The Best Mountain Bike Shoes of 2024

Specialized markets the 2FO Roost Clip as a shoe that can seamlessly transition from riding to post-ride activities, and they gave it an understated style. Hidden beneath that casual appearance are some great features that help it perform out on the trail. A 3/4 length Stiff Lollipop nylon composite plate runs from the cleat mount area back and provides a surprisingly solid pedaling platform. The Landing Strip cleat box offers ample adjustment that should allow most riders to position their cleats in their preferred location.

At the front of the shoe, the sole flexes quite naturally, allowing for a relatively natural gait whether you’re pushing your bike up a technical section of trail or wandering around the grocery store after your ride, and the full-coverage SlipNot FG rubber soles provide great traction on a wide range of surfaces and interface well with pedal bodies for lateral stability.

The shoes have a “relaxed fit” and incorporate Specialized’s Body Geometry construction and footbeds designed to optimize your leg alignment, and we found that they cradle and secure the midfoot and heel very nicely. Our test pair fit true to their EU size for length.

Simple laces tighten the shoes over the top of the foot, and the uppers are constructed from supple synthetic leather that is lined with breathable AirMesh material that wicks away sweat and adds a little cushioning. The midsole features EVA foam that helps to dampen vibration, and there is a little added protection in the form of a rubber bumper that wraps around the front of the toes.

All this comes at a shockingly low weight of just 750g for our size 43.5 test pair, which is lighter than most comparable shoes on the market. Our only real gripe with the 2FO Roost Clip is the roomy fit in the forefoot and the inability to tighten that portion of the shoe for a more precise fit. That said, this will be fine for those who don’t require the tightest fit up at the front of the shoe or for those who have slightly higher volume or wider-than-average feet. If you’ve got a lower-volume foot, the Ride Concepts Accomplice BOA ($150) performs similarly but has a much snugger fit.

Still, we feel the Specialized 2FO Roost Clip is a solid option that will meet most riders’ needs without breaking the bank, and they’ll look pretty good doing it, too.

One of its standout features, of course, is its exceptional pedaling efficiency facilitated by the carbon fiber composite sole that is ultra-stiff with a stiffness index of 11 on Shimano’s scale. There is virtually zero flex in this sole, and all of your precious watts are transferred directly into the pedals.

Dual BOA Li2 dials and a well-designed upper provide a very snug and secure fit that is not only comfortable but helps to maximize your power throughout the entire pedal stroke and helps enhance control and stability. Weighing in at just 616 g for the pair in size 43.5, the XC9’s super-lightweight enhances efficiency even further.

The S-Phyre XC9 has a very precise fit that is on the narrow side of the spectrum in the “regular” width. Fortunately, they make a wide version of this shoe as well for those whose feet are wider than average. The closure system wraps around the foot for a very snug and secure hold, and the supple synthetic leather uppers conform to the feet very nicely.

The thin, high-density footbed has adjustable arch support, and the textured material in the heel pocket locks the foot in and helps prevent any unwanted heel lift. These shoes essentially become an extension of your body. The heavily perforated uppers also do a great job of ventilating and allowing heat and moisture to escape.

Other than the immediate cleat mount zone, the carbon sole is completely covered in Shimano’s Ultread rubber. This helps to not only protect the carbon from damage but adds grip during those inevitable dismounts. The toe and heel feature aggressive lugs for additional traction in loose soils or mud, and the cleat mount zone is bordered by “pontoons” that interface with the pedal body and provide lateral stability.

Shimano also includes a set of metal spikes that can be installed up at the toes for extra traction in extreme conditions you might encounter in a muddy cyclocross race. A rigid plastic heel cup and some light reinforcement around the toes add a small level of foot protection.

Given their outstanding performance, our complaints about the S-Phyre XC9 are few. As mentioned above, the fit of the latest version is relatively narrow, and we recommend that people try these on before they buy to ensure they work for your feet. Like most cross-country shoes, they also offer very little in the way of foot protection, and it’s best to avoid doing much walking or hike-a-bike in them.

The price is also pretty hard to overlook, but it may be worth it for those seeking the performance this shoe provides. Like the sound of the S-Phyre XC9, but want to save $150? The Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) is worth a look.

Learn more in our in-depth comparison of the Shimano XC9 vs. XC1 mountain bike shoes.

Borrowing some style cues from the new Mallet Trail BOA, the Candy Lace has a super clean and classy aesthetic. The seamless synthetic uppers, lace closures, and contrasting gum soles give them timeless appeal, and the black color we tested looks great — they also come in blue and white.

We tested a size 43.5 EU (10 U.S.) and found they fit true to size with a lower volume that worked very well for our tester. Despite an initially tight feel, the synthetic uppers broke in nicely after the first few rides. The lace closure makes it easy to get even tension over the foot, and an elastic lace retainer keeps them tidy while you ride. Laces aren’t quite as user-friendly as BOA systems, but they help to keep the price of these shoes reasonable and are inexpensive to replace if/when the time comes.

Crankbrothers gave the Candy Lace a fiber-reinforced nylon sole that provides a solid pedaling platform. They aren’t wildly stiff like some of the premium race shoes, but they don’t feel inefficient, nor do they beat your feet up over rougher terrain. The entire sole is wrapped in Match MC1 rubber with aggressive lugs on the toe and heel, and broad pontoons border the cleat box. For an XC-style shoe, the Candy Lace walks pretty well and has great traction in loose conditions.

The toebox and heel are reinforced for some foot protection, but like similar shoes, they don’t offer much. They also aren’t the stiffest, but for non-racers, that’s not necessarily a bad thing, either. Perforations above the toe and on the side of the foot help them breathe, but these aren’t the airiest shoes around. If you ride in the heat regularly, the super-airy Giro Sector ($240) will cost you a bit more but provide much more ventilation.

For cross-country or gravel enthusiasts, the Crankbrothers Candy Lace hits the sweet spot of pedaling efficiency, comfort, walkability, style, and affordability.

With two broad Velcro straps as the closure, getting into, out of, and adjusting tension over the foot is quick and easy. Our size 44 test pair fit true to size in length, and the width is fairly average. There’s nothing particularly remarkable about their fit, but we found them to be surprisingly comfortable and very easy to get along with.

There’s a decent amount of padding about the heel, some light reinforcement in front of the toes, and they offer protection similar to many trail-riding shoes. Despite their appearance, they also proved to be fairly well-ventilated, with a large mesh panel over the toes and a few smaller mesh panels by the instep, allowing for better-than-expected breathability.

The soles aren’t super stiff, but they’re not meant to be, either. Under power, you can feel the sole flex slightly, especially when compared to stiffer XC shoes, but it isn’t egregious, and we didn’t find that it caused foot or calf fatigue on the climbs or descents. That sole flex goes the other way, too, and from the cleat mount area forward, it allows for a very natural walking motion.

The outsole is fully covered in grippy rubber with a unique tread design that provides excellent traction on loose surfaces and rock. The cleats themselves sit just low enough to avoid clicking on the floor when you walk, and the tread on either side interfaces well with pedal bodies. Our test pair also came with a “cover” that bolts into the cleat holes, so you can use these shoes with flat pedals, too.

Now, no one will mistake these shoes for their high-end counterparts, but that’s also not the point. The Giro Berm is a great entry point to clipless mountain bike shoes that are sure to satisfy the needs of most new recreational riders. If you’ve got a bit of flexibility in the budget, you’ll find a step up in performance with the Specialized 2FO Roost Clip ($130) with a stiffer sole, more size options, and better style, too.

While the Union BOA is used by downhill racers at the top end of the sport, we found it to be impressively versatile. This has to do with several factors, one of which is the reasonable weight. At just 867g for the pair in size 9.5 US, this is in the realm of most trail riding shoes and makes it a viable option for those pedaling to the top of their descents or heading out for long, grueling trail rides. Another factor is the sole stiffness. The reinforced nylon shank provides a solid platform that provides excellent pedaling efficiency for most styles of riding short of XC racing.

Of course, Fox didn’t stop there. The midsole is cushioned with EVA foam, which helps to mute trail feedback during descents. The molded toe cap and heel are reinforced to offer protection against rock strikes, and the shoe has a robust and tough feel. This is partially to do with the weather-resistant welded uppers that easily shrug off abrasion and water.

The cleat box is long and offers ample adjustment range for folks to mount their cleats in their preferred location, plus it is surrounded by a full-coverage Ultratac rubber outsole for lateral stability on the pedals and traction off the bike.

The Union BOA has a “standard fit” that feels very average in terms of width and volume, and we found them to fit true to size when going off their US sizing (the EU sizing seems to run a bit smaller than other brands). The BOA dials make it quick and easy to get the shoes on and off and allow for on-the-fly tension adjustments.

Additionally, Fox has included insoles with adjustable arch support, so you can hopefully dial it into your needs. Perforations above the toes and on the sides of the foot do a commendable job of ventilating and allowing the feet to breathe on hot days.

Out of the box, we found the uppers to feel a bit stiff, but they broke in nicely after just a few rides. The stiff soles offer excellent power transfer, but the limited flex through the toes doesn’t make them the best for extended hike-a-bikes. They’re also fairly expensive, but you can opt for the standard Union with laces and a Velcro strap and save yourself a bit of cash. Or, if you like a more pillowy feel at a slightly lower price, the Crankbrothers Mallet BOA ($200) is our other favorite gravity-oriented shoe.

Regardless, the Fox Union BOA is an excellent entry into the shoe market, and we feel it is one of the best burly mountain bike shoes we’ve tested in recent years.

To be clear, these aren’t the highest-performance shoes around. Those seeking a super stiff sole and the utmost pedaling efficiency will be a little disappointed by the middling stiffness of the X-Alp Summit. For more casual trail riding, however, the nylon composite soles offer adequate stiffness, assuming you aren’t trying to PR every climb.

The middle-of-the-road stiffness is also why they work so well off the bike. The soles have ample flex through the toes, and when combined with the aggressively lugged Vibram ECOSTEP rubber outsoles, they make walking in loose conditions or scrambling over chunky rocks feel quite similar to wearing hiking shoes.

Overall, the fit is fairly neutral, about average from the heel through the mid-foot, and slightly roomier up in the toe box. Folks with average to slightly above average width feet will get along with them well, but those with narrow feet may find them to be a little too roomy. The synthetic uppers are quite supple and relatively thin, helping to give them a light and airy feel on the feet, with ventilation enhanced by perforations above the toes and along the sides of the feet.

A single BOA L6 dial pulls tension over the upper and mid-foot, along with a Velcro strap to snug things up down by the toes. The uppers aren’t the most supportive, but they certainly are quite comfortable.

While the X-Alp Summit shoes fit into their niche very nicely, they sacrifice a bit of performance in some areas as a result. The soles are far from the stiffest out there, and you can feel it flex a tiny bit under hard pedaling efforts and the cleat is slightly noticeable under the ball of the foot. They also offer very little in the way of foot protection, and vibration dampening isn’t on par with most of the trail or gravity shoes we tested.

They also only come in whole EU sizes, so those between sizes may have a harder time getting the perfect fit. For a slightly stiffer pedaling platform, more sizing options, and more casual style, the Specialized 2FO Roost Clip ($130) is worth a look.

Those concerns aside, the Pearl Izumi X-Ap Summit is a sensible option for the rider who prioritizes off-the-bike traction and walkability and wants a comfortable shoe that performs quite well on the bike too. If you’re the type of rider who scrambles to every vista point or likes going on far-flung adventures that involve pushing your bike for extended periods, these may be just the shoes you’re looking for. Adventurous ladies will also be happy to know they make the X-Alp Summit Women’s.

Given its extensive line of pedals, it makes sense that Crankbrothers designed its shoes to work in combination with them, and they even include a set of Crankbrothers cleats pre-installed on all Mallet shoes. If you ride Crankbrothers’ pedals you get a fresh set of cleats, and all you need to do is position them in your preferred location to be ready to roll.

If you ride any other brand of pedals, fear not — the Mallets also work with any mountain bike pedals that use 2-bolt cleats. The Match Box cleat box is generously sized and allows for ample side-to-side and fore-aft adjustability, including the “Race Zone” for those who like to slam their cleats way back for stability on the descents.

Getting in and out of these shoes is quick and easy with a single BOA Li2 dial and a Velcro strap at the top of the tongue, both of which make it a snap to dial in the tension for a secure and stable hold of the foot. Our test pair fit true to size with an average width that should work for most people’s feet. We’ve heard others mention the EU sizing runs a tad big, however, so it might be good to try these on before you buy to ensure you get the correct size.

Despite the tough and almost rubbery feel, the synthetic uppers are quite supple and conform nicely to your foot shape, and the padded tongue keeps the BOA wires from digging into the tarsal bones. Generous padding in the heel/ankle pocket is both plush and protective, and small silicone dots at the back of the heel help hold it in place.

The sole isn’t super stiff, but it feels very well-balanced, and at no point did it feel like it was sapping power or efficiency, even on long trail rides with lots of climbing. It’s also well-damped and absorbs trail feedback and vibration to keep your feet feeling fresh.

Other than the cleat box, the sole is fully covered with Match MC1 rubber that provides great grip off the bike, and the horizontal tread at the toe and heel works to add some traction when walking in loose dirt. A generous sole rocker and a little flex through the toes make walking feel impressively natural. A sturdy rubber bumper wraps up over the toes for protection from rock strikes, and the whole package feels tough and well-made.

Though the Mallet BOA is billed as a downhill and enduro race shoe, the reasonable weight of 860g for the pair (size 43.5) makes them well suited to any type of riding you’re doing short of XC racing, and they quickly became the go-to for after-work trail rides. This versatility makes them a great candidate for a one-shoe quiver if you split your riding between the bike park, enduro laps, and trail riding.

Our only real complaint is that they aren’t the most breathable, and they can get a bit sweaty in hot weather. If breathability is high on your list, the Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA ($220) provides a bit better ventilation along with a slightly stiffer sole.

While they have a silhouette similar to that of many other modern trail and gravity-oriented mountain bike shoes, the Accomplice Clip BOA looks somewhat unique. This is mostly due to the “lightweight nylon tech upper” material along with the slip-tongue design. The textile upper gives the shoes a more casual look and also aids in breathability compared to shoes that use synthetic leather.

You can feel the air passing through these shoes. The slip-tongue is a stretch affair that wraps the whole foot and is immediately comfortable, although it does take a little more effort to pull on than shoes with more traditional tongues that open wider.

Ride Concepts calls the fit of the Accomplice Clip BOA low volume, and we’d agree. The mid-foot feels relatively average, but the toebox is fairly snug, even on our low-volume foot. If you have wider toes, you may get away with sizing up, but these are a good candidate for trying on before you buy to make sure they work for you.

Fortunately, they broke in a little after a few rides, and ours got a tad roomier but still low-volume. A single BOA L6 dial tightens TX4 laces over the top of the feet. The textile laces move very easily, pull even tension, and don’t dig into the tarsal bones the way other BOA laces can. The slip-tongue is moderately padded, as is the ankle cuff, and the heel stays nicely in place, even while walking.

Underfoot, an EVA midsole provides some cushioning, and a nylon shank stiffens up the sole for pedaling efficiency. Still, these aren’t the stiffest shoes around, but they are appropriate for the intended use of more casual, everyday trail riding. The entire sole is covered in Ride Concept’s CLIP GRIP rubber outsole and signature hexagonal tread pattern.

This provides relatively good traction off the bike, although the limited flex through the toes makes hiking up steep slopes feel a little clunky. A 42mm-long cleat box provides a massive range of adjustability for all riders to get their cleats positioned just how they want.

There’s little not to like about the Accomplice Clip BOA shoes, but the low-volume fit, especially in the forefoot, will be a limiting factor for many riders. The breathable upper makes them a solid choice for warm to hot weather, but it provides virtually no water resistance and is not ideal for wetter climates. The material also doesn’t support the foot laterally quite as well as materials with a bit more structure, and the texture hangs on to dust and dirt and isn’t the easiest to keep clean.

If you’re willing to spend a bit more, the Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA ($220) provides a more accommodating fit, a slightly stiffer sole, a bit more water resistance, and walks a little better, too.

Still, the Accomplice Clip BOA is a solid value for riders seeking a reasonably priced, casually styled shoe for general trail riding in mostly dry conditions. These shoes look good, breathe well, and are quite comfortable if they fit your foot.

One of the first things you’ll notice about the Chamber II is the plush and pillowy feel, as there is a lot of cushioned padding around the ankle, heel, and tongue. Our size 44 test pair fit true to size with width and volume on the generous side of average, which should work for a huge portion of riders.

Simple laces work well to secure the shoe on the feet, with a wide Velcro strap at the top of the tongue to lock the heel down and secure your laces. The feet feel very well protected thanks in part to all the padding, but also the rubber toe cap and wider-than-average sole that helps ward off rock strikes.

Given their cushy comfort and skate-shoe styling, the soles with a “tri-molded shank” are stiffer than expected and provide a very solid pedaling platform while the EVA footbed and EVA midsole do a fine job of muting trail feedback and impacts. The entire sole is covered in Vibram Megagrip rubber for both pedal and off-the-bike grip, while a little flex in the forefoot allows for a relatively normal walking motion.

The cleat box is offset heavily to the inside which helps avoid crank arm rub with the chunky soles, and Giro advertises a 10mm setback to the cleat mount zone compared to their regular shoes. This will likely be the sweet spot for a lot of riders, though it doesn’t have quite as much adjustment range as some other gravity shoes we tested.

All that pillowy comfort and foot protection does come with a bit of a weight penalty, and the Chamber II are the heaviest shoes we tested at 1,072g for our size 44 test pair. They’re also just generally kinda big and bulky compared to more streamlined models. Our only other qualm is that they only come in full EU sizes, so finding the perfect fit may be a little harder for some people. If you’re looking for something with a little less heft, the Fox Union BOA ($250) weighs quite a bit less and is equally burly for aggressive riding.

Otherwise, the Giro Chamber II is a great shoe for those who don’t mind a little extra weight for a comfortable and protective shoe for gravity-oriented riding that retains solid pedaling performance.

Many high-end XC racing shoes are essentially copies of road bike shoes, so it’s not too surprising that the S-Works Recon looks nearly identical to the S-Works Torch road shoe. Of course, there are some minor differences, but they are the same in many ways. One of those is the full carbon fiber sole that is incredibly stiff, thin, and lightweight with an “Internal I-Beam” for added strength.

These soles have a very low stack and don’t flex under power, no matter how hard you mash on the pedals. The uppers and closures are the same as the Torch as well, and while they are incredibly supple and comfortable, it’s easy to get a very snug, stable, and secure fit that helps further enhance both efficiency and control.

One of the big changes to the new S-Works Recon is more width in the forefoot which should be accommodating to more riders compared to the narrower fit of the previous version. While this will be less ideal for those with narrow feet, the new arrangement of the dual BOA S3 dials manages to secure and snug the shoes for a precise fit and easy micro-adjustments.

Additionally, the ankle cuff has been redesigned to be lower to prevent irritation and allow for excellent ankle mobility, while the heel pocket is snug with friction material added to keep your heel firmly in place. Specialized included its Body Geometry design into the shoe and footbed with the goal of aligning the lower leg, and the footbed provides great support despite being thin and firm.

The is a lot of visible carbon fiber on the sole of the S-Works Recon, but Specialized added beefy, but not replaceable, lugs at the toe and heel, a small patch of rubber under the instep, and large “pontoons” on either side of the cleat. The pontoons are “tuneable,” and the shoes come with shims, so you can adjust their height to dial in the shoe-pedal interface to your liking or specific pedals.

Specialized also offers additional 3mm, 6mm, and 9mm shims and a cleat stacker should you need to account for leg length discrepancies. The aim of the tuneable pontoons is to provide a road bike-esque connection to the pedals for enhanced pedaling efficiency. In the stock configuration, our test shoes mated very well with all the different pedals we used them with.

Weight is also a concern for racers, so it’s not surprising that the S-Works Recon is absurdly lightweight at just 590g for our size 43.5 test pair. This is particularly impressive given how stiff, secure, and stable they are on the feet. Breathability is also fairly good, mostly due to the super thin and light construction of the shoes.

As with most XC racing shoes, foot protection is very minimal and is limited to a small rubber bumper in front of the toes and the asymmetrical plastic heel cup. There’s also virtually no sole damping of any kind. And, while it is definitely possible to walk in these shoes, the unflinching stiffness of the sole and all the exposed carbon make these a very poor choice for rides that involve much time off the bike, especially if there are sharp rocks involved.

Additionally, the wider fit in the forefoot may be too roomy for the narrow-footed among us. They are also very, very expensive. For similar performance with a slight weight penalty, the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) can save you a good bit of cash.

That said, if you’re seeking the top-level performance and comfort these shoes provide for XC or gravel racing, the cost of the Specialized S-Works Recon shoes may well be justified.

Read Review: WorldTour Winning Cycling Shoe Gets Gravel Treatment: Specialized S-Works Recon First Look

Despite the downhill focus of the Hellcat Pro, it has a surprisingly stiff sole that helps make it an efficient pedaler. Whether you’re grinding uphill for another lap or laying down the power in a sprint, there’s really no noticeable flex in the sole underfoot or torsionally. This translates to the descents as well, where the sole supports the foot and doesn’t flex around the pedal. It offers moderate vibration dampening, though not quite as much as some similar models.

Full coverage Stealth Marathon rubber soles with Five Ten’s signature raised dot tread pattern provide good traction on firm surfaces and is harder-wearing than the rubber found on the brand’s flat pedal shoes. While these shoes are okay to walk in, the minimal sole rocker and stiffness through the toes make them feel a little blocky underfoot.

We found the Hellcat Pro to fit true to size with average volume through the mid-foot and a slightly roomier forefoot. The fit of these shoes will be welcome for those with wider feet but may prove to be a bit spacious for those on the narrow end of the spectrum. The laces work very well to secure the shoes snugly over the tops of the feet, and the broad Velcro strap at the top of the tongue helps keep the heel planted firmly in the heel pocket and keeps the laces tidy.

A large mesh panel on the outside of the mid-foot and some perforations above the toes do a commendable job of ventilating, though these are far from the airiest shoes around. Given the gravity-oriented focus of the Hellcat Pro, foot protection levels are high, particularly at the front of the shoe, where the toebox is heavily reinforced and coated in abrasion-resistant material.

While our test pair has held up well, we have seen friend’s Hellcat Pros suffer from sole delamination issues. A quick search online reveals that this isn’t an isolated problem, but it doesn’t affect all of the shoes either. It’s safe to assume that Adidas/Five Ten is addressing the issue, and it is typically covered by warranty should yours suffer the same fate.

Based on our experience, however, the Five Ten Hellcat Pro is a solid option for trail, enduro, and gravity riders seeking a protective and stiff shoe for tackling aggressive terrain and riding at high speeds. If you prefer a BOA closure system, the Fox Union BOA ($220) is strikingly similar but a little quicker and easier to get on and off the feet.

The Vento Ferox Carbon has, not surprisingly, a full X1 carbon sole that has a 10/10 on Fizik’s sole stiffness index. This stiffness is in line with their top road cycling shoes and ensures that none of your precious watts get wasted when smashing down on the pedals. Our size 43.5 test pair fit true to size with an average width that avoids being excessively narrow or too spacious.

The uppers are made from a tough but thin and lightweight woven mesh and laminated upper secured over the foot with a BOA Li2 dial and a wide Powerstrap at the top of the tongue. We found it easy to crank these shoes down over the feet for a very snug and secure fit from the forefoot to the heel, and small grippy dots at the back of the heel pocket help to prevent any unwanted heel lift. This secure fit further enhances pedaling efficiency and power transfer throughout the entire pedal stroke.

Most of the carbon sole is covered by rubber with small lugs at the toes, larger lugs under the heel, and long pontoons bordering the cleat box. Not only does this protect the carbon from damage, but it also allows you to walk reasonably sure-footed, and the pontoons interface quite well with pedals for increased contact and stability.

The Ferox Carbon is also ready to accept toe spikes for you CX racers, although it doesn’t come with them. Ventilation is a strong suit as the thin uppers allow plenty of air to reach the feet. The reinforced toe cap and rigid molded heel provide protection on par with other cross-country shoes, though it is quite minimal.

While the Vento Ferox Carbon are undoubtedly excellent shoes for laying down the power and maximizing your efficiency, we found that the minimalist design could lead to some minor discomfort over the course of longer rides. There is very little padding in the heel pocket or the tongue, and those with sensitive tarsal bones or heels may start to develop hot spots after several hours of riding, but this may not be an issue for everyone.

Similarly, and this goes for most carbon-soled race shoes, the soles offer very little in the way of vibration dampening. If you’ve got wiggle room in the budget, we found the Shimano S-Phyre XC9 ($450) to be a bit more comfortable and slightly lighter, too.

Still, the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon has a lot to offer those looking for a stiff, lightweight, and well-ventilated shoe for gravel or XC that costs less than the competition.

One of the primary things that set the Sector apart from similarly styled shoes is the use of Giro’s Synchwire material. This mesh-like material is quite unique in that it is very flexible and incredibly air-permeable yet still quite supportive. In the case of the Sector, it also has a “thermo-bonded exo structure” that provides a little additional support and structure to the uppers while still leaving plenty of room for these to be some of the best-ventilated shoes we tested.

These shoes ventilate so well that riding in brisk conditions can be a bit chilling, so it’s definitely worth considering the climate where you ride. They also allow water to pass through freely, but they dry pretty quickly as well.

Slipping them on, the comfort is immediately apparent as the uppers conform to the feet easily, and the Giro 3D-molded medium arch support footbed cradles it nicely from below. Our size 43.5 test pair fit true to size with an average width, and the dual BOA L6 dials secure the shoes over the top of the feet and allow for micro increases to tension or full macro-release. We found it easy to get these shoes as tight as you want to really lock your feet and heels in place.

The sole is made with a carbon composite plate that is adequately stiff for most types of riding. It can’t match the unrivaled stiffness of full carbon soles, but instead, it feels solid underfoot while remaining a bit more forgiving than full-on race shoes. This is particularly noticeable over the course of a long gravel ride or chunky mountain bike descent, as they don’t punish your feet the way that some stiffer shoes can.

Pedaling efficiency isn’t top of the heap, though it isn’t far off thanks to the relatively stiff sole and precise fit. The sole is covered in rubber from front to back to provide off-the-bike grip and a reasonable walking experience. The lack of well-defined lugs, however, doesn’t give them the best traction in loose dry, or muddy conditions.

For those who don’t need a super airy shoe, the Crankbrothers Candy Lace ($160) is worth checking out. The soles are a touch less stiff, but they are a bit nicer to walk in and have a classic, almost retro style that we think looks great. Plus, you’ll save a bit of dough for new bike parts, too.

If you’re looking for a super comfortable and well-ventilated shoe for light trail, cross-country, or gravel riding, we feel the Giro Sector is a great option that looks good, fits great, and isn’t super expensive. Female riders will also be happy to know that Giro makes a women’s version of the Sector as well.

The previous Kestrel Pro BOA was a beefy shoe for aggressive trail riders and enduro racers, and the latest version resembles its predecessor in name only. This shoe is aimed squarely at the growing down-country market that has been spurred on by the evolution of more capable XC bikes. The full-length glass-fiber reinforced sole is very stiff, and power transfer felt on par with some of the more expensive competition.

This took us somewhat by surprise actually, as we didn’t expect such good pedaling efficiency. The heel pocket is well-shaped, and the BOA closure over the upper foot does a great job of locking the heel down in place.

While some of the rigid sole is exposed, much of it is covered in Five Ten’s signature Stealth Marathon rubber. This includes a small patch under the instep, as well as aggressive lugs at the toe and heel that provide excellent traction in loose soils. While the soles are quite stiff, these shoes are a bit more friendly to walk in than some similar models.

The cleat bolt channels offer a huge range of adjustment, especially for an XC shoe, and are bordered by two large pontoons that help you stabilize on the pedals. Additionally, Five Ten added a beefy piece of rubber that wraps up and over the toes to ward off rock strikes when you’re getting aggressive on your XC rig.

Our test pair fit true to size in length. They have a nice snug fit in the heel and ankle and are slightly higher volume in the forefoot than most other XC shoes. We’ve read complaints from others that they weren’t able to adequately tension the shoes over the forefoot, but we were able to get them snug enough with the two Velcro straps.

We got along fine with the fit with thicker socks, but it may be worth trying these on before you buy to make sure the volume jives with your feet. Those with narrower/lower-volume feet might find a more precise fit in a shoe like the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) but with a bit less foot protection.

The ventilated mesh panel above the toes and on both sides of the feet works effectively. And, while they aren’t the lightest shoes out there, they’re still fairly lightweight at 724g for the pair. We came away pleasantly surprised by the performance of the new Five Ten Kestrel BOA, which is a solid option for those who want XC performance with a bit of added foot protection. They come in two color options, and they are also offered in a women’s version with two different colorways.

One of the things that stands out about the Hellion Clip is their sturdy and robust feel. The supportive uppers provide excellent foot stability along with a reinforced toe cap and padded heel/ankle that provide ample foot protection for everything from aggressive trail riding to bike park use. The cushioned EVA midsole does a great job of absorbing and muting trail feedback, and along with insoles that feature D30 padding under the heel and forefoot, provide comfort on long, rough descents.

Out of the box, we found the Hellion Clip to fit true to size in length with a relatively snug initial fit. After a few rides, the upper broke in quite nicely and has stayed snug and secure, with a glove-like feel. As advertised, these are relatively low-volume shoes that should work well for those with narrow to average-width feet.

The lace closure is simple and effectively tensions the shoe over the upper and midfoot, and the Velcro strap ensures that your heel stays securely in the heel pocket. They lack the on-the-fly-adjustability of the BOA-equipped models, but we rarely found the need to adjust the laces once these shoes were on.

Given their skate shoe-esque looks, the Hellion Clip shoes are surprisingly stiff underfoot and provide an efficient pedaling experience. The RC Powerdrive nylon shank provides support and a solid pedaling platform, and it feels very stable laterally as well. The entire sole, minus the cleat box, is covered in Clip Grip rubber, which provides good grip and off-the-bike walking traction. They don’t have a lot of flex through the toe, but there is just enough to prevent them from feeling too clunky when walking.

Compared to some similar models we tested, the Hellion Clip is a little bit heavier, weighing in at 960g for the pair in a size 9.5 U.S. That’s about 100g more than the Fox Union BOA ($250) or the Crankbrothers Mallet BOA ($220) in the same size. It’s not a deal breaker, but it’s notable if you’re concerned at all about weight.

Also, the grip of the Velcro on the strap has degraded over the course of the past year of use, and though it still works, it seems like a bit of a weak point in these otherwise durable shoes. Despite these concerns, we’d recommend the Ride Concepts Hellion Clip to anyone seeking a versatile shoe with a precise, low-volume fit that can handle everything from trail riding to bike park days.

The Terra Atlas has a nylon plate to provide pedaling support, and it falls at a 5 out of 10 on Fizik’s sole stiffness scale. While it is noticeably flexy under very hard efforts compared to the 10-rated Fizik Veto Ferox Carbon, we didn’t find it to be excessively soft under power or fatiguing to the lower legs or feet. Ample flex through the toe of the shoe allows for a natural walking motion off the bike, and the grippy rubber outsole provides good traction on most surfaces. The cleat mount area offers a generous adjustment range that should accommodate most riders’ preferences.

The supple uppers of the Terra Atlas feel great right out of the box, and we found the length to be true to size. The width feels a touch wider than other Fizik shoes we’ve tested, but not excessively voluminous. A single BOA dial pulls tension over the asymmetric opening and tongue of the shoe to tighten the entire thing from the top down to the forefoot.

While this works OK, it can be a little tricky to get even tension throughout, especially if you need to decrease volume closer to the toes. This seems partially due to the fact that the wires crisscross and tend to hang up on each other. And, while we found the supple uppers to be very comfortable, they aren’t the most supportive.

The uppers and tongue are heavily perforated and do a good job of ventilating the feet. The construction seems solid, too, with good attention to detail and quality craftsmanship. Foot protection, however, is quite limited, so that’s something to be aware of depending on the type of riding that you’re doing. The Pearl Izumi X-Alp Summit ($150) is quite similar in terms of sole stiffness, but it has a roomier fit and a more aggressive sole for hiking.

Overall, the Fizik Terra Atlas is a versatile and comfortable shoe for those who aren’t too concerned with having super stiff soles. They feel good on the feet, and we think they look pretty good too.