors into account, including your boot size, the terrain you ski, your height and weight, and your level of experience. While you can make small adjustments on your own, you should go to a certified ski technician to mount your bindings and make major adjustments.

Bindings have a range of about 25-30 mm of adjustability to allow you to change boot size a little bit up or down. Brands in the same shoe size can vary 3-5 mm in length difference, so your binding will accommodate that.

Which ski bindings should I buy?

Some people start with a more alpine-centric binding, such as a Salomon, their first year, and then a Dynafit or a more touring-focused binding the next year because they want to go farther, longer, and stay more out of bounds.

In a perfect world, you should buy your bindings based on your objective. If you are planning for mostly uphill skinning at your local ski resort with groomers on the way down, you should consider something lighter, with a lower DIN, maybe simpler, and possibly less expensive.

The farther and more extreme your terrain, the more important other factors — including weight and features — come into play. Look for multiple levels of heel risers (simpler race-style bindings may only have one level of heel riser, while more full-featured bindings might have three levels).

Consider whether or not you really need brakes (for resort skiing, you do need brakes to legally board a lift). A multiday high alpine tour would call for a lighter, simpler binding than hike-to or short side-country runs.

Less aggressive skiers need to worry less about ejecting from their bindings in an untimely manner. Hopefully, you can extrapolate this into what you want to do, what you can afford, and what’s actually available. Then, pair that with the right skis and make sure you’ve got compatible boots — and go skiing!

Backcountry skiing is a blast if you have the right gear; (photo/Jeb Wallace-Brodeurr)

Subscribe Now

Get adventure news and gear reviews in your inbox!