The Best Hunting Binoculars of 2024

Choosing the best hunting binoculars is tough. For this list, to be totally honest, we were torn between three different sets of binos. Two of those were Mavens. The Maven C.3 10×50 binos ($475) won top honors for a few reasons. Where these binos beat out the competition is pretty clear. It all comes down to performance, price, weight, and low-light capability. The C.3 10x50s just outperforms in those categories with few drawbacks.

Before we push forward with why these really are the best, here’s the mini-pitch for the two other sets it beat out. The Leupold BX-4 Range 10×42 was in the running for top honors (and will be my go-to for this year). They found their sweet spot on the list as the best Rangefinding Hunting Binos (below). The Maven B1.2s were the other contender that got bumped totally off the list (sorry), and the only reason is the C.3s offer a price-to-performance ratio that is just hard to overcome.

Okay, let’s dig into why the C.3s, a mid-tier, budget-friendly, unlikely candidate, made the top-honors spot. It all comes down to the perfect balance. There are other hunting binos on the list that have more reach but less low-light capability. Some of the other options offer better clarity but also tip the scales with heftier weights. The C.3s fall in that sweet spot of doing everything really well and not breaking the bank while doing it.

When it comes down to it, the only real drawback to this glass is a narrow field of view. You are going to have to scan just a bit more to cover your scene, which is something very few people will even notice.

In the end, the C.3s performed with incredible clarity, a rugged, comfortable feel, minimal weight, great reach, and incredible low-light capability — all at nearly a quarter of the price of much of the competition. We’re certainly of the opinion that glass is a good place to spend your money, but this is one of those few times that top price doesn’t always equal top performance.

Sometimes, it feels like the budget product is an obligatory addition to these lists where we have to lower expectations. This is not the case here. The Redfield Rebel 12×50 ($160) binos have been one of the most shockingly impressive products we’ve tested this year. If we didn’t know the price of these ahead of time, we’d swear they’d cost at least double what they do.

For seriously budget-friendly glass, the magnification and clarity of these binoculars is comparable to some other binos that didn’t make the list. Many of which had price tags that were three times or more what these cost.

When comparing them to top-tier binoculars, you can certainly pick up that you get some clouding or blur at the edge of your field of view, and they don’t have the low-light performance that some of the higher caliber glass has. However, without having a side-by-side comparison to binoculars that cost thousands more than these do, I’d bet you’d be impressed by the performance.

Where you begin to notice the budget feel is the details. The case and strap are low-cost additions that totally work but aren’t, by any means, fancy. The fact that they’re even included in this price category is wild.

The feel of the binocular body doesn’t have that soft-finished rubberized feel that most of the more expensive options do, but that’s a reach. We’re literally scrambling for the cons here. It’s hard to find downsides to these binos at this price. They just perform at such a higher level than the price tag implies.

Both the Vortex Razor UHD 8x32s ($2,150) and 10x32s were released this year, and we struggled to decide which would fall into the best compact category winner. When it came down to it, the 8X32s had just a slight edge when it came to low-light conditions. Considering these compact binos will most likely be used by tree stand hunters (in our estimation), the reduction in magnification and increase in those first and last light viewing minutes was worth it.

The most obvious stat that jumps out when compared to the other binos on the list is the field of view. With a linear FOV of 472′, the Razor UHD 8x32s blow the competition out of the water, though most of that is due to the lower magnification. Obviously, if you don’t zoom in further (like 10x or 12x), you’ll have a wider view. That being said, the combination of wildly clear, edge-to-edge crispness and the wide FOV gives such a clear view of your surroundings.

The anti-reflective coating adds just another level of low-light performance, making the view almost seem artificially illuminated. We noticed this most on overcast days where the light wasn’t direct, and the shadowed landscapes were even harder to make out. Spring bear hunts under cloudy skies found us able to identify bears in the shadows where we may not have otherwise.

The obvious drawback, and the only downfall we really noted on the Razor UHD 8x32s (and the entire Razor UHD line), is price. These are not a budget buy, particularly for 8x magnification. It’s hard to stomach paying several thousand dollars for such limited magnification, but if you’re hunting in low-light conditions regularly and don’t need that reach, it really doesn’t get much better at any price.

I’d like to introduce you to the hunting binoculars that have become my go-to set and that hasn’t been an easy or fast transition to make. The Leupold BX-4 Range 10x42mm binoculars ($1,599) were in the running for our top honor this year, but fell short when it came to heft, both in size/weight and budget. Though, in my not-so-humble opinion, that’s a loss on a technicality.

These binos from Leupold represent two pieces of gear, so the price and weight should be divided as such. Carrying all 39 ounces of the BX-4 Range binos means I don’t have to carry a separate rangefinder. From a logistical standpoint, this means I save the weight and price of said unnecessary rangefinder. From a performance standpoint, I save time and movement between glassing and ranging. I now glass and range simultaneously, making me a more efficient hunter. When it comes to hunting gear, there is no better measure of a valuable product than that.

With a lens coating that makes these things incredibly scratch-resistant and harsh climate tech that makes them waterproof, prevents fogging, and ensures performance at even the most extreme temperatures, it’s hard not to love these binos for almost any hunting scenario.

When considering the added weight, my go-to range finder clocks in at 10 ounces. So once you consider the savings of not having to carry it, you’re down to essentially one of the lighter options on the list. Though, it doesn’t save you from the arm strain of holding them for long sessions. Learn to use your elbows, and you’ll never look back.

The only legitimate downfall for me is having to change out my bino harness. Unfortunately, the added bulk just won’t fit in my tried-and-true FHF Pro-M Harness. It says more than I can say that I’m willing to change harnesses for these binos.

Rarely does a gear test turn into a hard look at my personal budget to consider what sacrifices need to be made to add said product permanently to my gear pile. The SIG ZULU6 HDX 20×42 ($1,200) did just that. After testing these bad boys on a few different mountainscapes, I can confidently say I wasn’t prepared for the difference they would make.

Image stabilization is not just A game changer, it is the game changer (and I hate that phrase). Once you get up to the 20x magnification class, you can barely see straight without stabilization. The slightest movement (heartbeat included) creates a massive wobble. That typically means a tripod or some other steady leveling device is absolutely mandatory. With SIG’s image stabilization tech, that wobble we all know… is gone.

It is almost nauseating when you first hit the stabilization button. Comparing my standard binos to these at long distances made me question why I had never invested any time or money into this tech earlier. I am not easy to sway toward new innovations and consider myself quite the traditionalist in many ways. Color me swayed.

The SIG ZULU6 HDX 20x42s are not insanely expensive, they’re lightweight, have far more reach than any other binos in my arsenal, take incredible digiscope images, and have shocking clarity for the reach.

The only drawbacks I can find are the odd appearance and the decrease in function in low-light settings. Where they far exceed the capability of my go-to binos during the mid-day light, they begin to falter when dusk rolls around. These things need light, which is totally understandable. Unfortunately for me, I do a ton of scouting in the early morning and late evening hours, meaning they will never be my go-to… but dangit, they’re rad the rest of the day.

Oh … and they look weird. But honestly, who cares? Once I can string together a few extra pennies, these will be added to my permanent glass pile. Santa better be listening (hint, hint).

I won’t beat around the bush. The Vortex Razor UHD 12x50s ($2,600) live in my truck. Rarely do they make it into my pack unless I know I’m headed scouting for something that is going to require big reach. That being said, when it comes to scouting sheep and goats, this is the extra weight I’m willing to lug up the mountain.

The clarity at extreme distances is impressive, to say the least. I know these aren’t exactly a budget purchase, but they do have the edge-to-edge clarity of much more expensive glass. If the goal is to spot long-distance game and possibly capture images with a digiscoping device, this is about as good as it gets in the hunting binocular sphere.

Outside of high-alpine mountain hunts, the tripod adapter on the UHD 12x50s is almost exclusively mounted to a window mount and attached to the driver’s side door of my truck. For those dirt road scouting trips where you might be ripping around looking for game, this is the truck glass you need. They’ve replaced my spotting scope for on-the-road scouting. I know that might sound niche and oddly specific, but I don’t know anyone who doesn’t do it.

When it comes to the big hunts like stone sheep, bighorn sheep, mountain goats, and even bears, this is weight worth packing. It fits that sweet spot between binos and spotting scopes, where you can glass fast or set up shop with a bipod/monopod for extended glassing sits.

Testing and reviewing Swarovski Optik glass is sort of like test-driving a Ferrari. Right out of the gate, you’re dealing with the top-tier, best materials, highest tech, and most scrutinized quality control. The Swarovski EL Range ($3,999) is no exception. Even while being tested side-by-side with the most comparable competition, the El Range binoculars were just a step up in every way. They feel really nice in hand and have clarity that seems HD in ways our own eyes don’t seem to see.

As mentioned with the Leupold BX-4 Range binos, the Swarovski Optic El Ranges are fitted with rangefinding tech. They have just a bit wider linear FOV than the Leupold BX-4s, a noticeable increase in clarity edge-to-edge, and a pretty lofty weight savings. That all being said, those perks come with a pretty lofty price increase of more than double.

When it comes to deciding on a luxury pair of hunting binoculars at any price, this is it. With budget unconsidered, the Swarovski Optik El Range 10x42s are as top-tier as it gets with almost no downfalls aside from price and one other odd anomaly.

A note on shape: The El Range binos don’t lay flat. This might not even be something most people would notice, but we do. The bottom of the binos has an angled design. When you set them down, the tip back. This could be for the benefit of protecting lenses, but it also means they aren’t as steady if you set them down on an uneven surface. However, I assume if you’re spending $4,000 on a pair of binoculars, you’ll rarely be setting them anywhere outside a case.

Like a few other examples on the list, we really were reaching for cons here. Swarovski Optik certainly knows glass, and this was the pair we found ourselves reaching for most often during spring tests this year. They feel good, they perform, and if you have the budget for them, it just doesn’t get any better.