Snow and ice don’t have to end your running season. With the right pair of winter running shoes, you can stay consistent through sleet, slush, and single-digit temps.
Unlike your standard trainers, winter running shoes use specialized outsoles to grip slick surfaces, water-resistant uppers to block out snow, and insulation or liners to keep your toes from freezing. Whether you’re logging miles on snowy sidewalks or heading for packed winter trails, the right model makes all the difference between a miserable trudge and a confident stride.
If you’re looking for a waterproof running shoe with fantastic traction and a firm ride, take a look at the Saucony Peregrine 15 GTX. Or, if you prefer a fully-equipped winter running shoe with spikes and gaiter, consider the Salomon Winter Cross Spike.
In this guide, we’ll break down what to look for—traction, waterproofing, warmth, and cushioning—and share our favorite models for a range of winter conditions and running styles. Lace up, layer up, and keep moving all season long.
Editor’s Note: For our November 6, 2025, update, we undertook a major overhaul of the guide by adding several new and noteworthy winter running options. We also added detailed rating metrics to each product to better explain our process and how we arrived at each numerical score.
The Best Winter Running Shoes of 2025-2026
Saucony Peregrine 15 GTX
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Plenty of toe volume
- Firm, supportive ride
Cons
- Still low-profile for fans of big cushioning
Saucony’s Peregrine series has been a longstanding winner with trail runners and reviewers alike. The stack is low, the toe volume is ample, and the shoe wraps the foot without any awkward pinching or binding. And then there’s the traction. For serious runners who don’t want to slow down through winter, Saucony’s Peregrine 15 GTX ($160) is our best pick for winter running.
The ride is balanced; supportive yet more forgiving than previous versions. Flip the shoe over, and you notice the aggressive, tacky rubber chevron lugs. The tightly spaced rubber cleats run heel-to-toe and inspire confidence in the sloppiest conditions. The grip on the Peregrine is all business, and this is the shoe we reach for in heinous terrain. If you need more protection, the Peregrine can take screws and marks where to put them.
The GORE-TEX Invisible Fit membrane keeps feet dry without adding bulk, and the shoe still runs low to the ground for a stable, confident feel. A D-ring at the toe and a heel loop make gaiter attachment easy.
From fit to trail feel, the Peregrine 15 GTX keeps everything runners love about the line but smooths it out with a softer midsole and more comfortable upper. It’s still a lively, confident trail runner that transitions seamlessly into winter miles.
Asics Trail Scout 3
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Affordable
- Great heel lockdown
- Vegan
- Road to trail transition
Cons
- Heavy
- Stiff
The ASICS Trail Scout 3 ($65) is tough to beat for winter runners on a budget. While it’s not waterproof, spiked, or gaiter-compatible, this shoe nails the essentials for mild winter conditions without breaking the bank.
The outsole is built with thick, durable rubber and moderately aggressive lugs that grip well on hard-packed snow and frosty ground. It’s not an ice shoe, but for the everyday runner who just needs something stable underfoot on wintry paths, it delivers solid traction and reliability.
The upper uses abrasion-resistant mesh that sheds light moisture surprisingly well for a non-waterproof shoe. It won’t keep you dry in slush or deep snow, but it does fend off the kind of damp you encounter on frozen mornings or during snow-melt runs. The fit balances comfort and security, with a well-cushioned heel and a roomy toebox that leaves space for thicker winter socks without feeling sloppy.
ASICS uses a familiar, no-frills EVA midsole here; it stays decently soft in the cold and offers enough cushion for recovery runs or longer outings. The tongue isn’t gusseted, so you’ll want to make sure it’s centered before lacing up. But once locked in, the shoe feels stable and predictable, even on uneven terrain.
While it doesn’t have the bells and whistles of pricier winter trail models, the Trail Scout 3 earns its place as the best budget winter trail shoe for runners who just want to get out there. On packed snow or mellow winter trails, it’s proof that you don’t need GORE-TEX or spikes — just a reliable sole, a warm pair of socks, and the motivation to move.
Salomon Winter Cross Spike
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Outstanding traction in snow and ice thanks to included spikes
- Integrated gaiter adds a bonus level of protection
- Decent groundfeel, especially for such a protective shoe
Cons
- Must wear tall socks to protect skin from gaiter zipper
For runners who refuse to hang up their shoes when the trails turn slick, the Salomon Winter Cross Spike ($249) delivers the confidence to keep moving. Tested by GearJunkie staff writer Heather Balogh Rochfort on a 12-mile, late-season adventure up and down Mount Sopris (12,995 feet) in Colorado, the shoe proved its mettle on a mix of early-season snow, ice, and lots of mud.
The Winter Cross Spike’s embedded tungsten carbide spikes bite into hardpack and ice, but don’t feel awkward or clunky once you hit dirt. That versatility makes them a smart option for shoulder-season runs when trails transition between frozen and thawed. Underfoot, a tacky Contagrip outsole (Salomon’s proprietary rubber) and aggressive lugs provide quality grip without feeling stiff or unnecessary. Once Balogh Rochfort reached 11,000 feet, the terrain continually swapped from ice to early-season slush, and the Cross Spikes had no problem keeping up.
Where the Winter Cross Spike really stands out is with its integrated gaiter system. It seals out snow, mud, and trail debris while maintaining the feel of a true running shoe underneath. You’re not sloshing around like you would in a winter boot. Instead, the fit stays snug, secure, and surprisingly nimble, as Balogh Rochfort experienced while jogging down the mountain. The EnergyCell+ midsole contributes to that balance, providing a firm and responsive feel underfoot that keeps the shoe agile on slippery terrain.
For runners who usually pair separate traction and gaiters for cold-weather miles, this setup is a one-stop shop that simplifies the entire system without sacrificing performance.
Icebug Järv Gaiter BUGrip GTX
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Carbide steel tip studs hold fast on the slickest terrain
- Integrated low gaiter keeps slush out but doesn't feel clunky on your ankle
- Bio-based material (corn) in the midsole
Cons
- Icebug shoes aren't carried in very many locations
- Narrow toe box
The Icebug Järv Gaiter BUGrip GTX ($250) isn’t a household name in the United States, but it probably should be. Icebug has been quietly perfecting studded running shoes for over a decade, and this latest version shows just how far the Swedish brand has come since GearJunkie staff writer Heather Balogh Rochfort first tested a pair ten years ago.
The defining feature, of course, is the BUGrip outsole, which uses 17 carbide steel studs that adapt to the surface beneath you. The spikes retract slightly on hard surfaces and dig in on ice, making them one of the most confidence-inspiring traction systems available. On slick trails or frozen dirt roads, they deliver the kind of surefooted stability that keeps winter runs feeling safe and predictable rather than sketchy. But if you’re tromping around mixed terrain, you won’t feel the studs slight out against the rocks. In fact, Balogh Rochfort took these kicks on a 5-mile, all-dirt run just to see how “dynamic” the spikes felt underfoot. End result: lots of clicking but no slipping.
Underfoot, the Järv offers ample cushioning and a generous stack height, giving it a padded-yet-firm ride. A low-profile gaiter integrated into the upper sets it apart from the non-gaiter version of the Järv, keeping snow and debris from sneaking in around the ankle without feeling as all-encompassing as the Salomon Winter Cross Spike. While the waterproof upper is stiffer and less breathable than the airy mesh found on regular sneakers, it does a great job of keeping moisture out.
That said, all that protection and grip come at a cost: weight. The Järv Gaiter BUGrip GTX is a heavy shoe, and the heft is immediately noticeable when you take your first few strides. Speed-oriented runners will likely prefer something lighter and more responsive. But for most people lacing up to run on ice, the goal isn’t speed—it’s survival. And for that, these shoes are hard to beat.
Merrell Agility Peak 5 Zero GORE-TEX
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Accommodating fit for a wide variety of feet
- Inner shoe has a well-padded tongue that feels quite comfortable
- Built-in gaiter adds warmth and weather protection
- Relatively affordable for a full Gore-Text/gaiter winter running shoe
Cons
- Heavy for a pure running shoe
The Merrell Agility Peak 5 Zero GORE-TEX ($210) is built for runners who drift toward the hiking end of the spectrum. GearJunkie contributor Heather Balogh Rochfort first took them out on a solo six-mile adventure on Independence Pass outside Aspen, where patchy snow and shaded ice made for constantly changing footing. Since then, they’ve proven equally capable on a range of terrain.
A wider platform (90mm heel / 80mm midfoot / 115mm forefoot) gives the Agility Peak 5 Zero a planted, stable feel, though that same base also contributes to its slightly clunky ride. The fit is roomy and accommodating, which is great for thicker socks or wider feet. But runners with narrower feet may find it a touch loose. It’s sturdy and surefooted, but not the lightest option. When combined with the wider platform, Balogh Rochfort found the Agility Peak 5 Zero better suited for hiking with a bit of running thrown in.
The Agility Peak 5 Zero includes a light built-in gaiter that wraps over the top of the shoe, sealing out snow and slush without adding bulk. Inside, it feels more like a sturdy trail hiker than a nimble running shoe, which makes sense given its broader shape and cushioned build. The GORE-TEX waterproofing keeps feet dry in wet snow and puddles, while the gaiter helps block out debris and cold air on sloppy winter days. And, they’re warm!
Compared with shoes like the Salomon Winter Cross Spike or Arc’teryx Norvan 4 Nivalis, the Agility Peak 5 Zero feels less technical and more approachable. They’re also a touch more affordable, with the kind of comfort that makes hikers want to throw down a few running miles — or for runners who simply want to enjoy the day.
Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR Low 2
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Spacious toebox
- Superior traction and protection
Cons
- Can be an adjustment for those not used to zero drop
The Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR 2 ($160) takes one of Altra’s most popular trail shoes and makes it winter-ready. By pairing the eVent waterproof shell from the earlier Lone Peak 4 RSW with the upgraded EGO midsole from the Lone Peak 5, Altra created a highly breathable, storm-worthy shoe that stays true to its roots.
Like a waterproof shell, the eVent material doesn’t wet out and is reputably more breathable than GORE-TEX. After logging 100 miles in wet, sloppy winter conditions, we’d have to agree. Our feet didn’t soak from sweat, and our toes stayed warm during an off-trail marathon slog across the snowy Owyhee Desert.
The Lone Peak lineage runs deep. The 7.0 version, released last year, introduced the responsive EGO midsole that delivers just enough cushion to protect feet on rocky terrain without dulling ground feel. Traction remains excellent, the wide forefoot is pure Altra, and the upper and tongue are soft yet supportive.
The ALL-WTHR 2 keeps that same comfort and protection but adds serious weather defense. It’s a low-top, and because the Lone Peak’s low profile puts you closer to the snow, it’s best to pair with a gaiter on powder days.
In short, zero drop can be rough on the calves, but for those who have worked up to it, the Lone Peak ALL-WTHR 2 is one of the most comfortable shoes on the list. The addition of eVent makes it the most storm-worthy and breathable version yet — a winter classic that still feels like a Lone Peak.
Standout Snow Survivors
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Bomber traction thanks to 6 mm lugs and Vibram Megagrip
- Sleek silhouette, even with a protective, built-in gaiter
- Balanced midsole for a stable ride
Cons
- Lack of internal shoe leads to a less-than-secure fit
- Slightly cumbersome to pull onto your feet
The Arc’teryx Norvan 4 Nivalis ($250) is a fully waterproof, all-in-one winter running shoe that looks and feels every bit as sleek as you’d expect from the brand.
Instead of a separate shoe inside the gaiter as we found in the Salomon Winter Cross Spike and Merrell Agility 5 Peak Zero GTX, the Nivalis uses a single-piece construction with a cinch cord at the ankle. This design keeps out snow and slush but sacrifices some structure and lockdown. On a winter push up Mount Sopris, a Colorado-based tester wore them alongside GearJunkie’s Heather Balogh Rochfort and noted that while the shoes felt light and flexible, they also ran a little sloppy on steep downhills with some foot movement inside the upper.
That said, traction was excellent. There are no studs, but the Vibram Megagrip outsole provided plenty of grip on hard-packed switchbacks and mixed terrain. The dual-density midsole struck a nice balance between cushioning and control as well. The result is a shoe that’s smooth and supportive underfoot, even if the fit isn’t quite as precise as others in this category.
The Norvan 4 Nivalis may not have taken a top spot, but it remains a delightfully comfortable, waterproof option for runners who want plenty of protection in a sleek package.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Small gaiter keeps debris and slush out
- BOA dials are easy to use in cold temperatures
- Aggressive lugs hold their own in wintry conditions
Cons
- Quite expensive
- Not waterproof
The Speedland GL:SVT ($299) is a premium, limited-edition trail shoe that’s built to handle just about anything except standing water. It’s not waterproof, but with 6.5mm lugs and a built-in gaiter, it grips well in mud, snow patches, and loose terrain while keeping most debris out. The gaiter takes a bit of effort to wriggle into, but once you’re in, the fit feels secure and dialed.
Heather Balogh Rochfort tested the GL:SVT across roughly 30 miles of mixed terrain in Colorado’s Roaring Fork Valley and noted zero signs of wear. The dual BOA Fit System allows for quick, micro-adjustable tension across the foot, creating an even wrap without pressure points or hot spots.
Underfoot, the Michelin Fiber outsole and aggressive lug pattern provide excellent traction, while Speedland’s proprietary drop-in midsole gives a stable, responsive ride with just enough cushioning for long days on technical trails. Honestly, every component feels premium — as it should. This is the most expensive shoe Balogh Rochfort has tested this season, and the price tag is a tough pill to swallow.
Speedland operates on a small-batch model: once a shoe launches and sells out, it’s gone for good. The GL:SVT continues that tradition, which can be tough for runners who fall in love with the model. Still, there are few shoes out there that feel this sleek and refined underfoot. If you have the technical chops and cash to make this dream your reality, we recommend it.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Legit traction, especially on rocks and slabs
- Full-foot protection and durability that feels akin to a hiking shoe more than a lightweight trail running shoe
Cons
- Slightly narrow in the forefoot
- Extremely stiff underfoot
The Scarpa Ribelle Run 2 GTX ($219) is built like a mountain tool: precise, powerful, and made to take a beating. It’s fully waterproof and grips confidently on packed snow, wet rock, and even the occasional patch of ice. This is the kind of shoe that comes alive on technical terrain where every foot placement matters, offering grippy traction and a secure feel underfoot.
That precision comes with stiffness. The Ribelle Run 2 GTX doesn’t flex much (if at all, honestly). While that makes it incredibly stable, it’s also not the most forgiving. GearJunkie staff writer Heather Balogh Rochfort found it perfectly fine for shorter efforts — around 5 miles — but on longer runs, the rigidity started to create some arch fatigue. Scarpa traditionally runs narrow, too, so you’ll find that in the toebox. This adds to the shoe’s precision, but the Ribelle Run may not be suitable for runners with wide feet.
Still, there’s no denying how capable this shoe is. It’s durable, confident on steep and uneven ground, and designed for runners who like to push into the rugged side of winter. The Ribelle Run 2 GTX may not be the softest ride, but it’s tough, dependable, and made for days when the mountain demands your full attention.
Specifications
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Lightweight for what it offers
- Carbide spikes for added traction
Cons
- Expensive
- Somewhat difficult to put on
Winter, meet your match. The La Sportiva Blizzard ($245) is a reasonably lightweight GORE-TEX shoe wrapped in a full gaiter, running over aggressive 7mm lugs pegged with nine carbide spikes.
The Blizzard is deceptively light, given its monster silhouette. Its fat-tire look is attributed to the sock-like gaiter that wraps the shoe, giving it a bootlike presence. It requires some footwork to finagle over the dogs. Fortunately, the Blizzard has huge pull tabs to make that job a little easier.
Once the shoe is laced up, the single-cord lace tucks out of the way of the snow and ice (and hobnob spikes) in a tidy pocket. A few ounces of prevention (and bulk) pay dividends on the trail — nobody likes to run with snowballs in their shoes.
Runners scratching tracks over icy trails will appreciate the carbide spikes. Our reviewers ran on pure ice and found that they grip like a charm. No more timid tip-toe stepping on ice with these bad boys. We found there were just enough spikes for traction, but it sort of leaves you wanting more, which you can buy for another $49 through La Sportiva (they come with a tool).
Do-it-yourself runners will probably find it easier to go to the hardware store and sink a handful of extra sheet metal screws into the lugs for a couple of bucks.
In short, at $235, the sticker price will likely put your credit card on ice. But if your winter training requires pushing out into the tundra, the Blizzard is a sure bet to stay on your training plan.
Winter Running Shoes Comparison Chart
| Winter Running Shoes | Price | Weight | Drop | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saucony Peregrine 15 GTX | $160 | 9.7 oz. (per shoe) | 4 mm | True to size |
| ASICS Trail Scout 3 | $64 | 9 oz. (per shoe) | 10 mm | True to size |
| Salomon Winter Cross Spike | $249 | 12 oz. (per shoe) | 4 mm | True to size |
| Icebug Järv Gaiter BUGrip GTX | $250 | 13.4 oz. (per shoe) | 4 mm | True to size |
| Merrell Agility Peak 5 Zero GORE-TEX | $210 | 12.5 oz. (per shoe) | 6 mm | True to size |
| Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR Low 2 | $160 | 13.2 oz. (per shoe) | 0 mm | True to size |
| Arc’teryx Norvan 4 Nivalis | $250 | 11 oz. (per shoe) | 6 mm | True to size |
| Speedland GL:SVT | $299 | 10.7 oz. (per shoe) | 5 mm | True to size |
| Scarpa Ribelle Run 2 GTX | $219 | 11.4 oz. (per shoe) | 4 mm | True to size |
| La Sportiva Blizzard GTX | $245 | 13.3 oz. (per shoe) | 6 mm | True to size |
How We Tested the Best Winter Running Shoes
Our Expert Testers
Heather Balogh Rochfort is a GearJunkie contributor and writer of this guide. Located in the Roaring Fork Valley outside of Aspen, Colo., Balogh Rochfort is a once-upon-a-time ultrarunner who now enjoys more reasonable distances as she explores the wide variety of trails out her front door.
Her favorite runs usually involve windy singletrack, rugged ridgelines, and very few humans, but she always has her rescue mutt, Tux, along for the ride. More recently, Balogh Rochfort has been taking her 8-year-old daughter on even lower-mileage runs as the two train for the second grader’s first-ever 5K run.
Our Testing Process
Our testers took winter running shoes on a wide range of terrain from pavement to singletrack and beyond in inclement weather that included rain, snow, ice, and sub-freezing temperatures. During testing, we considered factors like each shoe’s comfort, waterproofness, and grip on wet and icy surfaces. Any shoe that didn’t hold up to winter weather didn’t make the list.

Our Winter Running Shoe Rating System
When comparing winter running shoes, we break our evaluations into four key categories: traction, waterproofing and weather resistance, warmth, and fit and cushioning. This system provides a balanced look at performance, comfort, and durability — helping us determine which shoes shine when the mercury drops, and which ones slip up when conditions turn nasty.
Traction
Traction is everything when you’re running on frozen ground, icy sidewalks, or packed snow. We evaluate outsole design, rubber compounds, and lug pattern performance across a range of real-world winter surfaces — from slushy roads to technical trails. Shoes with deep, well-spaced lugs, sticky rubber, and confident cornering earn top marks. Bonus points go to models compatible with screw-in studs or spikes for extra grip when conditions get truly slick.
Waterproofing & Weather Resistance
Cold feet can end a run fast, so we test how well each shoe blocks out moisture, slush, and snow. This includes evaluating GORE-TEX or proprietary membranes, upper construction, and tongue design to see how they hold up in sustained wet conditions. Shoes that balance protection with breathability — keeping feet dry without trapping heat — score highest in this category.
Warmth
Insulation isn’t always the goal, but warmth matters when the temperature plunges. We assess each model’s ability to retain heat through materials, overlays, and interior linings during runs in subfreezing weather. Shoes that stay warm without feeling stuffy or heavy get top ratings, while overly thick models that compromise responsiveness fall short.
Fit & Cushioning
A good fit keeps your stride natural and your foot secure on unpredictable terrain. We look for shoes that wrap the foot comfortably without pinching or heel slip, even when worn with thicker winter socks. Cushioning is evaluated for responsiveness, protection, and ground feel — the sweet spot between plush comfort and confident control. Shoes that maintain a balanced, consistent ride in cold temperatures earn the highest scores.
Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose a Winter Running Shoe
Staring at a wall of shoes or endlessly browsing an online retailer can be overwhelming. Here are some important things to consider when choosing the right winter running shoe.

Terrain
These days, manufacturers have dialed shoes for nearly every niche of running. This even applies to winter. A quick way to hone in on the right shoe is to identify where you run.
Winter road running shoes tend to be built off of a brand’s stalwart training shoe. Brands want to invest in a winner, and a winter winner will be a shoe that is also a summer winner. The traction on these trainers will already be beefier than a racing flat and are suitable for running on wet roads.
But they’ve added a waterproof, breathable membrane to keep dedicated runners on the road through winter on a familiar last. If you already run in Brooks or New Balance, their winterized road shoes will be a good bet for cold, wet conditions.

Tread
Winter trail running shoes have an aggressive lug pattern that bites into dirt, sand, and mud. But not all treads are the same. A blocky, cleat-like tread will shed mud in the Pacific Northwest but can feel clunky on hardpack found in the Southwest and can cause trips and falls.
Some brands, like the Salomon Winter Cross Spike or the Icebug Järv Gaiter BUGrip GTX, offer shoes with integrated spikes. These are for runners who live in regions prone to ice, like the Northeast or the Columbia River Gorge.
Spikes can be wonderful on ice but feel sketchy on rocky terrain and godawful on the pavement. Another option is to buy aftermarket crampons. We’ve paired our running shoes with Yaktrax and Black Diamond’s Distance Spike.
These aren’t going to feel as stable as lugs embedded with carbide spikes, but they provide more flexibility in your winter quiver, pairing with a variety of shoes. We’ve found these lightweight crampons capable of crossing over into fast and light mountaineering junkets, too.

Durability
Trail shoes, like the Scarpa Ribelle Run 2 GTX, also have a more durable upper, a robust toe bumper, and a firmer sole or even a rock plate — all to protect the feet from underlying roots and rocks. Trail shoes with lower lugs can be a little more runnable on roads, making them a suitable choice for snow-choked road runs.
Many of the shoes on this list like the Merrell Agility Peak 5 Zero GTX, Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR 2, and the Saucony Peregrine 15 GTX have a waterproof, breathable membrane to keep melting snow and water from creeping in while keeping the toes warm. But others, like the Asics Trail Scout 3 or Speedland GL:SVT, do not. If you run on really hard-packed trails or in mixed conditions, there is a chance you won’t need a waterproof shoe.
Like spikes, integrated gaiters, as found in the Arc’teryx Norvan 4 Nivalis and the La Sportiva Blizzard GTX, are a fantastic addition and worth the cost for those who frequently run in deep, snowy conditions. They shed snow weight quickly and keep feet warmer and drier. But because they trap heat, they can quickly become uncomfortable on milder days. Like crampons, gaiters can be purchased aftermarket for $25-50.
Price & Value
Budget
Winter running shoes can cost anywhere from $100 to $250 and beyond. At the lower end of the spectrum, you may find fewer features like gaiters and carbide spikes, but there are still solid winter running shoes in the $100-150 price range. Our budget pick, Asics Trail Scout 3, is an excellent running shoe that will get the job done in a pinch (or on a budget).
Mid-Tier
In the $160-200 range, you can find burlier traction for trail running, full-shoe waterproofing, and rock plates. In this price range, you’ll find shoes such as the Saucony Peregrine 15 GTX, Merrell Agility Peak 5 Zero GTX, and the Altra Lone Peak ALL-WTHR 2. In reality, most shoes in this price range are quite good and you will be very happy with them. That said, don’t expect extra features such as gaiters or spikes.
Premium
If you want all the bells and whistles, be prepared to spend $250 or more, and you’ll be in the market for a durable and sturdy stroller with plenty of bells and whistles. Some of the top-end shoes in this guide are the Salomon Winter Cross Spike, Arc’teryx Norvan 4 Nivalis, Icebug Järv Gaiter BUGrip GTX, La Sportiva Blizzard GTX, and the Scarpa Ribelle Run 2 GTX. Of those five, the Ribelle Run is the only option that does not come with bonus features like gaiters or spikes. The most expensive shoe in this guide, the Speedland GL:SVT, is packed with premium materials and features such as BOA dials, a proprietary drop-in insole, and Michelin rubber. But, it’s not waterproof, so you’ll need to decide which pricey features are worth blowing the budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
With so many options to choose from, it can be challenging to choose the right trail shoes. Here are three things to consider as you shop:
- Set realistic running goals. If you dream of running a 100-miler one day but realistically will use the shoes for 5-mile training loops around your local park, buy shoes for the latter use first.
- Consider shoe width. For folks with wide feet, or those running very long distances, a wide forefoot can be a bonus that lets toes splay. The downside is that wider shoes are less precise, can be a little more clumsy, and won’t fit well on people with narrow feet.
- Test out the tongue. Does it fit comfortably? Will it keep rocks out of your shoe? Shoes with gusseted tongues help keep snow and debris from creeping into the shoe.
- Go with what you know. If you run in the dead of winter, you’re probably more than an armchair enthusiast with a few pairs of running shoes in your closet. Check whether your go-to model also has a waterproof model, often signified by GTX (GORE-TEX) in the title. If you love the fit of the Brooks Ghost 15, chances are you’ll also like the Brooks Ghosts 15 GTX.
Stack & Drop
Unless you’re running barefoot, every shoe has a stack. Measured in millimeters, the stack refers to how high the insole sits off the ground. Shoes with more cushion inherently have a higher stack. Furthermore, most shoes have a drop in stack height from the heel to the toe.
If you’re new to running, experts recommend a lower heel drop; it builds a wider range of motion and strength, which makes you a healthier runner. We also find a lower stack keeps your center of gravity closer to the ground. This becomes even more important on unstable terrain, with snow covering hidden obstacles.
Flexibility
Flexibility is your friend on the trails. You need variability to match the variable terrain. Trail runners and those running in winter — where obstacles can be hidden under snow — will prefer a shoe with a firm outsole and less cushion but a firm toebox to push off of.
Flexibility and torsion can help the foot adapt to the trail and objects obscured by snow. But, too much flexibility can feel unstable. Without stability, the ankle can be exposed to rolling.
The life of a shoe depends on a variety of factors, including running style, weight, and how often they’re used. But in general, 300 to 500 miles is a good rule of thumb.
So, if you run 10 miles per week, your shoes could last 8 months to a year. If you’re logging 20 miles per week, plan on replacing your running shoes every 4 to 6 months.
And if you see excessive wear patterns, holes, or tears, or if you notice a decrease in footbed comfort, it’s probably time to grab a new pair of sneakers.
Durability aside, we typically don’t wear our winter shoes daily. Winter-specific running shoes supplement our running quiver, rotating into the queue as the weather calls for it. This increases the shelf life of our winter shoes and stretches our dollars out over several years of use.
