All-mountain skis are built to handle everything the mountain throws at you. Whether you’re carving morning corduroy, navigating afternoon slush, or hunting for fresh powder in the trees, these versatile workhorses are designed to perform across all conditions.
For our most recent four-month downhill test laps, ski gear experts Justin Park, Jake Stern, and Bergen Tjossem carved hundreds of hours on nine sets across the U.S., France, and Switzerland.
Based on our findings, skiers seeking a directional daily driver with dependable edge grip will gravitate toward the Rossignol Soul 102, while the twin-tipped Blizzard Canvas 100 caters to creative riders looking for a playful, maneuverable platform that still holds its ground in variable snow
Check out our favorite women’s-specific all-mountain skis in the Best All-Mountain Skis for Women and, if you’re newer to the sport, Skis for Beginners.
Editor’s Note: We updated our All-Mountain Skis guide on September 4, 2026, with the Fischer Nothing, K2 Blur, Moment Deathwish, Rossignol Soul 102, Rossignol Sender Free, and Blizzard Canvas 100.
The Best All-Mountain Skis of 2026
Atomic Maverick 96 CTI Skis
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Skis better than its specs in soft snow
- Stable at high speeds
- Good carving performance
Cons
- Limited freestyle chops
- Expensive
Many ski makers like to tout all-mountain planks as “perfect” for any conditions, but the apparent reality is that shape, materials, and construction always present trade-offs. Brands get better every year at creating more versatile skis, but all-rounders will always make compromises. The reimagined Atomic Maverick 96 CTI ($750) — formerly Maverick 95 Ti — threads this needle better than any ski that tester Justin Park put miles on this past winter.
It’s a fairly stiff, directional charger with a powder-plowing shovel that outperforms its waist width in soft snow but retains enough traditional shape to be a competent frontside carver. Park’s first powder day with the Maverick 96 CTi was a revelation, considering he usually opts for much fatter boards when things get deep. The Mavs had no problem planing across the top of a fresh 6 inches, and he thanks the softened 130 mm HRZN Tech 3D shovels, which have plenty of tip rocker and a shape designed to float, but the fairly shallow camber lets them surf. When Park left the untouched goods for chopped-up soft snow, the stiff tails let him blast through the crud.
The Maverick 96s transition easily to frontside trails as well. The relatively flat tails, traditional shape, and rearward mounting point lend themselves to classic carving style. The soft tips can wobble a bit when leaning into hardpack, but that’s an expected trade-off for the oversized shovels you need in the soft stuff.
While they might not be a fit if you want to spin off everything, they hold an edge well thanks to layers of carbon and titanal that stiffen up the ski without making it as heavy as beefier dedicated carving skis.
K2 Blur 79 With QuikClik Bindings
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Shape and construction encourage good technique
- Affordable setup with integrated bindings
- Lightweight for quicker turns and less fatigue
Cons
- Limited in soft snow
Topped off with bindings, the K2 Blur 79 ($750) is a narrower frontside ski featured in our Best Beginner Skis Guide — but they’re plenty fun and capable for budget-conscious and progressing skiers. This design is especially good for riders looking for something narrower and carving-focused. The Blurs are traditionally shaped and constructed but have a forgiving, consistent flex that makes it natural to flow from turn to turn. They also come with integrated QuikClik bindings, which save on the purchase price and mounting costs.
The Blurs make it easy to improve in the basics of edging, body position, and the dozens of other things that go into proper carving technique. They actually were a ton of fun for ski tester Justin Park. Even as an expert skier, they don’t require a ton of skill, strength, or experience to ski well. If you’re a heavier, hard-charging skier, you’ll find their speed limit, but the relatively soft tip and tail make them a fun ski for any ability.
The personality of the ski comes from the build, which starts with a softer aspen wood core paired with an H-shaped sheet of titanal metal that prioritizes stiffness underfoot and along the edges, which is key for stable carving on edge. The shape is fairly traditional, with a long effective edge and gradual, shallow rocker in the tip and tail, which helps keep the ski glued down under the force of your turns.
Despite the inclusion of some metal for stiffness, the Blur 79s are refreshingly lightweight thanks to the use of aspen, which makes them easier to swing around. Over the course of a full ski day, that lighter weight also lets skiers conserve energy and stay out longer. Park skied them in a wide range of conditions, including icy bumps and refrozen chunder, and the softness helped smooth out the ride where stiffer skis would’ve beaten him up.
Not surprisingly, the biggest shortcoming of these skis is their performance in deep snow. The wider tips and tails help a little, but you can’t stay afloat in more than a couple of inches of softer snow. Park skied the Blur 79s in a few inches of fresh snow and had a blast, but you’ll want to look at any of the 100 mm+ skis in this guide if you prioritize pow days.
Blizzard Canvas 100
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong underfoot in mixed conditions
- Playful without feeling flimsy
- Broad appeal for all-mountain skiers
Cons
- May disappoint Blizzard traditionalists
- Limited float in deeper snow
Blizzard built a serious reputation on serious, directional skis that demand powerful input. This traditional approach satisfied diehard fans, but the brand’s sponsored athletes pushed for something more adaptable to modern, creative freeride skiing, resulting in the new Canvas line. The all-mountain headliner, the Blizzard Canvas 100 ($800), is a radical departure from race-minded skis like the retired Bonafide or newer Anomaly line. It is built with surprisingly little metal, is lightweight (even the wider 118 option is under 2000 grams), and features artist-designed graphics. This ski represents Blizzard finally figuring out what new-school, all-mountain skiers want.
The Canvas 100 is Blizzard leaning hard into the freestyle-meets-all-mountain category, prioritizing creativity — jibbing, slashing, and pivoting — over trench-digging precision. Despite its freestyle DNA and moderate rocker lines, this twin-tip ski retains some classic Blizzard characteristics, most notably a surprisingly strong and damp platform underfoot. This partial titanal layer and stiffer midsection are where the Blizzard DNA shines, lending stability in skied-out junk at speed, which differentiates it from softer alternatives like the Bent 100.
The Canvas 100 carved better than previous iterations in ski tester Justin Park’s five days between the PNW and high-alpine Colorado ski resorts, and held an edge better than expected for a lightweight twin tip thanks to its traditional camber pocket. While it’s not a frontside carving ski and prefers a smeared entry over a locked-in arc, it has plenty of composure for casual groomer use. In tight spaces, the lower swing weight and centered mount point make it quick, agile, and much more forgiving than older, heavy Blizzard designs. Unlike most of the brand’s traditional offerings, you can ski the Canvas 100 from a neutral stance without being punished.
At 100mm underfoot, it’s not a deep-day specialist, but it punches above its width, offering decent float and encouraging a playful style — happy to slash, surf, and make quick pivots. For freestyle, the ski delivers enough tail rocker and symmetry to ski switch comfortably. It is noticeably stiffer than some competitors such as Atomic’s Bent series, especially underfoot and through the tail, providing the added support that big mountain, high-speed freeride skiers will appreciate.
The Canvas moves further into freestyle territory than the directional Rustler 10, achieving a balanced feel without abandoning the brand’s core stability, making it an accessible, fun, and composed all-mountain ski.
Rossignol Soul 102 Ski
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Predictable shape, solid on edge
- Enough shovel to float off piste
- Unisex sizing down to 156cm
Cons
- Lighter weight can be a liability in manky snow
- Not the loosest shape for drifty skiing
Introducing the Rossignol Soul 102 ($800), a directional-yet-avuncular ski that is equally comfortable cruising mellow blues as it is crushing steep chalk. Rossignol simplified their lineup this year into two legible halves: the twinned, freestyle-oriented Sender on one side, and the fall-line focused Soul on the other.
This ski shares a name, and a bit of heritage, with its iconic older brother, the Soul 7, but the similarities end there. Unlike that floaty-yet-floppy ski, the Soul 102 is built with a sturdy backbone, complete with titanal and rubber damping from their Sender Pro series, creating lots of torsional rigidity to quiet nervousness when skiing fast or through rough snow conditions. This additional beef makes for a plush ride, especially off-piste, that belies the Soul 102’s average-to-low fighting weight.
And here’s where things get interesting. All of the above might lead a reader to assume that this is a bruising charger, made only for experts. But that lower weight — and especially the low swing weight produced by the Air Tip — makes the Soul 102 perfectly amenable to lower-speed skiing for intermediates, found expert ski tester Jake Stern on test days at Mammoth Mountain and Kirkwood Mountain Resort.
In fact, the high ceiling and speed limit, combined with the surprisingly low floor in terms of accessibility, make this one of the best skis Stern has come across for progression. Intermediates can get on this ski, build their skills, and not worry about outgrowing it. That’s a huge win when dropping money on a big-ticket item like a pair of skis.
In a market dominated by jack of all trades, masters of none, the Soul 102 is about as wel- rounded as you can get. It’s not a deep snow specialist, or an ice machine, but it can take you from the top to the bottom of any mountain on Earth and leave you smiling.
Nordica Unleashed 114
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stable in mixed chop and crud
- Lightweight, quick edge-to-edge
- Good float in fresh snow
Cons
- Unforgiving for beginners
- Pricey
Read Review: Powder-Hungry Daily Driver: Nordica Unleashed 114 Skis Review
If you think 114 millimeters underfoot is too wide to be an all-mountain ski, the Nordica Unleashed 114 ($900) might change your mind. Yes, the width makes them less than ideal for hard snow carving, but if you mostly ski out West and chase soft snow above all else, these damp, wide chargers might be the only ski you need.
This lighter, more playful freestyle ski still retains Nordica’s trademark stability. Whether on high alpine chopped-up pow or saucy spring slush near the base, the Unleashed blasted through anything in its path.
Per Nordica’s pedigree, there’s plenty of metal in the Unleashed, but they’re slightly softened compared to the popular Enforcer line, and the tip and tail rocker helps with float and quick turns in trees. Still, the relative stiffness compared to other lightweight powder boards allows you to blast through crud and chop when the fresh inevitably funnels you into the runout.
But put it on softer snow, as we did after one of Mammoth’s few powder days this year, and it really shines. We especially enjoyed its quickness edge to edge while dropping through Mammoth’s expert terrain.
For the width, 2,160 g is reasonably light, and we found the Nordica Unleashed 114s surprisingly nimble and able to throw the skis side to side quickly when needed. Partly, this is due to the rocker that releases tails easily, but the recommended mount point is slightly more centered than traditional frontside skis, which reduces tip swing weight.
Despite being a little centered, the skis didn’t feel short and had no problem staying afloat in double-digit deep light pow. The Unleashed absolutely roared in fields of fresh with no speed limit, planing confidently and giving back energy in every turn.
While this ski was instantly intuitive for our expert skiers, the Unleashed might overpower more novice skiers. Whether charging across pow fields or blasting through crud, the Unleashed requires good powder-skiing technique to perform, and there are more forgiving skis for learning soft snow skills, such as the wider options in the Atomic Bent lineup.
The Unleashed also comes in 98 mm and 108 mm widths, but we loved the extra width for mashing over diverse off-piste snow types. Moving to the 108 could be a good compromise if you spend a decent number of your runs on the frontside, but want to retain the playfulness of the Unleashed over the rigidity of other models.
The Unleashed is a perfect ski for aggressive big mountain-style skiers, but the softer, lighter tips and easy-release tails are also more forgiving for more intermediate or casual skiers who don’t want to have to drive as hard into every turn. Strong soft-snow skiers won’t find much to gripe about, however. The Unleashed 114 are quick enough for agile tree and bump skiing, but burly enough for charging over and through chop and crud to get to the next pow stash.
Salomon QST 94 Skis
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Capable carver away from ice
- Outperforms its width in soft snow
- Energetic flex
Cons
- Has a speed limit
- Narrow for powder skiing
The narrowest ski in Salomon’s QST lineup is a surprisingly versatile frontside/freeride hybrid that will please many skiers: the Salomon QST 94 ($750). Experts can push the ski hard, but it’s got enough friendly, consistent flex for advanced beginners and intermediates.
Salomon has tweaked around the edges of the QST skis for almost a decade, and the QST 94 is a new ski for 2025, but it’s not a wild departure from the QST 92 that preceded it. In addition to gaining 2 mm underfoot, Salomon brought in the “Cork Damplifier” tip that the rest of the QSTs already had and swapped in a basalt layer for the previous carbon and flax layer.
While we’re sure these details impact the ski’s character, we found the highlight to be their predictability and energy, which tester Just Park chalks up to the fact that, at its literal core, this is a pretty traditional wood and fiberglass build. Like most skis, the QST 94s are stiffest underfoot thanks to a titanal plate, but the flex stays pretty consistent until the very tip where the cork cap makes the ski lighter and floppier by design.
The squarish tail has less rocker and is part of a pretty traditional build, considering the QST line’s freeride lineage. The mounting point is a throwback at almost 10 inches back of center, which won’t work for freestyle/park skiers. But Park felt like the 94s skied much more centered than the specs would suggest, and were easy to pivot in the 180 cm length Park has tested.
The most fun we had on the QST 94s was on groomers and light frontside crud, where we had no problem blasting through a variety of snow types at speeds over 50 mph. Our expectation was that the moderately soft flex wouldn’t hold up in chunder, but as long as the snow wasn’t too hard, the QST 94s could carve a variety of turn shapes almost anywhere without requiring the laser focus and force of a dedicated carving ski.
Off-piste, the width and flex make them underpowered for deep pow, but they’re plenty capable almost anywhere. We personally would pick the QST 106 (there’s also a 100 mm option) if we were skiing a lot of soft snow because wider holds up better blasting through chopped pow and junk. However, it’s much less fun on softer frontside snow, which is where the QST 94s really shine.
Atomic Bent 110
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- A super fun ski that loves to shift, pivot, and surf down the mountain
- Poppy and capable in the air
- Rides over soft snow adding to the playfulness
Cons
- Doesn’t charge through variable snow as well as stiffer skis
Ah, the Bent Chetler. Well, in the case of the 110 mm underfoot version, it’s just the “Bent” but the Atomic Bent 110 ($750). Either way, this is one amazingly fun ski. We had to fight the urge to give this the “best overall” title. But in all fairness, it’s not the overall “best” ski. But it darned sure might be the most fun.
Do you love to hit bumps or rollers with abandon? Do you like to pop out the tails and “surf” any little piles of snow you come across? Then the Bent is aimed squarely at you. And if you like to do it while carrying a lot of speed, this ski should be squarely in your crosshairs.
We tested the 180 cm model, 110 mm underfoot. While this isn’t the largest Bent Chetler (the 120 mm version is venerable among powder hounds), it’s still a lot of ski. And we found we got the most out of it when we let it run fast but with loose input.
The Bent 110 has a light wood core. At just under 8 pounds per pair, the Bent Chetler is remarkably light for its size and design. And the lack of carbon or metal in the core allows it to flex fairly easily. As a result, we found the Bent pops over and around choppy snow more than through it. This underscores this ski’s primary goal as “Fun” with a capital F.
Can “fun” be a downside? Well, maybe. If you charge hard and want a really locked-in ski, the Bent Chetler is not a good choice. Sure, it carves well, but for those who mostly want to charge the fall line, a ski with a stiffer, metal design will provide more power and control.
But that’s not for everyone. One of our testers, for instance, is pretty light (150 pounds), and while he considers himself a powerful skier, he loves to goof off with his planks. The Bent Chetler is an accomplice for goofy side missions.
It wants to find the little powder stashes and send them flying into the air. And it has enough backbone to find the couloirs and keep us upright even when we get in the back seat after an off-balance drop. Expert-level skiers looking for a fun-forward ski that can handle everything from powder to packed snow should look hard at the Bent 110.
7 More All-Mountain Skis We Shred: Tested & Approved
While these seven sets of skis don’t carry an accolade, each one is kept in our quiver for its excellent, unique design and durability.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Outrageously fun in soft snow
- Intuitive and well-balanced
- More versatile than their width would suggest
- Dynamic and forgiving
Cons
- Limited sizing
- Does “experimental freeride project” mean they won’t stick around?
- Not great for the icy days
Fischer stripped away the traditional marketing jargon — and pretty much the entire spec sheet — to build a mystery freeride plank. The goal? To make the discovery of a ski even more personal and fun. Coming in at roughly 112mm underfoot with a deep rocker profile, the Fischer Nothing ($900) blurs the line between a surfy powder tool and an agile, high-speed freeride twin.
Field-tested through waist-deep Vail powder by ski expert Bergen Tjossem, the Nothings handled variable snow through the glades and skied-out resort chop. He determined that the combination of wide shovels, generous tip and tail rocker, and intuitive flex made it feel second-nature to slash sideways, drive over wind-buffed snow, and launch off side hits. Tjossem never liked the design made him feel unseated or out of control.
Despite its forgiving, swervy personality, the Nothing hides a surprising amount of backbone beneath its top sheet. A subtle camber pocket underfoot and a damp core provide the midsection support required to stomp landings, charge open bowls, and track securely through variable snow when you decide to lay off the brakes. It isn’t a hardpack carving tool — rail it on ice, and it will remind you quickly of its soft-snow pedigree — and it won’t satisfy skiers who rely on rigid, metal-laminated directional rails.
For intermediate-to-advanced freeriders who prioritize intuitive handling, playful float, and creative terrain usage over rigid frontside precision, Fischer’s unbranded experiment — the Nothing — proves that throwing out the rulebook can lead to a superior day on the mountain. Our team approves.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Ultra-low swing weight makes for easy rotations
- Poppy tip and tail for freestyle fun
- Full sidewalls deliver excellent edge hold
Cons
- Centered mount takes some getting used to
- Low weight comes with a suspension penalty
It’s exciting to see ambitious, high-end, athlete-driven products like the Rossignol Sender Free 100 ($700) — a staple of the Freeride World Tour — trickle down into the recreational market. That ski was a weapon for big mountain skiing in deep snow, but what about taking that attitude to your local ski hill during low tide? That’s the big idea behind the littler Sender Free 100: Taking the “make the mountain your playground” attitude for mountains smaller than the Bec des Rosses.
The Sender Free 100 delivers on that promise, letting you make the most of quotidian conditions wherever you like to ski. This poppy, playful ski specializes in switch skiing, popping off anything and everything, while providing enough of a landing platform to get you into some trouble (and a substantial tail to get you out of it!)
Less playful skiers or those unused to skiing a near-center-mounted ski will need some time to adjust their stances. When skiing the Sender Free 100 at the recommended mount, you have much less shovel in front of you than on skis like the Rossignol Soul 102. That makes it easy to overdrive the skis if you’re used to pressuring your boots. However, when skied with an upright stance, you can still carve as hard and fast as you want thanks to the full sidewall construction.
If swooping, drifting, pressing, and popping sounds like your kind of skiing, and you’re used to skiing upright with a centered stance — but you’re not ready to give up carving hard and fast — the Sender Free 100 might be right up your alley.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Triple Camber blends grip and playfulness
- Good stability at speed
- Durable and U.S. built with standout graphics
Cons
- Learning curve for the Triple Camber
- Limited float in deep snow
The Moment Deathwish 104 ($849) width places it squarely in the crowded all-mountain category, but its unique Triple Camber construction and on-snow personality are anything but generic. Built in Reno by Moment, this ski has boutique brand craftsmanship despite coming from the nation’s largest domestic ski manufacturer.
The Deathwish 104 pairs a full-length poplar/beech wood core with a carbon and fiberglass laminate for high torsional rigidity and energetic rebound. Add in ABS sidewalls and beefy 2.2mm edges, and you get a ski built for durability and precision. And if you’ve never seen Moment skis, they have standout, graphic novel-grade graphics that every…single…person in the lift line will comment on.
Specs are right in the sweet spot for a freestyle-oriented one-ski quiver: 132-104-124mm dimensions, a loose 22 m radius (184 cm), and weight around 2000 g per ski. The defining feature, though, is Moment’s Triple Camber profile — rocker in the tip and tail paired with two micro-camber zones — which gives the ski a unique mix of edge hold and loose, pivoty behavior.
On snow, the Deathwish 104 thrived in the mixed Western conditions where our tester rode it for a dozen ski days around Colorado in soft chop, trees, and bouncing between groomers and high alpine. It’s playful, quick, and while not a precise carver on hardpack, it’s plenty fun making wide arcs on fresh corduroy and spring slush. The Deathwish 104 is a stable, centered freestyle ski that prefers a playful approach to really come alive, but has enough stability to go fast, setting it apart from floppier all-mountain freestyle options such as Armada’s ARV 100.
Tester Justin Park mounted his pair a centimeter back from the recommended -6 cm point for a slightly more directional setup, but the skis still felt centered and quick to pivot and slash. The 6’0” 190-pound tester felt he was between lengths with the 184cm skis he tested feeling quick but occasionally a touch short. The 190 cm model would likely sacrifice agility, but allow for more high-speed, big mountain lines and be less demanding in terms of body position to perform well.
Where the all-rounder Deathwish 104 falls short is at the extremes. With all that rocker, it’s obviously going to be disappointing if you’re a technical carver favoring frontside groomers, and while it floats well for a 104mm ski, it’s not a dedicated powder tool, either. If you prioritize pow and live somewhere you get it often, pick up the Deathwish 112. Skiers who prefer a familiar, directional ride may find the centered stance and Triple Camber a bit confusing at first, especially in variable snow where we found edge engagement less than predictable. Our tester said that after the first few ski days that he settled into a more centered, crouched stance that made the Deathwish 104 feel much more intuitive and trustworthy.
Bottom line: The Deathwish 104 is best suited for advanced to expert freestyle-oriented skiers who want a lively, stable all-mountain ski that rewards input. If you ski dynamically at speed — slashing, popping, and weaving — it’s one of the best options in its class.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Versatile soft snow performance
- Mid-tier price point
- Durable construction
Cons
- Skis somewhat short in powder
- Imprecise on hard snow
Read Review: Smear Butter on Big Terrain: Scott SEA 108
Western skiers have the luxury of skiing mostly soft snow conditions throughout the season. Where tester Justin Park lives in the Colorado Rockies, high elevation keeps snow cold and soft between storms and if you chase soft snow all season like he does, we recommend a fatter all-mountain ski between 100 and 110 underfoot. You could go even fatter if you live in a powder-magnet area like the Wasatch. The Scott SEA 108 ($800) is a perfect all-mountain ski for the Intermountain West, where you regularly ski powder and chopped-up soft snow.
Justin Park tested dozens of skis this past winter, and the SEA (Skiing Everywhere Anytime) 108s were the boards he was most excited to reach for. If Park was grabbing the SEA 108s, that meant there was soft snow to be skied hard and fast. These skis hold firm on hard snow, but its width, relatively shallow camber, and shape limit pure carving — though they aren’t designed for that purpose.
The SEA 108s are a freeride ski designed for smashing soft snow at speed. They’ve got a fairly centered recommended mount point, but not as extreme as the park-oriented Armada ARV 100s. We found the factory mount gave them the agility of a slightly centered stance while leaving enough nose to stay afloat in deeper snow. The 139 mm tips are shovels and much softer than the rest of the ski, but the tails and the effective edge section of the ski are fairly stiff thanks to titanal inserts that pair with the softer poplar wood core.
This build is at its absolute best when charging through mixed soft snow. Hitting tracked lines underneath lifts showed off the SEA 108’s strengths, and we couldn’t find an upper speed limit. Even snow-covered moguls were no match for them, and we learned to open up the skis anytime we could see more than 50 yards ahead, knowing they could blast through whatever we found. In steeper terrain, we needed to use jump turns to keep the stiff tails from pushing us forward, but on landings and charging across fields of softer snow, we were glad for the support of this build.
Park skied the SEA 108s in several late-season storms and felt that they skied much fatter than the 108 mm underfoot. He tested them in the 184 cm length and, with the more centered stance, was worried they might sink in blower pow. While they were definitely at its best in shallower snow totals, even in as much as 10 inches of powder, Park had no issues staying afloat as long as he stayed balanced over the skis. That said, he’s curious to try the 116 cm width version of the SEA, and he’s sure they’re an even better tool for deep days since the construction remains the same throughout the lineup, which includes four different width options.
If you’re a larger skier, consider going for a longer-than-normal length (there’s a 192 cm option of the SEA 108), but Park is 6’0″ tall and 200 pounds and felt that the 184 cm length was plenty for most scenarios and kept the skis quick-turning.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Easy, intuitive to ski
- Lightweight, maneuverable
- Good edgehold for wider ski
Cons
- Less stable at speed
- High price tag
Read Review: Quiver of One for Soft Snow: Elan Ripstick 102 Black Edition Review
Lots of skis claim to be a quiver of one, but the truth of those statements will depend on where and how you ski. If you like playful, freestyle skiing in soft snow, the new Elan Ripstick 102 Black Edition ($1,100) might actually be the only ski you need.
Elan skips out on metal plates here, opting for carbon in various forms along with a wood core. This combination gives you a softer ski overall that’s just plain fun as long as you keep your speeds somewhat in check.
This Ripstick lineup has an asymmetrical construction dubbed “Amphibio Carbon Line Technology,” which means there are left and right skis, and you’d rather not mix them up, though the differences are fairly subtle.
The inside edges get a carbon weave meant to add rigidity when you’re carving, and for a fairly light ski (1,830 g at 180 cm) for the width, the Ripsticks deliver. The soft, wide rockered shovels can get floppy at speed in crud, but they love to go on edge and carve shockingly well for 106 mm skis as long as you keep them below their speed limit.
Their playfulness really comes out in mixed conditions. The Ripstick 102 Blacks use their width and plushness to turn chopped up pow, crud, and roughed-up groomers into a playground. Refrozen, hard chop isn’t as forgiving, but few skis can make those conditions pleasurable.
Because of their light weight and ease to ski in a variety of conditions, the Ripstick 102 Blacks are a perfect all-mountain ski for intermediates. The carving capability means skiers can grow into the ski with better technique without feeling overpowered and it’ll please expert skiers who want a fun ride as well.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- This versatile ski can handle anything the mountain throws at it
- It’s the closest thing to a one-ski quiver on the market
Cons
- Chattery on very hard snow
- If you ski a lot of ice, look for something with metal construction
Taking a crown of versatility, the Völkl M7 Mantra ($930) is an incredible ski. Now, the Mantra exceeds its predecessor with tailored carbon tips that increase responsiveness, handling, precise response, and torsional rigidity.
Also new, the integrated Titanal is adapted to each model’s length and proportions, bumping up stability and improving the control, as well as slimming weight. The model also is the first to have the new 4 Radius Drive design — an advancement of the 3D Radius Sidecut — to max out versatility for variable snow, increase stability on solid surfaces, and improve performance on soft snow. We’re stoked.
While carving lines down Upper and Lower International at Crested Butte, the ski held an edge very well when carving. It would also skid turns or slarve around as requested. After just a few turns on snow, we were grinning.
Our big takeaway? For most skiers and conditions, well, it’s one of the most versatile skis on the market.
These skis are quick, with the unique and improved 4 Radius Drive that allows the ski to turn at different rates depending on how hard you lean into it. This ski will arc long lines at high speed, but happily snip between moguls and trees with grace.
If you’re looking for a reasonably light ski that can handle everything on the mountain other than full-on ice, the M7 Mantra is our best recommendation. Quick edge-to-edge and highly capable in a wide range of conditions, the M7 is our top pick.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Playful, energetic build for freestyle skiing
- Friendly mid-tier price point
- Durable construction
Cons
- Low speed limit
- Limited soft snow performance
Most all-mountain skis try to do everything and end up being jacks of all trades, masters of none. Not the Armada ARV 100 ($750), a slightly wider version of a classic twin-tip freestyle ski at home in the terrain park and fun most everywhere else. Given the modest width and softer flex, it lacks in powder, but it’s an excellent frontside all-rounder, especially if you prioritize the terrain park.
Tester Justin Park doesn’t ski park like he used to, so he wasn’t a first fan of the ARV 100s. Having gotten used to skiing more directionally and generally pretty hard and fast, he was frustrated with the softer flex and very centered mount point, making them feel short. But once Park zeroed in on the strengths of the ski, they were a blast. The soft (6 out of 10 as Armada claims) flex is consistent throughout the poplar wood core (there’s also an ash insert underfoot for binding retention). It’s hard to explain why, but this consistency helps ease landings and encourages flexing into the skis for spins, smears, and butters.
If you follow the skis’ lead, you’ll naturally find yourself slowing down and exploring the trail, looking for places to jump, hop, and spin, and generally being more creative in your skiing. If you’re a dedicated park skier only, 100 mm underfoot might feel a bit wide, but freestyle-oriented skiers who like to explore everywhere can use these skis comfortably outside the park. They’re quick in the trees, forgiving in bumps, and surprisingly fun to carve as long as the groomers aren’t too hard or scraped off.
In deeper, softer snow, the ARV 100s have some limitations. The soft flex, modest rocker, and relatively narrow 124mm tips shortened by the mount point all conspire to make it tough to stay afloat when things get deep. Park took the ARV 100s out on a 10-inch day in the high alpine and, while still having fun, found himself wishing for something built for the task. In mixed soft snow conditions, they struggle to support if you take rough terrain at speed, but are still fun if you slow things down.
All-Mountain Skis Comparison Chart
Scroll right to view all of the columns: Price, Profile, Sidecut Radius, Best For, Waist Width, Sizes.
| All-Mountain Skis | Price | Profile | Sidecut Radius (m) | Best For | Waist Width (mm) | Sizes (cm) |
| Volkl M7 Mantra 96 | $930 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 19 (184 cm) | All-Mountain Charger | 96 | 163, 170, 177, 184, 191 |
| Atomic Bent 110 | $750 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 18 (188 cm) | Freestyle Playful Powder | 120, 100, 90, 85 | 172, 180, 188 |
| Scott Sea 108 | $800 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 19 (184 cm) | Freeride, Soft Snow | 88, 98, 108, 116 | 168, 176, 184, 192 |
| K2 Blur 79 With QuikClik Bindings | $750 | All-Terrain Rocker | 16.3 (177 cm) | Frontside | 74, 76, 79 | 156, 163, 170, 177 |
| Blizzard Canvas 100 | $800 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 16.5 (174 cm) | All-Mountain Freestyle | 100, 108, 118 | 162, 168, 174, 180, 186 |
| Rossignol Soul 102 | $800 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 17 (180 cm) | All-Mountain Directional | 156, 164, 172, 180, 188 | 164, 172, 180 |
| Fischer Nothing 112 | $900 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 21 (186 cm) | Freeride | 112 | 176, 186, 196 |
| Rossignol Sender Free 100 | $700 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 20 (184 cm) | All-Mountain Freestyle | 99, 100, 101 | 162, 170, 178, 184, 190 |
| Moment Deathwish 104 | $849 | Triple Camber | 22 (184 cm) | Freestyle Charger | 96, 104, 112 | 164, 174, 179, 184, 190 |
| Armada ARV 100 | $750 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 18.7 (186 cm) | Park, Freestyle | 88, 96, 105, 115 | 158, 165, 172, 179, 186 |
| Salomon QST 94 | $750 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 16.5 (180 cm) | All-Mountain | 94, 100, 106 | 156, 164, 172, 180, 188 |
| Atomic Maverick 96 CTI | $750 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 18 (186 cm) | Directional Charger | 88, 96, 105, 115 | 165, 172, 179, 186 |
| Nordica Unleashed 114 | $900 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 20.4 (186 cm) | Big-Mountain Freeride | 98, 108, 114 | 174, 180, 186, 191 |
| Elan Ripstick 102 Black | $1,100 | Rocker-Camber-Rocker | 18.2 (186 cm) | Ultra-light Freeride | 94, 96, 102 | 161, 168, 175, 182, 189 |
How We Tested the Best All-Mountain Skis
Five expert skiers contribute to our all-mountain skis testing and guide, which debuted in 2022. This guide has been updated eight times.
Our Expert Testers
Contributor Justin Park tests and reviews gear from his home base in Breckenridge, Colorado, where he skis more than 100 days each season, split evenly between backcountry and resort days. From sub-zero January pow days to slushy June touring missions, he puts dozens of jackets, skis, boots, and pants through their paces at high elevation.
- In the 2026 test window, Park hammered laps on six skis, including 97 hours and 32 days of riding. The temps ranged from -10 to 68 degrees Fahrenheit — the broadest of our group. These skis rallied across Colorado — at Vail Ski Resort, Breckenridge, Loveland, Monarch, Steamboat, Arapahoe Basin, Silverton — at Utah’s Deer Valley, Washington’s Cascade Range, and resorts throughout France and Switzerland: Grand Montets, Courchevel, Andermatt, and Flégère.
Jake Stern is a former ski boot fitter and works at Sierra-at-Tahoe, leading the resort’s content and communications efforts when he’s not testing ski boots and all-mountain skis. He also formerly served tables at Alta Lodge, where he cut his teeth as a skier, and worked as the Assistant Editor and Gear Editor at Powder.
- In the 2026 test window, Stern tested two sets of skis for 18 hours and 4 days at Mammoth Mountain, Sierra-at-Tahoe, and Kirkwood Mountain Resort. The temps ranged from 18 to 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
Gear tester Bergen Tjossem is a ski fanatic born, raised, and currently based in Vail, Colo., at the foot of his favorite mountain range, the Gore. Tjossem is a known destroyer of gear and a sharp critic of all-mountain skis.

Another contributor to field testing is Editorial Director Sean McCoy. He’s an aggressive skier with 40 years of experience. McCoy started skiing at 4 years old, slogging across snow-covered golf courses with his parents on ancient wooden cross-country skis. That was in the 1970s. He now tends to favor wider skis in his home mountains in Colorado.
Former ski testers include custom ski builder Albert Kim. Over the years, he has worked in many ski shops, testing hundreds of pairs of skis. He eventually worked for Wagner Custom Skis in Telluride, molding desired ski attributes into one-of-a-kind skis for customers. He enjoys being the first one out on steep, tight terrain and skiing as fast as he can.

Our Testing Grounds
Our testers are based in Colorado and Utah and ski a range of resorts across the West, as well as backcountry turns.
The GearJunkie team meets for an annual on-snow test week to grind out turns and swap notes, including two previous gatherings at Crested Butte Mountain Resort, which is known for its expert terrain.
Our Testing Process
While testing skis, we assess a range of factors including each design’s stiffness, maneuverability, and playfulness as well as the ski’s energy, damping, chatter, weight, shape, edge hold, and turn initiation. The base and edge tune also influence how a ski performs. We considered what type of skier and conditions are the best fit for each ski.
In addition to our team’s field experience, we consider the most popular, innovative, award-winning, and bestselling skis on the market as well as a broad range of price points and a variety of features and applications.

Finally, we meet with brands throughout the year to learn about top products. We carefully research these skis before selecting only the most promising for real-world testing.
The result of these hundreds of hours of work is the buyer’s guide you see before you. And we will update this guide multiple times each year to keep it timely and relevant to help you pick the best all-mountain skis for your needs.
Our All-Mountain Ski Rating System
To help skiers find the best pair, we evaluate each set of skis using four qualities to measure performance across conditions and terrain:
- Versatility examines how well skis transition between conditions — ice, crust, hardpack, chalk, corduroy, deep powder — and terrain from groomers and glades to rocky traverses and open bowls.
- Stability looks at how consistent and solid the ski feels when hitting the gas and its ability to resist chatter. The design’s ability to remain stable across ice is factored in, too.
- Ski Edges & Ice Grip inspects how aggressive the skis can bite into snow and ice, while also considering the effective edge angle. A good side bevel for All-Mountain skis is 2 degrees (88 degrees total) for a sharper grip that’s precise.
- Playfulness & Powder scopes out the forgiving nature of skis including the amount of flex and the distribution of the flex. Softer flex is more playful, and a gradual flex provides a surfier feel. Adding rocker to the profile increases personality, as does a lighter weight or twin shape. Those qualities plus a longer, wider tip and wider waist boost flotation in powder.
The Overall Rating is an overall impression after in-depth field testing and cross-comparison. That halo digit includes additional factors such as the price point, quality of materials, sustainability, and durability.

How to Choose the Best All-Mountain Skis
All-mountain skis are designed to handle a broad range of skiing styles and snow conditions. If a single-quiver ski exists, it’s likely an all-mountain ski.
What Does ‘All-Mountain’ Mean?
While some skis are made for a specific purpose — racing or ripping through the terrain park, for example — all-mountain skis are much more versatile. With any of the excellent skis on this list, you’ll be free to roam around the resort as you please, from the trees to the groomers and back again.
There is no official set of traits and specs a ski must have to earn the all-mountain title. Many brands and retailers have their own unique all-mountain criteria. Generally, versatile skis that can serve as an effective quiver of one have a few key characteristics in common.
First, most men’s all-mountain skis have a waist width between 75 mm and 105 mm. This spectrum represents the middle ground between super-narrow and super-wide skis — which is perfect for all-mountain use. Though, some all-mountain skis are even wider, which we dive into below: check out “powder-leaning all-mountain skis.”
Second, most skis in this category have a relatively traditional profile. With camber underfoot and some degree of rocker at the tip and the tail, a traditional profile offers a high level of usability from the fresh powder to the hardpack.

Different Types of All-Mountain Skis
All of the skis on this list prioritize versatility and can readily venture onto all parts of the mountain. Still, “all-mountain” is ultimately a spectrum that contains multiple subcategories of skis. Many skiers like to explore the whole mountain and still maintain a preference for a certain style of skiing.
Additionally, depending on where you live, you may be dealing with certain types of snow conditions on a regular basis. In these cases, it’s very helpful to have an all-mountain ski with design elements that best support your specific personal or place-based needs.

Frontside (Groomer-Leaning) All-Mountain Skis
Skis in this category will perform at their best on groomed runs and firm snow conditions. Typically, groomer-leaning all-mountain skis have a relatively narrow waist width between 75 mm and 100 mm.
Skis in this category will also prioritize edge hold, stiffness, and high-speed stability. While groomer-leaning all-mountain skis tend to sacrifice some performance and float in the deep powder, they’re great for hard carving and speeding down firm runs with minimal chatter.
This category is especially worth considering for skiers in the Midwest and East Coast regions.
If you’re a more casual skier who prefers sticking to the marked runs, consider a softer frontside all-mountain ski such as the Atomic Bent 110 or 100. Softer skis are less demanding to ski for intermediates which lets more relaxed skiers stay out longer.

Backside All-Mountain Skis (All-Mountain Power Skis)
Backside (sometimes called off-piste or powder-leaning) all-mountain skis are the opposite of their narrower groomer-leaning counterparts. Generally, skis in this category have a waist width between 95 mm and 115 mm. If powder lines are your jam, these are the skis for you.
Wider skis used to be dedicated pow-day tools, but many Western skiers use fatter sticks all season long, and most backside all-mountain skis have enough side cut to permit serviceable carving on frontside groomed runs as well. Fatter platforms generally perform better in mixed off-piste conditions because they help you float and smear over and through soft snow, mixed chop, and even the dreaded breakable crust.
Skiers in regions with lots of snowfall should consider this category. For maximum floatation and a bit of added flex, check out powder-leaning all-mountain skis such as the Atomic Bent 110. For a stiffer big mountain ski that still has great float, check out the Nordica Unleashed 114.

Freeride & Freestyle Skis
While all-mountain skis can be quite wide, freeride skis are another subset of design and they are all generally wider. That width is an asset for powder, ungroomed territory, and off-piste adventure. They also typically have an upturned tip for float and maneuverability.
What differentiates an all-mountain ski is that it thrives on groomers and also manages ungroomed terrain or powder. All-mountain skis are generally easier to control. Freeride skis excel more on ungroomed terrain and powder but can also be used on hardpack. The preference also comes down to a skier’s experience, style, and preference.
Freestyle skis are tailored for parks, tricks, half pipes, jumps, and jibs. Overall, you’ll see these designs are often shorter in length, symmetrical, lighter weight, poppy, and feature twin tips.

Waist Width: All-Mountain Skis
Waist width is the width of a ski at its narrowest point. All-mountain skis typically have a waist width between 75 mm and 105 mm, though Western pow-chasers can go even wider with all-mountain fat skis such as the Nordica Unleashed 114. Within the spectrum, narrower skis are generally better for carving on hard surfaces, while wider widths are better for floating through soft snow and powder.
Many ski models are available in multiple waist widths. For example, the Elan Ripstick 102 Black Editions are available in waist widths of 102 mm, 96 mm, and 94 mm. For each ski on this list, we’ve listed all the available waist widths.
The “all-mountain” category includes skis that range widely from as narrow as 75mm for groomer-focused carving all-mountain skis to 118mm for pow-first flotation in an all-mountain soft-snow model. We’ve divided this broad grouping of all-rounders into subcategories that can help you understand an appropriate width for your style of skiing.
- All-Mountain (Groomers): 75 to 90 mm
- All-Mountain (Midwest/East Coast): 80 to 95 mm
- All-Mountain (Western): 90 to 115 mm
- All-Mountain (Powder): 100 to 118 mm

Ski Length
Ski length is a major consideration, and most of the models on this list are available in multiple lengths. In the past, a skier’s height would determine their ideal ski length. These days, the process is significantly more complicated.
While skier height remains an important factor, there are many other considerations for identifying the proper ski length. Shorter skis are easier to handle, which makes them a good choice for beginners. Shorter skis are also more nimble for quick turns if you’re a tree hound or love bumps.
The “effective edge” of a ski can also make a ski feel longer or shorter depending on where the widest part of the ski is relative to the tip and tail ends of the ski. Skis with shorter effective edges relative to their length will feel shorter when turning than more traditional skis, whose effective edge often extends to nearly the end of the ski.
This means that for skis with short effective edges relative to their length, you may want to size up from your normal length. Likewise, skis with long effective edges can be skied in shorter lengths comfortably and may have length ranges that feature shorter options overall.
Longer skis have more surface area, which means that they feel more stable at high speeds and float better in powder.
A skier’s weight may have an impact on a ski’s flex and power transfer. This sizing chart is an effective tool that will help you consider all of the relevant factors.

Ski Profile: Camber vs. Rocker
A ski’s profile is a major contributor to its overall performance. Today, the market is full of skis with all kinds of different profiles, from traditional to experimental and everything in between.
Skis with a more traditional camber profile are shaped like an upside-down letter “C” and rise up underneath the foot, making contact with the ground at the tip and the tail. While skiing, your body weight pushes the base of the ski against the snow.
During turns, the camber shape provides some lift and pop, which propels you into your next turn. For pure carving purposes, traditional camber is still the leading ski profile, and many skis on this list feature some variation on the traditional camber shape.
A rocker profile is the opposite and shaped like a banana — the tip and tail of the ski are lifted higher than the underfoot area. Rocker profiles are newer to the ski design world, but they have plenty of advantages.
When skiing in deep powder, a rocker profile offers extra float and creates a blissful surf-like experience. The downside of rocker profiles is they generally don’t hold an edge as well as traditional camber, so they aren’t ideal for precision carving on firm surfaces. But rocker (also called reverse camber) can be more forgiving while playing on snow and riding switch.
Many of the leading all-mountain skis have a hybrid profile that combines aspects of camber and rocker. To learn more about ski profiles and the nuanced differences between them, check out this handy video from snow sports retailer evo.

Stiffness & Flex: All-Mountain Skis
Ski stiffness is a major factor that seriously affects overall performance. On one end of the spectrum, soft skis are easier to maneuver, more playful, and best suited for beginner to intermediate skiers.
Freestyle skiers who love to hit boxes and rails may also want a relatively soft and flexible ski. One of the downsides of soft skis is they’re prone to be squirrelly and chatter at high speeds.
Stiff skis are preferred by intermediate, advanced, and expert skiers who crave speed and long, aggressive carves. Rigid designs offer more stability, which is essential for staying in control when skiing fast.
The downside of stiff skis is they require power and honed technique to steer properly. For this reason, we don’t recommend ultra-stiff skis to beginners.
Most all-mountain skis fall somewhere in the middle of the soft-to-stiff spectrum. Groomer-leaning skis are usually on the stiffer side to best support speed and stability.
Powder-leaning skis may be more flexible in order to maximize surfability and play. If you’re looking for a true do-everything ski, midrange flex is the way to go.

Sidecut & Turn Radius: All-Mountain Skis
The sidecut of a ski refers to the shape of the curve on either side of its length. To some degree, all skis have an hourglass shape, but the radius of these curves has a major effect on steering and stability.
Skis that are much wider at the tip and tail than at the waist will have a short turning radius. A shorter turning radius is perfect for quick and nimble movements.
When skiing tight trees or moguls, a short turning radius is a helpful feature that will help keep you in control. Anything less than 16 m can be considered a short turning radius.
Skis with a longer turning radius are generally preferred for riding fast and carving hard on wide-open groomers. While a long turning radius makes sudden nimble changes of direction difficult, it’s certainly an asset when laying down endless sweeping carves. Anything more than 20 m can be considered a long turning radius.
- 16 m or less: short turn radius, quick movement
- 16 to 20 m: moderate turn radius, many all-mountain skis
- 20 m: long turn radius, large carves
Many all-mountain skis have an all-around turning radius somewhere between 16 m and 20 m. While a ski’s sidecut does partially define its personality, it won’t tell you everything about how a ski will actually feel to use. Other factors — including profile and flex — combine with the shape of the sidecut to define the nuanced capabilities of any given ski.

Parts of a Ski
High-quality skis are complex tools that pack lots of technology into a streamlined package. The materials and construction that make up your skis will define your experience using them.
Though there are many different ingredients involved in crafting a ski, the most important ones to be aware of are the core, laminates, sidewalls, and base.
Core and Laminates
The core of a ski is the innermost material that defines the basic structure, flex, and shape. Most all-mountain skis feature a wood core made from poplar, aspen, beech, or a combination. Foam cores are commonly found in cheaper beginner-level skis.
Around the core, layers of metal, carbon fiber, and other materials are added to boost or reduce characteristics such as pop, rigidity, and dampness.

Sidewalls
The sidewall is the material along the edge of a ski. Generally, it’s a plastic that protects the sides of the sandwiched core layers. Or, the fiberglass and top sheet layer could be extended to conceal the edge. The sidewall could also be a hybrid construction.
Base
A ski’s base is the surface that comes in direct contact with the snow. There are two kinds of bases: extruded and sintered.
Generally, extruded bases are found on beginner skis due to their low maintenance requirements. Skis with extruded bases are increasingly rare, but if you’re looking to prioritize affordability and low maintenance, they’re a reasonable option.
Sintered bases are the norm for almost all high-quality skis on the market. Though these bases require frequent waxing and general maintenance, they’re the best option for consistent all-mountain performance.

Women’s Skis vs. Men’s Skis
While some manufacturers make unisex skis, many models are specifically designed for either men or women. In the current market, men’s skis tend to have a slightly higher overall weight, increased rigidity, and a slightly setback mounting point to account for the way men tend to balance on skis.
Meanwhile, women’s skis commonly feature a mildly setback stance and are lighter and flexier. Though a women’s ski with enough rigidity for pure hard charging is harder to find, there are some excellent options available. Many women’s skis now possess all of the hard-charging power of any ski on the market.
It’s important to remember all skiers can absolutely enjoy both men’s and women’s models. Ultimately, it comes down to preference. The differences between men’s and women’s models are often subtle, and we recommend prioritizing performance and comfort over a men’s or women’s label.
If you’d like to learn about more women’s all-mountain skis on the market, check out our gear guide that highlights our favorite pairs.

Boot & Binding Compatibility
Skis are only one part of your shredding setup, and your boots and binding are equally important components of the system. It’s crucial that all aspects of your setup work well together to provide the best performance possible.
A high-end pair of skis won’t be able to live up to its potential with low-quality boots or bindings. Generally, you want to match the strengths of your skis with boots and bindings with similar traits. For example, softer, more playful skis will work best with soft and playful boots and bindings.
Aside from this, most boots and bindings can be mounted successfully to most skis, regardless of brand. Still, we recommend checking with the manufacturer’s specs to be absolutely sure.
Sustainability
Skiing and ski resorts don’t have a great reputation for their environmental impact, but organizations such as Protect Our Winters have pushed resorts and ski brands to make sustainability a priority and, as a result, ski brands have started to introduce more sustainable materials and practices into their manufacturing.
French ski maker ZAG launched their ZAGREEN program in 2015 which aims to shorten their supply chains and swap in more sustainable materials such as bio-based raw materials such as flax and using recycled metals for edges.
Telluride’s custom ski maker Wagner has used avalanche debris and local wood sources in ski cores. Utah startup ski brand WNDR Alpine developed an algae-based oil to replace petroleum-based materials to build its skis.
Where applicable, we’ve highlighted sustainable materials and features of the skis featured in this guide.

Maintenance
Even the best skis won’t perform if you don’t keep them in good working condition. Damage to the bases can slow you down if not fixed and edges get dulled and damaged with use and should be sharpened at least a couple of times a season if you ski regularly. The right type and amount of wax applied to your bases will keep skis sliding properly.
Major repairs are generally best left to the professionals if you have access to a quality ski shop, as they require specialized materials and equipment to return the skis to like-new condition.
Minor scratches can be repaired at home with sticks of P-Tex without too much skill, but deeper incursions, especially around your edges, demand a bit more finesse and won’t last if not done properly.
Likewise, waxing can be done at home to save on professional tunes with a simple ski waxing setup. If you ski a lot, DIY waxing makes a lot of sense. Racers will wax after every ski day, but recreational skiers can get away with waxing every 5 ski days or so.
If you’re an infrequent or vacation-only skier, it may be easier to bring your skis in for a tune before a ski trip and at the end of each season. To avoid your bases drying out in the off-season, you can leave a thicker coat of wax on them through the summer and scrape it off before your first day on snow.

Mounting Bindings
Your ski shop is your best resource for choosing alpine ski bindings that are compatible with both your boots and ability level. They can also discuss the mounting point of your bindings, which can have an outsized impact on how your skis perform.
Ski manufacturers recommend a mounting point for their skis, which optimizes the ski’s edging when carving and flotation in soft snow. This is your best bet unless you know from past experience that you prefer a different mounting setup.
Most all-mountain skis are built to have more ski in front of the bindings and less length in the tails. Moving the mounting point back for a more center-mounted ski makes skis more maneuverable and may be preferred if you want to be able to turn more quickly or if you ski switch often.
There are trade-offs for any changes you make to your mount point, so make sure to discuss these pros and cons with your ski tech before committing to a mount point, as you should only mount bindings 2-3 times, and ideally, you only do it once.

Price & Value
Skis aren’t cheap. Expect to spend at least $400 on a pair of new skis, and the price usually goes up as the waist width (and thus the total amount of material) increases.
Budget All-Mountain Skis
Significant savings can be had by purchasing a pair of skis that come with bindings, and these skis are often aimed at beginner and intermediate skiers.
Buying used is another way to save big on sticker prices, but make sure to buy from a trusted online retailer such as evo, REI, or a good local ski shop to ensure the skis are in good condition and not a deal too good to be true.
Mid-Tier All-Mountain Skis
The majority of our favorite skis fall in this middle zone for price. Options like the Atomic Bent 110 ($700) are not made with the lightest, strongest materials but offer plenty of durability, versatility, rebound, and dampening for the average skier.
The Volkl M7 Mantra ($930) starts to creep into the premium zone with upgrades that include the 4 Radius Drive design, an advanced development of the 3D Radius Sidecut. The intent is to maximize versatility for variable snow on groomers and off-piste, increase stability on solid surfaces, and improve performance on soft snow.

Premium All-Mountain Skis
Higher-end skis from brands such as DPS can retail for more than $1,500 new. These higher-priced options usually include a higher percentage of premium materials such as carbon and may be worth the spend if your budget allows and you’re an experienced enough skier to notice the performance improvements.
Frequently Asked Questions
The best all-mountain skis are the ones that suit your skill level, skiing style, and budget. On this list, we’ve included many top-quality options across a broad range of design characteristics.
Our choice for the best overall men’s all-mountain ski is the Volkl M7 Mantra.
Some all-mountain skis are excellent for beginner skiers. As a beginner, your priorities are progression and comfort. With these needs in mind, we recommend you choose a ski that is reasonably flexible and narrow. Flexible skis are easier to maneuver, and they won’t fight you for control.
Skis in the narrower range (about 70-95 mm in waist width) will be easier to shift from edge to edge. They tend to do better on the groomers where you’ll likely spend most of your time as a new skier.
On this list, we’ve selected the Rossignol Experience 76 Skis + Xpress 10 GW Bindings as the best beginner ski.
Most likely, you’ll be able to use your old boots and bindings with your new skis. Most skis will accept any bindings, though there are some exceptions. Depending on the quality of your old boots and bindings, it may be worth considering an upgrade in order to get the most out of your new skis.
Furthermore, skis can only be remounted two or three times before safety is compromised. Be sure to seek the input of a professional at your local shop if you’re unsure about the remount process.
Most all-mountain skis will perform reasonably well in the terrain park. If you’re a pure park skier, we recommend freestyle skis over all-mountain options.
However, if you enjoy wandering all over the mountain with an occasional visit to the park, all-mountain skis should do just fine. Generally, skis with better-than-average flex and pop are better than stiff and aggressive skis for park riding.
Most fatter skis up to 120 mm underfoot still have enough sidecut for carving on groomers, even if they’re primarily off-piste tools. The fatter the ski, the further your boots and bindings will be from the snow surface, so it can be harder to achieve and maintain the higher edge angles used in aggressive carving.
If you mostly value on-piste performance but still want a ski that’ll float when storms visit, look for a carving-oriented ski with camber underfoot and rockered tips and tails to help you float in soft snow.
The definition of an all-mountain ski changes with the type of skier and the manufacturer. On a personal level, a good all-mountain ski is one that you can enjoy most of the time on most of the days in the terrain you normally pursue.
For an Eastern skier that sticks mostly to groomers, that might be a 75mm waist width ski with a 16m sidecut. For a Western skier that stays off-piste, that might be a 114mm waist ski with a 25m sidecut that performs well in everything from powder to mixed chop but still skis well enough on the groomers back to the base.
More important than analyzing whether or not a particular ski is considered “all-mountain,” is finding a ski that matches your abilities, preferred terrain, and the conditions you normally encounter.
